AZ Lawyer
AZ Lawyer
  • 338
  • 624 227
🚨 Arizona Police: What Happens if You Violate Admonishments During an Internal Investigation? 🚔
🚔 Attention Arizona Law Enforcement Officers! 🚨 Do you know what could happen if you violate the admonishment not to speak to others during an internal investigation? This video covers everything you need to know about the consequences of speaking out when you're the subject of an ongoing probe.
When you're under internal investigation, keeping silent is NOT just a suggestion-it's a professional requirement. But why? What happens if you ignore this rule? Whether you're in Arizona law enforcement or anywhere else, understanding these rules is crucial for every officer's career.
In this video, we’ll break down:
✅ What an admonishment is in law enforcement
✅ Why officers must NOT talk to others during an internal investigation
✅ The serious consequences of violating this rule (yes, it could lead to charges or termination!)
✅ Best practices for officers during internal investigations
Whether you’re a rookie or a seasoned officer, understanding internal investigations and what’s at stake is essential. Learn how to protect yourself, maintain your integrity, and avoid common mistakes that could jeopardize your career.
🔴 If you're part of law enforcement, don't miss this crucial info! 🔴
Make sure to subscribe for more insider tips, legal info, and best practices for law enforcement officers in Arizona and beyond!
👉 Like this video if you found it helpful, comment below with any questions, and share with your fellow officers!
#ArizonaLawEnforcement | #InternalInvestigation | #PoliceTraining | #OfficerConduct | #LawEnforcementTips | #PoliceAccountability | #OfficerRights | #PoliceMisconduct
Переглядів: 668

