Jenn The Liberty Lion
Jenn The Liberty Lion
  • 761
  • 54 834
TROPES IN COURT - PROVIDING DRAMATIC EFFECT TO PERSUADE
TROPES IN COURT - PROVIDING DRAMATIC EFFECT TO PERSUADE
Переглядів: 21

Відео

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AS FICTION
Переглядів 1712 годин тому
LARUE Shares insights from his experience as a lawyer in Mississippi and as a Harvard Law Graduate. My favorite quote from his book is this: "...the proud towers of the law are built not on the level bedrock of 'fact' but on the perplexed terrain of 'fiction,' that judicial opinions are filled with 'stories' that purport to be 'factual' but that instead are 'fictional,' and furthermore, that th...
GOOD BOOK - Strategy. Political deceptions.
Переглядів 312 годин тому
GOOD BOOK - Strategy. Political deceptions.
ENCODING MEANING INTO WORDS
Переглядів 1813 годин тому
How "they" change the idea or perception of a word by using it in a different context repeatedly until it has sunk into the minds of people and then using it in a different context to conjure up the preconceived idea of the word which then changes the context of the document to which the word is used.
Advertisements, Deception, Contracts lose your rights
Переглядів 1713 годин тому
This is your freedom video.
Government Advertisements ~ to make Contracts.
Переглядів 2916 годин тому
Advertisements are a type of propaganda, propaganda is often deceptive. Have you heard the phrase: "Taxes are voluntary." and then also heard the phrase: "If you don't pay YOUR taxes you will go to jail." If YOU make a contract to pay taxes you must then pay taxes, but the making of the contract to pay is voluntary because all contracts must be voluntary. Contracts are often those Titles not ma...
Signature to give up right to Tort.
Переглядів 2316 годин тому
You signature on a government contract requires you to give up your right to a claim when your rights are removed.
DECEPTION MAXIMS: SUMMARY END
Переглядів 222 години тому
DECEPTION MAXIMS: SUMMARY END
DECEPTION Maxim 10: Care in the Design of Planned Placement of Deceptive Material
Переглядів 22 години тому
DECEPTION Maxim 10: Care in the Design of Planned Placement of Deceptive Material
DECEPTION Maxim 9: The Money's Paw
2 години тому
DECEPTION Maxim 9: The Money's Paw
DECEPTION Maxim: 8. The Importance of Feedback
Переглядів 12 години тому
DECEPTION Maxim: 8. The Importance of Feedback
DECEPTION MAXIM 7 A SEQUENCING RULE
Переглядів 42 години тому
DECEPTION MAXIM 7 A SEQUENCING RULE
DECEPTION Maxim 6: Axelrod's Contribution: The Husbanding of Assets
Переглядів 52 години тому
DECEPTION Maxim 6: Axelrod's Contribution: The Husbanding of Assets
DECEPTION Maxim 5: A Choice Among Types of Deception
Переглядів 32 години тому
DECEPTION Maxim 5: A Choice Among Types of Deception
DECEPTION Maxim 4: Jones' Lemma
Переглядів 62 години тому
DECEPTION Maxim 4: Jones' Lemma
DECEPTION Maxim 3: The Multiple Forms of Surprise.
Переглядів 32 години тому
DECEPTION Maxim 3: The Multiple Forms of Surprise.
DECEPTION. Maxim: 1. Magruder's Principle - The Exploitation of Preconceptions.
Переглядів 122 години тому
DECEPTION. Maxim: 1. Magruder's Principle - The Exploitation of Preconceptions.
Territories, War and Operations 23
Переглядів 162 години тому
Territories, War and Operations 23
All things military, Proper Context. 22.
Переглядів 152 години тому
All things military, Proper Context. 22.
Enlistment into National Military changes status 20
Переглядів 152 години тому
Enlistment into National Military changes status 20
The United States military to conformity with requirements to meet demands for the United Nations 1
Переглядів 112 години тому
The United States military to conformity with requirements to meet demands for the United Nations 1
No longer in service to the United States 18
Переглядів 152 години тому
No longer in service to the United States 18
Citizen, Residence, Declaring your intention to become a Citizen of the United States 17
Переглядів 182 години тому
Citizen, Residence, Declaring your intention to become a Citizen of the United States 17
Alford Is not a citizen of the United States 16, never was in the military...
Переглядів 192 години тому
Alford Is not a citizen of the United States 16, never was in the military...
They have no power until you SIGN, give a signal, act the way they like.
Переглядів 412 години тому
They have no power until you SIGN, give a signal, act the way they like.
Commissioned Officers 15
Переглядів 222 години тому
Commissioned Officers 15
Enlistment Contract, Positive Law, under federal constitutional law.
Переглядів 232 години тому
Enlistment Contract, Positive Law, under federal constitutional law.
Upshur, federal and state 13
Переглядів 232 години тому
Upshur, federal and state 13
Anarchy not lawlessness 12
Переглядів 212 години тому
Anarchy not lawlessness 12
Independence belongs to AMERICA, not the United States 11
Переглядів 222 години тому
Independence belongs to AMERICA, not the United States 11

