Відео

Inviting, compelling and a drive to action!

Can you please upload a high-quality version of your Ronald Akers video?

Sabit kura geçtiğimiz söyleniyor

06:50 Steps to protect Scientific Integrity - Data Archiving for replication. - Restriction on data and sensitivity. - Submit the program - Protocols of the use of the 30+ flowchart of COPE 09:23 audience inputs - Retractions guidelines 10:30 - Timeline and link to issues in original article page 16:46 - Data & whistleblowers COPE flowchart : investigation of anonymous comments 20:30 - Investigation by contacted institution: is that good enough 24:45 - human ethics and ORB approval requests 28:14 ? - Internal discipline, quality of investigation, 31:17 - Critical investigation of behaviour and motivation 33:53 - whistleblower and anonymity 39:00 - Public war attached to an investigation 39:54 - Protections of the readers 45:00 - Automatic proactive tests checks 48:00 - Impact on the people being researched 52:00 - Improvements of the peer-review process 55:00 - Committee on Scientific Integrity distinct of journal or ethic committee 56:00

Sorry I had to miss the conference this year. Thank you for taking leadership in this important topic. It is important to also look at integrity in research design. Confirmation bias design has become more subtle, but present, across disciplines within social science.