Відео

If your saying 75 why are you showing a 71 and and a monza

4:19 no it was not a failure and what prevented it from being a success was the demise of Studebaker.

Nobody hates these cars.

The 1963 Pontiac Tempest was marketed as a 'senior compact', and would grow to be a mid-size car for 1964. How could the 1963 Tempest compete with the Chevelle when there was no Chevelle yet? Then you talk about the 1965 Rambler Rebel which was a 2-door hardtop, while showing pictures of the 1964 Rambler Classic 6 cylinder 4-door sedan. The optional AMC 327 V8 in a 1965 Rambler Classic / Rebel certainly competed with other manufacturer's muscle cars. Why would you compare the mid-size Rebel to the Mustang and Camaro compact pony cars, expecially since there would be no Camaro until 1967? In short, your video is a boatload of hogwash.

God what an awful video... Sliding doors that aren't demonstrated, hardtop convertible that is barely shown in operation, the Edsel line which shows one model... and that awful voice. The Edsel looks good in comparison to this waste of time video. Oh, and a click-bait car that is never shown... Keep your day job? I'm surprised you've even got a job at all!

Demand was so high for the Avanti that Studebaker, being a small company compared to the big 3 couldn't build them fast enough so buyers got tired of waiting and bought a Buick Riviera instead which was in its targetted market. None of these cars were stupid. They all sold fairly well.

After 30 seconds i knew that you dont know shit from clay, those cars are older and a lot smarter than you,youve got nothing new. Why show a mustang on yourthumb nail,one of Americas most popular cars but you aint old enough to know that

Who is this guy, those cars are part of our life during the sixties. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

1:51 guess again the last year for the Avanti was 1964. Research anyone?3:14 in Canada. Production in South Bend, where the Avanti was made, ceased in Dec. of 1963.3:32 1965 Rambler rebel? OMG you're kidding right? The rebel didn't get re introduced until 1966 3:34 Not an Ambassador. 3:46 which of course wouldn't be unveiled for another 2 years, dumba**.

The only thing stupid are your suppositions.

You know nothing!!! All that talk about the 1967 L88 Corvette and you didn't mention the one thing that makes an L88 what it is... The high performance aluminum cylinder heads, you dolt!! I hate you brainless voice boxes! You lack heart, have no soul and get the facts wrong!

More rare.

1:32 that's a '65 not a '62 .2:31 It's an Imperial not a Chysler Imperial.

Fake AI narration

Make you think what?

Yes it was bare bones and auster and had a lack of chrome. It's called a base model. 1:00 that's a 210 2:36 but it made a hulluva of a gasser.3:11 obscure my a**, see previous comment.

If you're going to talk about cars from the 50s why are you showing a 61 Plymouth....?

You'll be glad to have a car to drive I have to ride a bike can people have supported Pontiac in Plymouth and Oldsmobile weed still have them today

Ford ranger no no it was close to the galaxy 500

What a laughable analysis. View the 50 Chev Olds or Buick if you want to actually see and hear about old design,(Chrysler Ford as well), underpowered like the Chev and certainly not any better design than the Packard. SO many pundits in the auto arena like this person/ persons that know truly very little about auto history, design and Quality. Soon as I hear their baloney early in the scheme I just laugh and cancel Out the sound.

Putting a Packard on a list of worst cars is just wrong. They were made from top quality materials with true craftsmanship. Were they outdated, yes, but they were as reliable as an anvil.

Why is it that everytime a bad review of an American automobile is given its done by a non American? You don't hear of Americans going to Europe to critique their fine line of crap

With push button everything on today's cars, why call mercuys push button transmission gimmicky? And it's ride was smooth. A perfect vehicle for handling Eisenhowers new interstate highway system!

Theres a quick simple solution to all these ai generated BS videos, do what I do, everytime I come across one I click "Don't Recommend channel or Turn off all from XXXXXXXXXX" icon.

Reviewer should rebrand self as "Car Hater".

If you want anyone to subscribe, you're going to have to get your thumbnails correct and correct the information. Your AI is completely ignorant.

Garbage. Nothing interesting here.

1:17 And how did 1 of the few cars with hidden headlights not stand out?1:24 how were they being pressured? Did they know that 12-7-41 the automotive world was gonna be turned upside down?1:29 and hidden headlights weren't innovative?1:42 there was no rush, WW II was several months away.1:55 outdated look? WTF drugs are you on ?2:35 not a nash.3:24but would have 2 wait another 2 to 3 years for.all automakers offered pre war retreads until '48 or '49.

Really? Do you think these were dumb failures? What about push-button gear selectors placed where children can reach them? How about not spending the $$ to design a V-8 or borrow someone else's and instead propel all your new products with a flathead 6?

take a look 👀 at the tesla brick 😮😮😮😮😮

Not only weird uglies , but the excess of public space these cars occupied due to their absurd sizes

He must like that crap they build today

Kaiser Darrin was TOO distinctive. Initial impression when seeing the front was shock, shortly followed by a laugh and head scratch!

They were beautiful I was there

I can see why you only have 483 subscribers. Lucky you have that many.

The Ambassador was a longer plusher version of the regular Rambler, a midsize or compact car and never full sized (although the original body introduced in 1956 and lasting until 1962 was more space efficient than full sized cars.) When talking about the 1969 model the video shows the completely different 1965-66 version. The Gan Prix (a bad year for them) shown has silly restomod wheels so it does not look like the original.

I found the thumbs down and clicked.

Hey that 69 Grand Prix is gorgeous it's got a lot of Chrome without being overboard and actually if you look at that at the 1969 Monte Carlo it's got a long hood longer then that 1!!! Even the one in your thumbnail isn't that bad compared to something like the pacer or the grimlin or the Maverick those are ugly ugly canalysis in the Matador is no beautiful vehicle either but yeah you're not on the same page with most people that's just your taste now

The Skyliner had a tub in the trunk to put luggage in so it wouldn't interfere with the top which would cover the bin. The trunk was longer and taller (the fuel tank was in the front of trunk - see the filler door at 4:20 - instead of under it) than a regular convertible so while there was less trunk room it isn't small. You can see the bin (covered) at 4:40. The technology was adapted for the 1958-1966 Thunderbird and Lincoln soft top convertibles. None of these are "dumbest and worst" and none of them will surprise anyone even 1% of the time, other than being wrong.

You don't know shit from clay

No Pontiac Aztek?

If Shakespeare was correct when he wrote, "Brevity is the soul of wit," this video is witless.

Those stupid wheels ruin the Pontiacs looks not its hood and bird beak.

So much better than today's clones.

False mouth flapper !

not worth watching

The conservative lines of the Willys Aero were probably not attractive enough for the then taste for chrome excess. There’s actually an elegance in its simplicity.

Maybe you should show an actual Turnpike Cruiser instead of a Montclair.

I liked the 1853 Jet!

the 54 Hudson Hornet Hollywood Hardtop was a beautiful luxury car.