Відео

Already caught you once, but since you are continuing to spread false information, I will call you out here too. This is absolutely inaccurate as a scholar of Hellenic history. She is the Princess of Aethiopia, believed to be in the South and East, beyond the land of Egypt in Kush. Aethiopia literally is Greek for “Land of the People of the Burnt Faces”. Hesiod clearly states that the Libyans, Aethiopians, and further Pygmies are all dark skinned- “For verily Epaphus was the child of the almighty Son of Cronos, and from him sprang the dark Libyans, and high-souled Aethiopians, and the Underground-folk and feeble Pygmies. All these are the offspring of the lord, the Loud-thunderer.” Herodotus goes on to further state that the Egyptians, Colchians, and Aethiopians are all dark of skin and wooly haired- “the Egyptians said that they held the Colchians to be part of Sesostris' army. I myself guessed it to be so, partly because they are dark-skinned and woolly-haired; though that indeed goes for nothing, seeing that other peoples, too, are such; but my better proof was that the Colchians and Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only nations that have from the first practised circumcision.” We are certain Herodotus speaks of the African region of Sudan and Kush from his further description here- “Where the south declines towards the setting sun lies the country called Aethiopia, the last inhabited land in that direction. There gold is obtained in great plenty, huge elephants abound, with wild trees of all sorts, and ebony; and the men are taller, handsomer, and longer lived than anywhere else.” So, you are entirely 100% wrong. Andromeda was Black African. Not Sub-Saharan, as you cannot lump all Black Africans into Sub-Saharan, but NILOTIC African, like the people of modern Ethiopia, who are not Sub-Saharan African, but Nilotic African.

​​@@KrasseOdaVonBayernnice try. The word Aethiopis is purely a Hellenic word and can mean different things depending were when and how you form it in a sentence. It's not exclusively used for Sub Saharan Nubian Africans. Secondly dark skin does NOT mean black. Burnt Face dose NOT mean having sub Saharan African features or characteristics. Thirdly you are mixing history with mythology. Fourthly sesosrtis is folklore. Last but not least. In Hellenic mythology and culture where Andromeda the Aethiopians and the Mythical Kingdom of Aethiopia originated from. Are not described believed or depicted as Sub Saharan Africans or being South of Egypt and Libya. Please stop embarrassing yourself. Do Better

❤❤❤❤❤

❤❤❤❤❤

❤❤❤❤

The thing is Andromeda has nothing to do with the lands South of Egypt and Libya. The mythical kingdom of Aethiopia in the East from Hellenic Mythology has nothing to do with the Geographical Term of Aethiopia South of Egypt and Libya from History. Andromeda is NOT described believed or depicted as a Sub Saharan African woman in Hellenic mythology or culture where she originates from. She is a Hellenic woman.

@@EudaimonVThis is absolutely inaccurate as a scholar of Hellenic history. She is the Princess of Aethiopia, believed to be in the South and East, beyond the land of Egypt in Kush. Aethiopia literally is Greek for “Land of the People of the Burnt Faces”. Hesiod clearly states that the Libyans, Aethiopians, and further Pygmies are all dark skinned- “For verily Epaphus was the child of the almighty Son of Cronos, and from him sprang the dark Libyans, and high-souled Aethiopians, and the Underground-folk and feeble Pygmies. All these are the offspring of the lord, the Loud-thunderer.” Herodotus goes on to further state that the Egyptians, Colchians, and Aethiopians are all dark of skin and wooly haired- “the Egyptians said that they held the Colchians to be part of Sesostris' army. I myself guessed it to be so, partly because they are dark-skinned and woolly-haired; though that indeed goes for nothing, seeing that other peoples, too, are such; but my better proof was that the Colchians and Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only nations that have from the first practised circumcision.” We are certain Herodotus speaks of the African region of Sudan and Kush from his further description here- “Where the south declines towards the setting sun lies the country called Aethiopia, the last inhabited land in that direction. There gold is obtained in great plenty, huge elephants abound, with wild trees of all sorts, and ebony; and the men are taller, handsomer, and longer lived than anywhere else.” So, you are entirely 100% wrong. Andromeda was Black African. Not Sub-Saharan, as you cannot lump all Black Africans into Sub-Saharan, but NILOTIC African, like the people of modern Ethiopia, who are not Sub-Saharan African, but Nilotic African.

@@EudaimonV This is absolutely inaccurate as a scholar of Hellenic history. She is the Princess of Aethiopia, believed to be in the South and East, beyond the land of Egypt in Kush. Aethiopia literally is Greek for “Land of the People of the Burnt Faces”. Hesiod clearly states that the Libyans, Aethiopians, and further Pygmies are all dark skinned- “For verily Epaphus was the child of the almighty Son of Cronos, and from him sprang the dark Libyans, and high-souled Aethiopians, and the Underground-folk and feeble Pygmies. All these are the offspring of the lord, the Loud-thunderer.” Herodotus goes on to further state that the Egyptians, Colchians, and Aethiopians are all dark of skin and wooly haired- “the Egyptians said that they held the Colchians to be part of Sesostris' army. I myself guessed it to be so, partly because they are dark-skinned and woolly-haired; though that indeed goes for nothing, seeing that other peoples, too, are such; but my better proof was that the Colchians and Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only nations that have from the first practised circumcision.” We are certain Herodotus speaks of the African region of Sudan and Kush from his further description here- “Where the south declines towards the setting sun lies the country called Aethiopia, the last inhabited land in that direction. There gold is obtained in great plenty, huge elephants abound, with wild trees of all sorts, and ebony; and the men are taller, handsomer, and longer lived than anywhere else.” So, you are entirely 100% wrong. Andromeda was Black African. Not Sub-Saharan, as you cannot lump all Black Africans into Sub-Saharan, but NILOTIC African, like the people of modern Ethiopia, who are not Sub-Saharan African, but Nilotic African.

