Відео

Died 2 days ago. Rest in peace.

A realidade enquanto fisica é necessariamente diversa e independente daquela que lhe corresponda mas, enquanto considerada na metafisica.

a forma como a razao usa sua capacidade de selecionar e organizar as ideias a sua disposicao é uma questao de medidas baseada em diferencas ou na proporcionalidade entre elas.

AO filosofar vc deve sempre iniciar seu trabalho nao nos objetos da experiencia por ser caminho nao-confiavel pois sao de natureza mutavel mas na forma dos objetos por serem de natureza nao-mutavel.

30:55 thats VICO, or isnt it ?

Trata-se de um processo que busca seu fim por mais de 2000 anos.

emprismo e espiritualismo pertencem a uma mesma linha de realidade de um processo orientado para o mesmo fim.

Ganha a disputa aquele que conhecer a doutrina do outro na integridade dos conceitos promordiais.

Thank you Prof Wolff and We appreciate your works.

Marx is the greatest philosopher.

This is simply amazing. Mr. Wolff is such a wonderful teacher and such a joy to listen to. Can’t thank him enough for conducting these lectures and can’t thank Alex enough for uploading them!

This is simply amazing. Thank you, Mr. Wolff, for these lectures.

I saw that facial tic and IMMEDIATELY knew this was gonna be a banger

Many thanks for this. I am watching your videos from Brussels, while reading Kant's works. Your contextualizations and disections of his work are being remarkably enlightening.

Thank you so much for your wonderful gift!

Seems to me the greatest philosophers are those who can most learnedly distance us from the ugly truth about ourselves we live in fear of being exposed. In my opinion the greatest flossifers after Plato were Dante and Shakespeare.

The state in understanding of the mind is related to hability to create a symbol to what one's mind is feeling.about a experience of the senses.

Apparence needs using a reference time/space as Newton did to define something being big or small and something is good or bad but something in itself doesnt need a reference due to its independence of any other external thing but it alone..

Kant believes there are synthetic judgments that can be known a priori that can be true. My answer is, if he’s asking about “could” it be true, then I agree but if it’s a statement that means there is knowledge that can and will be true then I disagree because isn’t by his very definition of synthetic, it can’t be known just by definition? Or am I misunderstanding

things that are independent of apperences are things by themself they exist and to exist do not need of a reference of space/time. They do not belong to Newton world but to the one of Descates/Leibniz

Indeed we are reading in 2024, quite fascinating!

Empiricist and idealist are figting the same object to know who is right thinking there are two of them.

2024 we made it

substance is a notion by nature then posses an abstract state of Reality

Monad of Leibniz as the universal Unicity as quality by one side and quantiy by the other.

Idealistas falam do ser metafisico, enquanto emperalistas falam a experimentacão, do empirico dentro do sistema de referencia de Tempo/Espaco necessario para se medir a diferencia entre A e B por sua vez medidos com relaçao ao mesmo sistema de Newton determinando a nova realidade

O movimento predicado a entidade Superior tem o sentido "para dentro" de si e não "para fora" de si o que justifica o nome dado por " o velho grego" de motor imovel significando uma entidade dual em que na aparencia de imobilidade possui um motor.

James Beatty is right and new idea: whatever exists does not dies.

Yes, empirist and idealist are talking about the same object, but in differents times. To nature it makes no difference at all