MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
  • 61
  • 695 270
The PSFC is hosting SOFE 2025 in Boston!
We hope everyone enjoyed their time at #SOFE2023Oxford, hosted by @UKAEAofficial! We are honored to announce that you'll be able to join us right here in Boston for #SOFE2025. Sign up for SOFE updates to learn about conference updates and deadlines, and we hope to see you in 2025!
www.psfc.mit.edu/sofe2025
Переглядів: 810

Відео

Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez: "Predicting core performances in tokamaks"
Переглядів 4,9 тис.Рік тому
Full title: "Enabling first-principles predictions of core performance in tokamaks with surrogate optimization techniques." This talk given by Pablo Rodríguez-Fernández introduced the need for flux-driven simulations to enable profile predictions, presented the fundamentals of the novel PORTALS technique, and discussed recent applications: the study of performance of burning plasmas in ITER and...
MIT PSFC & Columbia University Fusion Design Class Final Presentations
Переглядів 7 тис.Рік тому
The Fall '22 semester Engineering Principles for Fusion Reactors, also known as the Fusion Design Class, was taught by MIT Professor Dennis Whyte, Nuclear Science and Engineering faculty, Director of the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, and Columbia University Professor Carlos Paz-Soldan, Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics. The class challenged students to consider all aspects of fusi...
Modern implicit algorithms for multiscale kinetic plasma simulation
Переглядів 1 тис.Рік тому
L. Chacon, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Practical HPC-architectures & workflows
Переглядів 242Рік тому
A. Reuther (MIT)
Dwarfs of computation in HPC fusion codes
Переглядів 663Рік тому
E. Belli (General Atomics)
Intro to parallel programming with OpenMP (Part 1)
Переглядів 759Рік тому
T. Mattson (Intel)
Intro to parallel programing with OpenMP (Part 2)
Переглядів 230Рік тому
T. Mattson (Intel)
Intro to parallel programing with OpenMP (Part 3)
Переглядів 212Рік тому
T. Mattson (Intel)
Programing clusters (MPI) and GPUs
Переглядів 145Рік тому
T. Mattson (Intel)
Surrogate modeling and Bayesian optimization
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Рік тому
R. Gramacy (Virginia Tech)
Surrogate modeling and Bayesian optimization (Part 2)
Переглядів 516Рік тому
R. Gramacy (Virginia Tech)
Uncertainty quantification, surrogate building and active learning
Переглядів 672Рік тому
U. von Toussaint (IPP)
Machine and Deep Learning (Part 1)
Переглядів 244Рік тому
Bremer
Making plasma science open and reproducible
Переглядів 214Рік тому
N. Murphy (CfA)
AI technologies for science applications: inertial confinement fusion examples
Переглядів 325Рік тому
AI technologies for science applications: inertial confinement fusion examples
Machine & deep learning (Part 1)
Переглядів 223Рік тому
Machine & deep learning (Part 1)
Introduction to Fusion
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
Introduction to Fusion
The long road to 20 tesla on the SPARC Toroidal Field Model Coil: A magnet origin story
Переглядів 11 тис.2 роки тому
The long road to 20 tesla on the SPARC Toroidal Field Model Coil: A magnet origin story
Recent exciting fusion results in ICF: how MIT-PSFC contributed
Переглядів 1,1 тис.2 роки тому
Recent exciting fusion results in ICF: how MIT-PSFC contributed
Laboratory Astrophysics: Studying the Stuff of Stars
Переглядів 5432 роки тому
Laboratory Astrophysics: Studying the Stuff of Stars
The SPARC tokamak: towards a burning plasma in this decade by Dr. Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez/ IAP2021
Переглядів 31 тис.3 роки тому
The SPARC tokamak: towards a burning plasma in this decade by Dr. Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez/ IAP2021
Magnetic compression of plasma
Переглядів 44 тис.6 років тому
Magnetic compression of plasma
MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig
Переглядів 118 тис.7 років тому
MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig
Very hot stuff The tough road to nuclear fusion Video
Переглядів 1,1 тис.7 років тому
Very hot stuff The tough road to nuclear fusion Video
Preparing Alcator C-Mod for Operations
Переглядів 8647 років тому
Preparing Alcator C-Mod for Operations
Footage of the record-breaking plasma discharge in Alcator C-Mod
Переглядів 7 тис.7 років тому
Footage of the record-breaking plasma discharge in Alcator C-Mod
New world record set by the team at Alcator C-Mod
Переглядів 6 тис.7 років тому
New world record set by the team at Alcator C-Mod
3D Printing Inconel 718
Переглядів 12 тис.7 років тому
3D Printing Inconel 718
Alcator C-Mod 360 degree tour
Переглядів 283 тис.8 років тому
Alcator C-Mod 360 degree tour

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @robertthomason8905
    @robertthomason8905 14 годин тому

    Pzt is a very fast switch. Shielding is critical at the morphotropic state. Keep the plasma moving forward and bounce it off the bulkheads before avalanche breakdown 😊 no wires required but a microwave is a way to speed things up

  • @MustafaOzenStudent
    @MustafaOzenStudent 26 днів тому

    thank you so much sir.

