Відео

so why did you persecute greco roman pagans then

That's what I wanna know.

The pantheon is an anomaly. It’s the most perfect concrete dome that’s in existence. They still don’t know how they did it to this day.

Yes the Treasury of Atreus is a corbelled dome. Not exactly like an arch or a round dome, but same principle. I'd like to explore corbelled architecture in the future.

😂😂

True

In 1687, Venetians (Catholics?) fired the canon shell that hit the Parthenon (Pagan?) and ignited gunpowder the Ottomans (Muslim?) had stored there. All will deflect any blame.

I can answer that since I made the video. It's actually AI generated, the only one in the video. I try to avoid using AI as much as possible, but sometimes I need a shot that doesn't exist in reality, like a temple still with a roof but crumbling. So there it is.

I agree. I think some of my statements really trigger some Christians, so I'm glad to see someone that isn't triggered. Thanks for your comment.

I've felt the same way since the fire !!! That other religious " group " considers Christians " infidels, " and there's been a big influx throughout Europe as well as France . Paris in particular. GOD will certainly know what happened, and IF we're correct, will deal with the perps for burning down one of His Houses !!

Yes, pretty sure it was the "religion of peace".

Or the cursed fig trees​@@thebes118

Are you French? How many people believe this in France? I'm just curious. I actually wasn't aware that so many people believe this until I made this video and read all the comments.

​@@Street-Gems I am Flemish but western Europe, North America and even beyond have been hit by waves of church vandalism, in Canada it came mostly in the wake of claims that the church was guilty for the deaths of 150 000 natives, a claim that was later disproven but still many catholic churches were vandalised and even burned down over it, probably more so by anti church white canadians than natives though that is yet to be investigated but most likely wil not be anyway in Europe the vandals are allmost solely young islamist thugs. in most cases these churches were not very prominent and the news didn't seem very keen on reporting it, but cathedrals and especially one as prominent as the notre dame cathedral can't escape attention as easily. moreover the fire took place on april 15th, that day the temperature ranged between 2 and 9°C humidity between 70-50%+- the days prior had been even colder and more humid than the 15th had been. and both government and media were seemingly desperate to declare it "likely accidental" and they have not come to any specific conclusions since. now, feel free to try and burn a roof that has been coated in fire retardant on a particularly cold and humid day, anyone could do it but only with intent, and highly combustable materials and even untreated wood would simply be to cold to ignite without help, the only other option is pure incompetence of the governing agencies and contractors but here's the thing, these types of buildings are only maintained by companies specialising in monument maintenance and restoration, they use materials and techniques specifically meant to not alter the nature of the building whilst taking great care to not damage anything they are not replacing with an exact replica and that only happens if there is no way to keep the original element, in such cases they wil always keep the original part and it is likely to be studied at a university to learn more about it. the Macron administration also didn't want to give Le Pen another scandal to boost anti islam and anti immigration sentiments and this counts double for the very "progressive" Paris administration with a significant percentage of Muslims in it's electorate. in other words, if no evidence to the contrary is found then deliberate arson is the most likely scenario. there are preceding cases that are highly similar in nature, there is incentive for those in charge to deny it being an act of religious terror and there wasn't supposed to be anyone up there at that time, the conditions for a natural or even accidental fire were just not met. terrorism is the most likely scenario

No it wasn't! What are you talking about? Sure there would be minor repairs but it couldn't be rebuilt. We dont posses the old growth forests today that would be necessary to build the roof as it was back then. Why would you lie about something like that? It's like saying the Monet Lisa was repainted every ten years. Insane.

Got Proof?! 🤨

​@@AngkatanNamwaranDon't cry because you know he's right.