Відео

🚨 What Does Trump's Re-election Mean for the Phoenix PD Investigation? 🚔
Переглядів 814День тому
🚨 Big Questions in Law Enforcement! 🚨 With Trump’s second election now in the rearview, many are asking: What does this mean for the Department of Justice-especially when it comes to the ongoing investigation into the Phoenix Police Department? 🤔 In this video, we dive into what could happen next for the Phoenix PD, how a new political climate could affect DOJ priorities, and what Arizona law e...
Puente v. City of Phoenix (Protesters Sue Phoenix P.D.)
Переглядів 2,3 тис.14 днів тому
Putene v. The City of Phoenix is a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion several years in the making. In 2017, while protesting a Trump rally, protesters turned violent. Police responded and were sued with claims of excessive uses of force. This opinion is important because it addresses the issue of protesters blocking roads or attempting to enter security barriers. Check it out!
New York Times v Sullivan
Переглядів 42421 день тому
It seems like the media is often biased against law enforcement officers. After all, dramatic news sells well and it's a lot less dramatic to say that officers are making the best decisions in tough situations. But when is too much - too much? When can a police officer, sheriff's deputy, state trooper, or other LEO sue the press for what they say. The United States Supreme Court actually set th...
Be Careful Using Personal Phones
Переглядів 620Місяць тому
In law enforcement, officers can be held over for any number of reasons. Police officers are familiar with updating family and friends when they have been held over, or are okay after a critical incident. Sheriff's deputies, state troopers, and every other type of LEO should also be aware of the risk involved by using your phone - personal or work - on a scene. Check out the video for more.
Forming a Local Organization
Переглядів 93Місяць тому
For the best client representation, AZCOPS partners with local organizations all over Arizona. LEOs know their home agency better than anyone! If a police officer, sheriff's deputy, or state trooper needs a rep, who better to help than a team of the best police attorneys in Arizona and a friend from work? Local organization leaders have valuable insight into their communities and are absolutely...
Top 3 Videos on the Channel (Thanks for 5000 Subs!)
Переглядів 186Місяць тому
Thanks for watching our channel. Whether you are an Arizona law enforcement officer - a state trooper - a sheriff's deputy - other LEO - or citizen - we appreciate the time you take to watch our videos. It makes our mission of providing quality educational content to law enforcement officers worth it. Check out the video.
5 Habits for Mental Health Wellness
Переглядів 173Місяць тому
This may be one of the biggest issues facing individual law enforcement officers today; mental health. Police officers are subject to everyone else's worst day. Knowing that, it's no surprise that a state trooper, sheriff's deputy or other cop would be under constant pressure mentally. After all, LEOs are just people and all people need to maintain their mental health. Check out the video for t...
Using Discretion During Emergency Driving
Переглядів 6422 місяці тому
Most deputies, troopers, and local police are generally familiar with the Arizona Revised Statutes that govern emergency vehicle operation, and that's great! This video simply addresses the difference between "allowed" and "best practice" when it comes to EVO. Check out the video!
Here is What We've Found Wrong with the DOJ Report SO FAR
Переглядів 2,4 тис.2 місяці тому
The United Stated Department of Justice Phoenix report seems to be a poorly researched document full of mischaracterizations. We have provided examples - and more may follow. With so many obvious blunders, it's a wonder anyone would consider using the report as the basis for anything. Check out the video for more!
U.S. v. Johns - Searching Vehicles
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 місяці тому
U.S. v. Johns is an older case , but one every law enforcement officer should want to know. This case established precedent that might allow a cops, deputy, or trooper to change the way they complete searches of vehicles once they have probable cause! Check it out! For further guidance on vehicle searches - check out my video on Arizona v. Gant - ua-cam.com/video/NadoLHHKKcs/v-deo.html
Redacting an Officer's Image from Public Record
Переглядів 9302 місяці тому
Did you know that Arizona State law allows police, deputies and troopers to request that their face be removed from videos and images accessible to the public? That's right! in fact, any cop or LEO can ask that a judge issue an order to do just that. These simple steps in this video can help any department, administrator, or law enforcement officer to better protect the men and women who serve ...
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U10 - The Domestic Violence Incident
Переглядів 6983 місяці тому
This video addresses an allegation by the United States Department of Justice that the Phoenix Police Department engaged in a pattern or practice of unconstitutional policing related to officers responding to a man engaged in domestic violence offenses.
Brady List - Common Misconceptions
Переглядів 1,2 тис.3 місяці тому
What is the Brady list? How do you end up on the Brady list? Is the Brady list a list of liars? Can I get fired for being placed on the Brady list? This video addresses some common misconceptions officers and others may have about the Brad List.
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U34 - Pepperball
Переглядів 1,4 тис.3 місяці тому
This video addresses an allegation by the United States Department of Justice that the Phoenix Police Department engaged in a pattern or practice of unconstitutional policing related to officers deploying a pepper ball gun while responding to a call involving behavior health problems
US vs. Nora - Residential Callouts
Переглядів 9 тис.3 місяці тому
US vs. Nora - Residential Callouts
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U01 - Matthew Begay
Переглядів 9414 місяці тому
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U01 - Matthew Begay
Chong and Tran vs US - 4th Amendment Violations
Переглядів 1,4 тис.4 місяці тому
Chong and Tran vs US - 4th Amendment Violations
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U04 - James Garcia
Переглядів 8464 місяці тому
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U04 - James Garcia
Chinaryan vs. the City of Los Angeles
Переглядів 4,5 тис.4 місяці тому
Chinaryan vs. the City of Los Angeles
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U08 - Jacob Harris
Переглядів 1,4 тис.4 місяці тому
DOJ Phoenix Report - #U08 - Jacob Harris
United States v. Anderson
Переглядів 8864 місяці тому
United States v. Anderson
Critical Incident Effects on Family
Переглядів 2104 місяці тому
Critical Incident Effects on Family
NEW Lights on Personal Vehicles!
Переглядів 5945 місяців тому
NEW Lights on Personal Vehicles!
How to Leave Your Agency
Переглядів 4795 місяців тому
How to Leave Your Agency
United States v. Payne (5th Amendment and Phone Biometrics)
Переглядів 5835 місяців тому
United States v. Payne (5th Amendment and Phone Biometrics)
Meinecke v. Seattle (1st Amendment Restrictions)
Переглядів 1,8 тис.5 місяців тому
Meinecke v. Seattle (1st Amendment Restrictions)
US v. Ramirez - Officer Safety Questions
Переглядів 1,9 тис.5 місяців тому
US v. Ramirez - Officer Safety Questions
Grants Pass v Johnson - Public Camping Laws
Переглядів 1,1 тис.6 місяців тому
Grants Pass v Johnson - Public Camping Laws
The Department of Justice Phoenix Report is Filled with Lies
Переглядів 8 тис.6 місяців тому
The Department of Justice Phoenix Report is Filled with Lies

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @emunoz01
    @emunoz01 12 днів тому

    Great presentation

  • @jeteagle1457
    @jeteagle1457 12 днів тому

    Justice can start again

  • @mosherubin7338
    @mosherubin7338 12 днів тому

    Any chance the DOJ investigators can be Brady Listed?

