Відео

Hii❤❤❤❤

Madam aap bulb ko apne pichhe rakh lia hai light effect chhitra gya hai

Sunder ❤

🎉

Okay waiting for your video

Dono aankho ko bandh karo aur Dhadkan me joh Aag lagi hai u se dekhte raho, Prem ka vishfot hoga.

Mujhe ek baat bataiye kisi video me aap kaafi moti dikhti h fir next video dubli kaise ho jati hai...?

😂 buddha ne kab kaha sukh kabhi nahi ayega...donot talk nonsense

Radhe Radhe sister g

Aap kahan se hai aur ye bataye ki 50 subscriber se kam hone par videos kaise dal leti h plz

Mam kis subject se h aap. Mera history se JRF hua h 99.89 Percentile. Aapka good motivation h . Kuch log result ke bad demotivate ho jate h .December me aapka pakka ho jayega JRF.mera 3 bar Net ke bad 4 bar me JRF huaa h.

I qualified net this time jitna log easy smjhte hain utna easy nhi hai ye to kuchh b nhi dear jo married women h unse puchho kitni problem hoti h mai khud married hu aur job b krti hu sari responsibility k sath pdhai but thanks to god and hubby qki o support krte hain is bar ho gya next time jrf k liye fight jari

Same here sister, i failed only 1 qus 😒,, but aap ki baat bilkul shi bol rhi 👍but koi na next exam JRF bss

Main bhi do baar fail hua tha phir teesri baar net hua aur iss baar jrf hua mera. I can understand the situation.Aapka bhi clear ho jayega .Aapne kaafi badhiya perform Kiya.

Please share your experiences with us...

Fire ma'am Grace mark ke sath Result bana rha hai NTA because cutoff kaafi kam gye hai...60 70 questions pe JRF koi ho jaye ye NTA kaise hone dega... Waise comedy achhi rahi😂

That by which Hume was able to formulate his proposition and the context in which it functioned and was considered, defines certain necessities that he could not deny OR HE COULD NOT HAVE FORMULATED IT TO BEGIN WITH. Either it is, or it ain’t. 1. He chose to employ in his proposition the concepts of billiard balls specifically to the exclusion of all other things. This cannot be questioned. This means by definition that he had to have recognized and acknowledged the (“physical?” or “sense impression”) characteristics of all of those entities from which he chose the billiard balls or how could he have decided on the billiard balls as opposed to something else such as crochet balls? So the assertion of the form and function of all of those entities in material reality that he had to have perceived (or again, he could not have made the distinct choice he did) was that by which he was able to choose. That he claimed to recognize only sense impressions does not alter the point. There is no escaping this. 2. In that he had to have recognized the physical characteristics of the billiard balls or the sense impressions of them, again, the only means by which he could have chosen them to the exclusion of all else, he had to have known that motion was not one of those characteristics. First, motion is not tangible as is all of that by which the billiard balls were defined in their physicality or the sense impressions which were drawn from them. Secondly, were motion a characteristic of billiard balls, both not just one would have been moving. That the one ball was moving (and not the other) then has to have been the effect of a cause of that motion having been imparted. There is no escaping this. 3. Then, that he had to have known that motion had to have been imparted to the moving ball, he had to have understood that that which imparted that motion was itself a moving entity for which motion was also not a characteristic. I am sorry but this is cause and effect, like it or not. What Hume did in the formulation of his theory was akin to “appealing to truths to formulate a position which denied truth”. He doesn’t get to have done that any more than the rest of us. That entities are distinct, they are that by their characteristics. That they are distinct, they are chosen for their characteristics because each imposes a specific quality (“effect”?) from which to choose. The balls were chosen because they would roll, the reality of that to which he had to have surrendered, a given because they were his choice. He did not choose bricks or the like because they wouldn’t roll, necessary to the purpose of the analogy. That recognition in part defeats his theory of no cause and effect. A final point…..the proposition that ball 1 hitting ball 2 would cause it to move, is inductive only in the most general context of consideration. However, in a sub-context where we consider that motion had to have been imparted to the moving ball, it is deductive. His theory makes no sense. What do you think?

Waah ...

क्या हुआ यार पूरा मामला बताओ

Waah kya baat hai

IQ to sb thk he, ye btao aaj cute jada LG rhi ho

Very well explained in simplest language. Highly relatable. Just try removing background noise and if possible, improve video quality. Content of videos is Great! Good luck 👍🏽

Informative

Agnostic 🎉

Oh my God I can't believe

Thanks for the video. Looking forward to watch more videos.

beauty with brain.

you are so beautiful. yahi satya hai kyuki mujhe yahi dikhayi de raha hai.

You are a 10/10 😅 🤎

I think audio and video quality can be improved , content is good

Hello Astha, good to hear that people are engaging in philosophical discourse, now talking about Hume's argument on cause and effect he simply says that we do not know why phenomenon occur predictively and what if that prediction go the other way, what explanation we have for that, scientists too says that we do not know why this (any physical phenomenon) happen but how this happen and since it is repetitive we should consider it a fact and move on because if you cling to the fact that why earth moves east to west and not the other way around then that will not bear any fruit for you

Cause and Effect (aka Causality) is a human perception. Humans are contrained by their limited sensory input. For example, we see only a limited part of EM spectrum, we can't see things at atomic scale etc. Our beliefs/ perspective / intution is has developed with what we experience around us but one should realize that it is very small fraction of the entire creation. Ultimately we are reloving around a medium sized star on a medium sized planet. Things work differently at different scales. For example, you would be knowing about dual behaviour of atomic sized particles and counter-intiutive concepts when things move at speed of light. Now coming to causality part, causality happens between two points of space-time which are space-like. For example, causality breaks inside a black hole.