Відео

I agree. With enough time and attention to detail, I believe an AI generated film can be created by one or two people. The current impediment at the moment is the rather uncontrollability of AI video. This is being remedied, but it's still early days.

@cbnewham5633 consistent characters are easy enough already, the one weakness that currently is only remediable by the use of traditional CGI methods like the use of Blender or maybe Unreal engine is consistent backgrounds. There are some emerging tools that may remedy this in the near future, but it is decidedly the largest issue currently.

ps: great advices otherwise, thx

I think you’re right. AI is like the next evolution of CGI, it won’t kill Hollywood or creativity, but it will turbo-charge those who use it.

I know! It seems there isn’t a week goes by without another incredible new release.

Agree entirely, this is the kind of tool that doesn’t get the headlines and hits on social media, but as a workable tool that you could add into your pro toolkit right now, it’s one of the better ones.

Amen to that 😁

Well done!

Fair enough.

It’s the dream I’m working towards. Several key scenes in the feature film I hope to make one day, are set in popular tourist spots in central London, and they would be incredibly expensive and difficult to film, but with AI, they become much more plausible at the price point of a small, independent filmmaker.

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmakermakes sense if there's a high level of control over what background is placed. and keep the character clothing consistent from scene to scene

Is that a suggestion or the title of another movie that may or may not have been the “First AI Feature Film”?

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmaker a suggestion to anyone using generative ai.

Thank you for your assessment 😆😆

Safe to assume bro’s replying to the comments with ai

Is that another contender for the title of “First AI Feature Film”? Do you have a link?

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmaker No. Saberspark reviewed that movie today.

@@entertainmentpowerfuchs5744 yup, and the review is on point

Really sorry, can’t help you there, I didn’t ask. Unfortunately Tom would be the person to answer that question.

Hey! Thanks very much. These interviews didn’t get huge view-counts, but the quality of the viewers has been terrific (which was always the aim… quality over quantity). Glad to be helpful :-)

These are fair concerns, and I shared a number of them myself until I went visited the studios where the movie was made and interviewed the writer and director, Tom Paton. The interview videos are here on my channel for all to see, as well as a studio walkthrough. I can honestly say the way they work was paradigm-shifting. This movie was released online for free partly because it was a proof-of-concept, and once I found out more about how they made it and the rest of the backstory, it really did stand up very well to close scrutiny.

@ I understand your thinking, in that the fact that they could put something together with few expenses or resources is impressive but in the end, very little of this was “dependent” on AI. The fact is, it would have better been described as “a concept piece, ASSISTED in its creation by AI” rather than “The first AI-made feature film.”. I am genuinely not being critical of the production itself, but the result. The “I have nothing negative to say about this project” is disingenuous at best. There is PLENTY of valid criticism of the film itself, irrespective of the “ability to put a ‘movie’ together on the cheap”, the fact is, on its own, the film just isn’t good. The storyline forces one to make nearly impossible leaps in logic and to fill out the missing storyline bits oneself. If one must fully flesh out the methods used to tell the story by visiting the studio to be impressed with the end product, then most people will not be impressed. Good on them for the shoestring budget and minimal crew, but in the end the final product was severely lacking. For an English-language film, even the dialog was clearly not from a native English speaker. I am not criticizing the WAY this was made because most of us have no access to that. My biggest criticism is in calling this a “fully AI produced” project because while I’m sure AI assisted, the result was amateurish at best and as yet, could not be “fully AI created”. This film looks like it could have been produced by any small animation shop. The low production cost may be impressive but the result was not. I am required to be impressed by the RESULT, not the backstory about how it was made. This result was simply not very impressive.

😆😆😆😆

Well, therein lies the conundrum… how to make all of this revolution profitable. UA-cam has made a great many people rich by democratising this part of the entertainment industry (not me, I make about $1.50 per day in ad revenue) I think, in time, a new economic model will emerge for long-form, big-vision storytelling.

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmaker Well, UA-cam is entirely run on IP Rights and Copyrights. Or I would steal all of your clips and run them and everything else I find interesting on my own channel here on UA-cam and make a few doubloons from that. And that would make all of this collapse. What funds UA-cam would break. If everything we make is free for everyone to use however they want everything loses value. I can't see how we would remove ourself from the system of "pay the creator" and move into an economy where value is created somehow out of thin air. The internet in the early days where onto something by cutting out the middle men so the creators could keep more. That has however failed in a big way and we now have more middle men than ever before. What we can expect in the coming years is a huge legal backlash on Generative AI since it sources everything from the best copyrighted work out there. It is going to be a blood bath.

Yikes!!! 😬 You’re absolutely right, these tools currently wouldn’t match the performance of well-oiled, time-tested workflows in the big studios, but they’re worth keeping an eye on because 3024 has been filled with surprises at how fast these tools are developing into useful little additions to an existing production workflow… you never know when a new tipping point will be reached.

It really is 😁

Creative? It’s the antithesis of creativity

Agree entirely. I think one of the most appealing draws for AI filmmaking will be the creative freedom afforded the writers and filmmakers.

I think so too.

Thanks very much

Glad it was helpful!

No problem, thanks for watching :-)

Absolutely, agree 100%

Thank you! Cheers!

Do you mean the background audio was too loud in this video or "Where The Robots Grow"?

"Exlusive"... SO embarrassed. I'll change it now. Thanks for picking it up :-)

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmaker It can happen to anyone. And who knows if using a "new" word is good or bad according to UA-cam's dark algorithm. :]

Touche! Agree entirely. Imagine if we could see what the state of AI will be like in six months from now!

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmaker I suspect that mocap action performances will be viable a la Act One Plus so to speak and I suspect you will be able to divide facial and body performance soon too. Likely you will be able to assign performance to a character and it will all be image based like in traditional CGI. I mean CGI artists know the tech they want and it's the same tech filmmakers want. Of course like in AI image generation it will probably advance to even more photorealistic and maybe in a year or two backgrounds will not have the errors they have now.

Thanks very much. It's a really tricky thing for me to figure out the right tone and visual balance... still working on it.

You’re definitely not the only person to report that, but so far it hasn’t been many people to report the same experience. Further testing needed, I think.

I’ll take a look and add it to the list. It turns out there are several other contenders for the title of “First AI Feature Film”, and I may create a video just about each of them (yours included). Thanks for the link :-)

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmaker it's great that UA-cam is documented proof of who may have been first. And you are awesome BTW.

I actually don’t remember that part. I’m sure you’re right, but I’ll have to go back and understand the context to get a clearer picture. I agree, that wouldn’t make any sense.

I suspect understanding the context of that statement is key to making sense of it, because on its own it really doesn’t make any sense and would be very weird.

@@HaydnRushworth-Filmmakeriirc, when you pulled out your script, he had you throw it in the floor.

Maybe the AI bots have already been watching those movies without anybody knowing they exist 😁😁

😆😆😆😆👏🏻🎉🦾

What an amazing place - almost like something an AI would dream up what with the military vehicles sitting next to wooden animals all situated in what appears to be a farm and yet has a whole lot of studio stuff. Yep - this is the future, whether people like it or not. Still a few people in the "not" camp - the YT recommended video I just saw prior to this was very much on the warpath - a "review" of WtRG and a string of comments damning every aspect of it without really understanding its purpose. To use a now much overused cliché - WtRG is as bad as AI filmmaking is ever going to be.