Відео

I don't think they plan to do that... We may not get to see MP-4 .. but who knows.. maybe just maybe 😅

@@Lokeygamer101 i hope too bro

I was literally going to add that but somehow ended up with underrated 😅😅.. I mean amazing.. have a good day.. mind reader friend... 😁 I'll change it 😜..

hese are just my theories stemmed from maxs monologue ofcourse.... Think about it in the first game Max's wife and daughter gets killed... Then max kills Nikole for playing a part in his family's death... Then in the next game... Opening of sorts... Max watches a girl die in front of him (unable to save her) ... winterson Max's corrupt partner... Max ends up killing her while trying to save Mona... Then at the end of the 2 nd game Mona ends up dying in Max's arms.. In mp-3 .. max fails to save Fabiana.. the girl he was protecting... Then there's a secretary that greets max during his visit to Rodrigo's office.. someone shoots her later in that mission... It was only when max manages to save Giovanna ( fabiana's sister) that Max's luck turns around (or the so called curse of women dying around him ends).. otherwise in the previous games we always got dark/ sad endings...while this time around there was a closure and a happy ending...😁

As for the alternate selves of Max..yeah these are (unofficial claims obviously)... First one brewer .. max is sympathetic towards him as he himself somewhat understands his pain... And further hints that if he had an option he'd take the same route too.So that's why i feel like brewer is continuation of Max's journey from the second game.. Had nothing changed, Max would have eneded up like him..Them with the anders ( happy cop) max is jealous... Cause he has everything that max wanted.. a happy life.. a wife, daughter and a son (who plays football)... Moreover he's retired and travelling the world ... So , I guess dan Houser in a tribute to our beloved hero added these alternate versions of max ...as a fan service of sorts.

Yeah they have ruined games with micro transactions and loot crates... It's not the same... I remember CODs multiplayer had 64 player lobbies on pc ... It was utter chaos but fun .. no micro management, no micro transactions , just load up , join and play... It was purely majestic..( nostalgia taking over)... Must find my old COD 4 disc 😂😅😅

The narrative presented in *Modern Warfare* resonated so strongly partly because it tapped into a powerful wave of Western propaganda that framed the "war on terror" as a straightforward battle of “good versus evil.” This portrayal was bolstered by a media landscape that, for years, leaned into a manichean perspective largely embraced across Western societies. This simplification of complex geopolitical realities made the game’s storyline not only believable but also widely accepted, as it echoed the rhetoric many media outlets were promoting at the time. The impact of this messaging on public perception helped normalize these narratives, which were less likely to be questioned. In today’s more informed and interconnected world, such portrayals would face immediate scrutiny, with audiences more aware of the intricacies and alternative perspectives surrounding such conflicts.

By that, all that is "echoed" in our memories is purely NOSTALGIA.

Well I am glad it was made in those times... Moreover strictly IMO, Video Games are a source of entertainment and there is no need for these to be politically correct.. Games need to be fun, cause if we wanted real world problems (as gamers), we would not be playing video games in the first place. 😜

@@Moneymatter247-jq9ni There’s no such thing as an ideologically 'neutral' or 'apolitical' narrative in games. Every game, whether it aims to be historically accurate, purely for fun, or something else, inherently reflects a particular perspective. Even if developers don’t intend to push an agenda, their work is shaped by the ideological environment they’re in. Take Call of Duty, for example. These games often align with pro-military narratives not by coincidence but because the developers, like Infinity Ward, have historically had significant backing from U.S. military propaganda efforts. This means Call of Duty has always been political, representing and reinforcing specific ideologies from the start. This isn’t just opinion-it’s a fact supported by history. On top of that, games today are often a continuation of that money-driven approach, but with new layers thanks to the internet. With microtransactions and digital-only releases, developers have more ways than ever to generate profit, and it’s easier for people to buy into it. Ironically, even though games today are technologically more advanced and costlier to make, they’re also much pricier than physical media games were years ago. Yet, back then, even with production costs for physical copies, games were often cheaper. This shift raises questions about the motivations behind game design and distribution now versus then

​@@TCODESERTSTORM almost everybody is influenced or has some sort of ideology fed into them( socialization, the way humans pass on information, values,mores to their next generation) and moreover who cares if infinity ward was pushing a particular agenda.. point is this is the game that will go down in history as one of the best games around ( narratively for cods) and yes the impact game had due to internet slowly becoming accessible to all , would be hard to replicate... But at least for now gamers have been rejecting woke propaganda that has sadly crept into some games..