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Годину тому

    It says no comments..... You- tube again ... Comments missing !

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Годину тому

    Last two words ...... Persuasive purpose ... ? Is that correct.... ? The judicial system is gone .

    • @James-f3l4b
      @James-f3l4b Годину тому

      I have listened half a dozen times and am not clear. Anyhow Thank you Jenn .

  • @lunareclipse6035
    @lunareclipse6035 4 години тому

    Quite interesting prediction…

  • @rentiap
    @rentiap 11 годин тому

    If one is within the exterior boarders/boundaries of Texas, But is not in the State of Texas.(Upon "territory or other property belonging to the United States" used "for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;-..."(land that has not been ceded or retro-ceded to the United States or State of Texas) And one has not signed any contracts with the State of Texas or United States. Do the State of Texas,/or United States statutes, codes, rules, regulations or public policies apply to you?

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty 11 годин тому

      In my opinion.... no.

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty 11 годин тому

      In Texas the current Jurisdiction manual States/writes ... the Republic of Texas is abrogated only in so far as it conflicts with federal authority... So that means you have a choice of State. I choose the Republic.

    • @rentiap
      @rentiap 11 годин тому

      @@JennWest-Liberty I agree.

    • @rentiap
      @rentiap 11 годин тому

      @@JennWest-Liberty Only, approximately 1.9% of the lands within the exterior boarders of Texas is under the territorial jurisdiction of the State of Texas.("territory or other property belonging to the United States" used "for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;-...") Which means the State of Texas,/or United States statutes, codes, rules, regulations or public policies, only apply to that 1.9% of the lands within Texas. And the courts of the State of Texas do not have territorial jurisdiction over 98.1% of the lands within the exterior boarders of Texas.

    • @rentiap
      @rentiap 11 годин тому

      And to be clear. There are no Courts of the Texas Republic .

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b 14 годин тому

    Torture is legal , but not over standing lawful , waterboarding is quite unpleasant and very effective. ( First hand knowledge) !

  • @BrewsterMcBrewster
    @BrewsterMcBrewster День тому

    "America is Supposed to be a republic!" -Jenn the Liberty Lion It's not "and to the 'democracy' for which it stands..." 😉

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b День тому

    The Original Document writer's intent , seems for pure justified good for the Sig nature . Thus my intrest in its Preservation. ... Hi Jenn , looking Great ; please keep warm ~~ James ~~

  • @steveraeburn5459
    @steveraeburn5459 День тому

    Have anybody show you a contract that you are their property You are a flesh and blood woman or man fullstop not any titles }":":"}

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty День тому

      For military enlistment into the national military: Property as in someone else has ultimate responsibility for you. If i am in the military and taken as a prisoner of war - the United States is responsible for my return. They will pay the costs associated with my return. If the President as commander in chief gives me orders he must, the United States must, pay to have me transported there and then back home. If i should be killed or injured i am or my family is compensated. They must provide "three hots and a cot" Three meals, a place and time to sleep, clothes/uniforms, boots, socks, arms, etc. If i should leave (AWOL) before my time/contract has expired, if found, i must be returned to my owner. I am "subject" to the laws thereof... Property, as in, the United States is responsible for me.

