Відео

Excellent video Tommy! Keep bringing the content. Find your spot. You are gonna be fine! Appreciate you brother!

What is your settings for your black magic 4K

fantastic job

Check the ISO!

Im five minutes into the video. A question that pops into mind is, What region are you from; whats the population count, and whats the main industry holding up 5he local economy.

Also, a good point, these massive resolutions that BMD is pursuing is great for the used market. As they continue to push toward these larger resolutions, they will make it where more people will part with their 4K equipment for these larger resolutions. We now are at a point to where 4K alone is often not enough, which means the used market is only gonna get better in terms of how affordable things will (hopefully) get.

My guess on the Pyxis monitor is that it just wasn't ready in time for NAB. It would have been the logical place to launch it and they would wouldn't have had so much flack over the lack of an external monitor

This is why I have come to avoid the obscure cheap cameras. While many are cool and will tempt you to buy one with a low price they all too often don't work well and the quirky unique features generally become annoying in practical usage. Worst off all they just don't live up to expectations and you just go lusting after a proven Nikon or a nice looking Leica.

Poor, poor Jeff.

If the mode is an Aperture/Shutter Priority, like most cameras, at least in my experience, will not fire if its way above or below recommended meter reading. The camera did fire when you angled it differently so it has something to do with its meter going within the acceptable scale.

Aren't those aperture blades actually this camera's leaf shutter?

a film roll on a casette LOL better than 90s marketing.

Great video! I bought my BMPCC4K in 2019 and at the moment have two of them. One of them is a little bit more rigged and on a tripod, another I use in similar fashion as you. However, I do not use mft lenses or any other lenses with stabilization as I prefer vintage full frame lenses with speedbooster. You can shoot stable footage with without any ibis whatsover with practice and 3-4 point contacts. I suggest you to try a shoulder/neck strap connected left and right side of the camera and keep the strap behind on your neck while shooting, which gives much more stability when compared using just hands.

Back then they said RED was crazy with their 4K cameras but like now it's a must resolution

bro you know the footage of bm4k wobbles like jello when move side to side because of the rolling shutter....nobody knows but you can fix that in a very professional way just by selecting the clip go to the color page go to stabilize-select camera gyro on the strength make sure is 0.00 because you not traying to stabilize the clip you stabilizing the shutter ones you do that the shutter becomes a global shutter.... is fucking mind blowing no cap....

Awesome bro, I'm trying this tomorrow with my cinelifter fpv drone and BMPCC4K, hopefully it will work. 🤞

Totally with you on keeping it lightweight. You should look at the Accsoon SeeMo as a monitoring option. Assuming you have an iPhone it’s a super lightweight option and pretty cheap (especially used).

PQ mode on it is actually WAY BETTER than Log. it only requires different workflow to apply. 1) First you need to always underexpose till you get all your lights fit in. 2) You need to transform its colorspace, which is Rec 2020 and gamma of ST2048 to your preferred colour space even C-log if you need to. 3) Bring back the exposure, WB, e.c.t. 4) Enjoy almost RAW like dynamic range!

I disagree with the "future proof" argument to be honest. What a lot of people forget is that just shooting in super high resolution isn't all you need to achieve high resolution. With a camera like this you'd need the absolute sharpest lenses in the world to resolve anywhere near that level of detail. Yes, it can be done but in most normal scenarios you won't be achieving anywhere near that. 17K works out to 140 megapixels. I've taken still images with my Panasonic S5 in its high resolution 90 megapixel mode and I find if I'm not shooting with the lens in its sweet spot it's not worth it resolution wise. Usually I have to be between F5.6 to 8. Surprised you didn't mention the high speed shooting modes of this camera which I'm actually more impressed by. 8K at 200 fps is insane! No global shutter though :( Would much rather have that.

ok so term police is here. i think its digital imax. just imax size is 3x almost. film was horizontal in that case. so almost 6x7 photo film frame.

I like your content. - Subscriber n725

Bmpcc 6K user here. Thanks for this vid. Now to up the ante. I use mine - no rig - as my every day carry. Always hand held. I have some notes to offer. Wide lens - not always. Happily use 24 to 105 at full zoom hand held and get this result ua-cam.com/video/g5vrrp1pCFQ/v-deo.html It’s in your technique. But sure start wide. F stop. No, not relevant, get your stability worked out, the F stop is an aesthetic decision. Here’s what I use to get great hand held stable footage Strap attached to the camera base, one hand on camera handle, one hand on the lens, elbows in. Pull to make everything taught. You can do amazing things with this in tension. Try it out. A long lens like the Sigma 18-35 works especially well here - like a lever. No stabilisation in the lens but your hand and the lens length and bulk work together to smooth the footage. Practice with this, control your breathing, get you core in play and wow, you are making scenes. Some lenses stabilisation (like the Tammy 44) have their own jitters, seen it in the canon lenses too. So no guarantee they wont mess up your shot beyond redemption. Your bag. I have a cheap opp shop over the shoulder bag for the camera. Its a bit soft and saggy. Like the Sakk. I sling it around my neck, drop the camera on top and hey presto, fantastic soft, weighty base to shoot from. Davinci stabilisation works really well but not 100% of the time. Sometimes it introduces distortions that are unnatural. So great, but get your technique in shape. Practice - hold the lens, pull focus, adjust the ND and tell the story with your left hand. Use the length of the lens for added stability. Don’t hold it by both sides, that’s where the jitters live. Use a strap attached to the camera base - you’ll dig it - or get a nice soft bag. Hand held footage here. ua-cam.com/video/8EaUbNpbib8/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/yo7gUywGEOo/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/PjyJ0774WQc/v-deo.html

Really cool video man you should try recreating a shot from the Batman next

Then rent lenses for it!?!?!