Like the book says, He works His work in mysterious ways. Some people like it. Some people don't. ----JOHN CONSTANTINE 🤪

It is what it is 😅😅

Ahh! The good old days!!!

It's a very good game (imo). my problem with the game is ubisoft.. and their in general treatment of the port on pc. Older version could have been fixed with a few patches but then ubisoft would not have gotten the opportunity to spy on us via their always online drm ( for a single player game) and on top of that they purposefully chose to ignore pc gamers again.. as if they are handing the game on pc for free..... So that's why I wanted people to wait for sale. 😅

Yet they still don't seem to be learning anything from it. Last I checked they are also going woke all guns blazing..

Doesn't seem like it..

Yeah Ubisoft sucks .. they got something stuck up their behind that just refuses to come out ..

Well I took one for the team 😜

I hated those stealth parts in the beginning but those are some of the best moments of this game .. at least those are the moments that are still stuck with me to this day.. 😂😅

Well it works fine for this game. I believe its one of the Usps of this game.

Staggering on the mill roof in ice and snow and wild wind, I was a ninja. My kung fu was strong. 😜

No Payne, No Gain. 😅

Sure, and you can check out my credentials splattered all over this joint.

@@Moneymatter247-jq9ni You're in a computer game, Max. I was in a computer game. Funny as Hell, it was the most horrible thing I could think of.🤣🤣

Yes .. love this game...

You are right. Music and sound effects are just amazing in this game. Even I noticed it in my later playthroughs. I think Akira doesn't get his fair share of recognition since it's his sound effects that actually set this game apart from the rest..😅

I have the same concerns about this remake but the child in me wants them to get the remake right (at least this time) 🤞

@@Lokeygamer101 Well if I were you, I wouldn't get my hopes up. If they wanted to, they could have just remastered the earlier version of the game. From what I can see (from the video) the game still looks good even after all this time. So think about it: If fan mods can keep this game alive on PC, Konami could also do it. yet they selectively ignored it as there was no money to be had there. As far as the new remaster is going, It seems to be a completely different game but since Konami has the IP and SH-2 already has a cult fan following, they chose to go for the easy money. So, if we are to take a page out of Konami's history, I'd say we stand to get a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Yeah! you are right.. back then(in 2001) ... this was a complete overhaul of sorts, graphics, sound design .. The game makers kept the original core gameplay and the rest of the game had completely been changed. The story of the first game (at least to me) seems like a hollywood movie(low budget) but for SH-2 they amped it up. We know from the start that Mary is dead, yet we are drawn into this beautifully crafted game world!! It speaks volumes of the creative mindset of the developing team. Back then games were not treated as yearly products and developers genuinely went in to create something fresh and authentic.. Cancel Reply

A small percentage of people played SH1 first. It was on a different console, the PS2 was sold in part as a DVD player and had a giant market, the games looked totally different (FFIII vs FFX) and SH1 was never that well known until after it became a franchise and people went back to play it.

I wanted to add so much more but had to cut stuff out due to time constraints.. If even one (new) person picks this game up after watching the video, I would believe that video managed to fulfill its purpose. 🙏

I agree

200% true man.. The game was on a whole different level. It still is scary as hell (without even trying).. Hope the remaster is also somewhat closer to this!!

I think they're just trying to make more money. They have also starting porting their games to PC recently..

@@Lokeygamer101 So where is Zelda on PlayStation? 🤣 Look around you. This is NOT 2002, its 2024. The PS2 domination era is LONG GONE. Get over it. Sony is making a Zelda movie where they are being ORDERED what to do by Miyamoto. They are NOT making a Horizon movie, but are making a Horizon game for Switch. That is the behavior of a company that has been CONQUERED.

@@Molybed1 I hope you are wrong 😅

Dunno man , will have to Google them 🤪

I also love this game. I am a fan from the Cartoon series that used to air on cartoon network 😁😅

Thank you sir

lots of retries 😁