Відео

@@aensti9077 I totally agree that it is not just about looks but the actual issues with the privatised healthcare system in the US, but the looks definitely made him more charming and supportable. Since he is attractive its easier to portray him as a matyr, as its a pity to have a young, healthy, good looking man be punished for an act that we could argue was for the common good. Thanks for commenting and sharing your thoughts, always good to have a convo in the comments!

@@williamray9359 the CEO personally didn't, and I did mention how messed up the healthcare industry is in the US and how many claims gets denied that costs lives

I am super grateful for the high praise🙏 these comments keep me motivated to make more content, thanks a lot!

thanks mate, appreciate it!

I'll take that, bless that guy from the airport😂

🙏🙏

Hahah thats what my friend said as well

😂😂😂

Appreciate the praise and watching the vid🙏🙏

Can only come from the heart😭😂😂

Thanks for the support as always🙏

I really agree but its so strange that its usually associated with like childhood memories, I guess those were really the best times...

Bread

Also bread

@@itsyaboidil gotta be done, lets see what they doing better

Thanks man these comments make my day!

Appreciate it man, thanks a lot!

Love bro🙏🙏

Let me know how it goes, I am quite jealous hahah

@@mylesg7278 heyya, very fair question to ask, well average net worth of a middle class family in Budapest, Hungary

🫡🫡appreciate it man! Whoever sees this give this man a follow

Heyya, long time no see, never thought I will see you again down in my comment section 😂😂. Appreciate the thorough comment. Sadly I am writing this in between a lunch break at work so excuse me if they are not the most eloquently phrased responses but I do want to at least reply to your thoughts as they deserve it. In terms of the cancel culture, wokeism side of things. I never said the right would not have similar social mechanisms in shutting down counter argumentative points, in fact u just need to get on a random 4chan or tbh Twitter page and u can already get the same treatment of being called woke or a social justice warrior just because u stand up for human rights. But what I specifically wanted to highlight is that cancel culture as a phenomenon including the term itself is a left wing thing anti-discourse mechanism that the right has defined and applied onto how extreme leftist resolve social and political debate. And the term became so widespread that all of us know about it even in pop cultural terms online and is usually associated with the left. The right is basically radicalising itself even more in response to left wing radicalisation which increases polarisation in our societies. For your point on debate, the problem that I highlight about the polarisation of our politics due to increasing anti-discourse trends on both aisles of the political spectrum causes the growing inability for us to practice democracy and I guess a closer version to intellectual political debate. Like the fact the Middle Ground show is getting filled with polarised opinions and that people like Jordan Peterson gets so much attention is a simple sign of what I just said. People getting more polarised and radicalised and they want to hear people representing the thoughts of their camps that attacks the other side. Even if you just compare the Harris v Trump debate to the VP debate in the US there is such a clear distinction between where there is a functional democratic debating format where you can propose opposing views in a much more nuanced or at least less moralising and professional manner compared whatever that shitshow was that Harris and Trump did that once again just shows where our politics are heading. I am not saying you are wrong, your observations basically align with mine, I guess I just didnt drive my point across clearly that my problem with cancel culture type social trends is that it polarises and radicalises us even more that leads to the inability for normal debate that you also pointed out as impossible nowadays. Hope this is comprehensive enough, have to get back to work. Thanks a lot for watching again, tune back in for my next vid as well haha

@@reallochentos Oh yeah same tbh haha. I thought it might be akward to just randomly drop a comment but I thought "why not". I definitely think that the social trend you're describing exists in some shape or form, and I have had similar thoughts/concerns in the past. Lot of conservatives definitely do believe that they are being censored/silenced - Musk bought Twitter based on this whole premise (...and then turned it around completely lmao). I guess my point is that while I agree with the notion that the right is using these terms to further radicalise itself as a counter-trend, this by itself does not necessitate that it's these trends that are to blame for the things we see today. I think the term cancel culture and wokism are more of a scapegoat (just two out of many the right has), and in some ways I think it's more common that the right uses this talking to point to shift focus away from more pressing political/economic conversations (not to say that those topics are less important but usually the question is just "Should these people have rights?", and it distracts people from discussing the status quo and stuff like the clearly not working meritocratic ideology). So yeah I think you're right, we have a similar view. You also framed the discussion more around how the right is treating these terms for their own talking points. I think the only thing that felt off to me then is that it felt like the terms have been used more in accordance to the right wing def - and reinforcing that perspective feels like endorsment to a certain level or making the counter-trend look somewhat justified. (But that might just be how it sounded to me) Anyway, looking forward to your next vids haha

