Відео

Glad you appreciate the focus

thanks so much for the feedback, You are absolutely right, real life examples are crucial for making these concepts relatable and truly understood, please stay connected to our videos, viewers like you are our strength.

Thank You Jennifer :)

The Archimede one itself can be explained in many ways one can be to by consider how much time it takes for the system to iterate it's steps. You'll end up with an infinite summ (a series) of smaller and smaller time intervals, wich is gonna be a convergent one (one that will have a finite result), wich will lead to the time necessary for Achilles to reach the tortoise.

Hey @RaraPremium, thanks for the comment! You're right, an audio example at 3:45 would have been a nice touch. I will keep that in mind for future videos.

Welcome aboard, We are working hard to make some awesome content, and with viewers like you, who knows what the future holds?

Hey @jonathancole5953 , thanks so much for noticing the quality! It means a lot that you appreciate the effort. You're absolutely right, having viewers who enjoy the content is the most rewarding part. That kind of feedback keeps me going even if the subscriber count takes time to grow. I'll definitely keep striving to make great videos, no matter the view count! Thanks for being such a positive viewer :)

@fernandoorozco5968 Great question, To learn more, I actually have a few other videos on my channel

@startingwithsmartness859 Wow, thanks, That makes my day

Awesome, thank you!

@aexmic Amen to that, But what do you think, are humans inherently evil, or is it something we learn? let me know in the comments

@rationalobserver3675 You are absolutely right about the definist and continuum fallacies being misused, It is important to have clear definitions, but also to acknowledge complexity

Same with abortion debates that immediately came to mind “pro life” and “pro choice” as if both are FOR something

@@TinyFord1 You are spot on, Pro-life and pro-choice are great examples of loaded language in the abortion debate. Both labels frame the issue as a binary choice between two positives, but the reality is much more nuanced. Many people on both sides have complex views that go beyond those labels :)

@harshvardhan6513 You're totally right, a conclusion would tie it all together nicely, Thanks for the tip, I will definitely make sure to wrap things up better in future vids. Glad you enjoyed it overall.

@TheEditorExp I hear you about it being simplified, but there's just SO much to unpack in philosophy! I'm glad it sparked your interest though. Philosophy is a rabbit hole of awesome questions, isn't it?

@@ThePigmentPlayground I get lost in it pretty consistently but it keeps pushing me towards theology I'm kinda pulling back reworking some basic stuff like nietzsche God knows I can't handle aquinas's metaphysical principles right now really 90% of medieval principality gives me a headache really figured something like this could help me look for something to review pretty good video 💪

@TheEditorExp That's totally fair! Philosophy can definitely be a labyrinth, and sometimes you need to retrace your steps or take a detour. It's great that you're drawn towards theology - it shares some core questions with philosophy but explores them through a faith-based lens. Reworking the basics is a fantastic approach. Nietzsche is a great starting point for grappling with ideas of God and morality. Aquinas might have to wait a bit, but hey, maybe someday you'll be ready to tackle those medieval headaches . I'm glad this video could be a stepping stone for you. Keep exploring, and happy philosophizing/theologizing!

@@ThePigmentPlayground its all childs play the only question is why is there Something rather than Nothing everything else is derivative

@brandenwaite Hey thanks for the comment! Physics paradoxes are fun thought experiments, even if they get a little weird. They push our understanding of the universe and can lead to new discoveries! For the tea leaves, it's centripetal force in action! Elevator paradox? Buoyancy wins! Achilles and the tortoise? It's about the nature of motion, not who wins. Hydrostatic paradox? Pressure acts equally!

:)

@jensphiliphohmann1876, In a future video, I could delve deeper and explore some of these solutions, like the geometric series you mentioned for Achilles and the tortoise.

Thanks for the heads-up, @jenspoiliphohmann1876! You're spot on about the parallel lines. In a perfect depiction of the Moving Rows Paradox, the rows would definitely converge at a single point in the distance to show they're truly parallel.

You're absolutely right! But paradoxes can also be a fun way to think outside the box. What if the "lie" reveals a hidden truth we haven't considered yet?

It's not necessarily lies, it also can be errors in thinking. If you, for example, split time in tiny _but nonzero_ parts, Zeno's arrow will have been displaced by a tiny _but still nonzero_ distance. If you dismiss that distance as essentially zero without doing the same with the time, you get the arrow paradox. If you dismiss both as zero, you get the ambiguous and therefore undefined 0m/0s which could be any speed.

You got me there, @jetds8466! Maybe the unstoppable force just got a little stumped (pun intended!) for the first time. But that's the beauty of paradoxes, right? They mess with our heads! What do YOU think would happen in this clash of the titans? Would the force find a way around, or would the object finally budge a millimeter? Let's see your theories in the comments!

@Rarerj ❤️ Thanks!

yeah 😔 him and his long ahh unnecessary personal questions

That's cool! Mr. Schlarz sounds like a great teacher.

Yep

​@@ThePigmentPlaygroundhell nah

Whoa, that honest! The video explores different ideas on happiness, maybe there's something for you after all. Let us know what you think!

Thanks for your comment, bobmirror7164! We're curious, which paradoxes on the list do you think have false assumptions? We'd love to hear your thoughts on them.

@@ThePigmentPlayground Paradox is a illogical word salad begging for a logical answer. Logic can be meet with logic, ill logic can not.

​@@bobmirror7164Speaking of a word salad....

Thanks so much for the encouragement, @PhilosophyLearning! It means a lot.

These vids pop up only when your are

Accurate 😅

@mryeet1952 Thanks for the comment! That's a great point about Zeno's paradox. It definitely uses a lot of mathematical ideas like infinity and divisibility. But the reason it's considered a philosophical paradox is because it challenges our everyday understanding of things like motion and change. It makes us question how something can be made up of infinitely many parts, or how something can actually move from one place to another. What do you guys think? Is Zeno's paradox more math or philosophy? Really glad you enjoyed the video overall!

@ThePigmentPlayground so while I get that, it seems to me more in line with physics and calculus because motion and entropy (change) are things that you measure within that. All in all great video and I think it does have a basis in philosophy, I just love to debate and especially with people who are knowledgeable

@mryeet1952 Thanks for sharing your insights on Zeno's paradox. You're absolutely right. Zeno's paradox uses mathematical concepts and connects to physics with motion and infinitesimals. But it also delves into philosophical questions about reality, like infinite divisibility and how continuous motion works. Perhaps that's what makes it so interesting - math provides a framework, but philosophy asks the deeper questions. What are your thoughts on how these disciplines work together to understand Zeno's ideas?

@ThePigmentPlayground I agree completely I think it finds itself in math as a problem but then becomes a philosophical manner when you apply it to certain topics. I think that it comes most prominently in my mind as becoming a master at something. The first steps you take are going to be your largest because you're taking the most information in. As time goes on you have to hone your craft but the improvements will be much more subtle such as increased speed or better technique. But where the philosophical paradox comes in is when is someone truly ever a master at something, and is is possible to be so good you can't improve

@mryeet1952, Thanks for sharing that! The concept of mastery and its connection to Zeno's ideas is a fascinating one, opening a new way to look at the paradox. This conversation has been great, and I've learned a lot from your insights, as I know the viewers have too. We'd love to hear your thoughts on future videos.

Thanks so much @airfikri9663! Really happy to hear you like the content, it keeps me motivated.

Thanks! We really appreciate the encouragement!

Thank you