- 272
- 41 826
Eradicate Hate Global Summit
Приєднався 27 сер 2021
The Eradicate Hate Global Summit was born out of the Tree of Life massacre that took place in Pittsburgh in October 2018, motivated by anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant hatred resulting in the largest loss of life in an anti-Semitic event in U.S. history. Rather than remain victims of hate, we have resolved to convert what happened into the most significant anti-hate rule of law initiative in the world and, to that end, are bringing together multi-disciplinary global experts and leaders who are committed to the eradication of hate speech and violent extremism-in all its forms -around the world.
Відео
Advancing Rule of Law Solutions in the Fight Against Hate Fueled Violence
Переглядів 2321 годину тому
Advancing Rule of Law Solutions in the Fight Against Hate Fueled Violence
Follow the Money: Disrupting Hate Financing
Переглядів 2121 годину тому
Follow the Money: Disrupting Hate Financing
The Cure for Hate: Film Screening and Discussion
Переглядів 2621 годину тому
The Cure for Hate: Film Screening and Discussion
Resourcing the Field Igniting Philanthropic Investment
Переглядів 3121 годину тому
Resourcing the Field Igniting Philanthropic Investment
Keynote: Tara Levine, President, Foundation to Combat Antisemitism
Переглядів 42День тому
Keynote: Tara Levine, President, Foundation to Combat Antisemitism
Investing in Survivor Narrative: Building a Sustainable Speakers Forum
Переглядів 39День тому
Investing in Survivor Narrative: Building a Sustainable Speakers Forum
Bringing Together Communities Confronted by Faces of Hate: The Community Relations Service Approach
Переглядів 2414 днів тому
Bringing Together Communities Confronted by Faces of Hate: The Community Relations Service Approach
Success Stories: Reducing Individual Risk
Переглядів 2314 днів тому
Success Stories: Reducing Individual Risk
Success Stories: Keeping Communities Safe
Переглядів 4014 днів тому
Success Stories: Keeping Communities Safe
Keynote: Gabrielle Giffords, Co-Founder, Giffords
Переглядів 1614 днів тому
Keynote: Gabrielle Giffords, Co-Founder, Giffords
Keynote: Major Elliott Garrett, Chief Washington Correspondent, CBS News
Переглядів 2914 днів тому
Keynote: Major Elliott Garrett, Chief Washington Correspondent, CBS News
Reducing the Risk of Political Violence
Переглядів 3814 днів тому
Reducing the Risk of Political Violence
Crafting Caring Conversations in Conflict
Переглядів 8814 днів тому
Crafting Caring Conversations in Conflict
Take Action to Keep Your Community Safe
Переглядів 482 місяці тому
Take Action to Keep Your Community Safe
Register Today for the 2024 Eradicate Hate Global Summit
Переглядів 1493 місяці тому
Register Today for the 2024 Eradicate Hate Global Summit
The woman in this video speaks really well and knowing she is important in this field makes me feel better. Happy you are all out there protecting us!
The "Constitutional Sheriff's Peace Officer Association" is a misnomer and people who believe them on their face are essentially buying into a fraud. Being Oath Keepers who are in law enforcement, they are actually an "Anti-constitutional militia extremist terrorist organization" who should be "regulated" and not "regulators" lest they begin railroading, witch-hunting, engaging in stigmatic governmental misconduct, or otherwise engaging in brutality and discrimination, just a handful of things that can go wrong in the hands of criminals pretending to be law enforcement. They are pure saboteurs.
Every American Read your Constitution. Be worthy of your selfies.
Non-partisan. Right.
When racist democrats tell you constitutional Sheriffs are an extremist group it's time to join the Sheriff's. 😆. The party of slavery - the KKK - is telling us that Constitutional Sheriffs are bad 🤣. The only thing that stands between us and any unconstitutional tyrannical law they want enforced. These are the people Malcolm X warned us about.
You would have to be a complete fool to give the federal government that can be compromised by any outside force, power over your Sheriff. Basic logic 😂.
It figures a bunch of liberal woman with no clue trying to tell everyone what they should think about the sheriffs obeying and uphold>ng the constitution when they are the ones subverting the constitution
Your feelings do not make it a hate crime. BTW, it is crime.... When did you get to decide someone "hates" you, just because it made you cry?