Melania Trump

Speaking straight facts brother

Thank you very much and appreciate that you left a comment! Hopefully I can keep posting good stuff out

Thank you haha

That is fair enough, that is why I mentioned that countries should develop more conscious integration policies where the aim is not killing off the cultural backgrounds of people but adding to them with the local ways of living and finding common ground between cultures

@@reallochentos currently the Lithuanian government has decided that starting from January 1st 2026 all workers should speak at least a1 level of Lithuanian, this is mainly meant for delivery drivers as most of them are from islamic countries or india, also there were some laws that most of the workers (but for some reason not taxi drivers and delivery workers) have at least minimum Lithuanian speaking skills

Ding dong 😂

"you can see this in China" and "its the immigrant's fault that people are racist" truly authentic bangers of contemporary thought.

even "low skilled immigrants" deserve to have a fair chance, many of them are just as hardworking and honest as many working class people in our country. Our country needs "low skilled" workers like truck drivers and construction workers. Also does it even matter if they don't assimilate? If they learn English and have a job does it matter if they are muslim, hindu, buddhist, chinese, asian, black, whatever? Unlike what most right-wingers say, having cultural diversity is not a bad thing.

Hey, thanks for sharing your thoughts in at least a more respectful manner, really appreciate that! In terms of government intervention increasing inequality, I am not sure what you are referring to in the China case, as an uptick of inequality increase happened gradually when the country opened itself for more of a capitalist model in the 1970s as lot of people got rich from booming global business opportunities and large foreign capital investments into Special Economic Zones. It opened China for an economic miracle but resulted in lots of unequal outcomes. Also, based on just unemployment data and economic performance in America during Keynesian times show that inequality was much lower compared to when a neoliberal system shaped in the 70s (same when China opened up to the West). With the security and race issue with immigrants the problem is that even if your statement on illegal immigrants committing a lot of crimes, the narratives around them still focus on race which then will make them to be associated with a given race. That then brings more policing and surveillance on certain groups of people who might be "highly educated law abiding citizens" according to your description but unfortunately having the same race as the people who are usually considered illegal immigrants. And yes, the assimilation issue is something I am still trying to figure out what could be a working model.

@@reallochentos I'm sorry I didn't make myself clear enough about China, I can elaborate. The economic model in China is quite heavily based around government intervention, and I have noticed a trend with that. The government is indirectly redistributing wealth from the bottom up, through things like Industrial policy and currency manipulation. It's an economic model that sacrifices equality for economic growth. And the point I am trying to make with this example is that in many cases government involvement in the economy tends to benefit the more wealthy. You can see this in action with what is currently going on in the US. The American government is intruding tariffs on China, and Industrial policy. This will make life more expensive for the average person while enriching the companies. Also another concept that I would like to expose you to is the fact that a lot of old money supports, more government intervention. This is because regulation and intervention in the economy increases the barrier to entry for aspiring businesses and secures their position at the top. It also increases social stability which is good for them since they don't want a revolution. You may not agree with this but Im just putting it out there.

@@reallochentos I agree that a lot of this conversation is focused on race and it's a problem. The problem is that the negative feedback loop already started. A part of the illegal migrant population commits crime, which invokes racism in the local population which invokes hate in the immigrant population, and the cycle goes on. And the problem with integration I think is specific to mainland Europe. When it comes to the US, and UK, they spread their culture a lot. English is the most spoken language, and American popular culture is adopted all around the world. When it comes to mainland Europe there are a lot of countries with very specific, traditionalist and often exclusionary cultures which don't handle migration well.

Understandable to a degree, however, having immigrants does not mean their cultures will be eroded. Cultures always shape and mold into new forms. Even just the fact that if you are exposed to foreign content online, the general culture in a country will be already affected by that. however, we don't cry out loud for having like American cultural influence.

hopefully video will grow and I will put out more quality content for you guys! Thanks for tuning in and commenting!

I completely understand what you mean. I think he’s so fed up that he doesn’t care because Immigrants are getting beaten and scapegoated

Please watch the video for more than 1 minute because you are not getting all the arguments that I am making. I tried to focus on the exact issue that you raise here that there is a greater right vs left divide nowadays that is very damaging to democracy and to our societies. I hope we would be able to find common solutions instead just cussing out people straight up after listeneing to them speak for 1 minute.

Calling people racist (as they are) isn’t divisive. They’re the ones being divisive by being racist

Oh how should I make it better next time hahah?

Thank you man, hope it keeps growing, this is just the start!