  • @craighohmann9534
    @craighohmann9534 13 днів тому

    Does that mean, Rape kits are certified untampered tested. Charges for dereliction of duties and aiding Rapists. When rape kits are not tested.?

  • @craighohmann9534
    @craighohmann9534 13 днів тому

    They are fired and dismissed to retirement. To not be charged for violating American's inalienable Constitutional protections rights and freedoms.

  • @whitmore524
    @whitmore524 13 днів тому

    Is this in effect?

  • @patrickshansoff
    @patrickshansoff 14 днів тому

    The officers should have said they were looking for a notice of suspension.

  • @user-sb3du4oq8e
    @user-sb3du4oq8e 14 днів тому

    So let’s say a particular media outlet puts a story out that comes from the DOJ website and a specific website put out by a police department that gave the media all the facts surrounding all facts involved in the case. Yet, this particular news outlet didn’t show all the facts provided which spun the story in a completely different way after omitting specific facts. The media outlet also did a public records request to have even more facts surrounding the incident explained and still refused to show all the facts in the story, placing the officers reputation in jeopardy amidst the community and placing the officer in danger if people contacted had seen the same story from the news outlet. Wouldn’t having all the facts and not presenting the facts show that the reporter knowingly falsely reported the story by omitting key facts to the incidents?

  • @moongypsyguerrero1925
    @moongypsyguerrero1925 16 днів тому

    Wouldn't a cop,or some officers use his gun to defend his canine partner?

  • @jaibusby673
    @jaibusby673 17 днів тому

    Funny thing is the this violence noted in 1:05 was PhxPD shooting pepperballs at "the ground" which you know is slang for anywhere below the waist of the protestors, why no video of the incident, boring youtube

    • @AZPoliceLawyer
      @AZPoliceLawyer 16 днів тому

      This video summarizes a court decision - so to remain faithful to what the Court held, I chose not to include videos of the protest. The ultimate conclusion was that PPD's decision to disperse the crowd after individuals became violent was lawful. The full opinion - which establishes what is lawful - can be found here - cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/12/19/22-15344.pdf

  • @anonymousperson9279
    @anonymousperson9279 17 днів тому

    We need to reset the judicial system it’s out of control.

  • @anonymousperson9279
    @anonymousperson9279 17 днів тому

    Dispersing the crowd is a 1st amendment violation.

    • @AZPoliceLawyer
      @AZPoliceLawyer 16 днів тому

      Not after individuals in the crowd engage in unlawful behavior. cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/12/19/22-15344.pdf

  • @craighohmann9534
    @craighohmann9534 17 днів тому

    D O J Derelicts Obstructing Justice

  • @rad4579
    @rad4579 17 днів тому

    Pure BS

    • @AZPoliceLawyer
      @AZPoliceLawyer 16 днів тому

      I'm summarizing what's in the Ninth Circuit's published opinion - which analyzed what happened and determined that the PPD's conduct on this date was lawful. If you think that I did not accurately report on what the Court held (and what the law is) please feel free to let me know. The full opinion can be found here - cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/12/19/22-15344.pdf

  • @henrystaggs9991
    @henrystaggs9991 17 днів тому

    Bull

  • @monikaramirez8067
    @monikaramirez8067 17 днів тому

    Ha ha ha ha!!! I have watched video after video after video of the Phoenix PD violating rights, being bullies, giving unlawful orders, pushing people on the street, getting in people's faces, trying to incite physicality... They're bullies who are ignorant of the law when it's convenient. Direct D's channel alone has a bunch. Cops work together to try to CREATE violations .

  • @randyeilers4061
    @randyeilers4061 18 днів тому

    Pheonix is the 2nd most corrupt police department in the country. Anything it takes to straighten out that corruption should be done.