    • @steveraeburn5459
      @steveraeburn5459 День тому

      @@JennWest-Liberty Thnx for replying Do you know of Cal Washington }{":"

  • @BrewsterMcBrewster
    @BrewsterMcBrewster День тому

    Well done, Jenn!

  • @lunareclipse6035
    @lunareclipse6035 День тому

    It is hard for me to understand about US military policy. I understand that there are 2 different entities within USA. It sounds like there are 2 kinds of people within USA, and according to you, the difference is a critical point in American society. I can’t see why that is a critical point because I don’t understand enough about how things work when U.S. military forces are involved. US military works for people in US, no?

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty День тому

      And that is exactly the issue. I will try harder but it might help if you try to understand that the United States, basically is the military.

    • @lunareclipse6035
      @lunareclipse6035 День тому

      @ USA is a military… All the people in US are soldiers… I know that USA is a corporation, and all the people in US are employees. Birth certificates are employment contracts. Any country that does birth certificate thing is the same as USA, I think.

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty День тому

      @lunareclipse6035 USA = confederated states. US = military.

    • @lunareclipse6035
      @lunareclipse6035 День тому

      @@JennWest-Liberty USA and US are 2 different entities… so, probably USA is a corporation, and US is military? Sorry🙏 I’ve been having this concern about ‘corporation’ for long. I understand that You are talking about military. I took so long to classify ‘United states of America,’ ‘confederated states,’ ‘United states,’ and ‘military.’ Finally, I think I understood. Thank you for your clarification.

  • @amylynndonahue
    @amylynndonahue День тому

    From one Veteran to another, thank you for making these educational videos!

  • @DEVDADIvine
    @DEVDADIvine День тому

    I love when you make videos like this.

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty День тому

      THANK YOU!!!. I am trying really hard to get people interested by producing shorter videos. Encouragement is appreciated! (heart) :)

  • @rentiap
    @rentiap День тому

    @Jenn If you are not already aware of 110-127 of the State of California Government codes. Under "Territorial Jurisdiction" I think you will find even more clarity as the legislators of the State of California were very clear when they decided to be transparent as to the territorial jurisdiction of the State of California. Of which clearly show where the State of California is. If one is upon lands within the exterior boundaries of California that are not on the lists in 111-127, Then one is not "in" the State of California, or subject to the jurisdiction thereof the State of California, or the United States.

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty День тому

      I have not read any California Codes but I do agree with what you say it says and if applying the information from the federal laws and constitution, that is absolutely correct. If you are not "on" federal lands or part of the federal government, you are not in that "legal state." I also will be showing, once again, the State of Texas birth Certificate application which writes that the legal name you give your baby is a "legal name for a legal state."

  • @rentiap
    @rentiap День тому

    I really appreciate your clarity.

  • @rentiap
    @rentiap День тому

    Looking forward to seeing and hearing more of your comprehension on TJ. It's great to see more from advanced students.

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty День тому

      I'm glad you are ready, you will get an ear-full. :)

  • @BrewsterMcBrewster
    @BrewsterMcBrewster 3 дні тому

    Wow. You look great Jenn! 😄 Miss ya over on the RPLR! Gypsy and I are still going strong!

  • @jorgesegura8044
    @jorgesegura8044 18 днів тому

    This one was really great information !!! Thank you a ton ! Really clearing some serious fog, for me ! 😂 😊 I of couse listen a couple times on all of this, but so love your teachings on really getting us up to par, in so much ! ❤

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty 13 днів тому

      Thank you! I appreciate your positive feedback. It does seem confusing sometimes. Even to me, you are not alone! 😊 Im working on the next video.

