- 540
- 114 833
Schweitzer Law Partners
United States
Приєднався 21 лют 2017
Pasadena Divorce Attorneys
The Law Offices of Donald P. Schweitzer
Located in the heart of Pasadena, the Law Offices of Donald P. Schweitzer is one of the most respected legal firms in greater Los Angeles. We offer complete family law services, providing unsurpassed representation in the areas of divorce, domestic violence, and estate planning, which means we can handle any eventuality that may arise in your case-protecting you and your financial future. Supported by today's most advanced legal resources, our responsive, dynamic team gives clients a favorable edge. Our full-service approach lets us provide you with expert advice while shaping a broader strategy that results in the best possible outcome.
Visit us at www.pasadenalawoffice.com/.
We are located at 201 South Lake, Avenue, Suite 800, Pasadena, CA 91101.
Contact us at (626) 788-5225.
The Law Offices of Donald P. Schweitzer
Located in the heart of Pasadena, the Law Offices of Donald P. Schweitzer is one of the most respected legal firms in greater Los Angeles. We offer complete family law services, providing unsurpassed representation in the areas of divorce, domestic violence, and estate planning, which means we can handle any eventuality that may arise in your case-protecting you and your financial future. Supported by today's most advanced legal resources, our responsive, dynamic team gives clients a favorable edge. Our full-service approach lets us provide you with expert advice while shaping a broader strategy that results in the best possible outcome.
Visit us at www.pasadenalawoffice.com/.
We are located at 201 South Lake, Avenue, Suite 800, Pasadena, CA 91101.
Contact us at (626) 788-5225.
ATTORNEYS REACT - Catch Me If You Can
Family Law attorneys Brooke Mulligan and Ali Smyser react to the 2002 crime/comedy Spielberg classic CATCH ME IF YOU CAN.
Переглядів: 123
Відео
CELEBRITY STORIES - Nikki Garcia and Artem Chigvintsev
Переглядів 5203 місяці тому
Family Law Attorneys, Brooke and Tori, discuss the recent divorces of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez and News about Nikki Garcia and Artem Chigvintsev.
CELEBRITY STORIES - Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck
Переглядів 974 місяці тому
Family Law Attorneys, Brooke and Tori, discuss the recent divorce of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez.
EXHIBIT A - Friends With Benefits
Переглядів 474 місяці тому
Join Don as he dives into an intriguing conversation with our associate attorneys, Stephanie and Brooke, about a groundbreaking case that challenges the boundaries of modern relationships. Can "friends with benefits" come with legal rights? Discover the surprising twists and legal insights in this must-watch discussion.
ATTORNEYS REACT to Crazy, Stupid, Love
Переглядів 1855 місяців тому
Family Law attorneys Brooke Mulligan and Mane Hakobyan react to the 2011 comedy, CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE
EXHIBIT A - Recording Evidence
Переглядів 545 місяців тому
Is filming someone without their consent admissible as evidence in court if a crime is captured? Join our Firm Partners, Don and Casey, as they discuss the legal complexities of Recording Evidence.
PASADENA PIONEERS - AppleOne
Переглядів 736 місяців тому
Don interviews Darlene Vergel De Dios, Executive Account Manager at AppleOne Recruiting, delving into the intricacies of the recruitment process and how to match individuals with careers that foster success for both employers and employees.
ATTORNEYS REACT to The Grand Budapest Hotel
Переглядів 6136 місяців тому
ATTORNEYS REACT to The Grand Budapest Hotel
How I Got Into Law School - Jessica Feng
Переглядів 737 місяців тому
How I Got Into Law School - Jessica Feng
EXHIBIT A - Rights Of A Putative Spouse
Переглядів 597 місяців тому
EXHIBIT A - Rights Of A Putative Spouse
CELEBRITY STORIES - Divorce and Separation
Переглядів 2457 місяців тому
CELEBRITY STORIES - Divorce and Separation
How I Got Into Law School - Chris Choi
Переглядів 287 місяців тому
How I Got Into Law School - Chris Choi
PASADENA PIONEERS - McCourt Foundation
Переглядів 279 місяців тому
PASADENA PIONEERS - McCourt Foundation
PASADENA PIONEERS - Schweitzer Law Partners
Переглядів 2511 місяців тому
PASADENA PIONEERS - Schweitzer Law Partners
CELEBRITY STORIES - Legal Separation
Переглядів 4911 місяців тому
CELEBRITY STORIES - Legal Separation
CELEBRITY STORIES - Reunification Therapy
Переглядів 10611 місяців тому
CELEBRITY STORIES - Reunification Therapy
PASADENA PIONEERS - Foothill Unity Center
Переглядів 40Рік тому
PASADENA PIONEERS - Foothill Unity Center
PASADENA PIONEERS - Small Business Success
Переглядів 21Рік тому
PASADENA PIONEERS - Small Business Success
This is an excellent interview! Nadia Chung is a great communicator and fun to listen to. The substance was excellent too. The interviewer, D. Schweitzer did a great job as well. He made her at ease so that she could be herself. Excellent! Both of you!
