Відео

Nitrogen has MW of 14 and not 28 as you mentioned but calcs are still based on 14.

Hold on: I understand you wish to say that little the PDF of Y is the derivative of the CDF of Y (i.e., the statements in the top-right corner of the whiteboard. However, you wrote that F_X(sqrt[y]) i.e., the cumulative distribution function of random variable X as a function of observed value sqrt(y) is 1/(2sqrt(y). You subsequently substituted this expression for F_Y(y) (i.e., the cumulative distribution function of random variable Y as a function of observed value y). is this appropriate? It seems like some amount of explanation would be needed, though? I.e., it seems that you simply used F_X(sqrt(y)) interchangeably with F_Y(y)

I wonder: Is it sufficient to simply without justification that P(X^2 < y) is precisely equivalent to P (X < sqrt(y))? I know it's obvious that X is SQRT(X^2) and that sqrt y is SQRT(y), but is it also fully defensible to say that P(m<n) is always equal to p(sqrt(m)<sqrt(n))?

Provided that Tis symmetric, show that tr ( nabla* T)=0 I am really got confused on this topic

❤ amazing short and sweet

The reason why they have to switch it up in general is that the expression P(theta | U, data) = P(theta| U) does not make sense unless you're a Bayesian. If you're doing frequentist statistics, the parameter is not random, just unknown. This means that the expression P(theta) simply does not make sense. This also goes to show how many people are intuitively Bayesian to begin with hahaha.

Thank you sir Tomorrow I am going to write a paper in Tesla in power systems

perfect, helped me understand this simple concept more effectively

Wow incredibly efficient video, thank you for helping me grasp this topic

Thank you I finally understood this 🙏

wow , thank you very much, it helps a lot

Thank you sir very very much for the information and by the way I had a doubt That why is biot savants law only restricted to steady state current flow?

As of August 2024, a new fare payment system has been implemented on subways, buses and trolleys. In addition to paying with your charlie card, you can also tap your credit card, or a phone with a digital wallet on the new screens by the fare gate/box. Just make sure to tap your phone/credit card on the screen and your charlie card on the circle. Enjoy the T.

Clearest most understandable video I have watched in my life

Great video!

Very well made!

Thank you. Very easy to understand. Brilliantly explained. Respect from Pakistan.

absolutely great video

at 0:31 you say "pressure times volume has the units of work", but the whiteboard says "pressure times the change in volume has the units of work"

Thanks!!

This video was incredibly helpful! Thank you for posting this.

I can't explain how much it useful for my exams. I was always confused in batteries one. You cleared all my doubts. Thanks a lot from India🇮🇳🇮🇳

Thanks! Also for the current we can choose any direction all the time?

Wow, this man can explain quantum physics to a toddler! BTW, how did I get here? Oh yeah, I was trying to learn what the f natural gradient is!!!!

You just showed that a commutative binary function is associative iff it satisfies a stronger form of commutativity. It's the first time I see that idea!

Thanks for clearing my doubt

The field lines of a quadrupole: ua-cam.com/video/1I_CGFyK5cg/v-deo.htmlsi=gUBuYevLHnP9t3JJ&t=371

Indiaa❤

Thanks.

My teacher taught me complex circuit without making my basics clear so i cant understand that but you made my basics crystal clear

Thanku❤

I found your channel googling tesla unit of measurement. Thank you for teaching me this sir.

This helped me out immensely. Thank you!

I would give this 1000 likes if I could. Thank you!

Clear and informative. Thanks

I'm studying to be an actuary, a big thanks to you for making these!

Fantastic Explanation! 😊

Thnxx

Thank you so much.

Bro your a life saver❤

What a wonderfully hel pful diagram - thank you!

Thanks so much!!

I saw this video before 3 month it was help full. But I forgot it. Now this time I searched on UA-cam,but you tube don't suggest me so I searched it on Google and found it. Tank you sir

Why not leave the small x's and y's as they are (not take their logarithms), and try to figure out a good enough equation to describe the relation between them using some other way? (I know the result won't be a straight line and won't be a first degree equation).

I wonder why it took so long for me to find this channel ❤️ Keep it up Mr. Cruikshank!

you are an absolute legend... appreciate your work!!

This is amazing. So simple and straight to the point. Thank you.

Thx, Doc. We in the streets turning up to this one. Using exponential families right now for most sufficient statistic work, but I am hoping to get this theorem down well. Also, you looking sharp, homie. I like the haircut and fit. Fresh.

Stuck on how you got 6.62V @1500resistor. I do .0441*1500 and come up with 66.15. Am I missing something? Thanks.

wise person