    • @jorgesegura8044
      @jorgesegura8044 12 днів тому

      @JennWest-Liberty Your work is astonishing in how much you're covering on this channel !!!!!!!!

  • @jorgesegura8044
    @jorgesegura8044 23 дні тому

    Is that a cousin ? You two act like silly cousins ..❤

  • @InLoveWithLove252
    @InLoveWithLove252 23 дні тому

    Love seeing the "silly" too. I presume this is your daughter?

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Місяць тому

    Watching now , gave thumbs up prior to watching , My appreciation is very real . TY . , Jenn !

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Місяць тому

    Title 28 3002 paragraph 15 subsection A and B ..... Seems to me to be a Bankrupt CORPORATION. TRUMP ( actor ) ..... Trump ; ( Man ) . Thus a description, im not fond of " A PERSON" ..... Dog Latin.

  • @joannthomases9304
    @joannthomases9304 Місяць тому

    Jenn, please look at Global Dave's 28th Amendment for the true republic, and see, if it is written up to mean a people who allowed any Government at all .

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty Місяць тому

      Ill try to get to it tomorrow. 😊👍🏻

    • @joannthomases9304
      @joannthomases9304 Місяць тому

      @@JennWest-Liberty Sorry, I messed up, my daughter overrhode my old phone and I'm not use to it. It's very different...I told her no. but ..no time to help, my stuff, so she puts her stuff she knows, over mine if it's not working right. Ugh. I have to get someone here, that can show me, it's been changed so much. Long story. .

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Місяць тому

    I will be in your study's...... Fall leaves have my attention...... I make the very best organic compost , according to them earth worms and Coffee grounds. TY Jenn . !

  • @joebravo5459
    @joebravo5459 Місяць тому

    Alright 👍 finally back 😀😀😀 ❤❤❤❤❤ . Awesome 👍.. we missed you. 🧠🧠🧠👌👌👌💪💪💪💪💪🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty Місяць тому

      Thank you Joe. Sorry, i got busy but never gone forever!!! Couple more videos will be out - hopefully today! 😊😊♥️♥️♥️

  • @nancyperreault3732
    @nancyperreault3732 Місяць тому

    Thanks Jenn. You are correct. 😊

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Місяць тому

    To "include" pumpkin pie @ the restaurant excludes all other types of pies .

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty Місяць тому

      All men includes some men. Have pie, we have pumpkin pie, does not exclude other types of pie. To include does not exclude all others. We have cars, including the hard to find antiques. Does not exclude other antiques or other cars. We include this in our message, does not exclude the obvious or unobvious intended other things not mentioned here.

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Місяць тому

    Looking good Jenn ..... Posted my comment as your video started , the title/ words , lured me right in . TY .

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty Місяць тому

      Love you!!! I sent a reply. As always friendly.

    • @James-f3l4b
      @James-f3l4b Місяць тому

      @@JennWest-Liberty Mutual feelings, you have impacted my life in a very positive fashion.....And you comment really made the day .

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty Місяць тому

      @@James-f3l4b❤

  • @lunareclipse6035
    @lunareclipse6035 Місяць тому

    So… military is not working for people in general.

  • @H1ya2u2
    @H1ya2u2 Місяць тому

    32:18 is that reason they use words like, "acting" as next to their "title"

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty Місяць тому

      As much as i have read i would say that all of "law" and the "legal" system is like theatrics. A stage or theater- incudes the scripts, actors and audience etc. Players/actors (us and them we all have a part) A director (representatives) Scripts (what the cops say, what a judge says, what is said at a marriage ceremony) Plays /procedures (an entire process) Acts (a part of the procedures such as the passing of a bill - how a bill becomes a law, the act of marriage, meet, agree, say something, sign papers, consummate, etc. the act of taking office, chosen or elected or volunteer, oath, etc.) Each law has parts authority, intent/purpose, etc.