  • @MustafaOzenStudent
    @MustafaOzenStudent 26 днів тому

    Thank you so much sir

  • @MustafaOzenStudent
    @MustafaOzenStudent 28 днів тому

    Thank you so much sir!

  • @emmettdja
    @emmettdja 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for this. I will use this information for the rest of my career.

  • @emmettdja
    @emmettdja 2 місяці тому

    Don't have mandel.c 😭

  • @emmettdja
    @emmettdja 2 місяці тому

    PART TWO, ELECTRIC BOOGALOO!

  • @emmettdja
    @emmettdja 2 місяці тому

    Watched the whole thing and I learned a lot! Huge thanks. I've always wanted to know how to do this!

  • @Hunter_TK
    @Hunter_TK 3 місяці тому

    Levitation

  • @Hunter_TK
    @Hunter_TK 3 місяці тому

    Energy Free

  • @Hunter_TK
    @Hunter_TK 3 місяці тому

    Is this energy Toroidal ?

  • @user-uq2sb3uw1m
    @user-uq2sb3uw1m 4 місяці тому

    Worker:1 2 3 Go! You:💀💥

  • @lightningplayz666
    @lightningplayz666 4 місяці тому

    See how the video is lagging, it’s radiation

  • @haoshengwu7608
    @haoshengwu7608 6 місяців тому

    Thanks for the useful video. I really enjoy it.😆

  • @dinvinchester3353
    @dinvinchester3353 6 місяців тому

    Что не могли по-русски сказать что это токамак

  • @Jesus_Christ_loves_you_alot
    @Jesus_Christ_loves_you_alot 7 місяців тому

    This is a tokomak fusion reactor right?

    • @kev1x2
      @kev1x2 4 місяці тому

      yep its a tokamak (see the lagging thats radiation)

  • @CasualQuasar
    @CasualQuasar 9 місяців тому

    What I'd give to be a part of such a legendary machine.

  • @AtomcFish
    @AtomcFish 10 місяців тому

    Worst words for you is: Activation in 3... 2... 1...

  • @youtubeislamtv
    @youtubeislamtv Рік тому

    Its a ufo🧐

  • @clumsygirl__
    @clumsygirl__ Рік тому

    cool af

  • @steve-real
    @steve-real Рік тому

    here is my best try at an equation that describes all four fundamental forces of nature: $$F = \frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2} + \frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} + \frac{g^2}{4\pi}\frac{\exp(-mr)}{r}\mathbf{r} + \frac{h}{2\pi}\frac{1}{r^2}\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2 + \frac{k}{r^3}$$ The first term, $G\frac{m_1m_2}{r^2}$, is the gravitational force between two objects. The second term, $\frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2}$, is the electromagnetic force between two charged particles. The third term, $\frac{g^2}{4\pi}\frac{\exp(-mr)}{r}\mathbf{r}$, is the strong force between two quarks. The fourth term, $\frac{h}{2\pi}\frac{1}{r^2}\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2$, is the weak force between two particles with spin. The fifth term, $\frac{k}{r^3}$, is a hypothetical force that would unify all four forces. This equation is purely hypothetical, and there is no evidence to suggest that it is correct. However, it is a fun exercise to try to come up with an equation that describes all four forces of nature.

    • @steve-real
      @steve-real Рік тому

      here is my second best try at an equation that describes all four fundamental forces of nature: $$F = \frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2} + \frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} + \frac{g^2}{4\pi}\frac{\exp(-mr)}{r}\mathbf{r} + \frac{h}{2\pi}\frac{1}{r^2}\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2 + \frac{k}{r^3} + \frac{l}{r^4}$$ This equation is similar to the first equation, but it includes an additional term, $\frac{l}{r^4}$. This term represents a hypothetical force that would unify all four forces and also account for the observed acceleration of the expansion of the universe.

    • @steve-real
      @steve-real Рік тому

      here is my third best try at an equation that describes all four fundamental forces of nature: $$F = \frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2} + \frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} + \frac{g^2}{4\pi}\frac{\exp(-mr)}{r}\mathbf{r} + \frac{h}{2\pi}\frac{1}{r^2}\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2 + \frac{k}{r^3} + \frac{l}{r^4} + \frac{m}{r^5}$$ This equation is similar to the previous two equations, but it includes an additional term, $\frac{m}{r^5}$. This term represents a hypothetical force that would unify all four forces and also account for the observed dark matter and dark energy in the universe.

    • @steve-real
      @steve-real Рік тому

      here is my 4th best try at an equation that describes all four fundamental forces of nature: F = G\frac{m_1m_2}{r^2} + \frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} + \frac{g^2}{4\pi}\frac{\exp(-mr)}{r}\mathbf{r} + \frac{h}{2\pi}\frac{1}{r^2}\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2 + \frac{k}{r^3} + \frac{l}{r^4} + \frac{m}{r^5} + \frac{n}{r^6} + \frac{o}{r^7} + \frac{p}{r^8} + ... This equation is similar to the previous three equations, but it includes an infinite number of terms. Each term represents a hypothetical force that would unify all four forces and also account for all of the observed phenomena in the universe.