While the pronunciation "SAH-win" is commonly used today, it's important to note that the pronunciation of ancient Gaelic words can vary, and "SOW-in" is also considered an acceptable pronunciation. The word "Celtic" can be spelled with both a 'C' and a 'K'. The 'C' spelling is more commonly used in modern English, but historically, both spellings have been used interchangeably. You are correct in stating that the direct historical connection between Halloween and Samhain is not well-established. Halloween, as we know it today, has evolved over time and has incorporated elements from various traditions, including Samhain. While some aspects of Halloween may have origins in Samhain and other ancient festivals, the modern celebration of Halloween has become a unique cultural phenomenon. You are also correct that the tradition of wearing costumes on Halloween as we do today largely developed in the United States in the early 20th century. However, the practice of dressing up as supernatural beings or ancestors can be traced back to ancient festivals like Samhain, where people believed they could ward off evil spirits by disguising themselves.

@@EnigmaticChronicles. Yes, both are acceptable in English - Gaelic has predominantly SAH- (in Irish, Scottish and Manx Gaelic) I didn’t mean the spelling, but rather the pronunciation. It’s ‘Keltik’ as opposed to ‘Seltik’ (unless you’re talking about a basketball team from Boston) There are no elements/practices of Samhain existent in modern Halloween. There’s just no connection. To be completely fair though, the one possibility is the idea that it is a numinous time of year when this world and the otherworld become closer. But how much of that idea comes from pre-Christian beliefs and how much of it is a result of a Christian feast focused on the afterlife and the dead is, again, impossible to tell. Again, three is zero historical evidence that the Celts ever donned animal pelts to ward off or blend in with the spirit world. Halloween and Samhain share a similar date and perhaps a ‘feeling’, but that’s really about it.

I am glad you liked it😊

Yes, In ancient Egyptian mythology, during the heart-weighing ceremony, a person's heart (representing their moral and ethical essence) was weighed against the feather of Ma'at (representing truth and justice). If the heart was found to be heavier than the feather, it was a symbol that the individual had led a life filled with wrongdoing and moral transgressions. When this happened, the individual's heart would be devoured by Ammit, a composite creature with the head of a crocodile, the front legs of a lion, and the hind legs of a hippopotamus. This was considered a second death into darkness because the soul would be denied entrance into the afterlife, and the person's existence would be erased, resulting in a fate similar to non-existence.👍

@@EnigmaticChronicles. the more detailed and interesting version of what I just said…I like it, thanks mate, Skál 🍻

Boy, do I have news for you

I respect your perspective, but it's important to note that beliefs and interpretations of religious texts can vary widely among individuals and religious traditions. The comment you've made reflects a particular viewpoint, but there are many different interpretations and beliefs regarding religious texts, including the Bible and ancient Egyptian mythology. People's religious beliefs and interpretations are deeply personal and can differ significantly. And remember here we are discussing mythology.

@EnigmaticChronicles. no actually, the bible is not mythology, it is the truth. I have far more experience with the supernatural than I would have ever asked for. I have met fallen angels, demons now, and i can tell you they hate Christianity. I have met angels obedient to God. I have visited heaven once, it is very real. So im not not into excuses and or interpretations or opinions, i know. My original statement stands solid, thats it.

The book was written by thoth and has been around forever

​@@TruthTella314where is it?

Idk but 🤔seems suspect... let's research

@hittrennathompson8286 I agree. If it is around, shouldn't a book like that have been known like say the Bible the Quran the Torah the dead sea scrolls the Samarian tablets and even archeological finds in Egypt from what I've studied have never found such a book. So idk where truthtella314 claim is valid?

@TruthTella314 Also the book of Thoth that is out today was written by Allister Crawley taken from old tablets that describe a book like that but never give proof to its existence.

👍👍

In some versions of the Yuki-onna legend, she is portrayed as a malevolent spirit who can be harmful to humans. However, her actions are not specifically directed toward children but rather toward anyone who encounters her. She is known for her ability to freeze people with her icy breath or touch, potentially causing harm or death. It's worth mentioning that folklore can be highly diverse, and there are variations in the Yuki-onna legend. In some stories, she may be more sympathetic or tragic in nature.

my nigga what?

What?

Me too

You are correct. Vlad III, the historical figure who inspired the legend of Count Dracula, was often referred to as Vlad the Impaler (Vlad Țepeș in Romanian) due to his brutal method of punishing his enemies. The term "Dracula" does indeed mean "Son of the Dragon" or "Son of the Devil," and it was used as a title rather than a surname. This title was bestowed upon him due to his father's (Vlad II) membership in the Order of the Dragon, a chivalric order. The association between Vlad III and the fictional vampire Count Dracula, created by author Bram Stoker, has made Vlad III an intriguing historical figure, and his nickname "Dracula" has contributed to the enduring myth and popularity of the vampire character in literature and popular culture.