Відео

after all, it was a 100-300 km/h race, not a drag race. Bugatti didn't use Launch Control here, so it had a slow 0-100km/h and 1/4 mile time, but at 100-300km/h it's as fast as a Chiron should be.

@@Smzxe at high power, a RWD is slower than AWD.

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 🤣 they are absolutely not

@@Smzxe you even confirmed it in your comment XD

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 RWD cars limited by traction not power Acceleration is Faster on RWD cars if both have cars have same weight same power from roll unless the traction is the issue

@@Smzxe that's exactly what I meant.

no it's not stock h2r, this h2r has +360hp, stock is slower

@@Seventh7Art Yes, 70hp more makes a difference. We'll see how fast the McLaren P1 successor will be.

​@@jozefjozefczyk3936 😂 dragtimes McLaren P1 did 10.2 sec @149 mph hitting with two people in the car motortrend got 9.8 sec @150 mph on a slightly better surface on a race track There's a video of P1 hitting 100-200 km/h in 3.9-4.0 seconds Ain't no way a slow 296 will even keep up 296 GTB never did better than 10.3 on Carwow multiple different 296 gtbs

@@Smzxe 296gtb achieves 9.9s on good surfaces, mclaren p1 is faster at higher speeds.

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 That's a fake tuned 296 GTB going downhill or some kind of ECU tune Fuel exhaust something Carwow drag raced 4 different 296 GTBs including the Asseto Fiarano package all of them did 10.3 seconds quarter mile Best one was blue 296 GTB did 10.2 sec @142 mph AutoTopNL Autobahn has much better conditions he did 10.0 sec @143 mph three runs he got same time Where's 9.9?? Never saw it And 296 GTB was running on best tires in business the Cup2Rs Others you see running 9.8s 9.9s are tuned ones

@@Smzxe tuned 296gtb? XD on Carwow the best time of the McLaren 720s was 10.4s and on AutoTopNL the McLaren 720s did 9.9s, was that also tuned?

Is there any comparison of the acceleration of cars or motorcycles that you would like to see?

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 not really

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 H2R vs Moto GP vs Formula 1 vs..... Rimac Nevera.... 0-300 km/h

@@Seventh7Art ok, it can be done soon.

​@@Seventh7Art the 0-300km/h comparison is already available.

@@Smzxe yes, m4cs is almost as fast as m5cs.

AUDI weights 2065kg! Do you imagine the RS7 with 1850Kg like the M5? 😂😂

@@Namek117still not winning 😀 if audi is heavy thats audis problem lol

Lulu lembo fenboy 😂 765LT is slowww after 250 kph 750s even slower McLaren 720s is much faster than both from 100-350 km/h 720s absolutely destroys the Revuelto Even if you give Lambo Headstart in rolling race 720s will still catch up and fly by the Lambo

@@Smzxe Like the way the almighty flew by u when he was sharing common sense right?💀🤡.... Coming from a guy who uses GTA to determine a cars real performance very childish and stupid of a person who calls him self a car enthusiasts what a waste of time talking to someone who is thinking like my 5yr old brother... LMFAO 🤣🤣

​@@Smzxebro is acoustic the Lamborghini can beat the 750s and 720s and 765lt get facts right

​@@HhuuBnnot in Rolling race

​@@SmzxeIt's quite the opposite, scrambled, it destroys both of them without much drama. 😂😂😂

@@O-Musashi yes it was a mistake, correctly it is 1/8mile 6.7s 194km/h

@@Isma_s58 it was the best 1/4mile time of 765lt in normal road.haha

@@Travelwithsubhajit2.0-r9f so why ferrari win 😅

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 s10000rr win I tell

H2R easily beats S1000rr​@@jozefjozefczyk3936

​@@jurandas00h2r have 100hp more 🤦

​@@Travelwithsubhajit2.0-r9f296gtb cross 300km/h first lol

@@Smzxe how BTtuned bike is stock bike 😅

@@Seventh7Art I have a comparison of the acceleration of this cbr1000rr and s plaid in a short video.

@@Smzxe the owner of the honda wrote that it was a stage 2.

How do you know that? Like you know that Chiron has "delayed V-box with lag" as if other cars are tested with non-delayed Vbox? You are mythomaniac.... You imagine things and then you believe they are real and try to convince everyone. This is a psychological disorder.

@@Seventh7Art s plaid have more power and more torque.

It was ran in the night in which wind speed will prevent it from making better performance get that to your head kid

If it's slower than a plaid ....How cm it beat the Tesla on Carwow during the rolling races the Lamborghini revuelto left a car or two cars length for the Tesla behind

@@NwosuChimaobi-gb7hq s plaid is faster in drag race and roll race revuelto can't even beat sf90 stradale. S Plaid beat sf90 stradale every time.

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 No need to argue go and watch Lamborghini revuelto vs Tesla model s plaid drag and roll race on Carwow

@@adityasreekar5308 short gear Turbo s can much faster than 300kph

@@Seventh7Art with more power and torque.

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 It also weigh half a ton more!

@@Seventh7Art yes you are right.