    • @H1ya2u2
      @H1ya2u2 Місяць тому

      You explained that so beautifully!

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b Місяць тому

    2.44 into your video " defence" Not defense.... Words matter..Hi Jenn !

  • @FreeDom-dh5mf
    @FreeDom-dh5mf 2 місяці тому

    What is the difference between a state and a commonwealth? thank you

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty 2 місяці тому

      A state means stat-us. Stat-ute. Sta-nding. And other things. They are all related. The type of government is commonwealth. Commonwealth and republic, i believe, are the same thing. Both meaning, for the inhabitants, residents, the people, the wealth of them, the safety of them, the security of them, etc. state is also related to the word Situs, situ, situation.

  • @InLoveWithLove252
    @InLoveWithLove252 2 місяці тому

    These may be silly questions, but I'd still like to ask them... Has anyone, in any state, tried reaching out to their representatives to discuss any of this information? If not, will you? Why or why not? If yes, which representative(s) & what was their response or overall outcome? For those of us that haven't reached out, should we? Or is there some sort of consensus as to what the best course of action may be going forward? Is it possible the entirety of the government is in on the grand scheme? I hope this is not the case nor that we are completely s.o.l. I feel discombobulated with all that I've learned over the last 6+ years. And I still feel as if nothing has been confirmed in a way that gives confidence taking a, b, or c course of action just yet. I wish we had some kind of organization amongst us where we were developing some preliminary plans. As it stands, it seems as though many well-intentioned people are doing things, but rather aimlessly. Those that are running the show have been well organized for a long time & are way ahead of us. I'm hoping that there isn't going to have to be an all out war. Jenn, Idk how it is that you STILL don't have a bigger following. I am grateful for your dedication to help teach the rest of us. Also for those that show up here interact, share, & keep the conversations going. I pray that more people listen, come together, and continue to grow in and for what is right. I don't think the Constitution needs to be rewritten, it just needs to be re-read...and often.

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty 2 місяці тому

      I have tried. They ignore me. I have tried to make an appointment to speak on the floor. They make it super difficult. A lot of rules to follow. I agree but that has a lot to do with youtube. I can comment first on a video and no one "likes" my comment. An hour later someone can make a similar comment and get hundreds of likes. Im just mostly blocked i think. Good luck in whatever you choose to do. It wont be easy but maybe, just maybe it will be worth it.

    • @User0player1
      @User0player1 2 місяці тому

      what is meant by "their"?

    • @jorgesegura8044
      @jorgesegura8044 Місяць тому

      I thought the fruit of a poisonous tree called it a dummy Corporation..ever notice, Biden's hands ? Seems like messaging, there. Thank you for pointing out no one has had qualifications to be there, for some time !! If Gov't took lands gifted by Rockefeller's, they already broke trust to the rules !!! And this is why, they are not to take gifts, persuading and bribing a lot of pretended ownership....some call this simply, "cheating"...in order to seem larger than they really are allowed by what the private people ever gave any consent in the first place voiding any other contracts, following......Trickery, signatures are none as they are done by trick cheating not following initial intent and so forth. They are not true contracts of full disclosures to constitute any complete agreements at all......Forced contracting is not contracting at all.....

    • @InLoveWithLove252
      @InLoveWithLove252 Місяць тому

      @@User0player1 ?

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b 2 місяці тому

    Lots of truth and plenty of thoughts in this . Good One. TY .

  • @JJ_FLA
    @JJ_FLA 2 місяці тому

    💯🇺🇸💯🇺🇸💯

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b 2 місяці тому

    Its similar to their " You have the right to remain silent .... ? ..... Ok , Article 1 , Freedom of speech . One really should not be more powerful than another.

  • @James-f3l4b
    @James-f3l4b 2 місяці тому

    No means No ! Do "No " harm .