  • @azwhitesnake2092
    @azwhitesnake2092 18 днів тому

    Is this about when individual's groins were targeted by PHX PD and a coin passed around when they hit the mark? If not, can you point me to the video you made saying the officers were wrong and should be held to a higher standard/prosecuted please

  • @raross6119
    @raross6119 18 днів тому

    Court will always be for the cop's because that's how they get paid

  • @krane15
    @krane15 18 днів тому

    Does anybody ever expect a police chief to say her men behaved unlawfully? Sometimes expectations behinds the outcome to these scenarios is comical. Or at least it would be if law-abiding citizens weren't harmed or criminalize for exercising their constitutional rights. The court are suppose to be neutral. Yet in every encounter they almost always side with the cops, not the people. Does anyone ever consider why the people are protesting in the first place? Is it because they have nothing better to do. Or is it because their rights and freedom is being threatened? There is one logical reality that authorities always tend to ignore: First, people don't riot when they're happy with their government. And second, the government serves the people. Not the other way around.

  • @ima9173
    @ima9173 19 днів тому

    Puente v city of Phoenix

  • @ronnieam33
    @ronnieam33 19 днів тому

    The DOJ and the FBI are not to be trusted ever again. They are ALL compromised!!!

  • @dee6975
    @dee6975 19 днів тому

    lol despite

  • @marck8899
    @marck8899 21 день тому

    Polygraphs are merely PROPS! Complete buffoonery, and only meant as a tool to spook out a confession from subjects. Basically, boils down to what the “operator” believes. Quack science and meaningless results other than the fact, and the only fact, they ruin peoples lives, especially truthful ones being labeled “deceptive.”

  • @wolfeman2120
    @wolfeman2120 23 дні тому

    You need to stop calling it rights. Cops have no more rights than any other citizen. They are given powers by the state. This just affirms their power and authority to perform this action. Calling them rights misconstrues what rights are.

  • @Moleinhole
    @Moleinhole 25 днів тому

    Just a question! What about the so called 1st amendment auditors that published a false video! Or video with false statements? 🤔🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸Thanks

  • @JoeGuzman-w9e
    @JoeGuzman-w9e 26 днів тому

    So is this currently in effect?

  • @ronmcmartin4513
    @ronmcmartin4513 26 днів тому

    It seems like Sullivan should have sued the MLK group. Example: "Trump wants to outlaw abortion, and eliminate Social Security & Medicare"(Both are LIES!) Leftist Media FactCheck: TRUE! (because Kamala ACTUALLY said that, so we didn't Lie). But with cops, you have to go thru one More layer of the "justice" system: Internal Affairs(Prof. Standards)-- "We investigated ourselves, and found No wrongdoing!" I find it rather hypocritical that cops are crying about the unfairness, when they have Frazier v Cupp(1969).

  • @DesertJoshB
    @DesertJoshB 27 днів тому

    The press should have to at least meet a burden of proof to be able to report. Even if it’s a small burden, it would put some faith back into what the media reports.

  • @iguanamanaz7264
    @iguanamanaz7264 Місяць тому

    I’m aware of a department who offers a stipend for sworn employees who are regularly subject to on-call status. The stipend is offered in lieu of having a government issued phone and thus having to carry two phones (one personal and one work) during on-call status. Allegedly it offsets a portion of the cost of the employee’s personal phone bill since he/she is mandated to be available by phone during those on-call periods. When the topic of subpoenas for work related calls, texts, emails, etc came up the command staff offered assurances that employees would have the opportunity to redact any personal data before release. Do you agree this practice is fraught with potential problems and should be avoided? I would think that, because the government is essentially paying the bill, it may open the door for a potential seizure of the device itself thus allowing whomever the court may appoint to analyze both personal and work data to determine what portion of that data is subject to a subpoena.

  • @andrewperez9283
    @andrewperez9283 Місяць тому

    What is Drop?

  • @DeputySage
    @DeputySage Місяць тому

    Does AZCOPS get involved in the collective barganing/meet and confer aspects? Having difficulty in Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, as they will not collectively bargan or recognize a union. They say by law they are not allowed to have meet and confer which seems strange because all the city departments around us have it.