​@@Seventh7Artyes it use batteries you can't do nothing about this. Batteries weighs.

@@Smzxe i don't have video with unlocked CBR. On mototop only 295kph max speed.

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 I'm talking locked CBR Mototop did 100-200 3.6 seconds while wheeling CBR can hit 100-200 in 3.4 seconds

@@Smzxe still chiron ss smash Agera RS on 1/4 and 1/2mile.

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 Chiron SS is fastest at 1 mile it's top end + AWD makes it much Faster Jesko absolut 1 mile time is 21.6 seconds Standard Chiron did 20.8 seconds 1 mile Chiron SS will go much Faster

M1000r have more power and less weight than Hayabusa lol.

@@Travelwithsubhajit2.0-r9f no

@@achraf9946 The m1000r is a naked bike so it has a problem with the wind, but you're right, the bus is good.

30% heavier, but 40% more torque.

Anche 3 motore

@@djaouedmansour835 look at the GPS speedometer not at the shit tacho error.

I CANT I CANT YOURE EVERYWHERE

@@risekujikawa7763 they have the same 0-200 km/h and 1/4mile.

@@retrofrost9433 yes

@@Travelwithsubhajit2.0-r9f Turbo s was faster 0-300 kph, SF90 stradale won over 300kph.

@@jozefjozefczyk3936there’s no chance for the turbo S . And by the way the best number for the SF90 on the quarter mile is 9.3s 😊

@@RIC-ux3wx A 1000/1050hp Turbo S by ESMOTOR UK did 1/4 mille in 9.12secs in rainy conditions ☺️

@@rogersveliu5947 show me one could do it then we could talk

@@rogersveliu5947 The SF90 has 986 horsepower, right? I want one that has the same power or less could do 9.3s in a normal surface. Then we can talk.

@@benjaalmonacid2096 this is full stock zx6r.

296gtb and 765lt ,750s will smash 488 pista in drag race.

@@stripy1984 with good driver non prepped surface 720s eats 296 GTB or both are evenly matched in terms of performance 720s has the edge it has better traction it's faster on top end Just get Toyo R888r tires on both 720s will easily smoke the 296 GTB

@@stripy1984 296gtb is 0.5s quickest on 1/4mile than 488 pista,kido.

@@Smzxe Like i said,if u belive in dreams

​@stripy1984 720S has run a best of 9.7@145mph on Dragtimes. Car was stock and it did this in FL. Heat on a prepped track. Look it up yourself. So your saying the 296 can run mid to low 9's stock ??!!!. ahhhh. The 296 cannot beat the SF90, so no it cannot beat either McLaren 720 S or 765 LT which runs low to mid 9's and hits 60mph in 2.3 seconds. These are all facts, just take the time to watch the videos. 296 is Gorgeous 😍 just not as quick.😊

@@Smzxe this was bad launch 0-100kph 3.35s so 1/4mile about 10.0s

Person that's every bloody where

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 0-100 3.2 100-200 3.6 200-250 3.2 this is a 9.8 quarter mile buddy for a bike Not for cars Thats why Aprilia was ahead of H2R H2R was struggling that would have got a 9.9 He managed 9.5 seconds quarter mile on H2R on different test tho Kenan Sofunglu H2R did 9.4 sec @173 mph against Redbull RB8 F1 cars 9.48 sec @168 mph

@@bugattichiron8784 XD stop joking, when the m1000rr has 35kph, the ferrari has 38kph, they both start almost identically.

0:14 The car starts when the bike is at 25kph

@@31keyser43 look on gps measure lol

​@@31keyser43 buddy watch the GPS speedometer Bike at 4 km/h and SF90 1 km/h There's 0.1 millisecond of difference Won't matter anyways bike is quicker and it's speed and acceleration is restricted completely Meanwhile SF90 AWD has advantage and it's top speed is already unlocked

@@Travelwithsubhajit2.0-r9f yes,faster top end.

765lt have ~850hp stock, sf90 stradale 1000hp

​@@jozefjozefczyk3936885hp stock

765lt has 885hp, its lighter and its rwd, less powertrain loss, propably even more areodinamic

McLaren 765LT has 765 Wheel Horsepower at the wheels It's 880 BHP at Crank SF90 makes 986 BHP 765LT is Dry 1330 KG and 1370 KG with fluids SF90 is 1590-1670 KG with fluids 765LT is almost 200 KG lighter than SF90 having better power to weight ratio SF90 is only faster because of AWD hybrid assist and more Torque and higher top speed McLaren 765LT has shorter gearing quicker mid range acceleration it falls on top end slower than a 720s 765LT top speed is around 325 km/h They claim 330 km/h or 205 mph SF90 has stronger low end similar mid range and faster top end acceleration and higher top speed around 348 km/h on GPS

Yes but m1000r was quickest 100-250 kph

Nah it is cause it was a simple rlly cheap Varner of bmw like it ain’t cheap it’s expensive a lot but it’s not made for doing these things it’s made for crushing but m1000RR d… don’t even look at it

I used a video where the 720s has slower acceleration because the Honda also has slower acceleration here 100-200 4.20s for the CBR is an average result.