Lol did he say Telegram--You carry the gossip app/device in your pocket and don't know what it is?
Far left extremism is still extremism by definition of the term. Violence is included in this umbrella. Both ends are equally bad there is no one is less violent than the other, theee is just an accepted position that the far right is the boogeyman without understanding the dangers building on the far left. Its why the west is so politically divided
Sounds pretty soft on the far left lol, it like it pains them talk about their own in a negative light lol
"It's not grounded by any kind of law created by the courts."??? WHAT!?!? And now I'm supposed to sit & listen to these people while believing they know anything whatsoever about the,Constitution?? My goodness. Under our constitution, the courts most assuredly *can not* create laws, people!! I'm SO sick of ignorant talk about "caselaw," which does not exist! If you're feeling complused by your programming to lash out & disagree, first off I'd ask you to actually read your constitution before making a f%$# of yourself, as well as ask you to show me where, exactly, in the law books these laws are written down? But you don't even need to do that. Just turn on your brain for one second, & consider the fact that case precedents can be found to support either side of virtually any case, & that's not something even the most deluded lawyers, judges, legal scholars, or anyone else will deny. So, that being true, if SCOTUS holdings or lower court rulings all somehow magically become laws, then that necessarily means there are directly opposite & conflicting laws regarding virtually every imaginable legal matter that exists in this country? Hopefully folks logic circuits aren't so irreversibly fried that they cannot understand what an unintellignle mess, & impossibility that situatiion puts us in? 1st guy- "Well, the law created by this holding & these other two rulings over here say I can do X, so I need to be released." 2nd guy- "Sorry sir, but I figured out that the holdings over in these two cases over here say you can't, so apparently you're going up the river." Preposterous! I sure hope this isn't going to continue this way, but so far between that statement, & a number of others I've heard, it ain't looking to promising?
So "far left extremists" when they do use violence, do so extremely rarely and most often utilize "melee" weapons- aka, "pick up the nearest thing to you". Unlike the far right who often arrive intentionally carrying 🔫s. Also "far left extremists" evidently inflict the most "violence" on properties and businesses. Not people. Look- for those far less frequent cases where REAL HUMAN BEINGS were harmed by left wing activists, thats awful. The loss of life is a tragedy for those peoples loved ones and I feel empathy for all involved with losing a loved one. That being said- NO, a group that primarily attacks PROPERTY and businesses is not in any way comparable to white $uprɛm@c1$t$ who want actual human beings un @l1vɛd. Obviously the R w1ng extremists are the problem.
These women are full of lies. The Sherriff's are the ones to call to get the FEDs out of our states and keep the policy enforcers at bay. If the legislative brach controls our elected Sherriff's then, our states are in trouble. Then we need to unelect our legislative body with all brand new constitutional representives.
Can you say Communist trying too overturned I will God return our god-given rights and our constitutional protections? The Sherriff's are the only elected by the people true law enforcement in our land. The new government UNITED STATES of AMERICA is in the 10 square mile radius of Washing DC. They are not the orgional government set up by We the People.
the solution to this is equality for men in dating/relationships. the average woman can go on a dating app and easily find acceptance by many men when it comes to both sex and relationships. the average man will likely get no matches and feel invisible. incels are resentful for the same reason anyone would be resentful over gender inequality. we just want what women have. we don't think it's OK that our sexual/romantic/reproductive autonomy is so much less than our female counterpart just because of our genital parts. the average woman swipes right on <5% of men while the average man swipes right on 60% of women. this is blatantly going to lead to gender inequality and male loneliness/sexlessness. it's all well and good making interventions to help men, but to solve gender issues, the solution has to come from both sides; we can't just focus on the shortcomings of men. as a society we need to have a conversation with women about the unrealistic standards they set on men in dating. if men were only going for the top 5% of women, they wouldn't like it either.
I'm not sure I follow your perspective on men just wanting what women have unless your referring to having sex with them. You make some good points but neither myself nor I suspect most of the men I know are unhappy being men and maybe that's why we don't have much of an issue being with or without a woman. It sounds like the problem your expressing is rooted in social media which might not be a bad thing if it's possible for some of these kids to get off line. It might just be that women want to meet men in a different environment or that meeting them in a different environment would be more successful. In the end, in my experience, women don't want men who want what a woman has anyway, they want men who know they are men and show it. Thats the beauty of the two completely different sexes is that they can only make a whole when their together. No need to be jealous of what the other has if your together.