    • @AZPoliceLawyer
      @AZPoliceLawyer Місяць тому

      We do - if you would like more information, please feel free to reach out to the AZCOPS office.

  • @dannyadams5999
    @dannyadams5999 Місяць тому

    What are the exemptions for a service vehicle if you own an auto repair facility.And have a service vehicle for roadside assistance?

  • @GClein72
    @GClein72 2 місяці тому

    US Supreme Court has maintained through case law that police have no duty to protect citizens and the ugly truth is that they don't they will only drive code 3 when it is a benefit to themselves because they have qualified immunity and do not care if they hurt the public or not

  • @ronmcmartin4513
    @ronmcmartin4513 2 місяці тому

    With the possibilty of missing-out on some extra Excessive Force used by Phoenix PD, to De-escalate the situation? NEVER! I used to be Pro-Police, but even with Dash/Bodycams, they can't control themselves.

  • @DeputySage
    @DeputySage 2 місяці тому

    Keep up the good fight, stopping the fake news of the DOJ trying to paint oficers in a bad light so the monitors and the lawyers can swoop in and start milking the city of phoenix for millions of dollars just like they have been doing at MCSO for the last ten years.

  • @AZ_Blueline503
    @AZ_Blueline503 2 місяці тому

    Love the work!

  • @d4niel457
    @d4niel457 2 місяці тому

    Cops = Government DOJ = Government Government = Bad All government is bad. Cops are the strong arm of the parasitic politicians.

  • @ChuckWood
    @ChuckWood 2 місяці тому

    The bottom line is that the current state of policing in America necessitates a comprehensive and far-reaching reform. Each day, new footage emerges that highlights instances where officers may have used excessive force, infringed on citizens' rights, or made questionable arrests. Such incidents indicate a critical need to address systemic issues within the law enforcement framework, aiming for a model that prioritizes accountability, transparency, and respect for all citizens' rights. A re-evaluation of training protocols, accountability measures, and the role of policing in communities would help build a more just and effective system. Focusing on these reforms can ensure that officers have the tools they need to serve and protect while upholding the values and freedoms central to a fair society.

  • @NicholasLatipi
    @NicholasLatipi 2 місяці тому

    when the forces of darkness battles out the forces of evil, and the taxpayers are paying for it.

  • @Somuchsawdust
    @Somuchsawdust 2 місяці тому

    Where is the body cam video of these cases

  • @crazybox7326
    @crazybox7326 2 місяці тому

    how surprising .. "we investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong" .. blah blah blah

  • @barbaraparks1759
    @barbaraparks1759 2 місяці тому

    Great job Mr. Sebalik...Keep up the outstanding work!!!!

  • @dokezmon
    @dokezmon 2 місяці тому

    lol welcome to arizona

  • @FranzBiscuit
    @FranzBiscuit 2 місяці тому

    Biden's DOJ is a real mess. The agency is obviously being misused for political purposes. Heck, they already admitted to Congress that they altered evidence in the "Trump documents trial", and that is just the tip of the iceberg! Clearly this is yet another example of them making specious accusations in order to justify their gross over-reach. Truly shameful....

  • @ned6938
    @ned6938 2 місяці тому

    Remember P-Nut and Freddy

  • @ned6938
    @ned6938 2 місяці тому

    Screw all of you tyrants.

  • @dwighthenry4298
    @dwighthenry4298 2 місяці тому

    Really, why would anyone believe and trust your biased opinion. You really want people to believe that what they actual know about policing in Phoenix that the DOJ is making it up.

  • @user-sb3du4oq8e
    @user-sb3du4oq8e 2 місяці тому

    There are several incidents that the public are curious about. Pages 113-114 and 115-116. Seems like officers can shoot multiple people and still keep their jobs. Curious how an officer can be involved in so much and still be on the street. How do you defend that? I’ve read the reports and have seen that officers get into several critical incidents within a short amount of time and can go back to work? Just to shoot another person? How? Please explain! You seem level headed, I would love to hear your take after hearing abc15

  • @DesertJoshB
    @DesertJoshB 2 місяці тому

    Share with council members.