Thanks for the reaction. Love the commentary
Does she practice in Birmingham , Jefferson county family ?
She has her first, middle, and last name .. like her invisible nanny Xanax 😈
What if the father does not give support to the mother?
Cop has a gun in courtroom, then killing himself on the stairs.
Becoming a court reporter is a herculian effort in itself.
Too short video.
Could have had more info. I like where it was going. But I definitely feel like you should have given some examples on how it can go and why. You said "manageable expectations" what are those ? How likely are they to let the kids move ?
Owming the medicine is evodence. Proven falsified. As well as paystubs aa well as paper trail and so on
It’s pretty much accepted that in whichever state the member files/initiates the action, they’re implying consent by choosing the venue. The protection comes into place if the spouse initiates and it’s not the service-member’ state of legal residency. In that case, the member must immediately tell the court they don’t consent to the retirement portion; the rest of the divorce can happen but not the division of pension.
Because Latin is a very precise language Almost mathematical Very logical
Common Law, which is the basis of the US law, descended from English law.
Because English is the perfect language for lying
Justinian law.
There is something so disingenuous when someone says, "That is a great question." It's almost like they do not believe it. I think I want to start saying that sarcastically. It is like when people say your name 3 times during a short interaction. It makes me think they are putting me on notice that they plan to report me, if I do not do what they demand. I have also noticed that people like to ask how my day is going. It is like they are trying to gauge a mental status before the exchange. Most of the time I do not respond to that question and just stare at them. I know they do not want to know just as much as I do not want to tell them. I do not know who is teaching these tips.
And a single Latin word can mean an entire sentence in English.
It just makes the stuff you say seem like you’re smarter
Provided it is used correctly.
But that’s being Eurocentric.
Because they fool you with false language.
Ex dolo Malo
DC is the Vatican sister city. The USA is technically DC, not the entire land mass. The USA is the second beast of Revelation. The Papacy is the first.
Forgetting that; the UCC code maritime law's pirates on land for profit$ are unlawful for: Quantum -language-grammar-syntax-parce.
Latin is a dead language with stable definitions of words, so they can not be re interpreted by word benders. There is a passage in the bible about this, about paid lawyers who prevent the definition of words to achieve their dubious goals. That was one of the reasons Jesus did not like Pharisees and Scribes or aa he called them law sellers.
Latin was a requirement at my high school in order to graduate.
Can we watch the whole reaction?
I have found people take bad news best when they know the one giving them bad news is also suffering from the news. I haven’t had this in divorce but any times when there is a death.
So...where's the reaction? This is a short review.
Im curious to know who is in a fraud marriage. Thanks for posting. I searched and cant find anything local .
What about new kids with a new partner. I’m from Germany and there’s a rule, that the new kids as dependents always go first. There’s a threshold of a certain amount of money the parent is entitled to keep - let’s say 1,500€. Let’s say a kid needs 500 a month. If he makes 2,200€ - before he would have given his ex 500€. Now he keeps 1,500€ + 500€ for the new kid and the ex can only be granted 200€ (which isn’t enough to cover necessities. The state will cover the rest 300€ and will - take back the money from the father as soon as he has money available- sometimes they even seize it from pensions. My point is, don’t make more kids if you can’t afford them. The state (other tax payers) should not have to carry your burden. Is that the same in the US?