@@Mike-tc8ob "no need to be jealous of what the other has if you're together" you are misinterpreting what I'm saying. I'm talking about gender inequality. back when women weren't allowed in the workplace, they complained (and rightfully so) that they want what men have so they can have financial equality to men. men gave women that financial equality and women can work and there is no longer a pay gap. however equality comes from both sides. even though it's 2024, men do not have sexual equality with women. the average woman has far more sexual autonomy than men do, just like how in the past men had more financial autonomy than women did. yes, social media has exacerbated this inequality by increasing male competition from a small social circle to the whole city...but it doesn't have to be this way if we teach women the damaging impact unrealistic standards have on men.
@@klimtkiller I understand where you’re coming from but I disagree. For many reasons. One being, women do NOT have more sexual autonomy than men do. That’s one. Men absolutely have sexual equality to women. Women in fact have less autonomy than men hence, abortion rights being taken away & the strange scarcity on contraceptives. Women can no longer risk to be as sexual as they were before since they don’t have much autonomy anymore. Men want to require these things not realizing they are the main problem. Women aren’t going for the top 10% men. Women are actually okay being alone now. They are also retreating from unhealthy relationships & refusing to settle. A woman isn’t low hanging fruit. In a true natural environment, majority of men wouldn’t even have access to women they would have to earn it. Your argument is about men having automatic access to sex & a variety to choose from. That’s not something men are entitled to. Men earn that. The male’s main biological goal is sex. We all know that by now. But it doesn’t mean women have to give that away freely for men to not lose their sanity & become a complete detriment & terrible dangerous human beings to society. There are many ways society can help men. But let’s keep it real. The entire society was meant to benefit men more than women. Patriarchy is an assistance for men. Very problematic system though. I think men need to become better citizens without depending on automatic access to sex from women. Women are not the property of men. Most women want to be left alone nowadays, because men have not evolved. The man needs to evolve past his lower nature. The world is tired of war, chaos, violence, ma*sacres, se*hale violence at the hands of men. It’s a global issue & it’s entirely out of hand. More access to women will NOT change men. Men had aaaall the access to women back then & still didn’t become better human beings, still didn’t stop war, famine, resource hoarding, you name it. Women in fact need to keep retreating because way too many men are unsafe. Work on yourselves.
Ultimate soyfest
Is Grady Judd connected to this???
No. Are you kidding? Other than the 2nd Amendment(which t'is an excellent that he supports at least somethinh from that document, the highest law in the land), that criminal tyrant doesn't give one iota of a f%$# about the constitution? In fact he clearly despises most of it, if he knows it at all?
“Whoever is against Fascism is in favor of Freedom. 🗽⚖️📜🇺🇸🫡🪖
Still waiting to hear him talk about the hate crime coverup of what we see when we google “arrest homicide”, and click images.
This summit of Karen's are what's destroying America. CSPOA is not anti government. They are pro American and don't want the Feds hurting anyone if they weren't doing anything bad. What's wrong with a sheriff arresting everyone if they think the Feds are right?
The Southern Poverty Law Center website has an interesting article about the CSPOA.
I know where to send my $17.76 now, thank you. It's easy to cast strawman arguments when you're sitting comfortably in a silo by the way.
Fools are spreading lies.
😂
1984..