I call BS. IMAX for one is a film stock and has been remixed into something else. Here’s when problems come into play for your audience. The file sizes have to be accounted for. A person will have to upgrade their computer, external drivers, etcetera. The folks who use 65mm and IMAX aren’t concerned with saving a few thousand dollars. Next, where is Joe Shmoe going to project this huge image? 😂😂😂 They’re going to rent IMAX theaters to show their indie film? The folks who will have real use for it is going to remain with Alexa or actual IMAX cameras.

Good job bro. Keep going

You need like a 150mm lens to get the sun bigger in the frame. But then you'd need to frame the shot from like 40 feet away, and for that you should get help from a friend, or plan it a few hours in advance.

I think this camera would be a great option for indie filmmakers that want that Alexa65 or 65mm film "scope" without taking out a loan the amount of a large house. This would also make it a perfect money maker for rental houses.

Load of wank....nope ....HD - 4K max...If your a good story teller that's all you need.

I think everybody is missing a very important point. A larger sensor gives a larger field of view with the same focal length than a smaller sensor. This means that with larger sensors we can use longer lenses that compress the background more, giving more separation. 65mm image will then feel very different than say, full frame 35mm. This is also the reason why Ursa 17k is not in fact larger than IMAX. Idk why the Blackmagic guy brought up The Sphere in the same sentence, they are not comparable. Pixel to pixel, maybe, but image size should be measured from the film negative/sensor, and there is currently no larger medium than 15-perf IMAX. I get that editors and VFX artists get some advantage with the higher resolution, I've worked with 8k RED sensors before and it's really nice to have that flexibility. Still, most cinemas are running 2k projectors and most consumer TVs are 4k so I don't think the resolution is the real highlight of this camera, otherwise we should've seen a higher demand for the original Ursa 12k. The real selling point for cinematographers is going to be the physical sensor size. That is something that has not been easily available for most filmmakers before.

If you say game changer one more time you’ll win a prize

I would want this so I can shoot at 17K and crop to 8K. 17K is 4.25 times the resolution of 8K, so one would be able to get the master, the medium, and the close up. This would come in really handy for scenes in which continuity can be a nightmare to keep track of like action scenes, dinner scenes, scenes in uncontrolled public environments.

as usual. this camera. will make. large.format. available to the. almost masses. disrupt. the market. a little ,,,,,I see only. positives can. come. from this. and. bravo. black. magic ...

Storage is gonna be crazy

A few thoughts: 1. Since 17K projectors don't exist yet, you're going to need to print to film. 2. The sensor shape is not like IMAX 70mm, it's more rectangular. In order to screen a film in "true IMAX" 1.43:1, the resolution will ultimately be less than 17K. 3. I hope filmmakers that use IMAX will start using this instead, so a movie can be fully in "70mm" and not have annoying aspect ratio changes. That's something that really bothers me personally. This is still a really monumental release. I just wish the next step will be a sensor that does 17K closer to 1.43:1, since that aspect ratio really looks better on huge screens. When I saw Oppenheimer in 70mm IMAX at the BFI in London, it was like the 1.43:1 scenes filled your entire field of vision. It's incredible.

love it ❤

Anyone who says 17k is dumb only knows about shooting and never thinks about editing creatively… Hollywood editors are going to love the things they would be able to do with it.

without any kind of IBIS, jitter on 17k footage must cause the tides to go off schedule within 1000 miles

Great idea as a camera but will not be usable for the 90% of people im afraid, the issue is lenses there is not many lenses for 65mm sensor size and the once that exist are manly owned by Arri and are only for rental, now yes there is Master Built lenses line for s65 and some Panavision lenses but they cost crazy money and it would probably be cheaper to just rent all the gear from Arri if one would need to do a s65 film. but it is sick that blackmagic is pushing the technology tough i just would like them to to make a global shutter full frame and s35 pocket camera whit better dynamic range of 15 stops and 12bit color space that would actually sell and be useful unlike the 17k franken stain haha

this is like a billion dollars... its sounds smaller than it is... 999 MILLION plus 1 million think about that... resolution scales exponentially fo example I shoot 5k as I shoot Gemini = thats 33% more resolution than 4k and on Gemini I have 300 extra pixels above that so 5120 x3000 (open gate) - It just doesnt sound like it is that much more resolution. 17 K in comparison is FLIPPN MENTAL SAUCE... Ill believe it when I see it and it doesnt catch fire.

Dude, this video is great. Your demeanor, flow, knowledge is great. It's nice to see someone like you young and confident in what you're saying.

This is a little misleading. The Alexa 65 and the ursa 17k 65 are equivalent to 5 perf 65mm, similar to what the Hateful 8 was shot on. IMAX is 15 perf 70mm, and then downscaled to 15 perf 65mm to leave space for the magnetic audio stripe. The difference between 5 perf and 15 perf is very significant.

Jesus these resolution wars are so fucking dumb.

Sorry guys, I screwed up some of the audio... if you watch with headphones you might only hear from one side on some of the clips. Hope you all still enjoy, the video sounds great without headphones!

Thanks bro your the man🎉🎉🎉🎉

What broke Jeff could do is buy a mamiya medium format speedbooster for his full frame camera and get to shooting 😉

I'm gonna need this camera for my you tube videos....

dude wtf why do you literally have only almost 700 subscribers.... you deserve WAYYY more

Why is the comment section full of people who are meant to be at Vimeo? Brother here is sharing his opinion if it doesn't sit well with you create a video and share your opinion. Why do you demotivate young creators and shout great to people because they have huge numbers? I like his video because what he's saying is true guys calm down.