Відео

thanks dr talis

if you please I want to ask a question how did you use the rule of the force on the electric field which is K|q||q|/d^2 while the rule of electric field is F/q0

thank you, really good explanation of the projection arrows for angular momentum

You are life saver thank you so much 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷

Thanks for your efforts 🎉🎉❤

😊😊😊thank you doc

Thank you though it's not clear. Today I'll be writing the exam imagine 😅

Am here Zambian

Anyone from Zambia 😂🇿🇲

يعطيك العافية دكتور🤍

Good job👍

thank you sir

Great

How did you do the integration😢

Thank you haha Im actually reviewing the chapter 8 problems for our exam.. this is very helpful

Thank you I could not understand it from my professor

Good explanation 🙏🙏

Nice lecture 👍

By mistake!!: We cannot cancel π at 27:20 Thank you for your remarks

Thanks for your explanation Sir

Thank you for the help, the only thing that I would add is showing the continuous charge distribution equations to understand where lambda comes from.

Thx doctor

How did u get these results, i did the same but i got different results

Vas dormir pfff j'ai commencé a suivre je coupe au soupir !

Thank you ❤❤❤

Gravity

Where that 9.8 came from?

can you tell me how( z-1 )mp cancel with (z) mp??????

think you incorrectly cancelled pi in the second and third calculation

Great, thank you!

I appreciation You video guys

what is the name of the book doc?

Jai un exercice pareil , pouvez vous m'aider svp?

Salut

from which book this example is taken?

pi is not with lambda l,how it gets cancelled ?

Book name plz?

continue

Thank you

Really helpful sir thanks 🥳🥳

Mafhamt waloo

Sir where are you

Thanks man, very useful!

sir can i get ppt of this lec??

Dear Sir, you are mistaken. Physics is mistaken. We have been making a stupid mistake. It is not possible to affect the magnitude of the velocity substantially by applying a perpendicular (even very near perpendicular) force which is what is being applied. We have been convinced because we saw something "spin faster", but if you actually evaluate the prediction and take measurement, you will find that it is in fact angular energy (Rotational kinetic energy, except that it is conserved instead of angular momentum) that is conserved. Take your example which is the same mathematically as a typical ball on a string demonstration. Please see the calculation in my thought experiment here: www. baur-research.com/Physics/MPS.pdf I know that you are biased and dogmatic, but I ask that you consider the possibility that you are wrong because there is no other reasonable explanation for this contradiction. Friction is not a reasonable explanation. We are not discussing an unlimited experiment. We are discussing an prediction that is supposed to happen within the second that you pull in the string. Please do not shoot the messenger. It is not my fault that there is a stupid mistake. I am just obliged to point it out.

J'ai très bien compris merci !!

تستاهل والله

حملة توصيل قناة الأستاذ زين ١٠٠ مشترك

Hi! This video is really smart! I have been trying to find for a awesome UA-cam vid that breaks down the topics in this UA-cam video. 🧑‍⚕️Your explanation actually reminds me of the channel from this insightful Doctor Ethan! Ethan's videos are knowledgable and he helped me on my exams. He is an insightful Doctor in the UK and he explains health symptoms! Go watch his page out and give the medical student a like here! ➡️ #DoctorEthanUA-cam

Correction: drive.google.com/file/d/1K1I1zb10UBHH5bgi2OO-Y3Rfn-intZf_/view?usp=sharing Please Check this link to see the correction