Hi, I am filing an ex parte. Unfortunately, I’ve been waiting for the 827 form through Cps and I have not received it. So it has been a wait. Can I still file the expert or do I have to do a modification? The transcript should be here within the next week and it is for her safety. I’m just not sure if there’s a time limit to file from the time with holding the child. also the father has not tried to contact or pick up the child
Y’all should react to Ghostbusters 2
statistics prove that men do not have the same rights as mothers
"We're relying on that lawyer complying with their ethical obligations and not filing meritless claims." 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Oh, my sweet summer child....
I'm not sure citing Brittany is a win at this point?
Tom Cruise is a legend
SEEK WORK orders lead to IMPUTING INCOME. Can a child support modification through child support services address SEEK WORK orders? Can they impute income from the primary caregiver when the other parent has neglected 100% of their stipulated custodial time of 20%? Can they impute income without requesting vocational training and providing support to do so? Can they impute income for not seeking work, during a “STAY AT HOME” order from the government due to a pandemic?
This example is crazy! She sounds like a privileged example of when a SEEK WORK order would be advisable. My case is quite different and was used as a form of financial abuse. Child support modification commissioner was absolutely fraudulent in my case!
Must be really nice to be privileged to have an attorney…the system favors the wealthy.
They don’t include time with child at support modification in CA.
I wish they would’ve talked about how a lot of these cases go
Charged with attempted murder but found innocent. Later person dies and he thinks hes home free because double jeopardy. Is that true?
Very nice interview, great info! Dani brings such great enthusiasm to her job, very much appreciated!
I am confused... Hopkin's character is not yet convicted as I understood it at that part of the movie.. Yet she calls him a "criminal".. Am I stupid or is that not actually a really, REALLY bad thing to happen? If he is not convicted for the alleged crimes they say he did.. He should NOT be labeled as a criminal.. Attorney's should know this.
Probably because she's seen the film and knows he is in fact guilty.
The very idea that Court reporters would be the place to cut costs is MIND BLOWING. I don’t understand how on earth this was even a conversation. There needs to be more recruiting for the professional court reporters, both machine and voice writers. Both are highly trained and an invaluable part of our judicial system. Digital court reporters and AI of kind will never be a replacement for stenographers. The legal profession needs to raise awareness and their concerns about this. It will comprise the integrity of the judicial system. That is a scary thought indeed.
Cool
I live in California and I am low income. I made $38k last year for a family of 5. We have 2 children from the Marriage and 1 that is the youngest she had from an extra marital affair for a total of 3 kids. My wife wasn’t working because she was carrying for the youngest child and is also a full time college student. She is 29yo. She filled for divorce and we came to a “50/50” child custody agreement.(I have the 2 kids from the marriage an extra day). She is seeking child support and alimony. We were married 10 years and out of that time 3 of those years I was a single parent without any financial support from my wife even though she was earning about 40% more a year than I was. I don’t have a lawyer as I cannot afford one. I am in the extremely low income bracket per family size, I receive food stamps and am in sec 8 housing. She has moved out to her parents house. I will try and ask the judge for a seek to work order and or imputed income. I have submitted my income declaration form and some most months I’ve had to put the extra expenses onto a credit card. I believe that her not working creates a bigger expense to the state as we now are both on separate food stamps and will soon both be in separate section 8 housing. She has applied to over 80 jobs and has not gotten hired however I believe the jobs she has applied to she is not qualified for. She could apply to in-n-out and make close to the same pay I am making. Honestly she doesn’t even have the proper space for the kids. I really should have the kids 80% of the time. My kids have lived with me all of their lives and call me saying they want to come home.
Wonderful interview with @Tashera Taylor! Foothill Unity Center is an essential service provider in our community. So grateful that you have showcased their work in this podcast!
Awesome podcast! John Leano, you missed your true calling as an interviewer/journalist. Don, I loved your thoughtful answers and your passion for serving your community. We you were talking about Lincoln, I could picture you asking him your questions over dinner at Smitty's! Well done.
I am not an attorney, but I was on juries in traffic and criminal court in Houston, TX and on a civil court jury and a federal grand jury in Oklahoma City. I know poor old Nunnally was grieving, but even a grieving police officer should know to walk out of a scene as soon as he realizes he knows any of the people involved and he knows not to be involved in any part of it, except as a possible witness. As for Willie, what DA would go to court without reading the arresting officers account of the crime scene, where he would have known that the perp and the officer both put their guns down.