@@thebes118 I'm not religious 😆... I don't pick sides, I believe that in a perfect world all religions would have fizzled out by now so that we could finally move forward as a species, what I don't like however is when a group is blamed even if there is no evidence to warrant accusations against them... All I'm saying is, gather your evidence then blame who is rightfully to blame, be objective about it. Accusing groups of people based on your bias is not going catch the real culprit, if the fire was even intentional to begin with. If it was purely an accident, then you are doing a witch hunt for nothing. Maybe the workers working on Notre-Dame that day were just purely incompetent, and they are actually the ones to blame, after all, they admitted to smoking on the job, which could have started the fire.

@@AngkatanNamwaran I really like your comment. Very wise and objective.

@@Street-Gems Thank you... By the way, hopefully you've already read up on Angkor 😋🙈

Who could have forseen that xD ? nonsense to make a video about this topic...u nailed it in one sentence haha

Not some, but literally all.

LMFAO!!!😅😊😅

"The entire educated body of academic archaeology is wrong, guise, Graham Hancock said it, so it must be true"

only we know how they did it, and if a bunch of academics can build a medieval castle with no experience and medieval tools then surely skilled craftsmen troughout history could do so as well, in fact you now have several people who made rediscovering these techniques and applying them for an audience, as for the ancient egyptians, people keep ignoring the context of what type of society they had. when the floodseason came most of the farmers went off to work on the public construction projects, imagine tens of thousands of people working to build the pyramids and many more working on them indirectly in all possible ways, they also built canals right up to the great pyramids and we even have descriptions of how they worked. and what they were fed. I know it is hard to imagine building these things without powertools but we also have gigantic mines that were dug by hand by far fewer people by hand as late as the 19th century is it really that strange to imagine a very straightforward and decadesspanning construction project being done by a highly centralised and organised copper age society? what's more the Nile was an incredibly reliable highway where wind always blew inland, and offcourse always flowed to it's delta, allowing for easy transport of goods and people, + you certainly underestimate what wooden barges can carry

@@stonedwizard0420 Well, legacy archaeologists offer no explanation whatever as to how the ancient Egyptians, for one example, carved extremely hard stone such as diorite into perfectly shaped, thin-walled vases using copper chisels and wood mallets. They seem to deeply resent the question even being asked, as if it is a personal attack on their scientific competence. Which it is, of course. They all have PhD's...can't possibly be wrong, eh?

@@istoppedcaring6209 Not arguing any of that. What legacy archaeology cannot explain (and seemingly has no interest in explaining) is the astounding precision with which certain artifacts were created given the technology available at the time. Not to mention the clearly seen, obvious powered tool marks left all over many ancient artifacts and structures.

But?

😢😢😢 that's sad....

@@squidwardwithoutaclue and you believe that?

I don't understand how can any building made from stone/concrete etc burn..

Are there any evidence and how do we know it's not domestic or an accident? But of course I know Charlie Hubdo's murder is a tragedy and yet we shouldn't let them scare any artists.

@@undefinednull5749 I don't understand how anyone could think the Notre Dame didn't have lots of wood and other burnable materials in it's construction and decoration (you can plainly see burning wood that made up the roof spires in the video footage), on top of the fact it was under renovation at the time so there was also plenty of burnable materials from the company doing the renovating. Conspiracy theories may be fun to throw around but very few are ever actually true.

who did it?

Are there evidence?

​@@okamijubeiDid they really investigate? Doubt it.

did you even watch the video idiot?

Yeah, pretty much. My house has brick walls but a wooden roof. So does pretty much every house made of brick

100% roofers and pavers the biggest crooks

🤣

they were not greece or roman i bet/ haha

Isn't it because porches are usually made of wood?

@@okamijubei the roofs yes

Accident?

Check out my main video. I delve into these places in detail. Here is the link: ua-cam.com/video/Rqh_i0TBs6E/v-deo.htmlsi=8bc9A3q7NEfLuNsi

Vitrified clay

I'm not sure shingles is the best word. They were tiles, and made of different types of stone, depending on the temple.

Yes correct

You mean the ancients, absolutely