I am afraid that the reason for the radicalization escapes the debaters. What they describe are not causes, they are symtoms. The underlying problem is the disconnection of social elites from the rest of society. The problems faced by the "ordinary eu citizen" are quite different. At the same time, EU policies often lead to "costs" shouldered by the lower and middle classes. So while people at conferences, in Brussels or in a French café are fretting that climate change is such a pressing problem that it is a shame that we are not doing more, the rest of society is dealing with expensive cars, a failing car industry, expensive energy, rising crime or unaffordable housing. There are more examples like this - but they have one thing in common. Russia will smile and start serving up every idealistic EU measure (but not only that) to its target group - of course, exaggerating and directing it appropriately to achieve the necessary effect. There is a growing sense of disconnection from mainstream society - people do not identify with the direction and values of the EU. All of this is exacerbated by the EU's democratic deficit and the limited scope for voters to direct the EU by voting in elections. So the problem is that Russia does have a role in the current radicalisation - but it is not the primary cause. The primary cause is the mismatch between the EU political mainstream and the voter base. Of course, the reasons are multiple and vary by country. Fundamentally, however, society needs to be given the opportunity to identify with the direction of the state/EU. If we allow a significant proportion of the population to live with a sense of alienation, they can easily be radicalised. // However, to confess - it escapes me what makes classical anti-Semitism "interesting". For while many other "radicalizing" topics have a bit of truth that disinformationists exaggerate, antisemitism is based on bullshit with no connection to reality. I can't think of a better explanation than that the extremists have left it in their notes from earlier and so, even though it makes no sense, they repeat it out of obligation.
This is such garbage I've been making content about intersexual dynamics for the past 3 years I just found out what an incell is today. You guys are standing on the backs of the victims of those horrible situations in order to attack what you consider misogyny or toxic masculinity. There is nothing wrong with being a masculine man that doesn't want to date a prostitute or a sex worker.
Alice, you are a disgrace for condemning the Palestine resistance and not condemning the zzionist who mass murdereds over 20000 people
Al Mansoori will discuss how AI can be used to promote sustainable development and peace. He will also talk about the importance of developing ethical standards for the use of AI.
Al Mansoori is a leader in the fields of AI and space travel. He is a strong advocate for using AI to solve global problems. He believes that AI has the potential to change the world in positive ways.
why is the sound so low on this video?
END THE OCCUPATION....FREE PALESTINE!!! END APARTHEID ZIONISM!!!!
Never in my life will I ever vote 👍
The hate group is this board of women. They actually say they hate the Sheriffs, The board is of white separatists women. They don’t want law, rights or truth. If they don’t get that they haven’t listened to CSPOA. Theses women are criminals. The Sheriff’s need to arrest criminals.
Cus we wouldn't want to follow the Constitution, would we? OMG! You people are deranged.
Great program. I'd love to join the organization 🌍🇬🇲
We had a constitutional sheriff in Pierce County WI. She left office because of health reasons but her anti government and fringe beliefs that the sheriff has more authority than the president shows what happens when extremist hold public office.
0:40. I would fire anyone who showed a graph like this without first defining the methodology. They should also address any confounders that could assist in explaining this trend that falls outside of the thesis being advanced. None of that is done here because this is not real science or real data. It is politics masquerading as something more legitimate.
keep watching
You literally don't know what you're talking about; you're not Jewish, you're probably not another minority, and you have no idea what it's like to be targeted as a group. You're completely emotionally and intellectually removed, and come here to criticize a group who was formed to document hate and fight it. But what do haters do who CAUSE the hate? They try to discredit the ADL. It's another form of trying to twist the truth and get uninformed and/or bigoted people to jump on the bandwagon.
If we look at physical violence, black-on-white violence is orders of magnitude more common than white-on-black. Can you give me the time stamp where this was mentioned? There has to be a reason that this is the only type of violence that isn't worth mention in the description.
MYORKAS NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. HE HAS COMMITTED PERJURY AND TREASON !!
Scott is a great guy. I had the privilege of working with some local things with him. He was always available and listened to what intel was given to him. Thank you for all you have done Scott.
Right wing extremism: mass murder. Left wing extremism: property damage. How they equate the two is beyond me.
Because in the labour market people are considered (human) capital and therefore they have a price, and as such they can be compared quantitatively to inanimate capital.
I voted Obama and trump myself .
Every US state should have a Mapping Project
Look at this WHITE PANEL of ISRAELI WHITE SUPREMACISTS talking about how "racist" it is to catch them slipping. LOL! Israel and Judaism are the two most RACIST entities on the planet and they scream the loudest about "racism".lol
Every comment on here is 🔥
This summit is amazing. I will promote it on whatever channels and platforms I can.
Making McCords proud!
kick these radical, far-right, pos out of law enforcement. Lol a neo-constitutional sheriff is the boss of The President, The Constitution, and The Federal Government based on their politics.