    • @steve-real
      @steve-real Рік тому

      here is my 5th best try at an equation that describes all four fundamental forces of nature: F = G\frac{m_1m_2}{r^2} + \frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} + \frac{g^2}{4\pi}\frac{\exp(-mr)}{r}\mathbf{r} + \frac{h}{2\pi}\frac{1}{r^2}\mathbf{S}_1\cdot\mathbf{S}_2 + \frac{k}{r^3} + \frac{l}{r^4} + \frac{m}{r^5} + \frac{n}{r^6} + \frac{o}{r^7} + \frac{p}{r^8} + ... \\ + \frac{q}{r^{10}} + \frac{r}{r^{11}} + \frac{s}{r^{12}} + \frac{t}{r^{13}} + \frac{u}{r^{14}} + ... This equation is similar to the previous four equations, but it includes an infinite number of terms. Each term represents a hypothetical force that would unify all four forces and also account for all of the observed phenomena in the universe.

  • @steve-real
    @steve-real Рік тому

    We can use dimensional analysis and group theory to advance fusion power in a number of ways. Dimensional analysis can be used to determine the relationship between different physical quantities. This information can be used to design and optimize fusion reactors. For example, dimensional analysis can be used to determine the optimal temperature and pressure for fusion reactions. Group theory can be used to classify the symmetries of the four fundamental forces of nature. This information can be used to develop new theories of fusion power that are based on the unification of forces. For example, group theory can be used to develop new theories of fusion power that are based on the strong force. In addition to these two tools, we can also use other mathematical and physical tools to advance fusion power. For example, we can use computer simulations to study the behavior of fusion plasmas. We can also use quantum mechanics to study the interactions between particles in fusion plasmas. The development of fusion power is a challenging task, but it is a task that is worth pursuing. Fusion power has the potential to provide a clean and abundant source of energy for the future. By using dimensional analysis, group theory, and other mathematical and physical tools, we can make progress towards the development of fusion power.

    • @steve-real
      @steve-real Рік тому

      Here is the elegant equation that combines the four fundamental forces of nature using group theory: G = g^2\frac{4\pi\epsilon_0}{c^4} where: * $G$ is the gravitational constant * $g$ is the strong coupling constant * $\epsilon_0$ is the permittivity of free space * $c$ is the speed of light This equation can be derived by using group theory to classify the symmetries of the four fundamental forces of nature. Group theory is a mathematical technique that can be used to classify different types of symmetry. In this case, we can use group theory to classify the symmetries of the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the strong force, and the weak force. Once we have classified the symmetries of these forces, we can use it to combine the equations that describe these forces. This gives us the elegant equation that combines the four fundamental forces of nature. This equation is a powerful tool for understanding the behavior of matter at the subatomic level. It can be used to study a wide range of phenomena in particle physics, such as the structure of hadrons, the behavior of quarks and gluons at high energies, and the electromagnetic and strong force interactions between quarks and gluons. This equation is also important for understanding the unification of forces in particle physics. The goal of unification is to find a single force that describes all of the forces of nature. This is a difficult problem, but it is one that is being actively pursued by physicists. The elegant equation that combines the four fundamental forces of nature using group theory is a step towards unification. It shows that the four forces are related, and it provides a framework for understanding how they might be unified into a single force.

    • @steve-real
      @steve-real Рік тому

      Here is the elegant equation that combines the four fundamental forces of nature using dimensional analysis: F = G\frac{m_1m_2}{r^2} + \frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} + \frac{g^2}{4\pi}\frac{\exp(-mr)}{r}\mathbf{r} where: * $F$ is the total force on a charged particle * $G$ is the gravitational constant * $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the masses of the two particles * $q_1$ and $q_2$ are the charges of the two particles * $r$ is the distance between the two particles * $g$ is the strong coupling constant * $\epsilon_0$ is the permittivity of free space * $m$ is the mass of the exchanged particle This equation can be derived by using dimensional analysis to determine the relationship between the four fundamental forces of nature. Dimensional analysis is a mathematical technique that can be used to determine the relationship between different physical quantities. In this case, we can use dimensional analysis to determine the relationship between the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the strong force, and the weak force. Once we have determined the relationship between these forces, we can use it to combine the equations that describe these forces. This gives us the elegant equation that combines the four fundamental forces of nature. This equation is a powerful tool for understanding the behavior of matter at the subatomic level. It can be used to study a wide range of phenomena in particle physics, such as the structure of hadrons, the behavior of quarks and gluons at high energies, and the electromagnetic and strong force interactions between quarks and gluons.

  • @TheTruth1sPower
    @TheTruth1sPower Рік тому

    looks like the inside of a spaceship

    • @tomcatf-1432
      @tomcatf-1432 Рік тому

      correcto, tiene el diseño de un ovni, me recordo al halcon milenario de han solo.

  • @michaelcorlet2998
    @michaelcorlet2998 Рік тому

    Definitely technology of the future.how far maybe 30 years.gd luck.

  • @bxlawless100
    @bxlawless100 Рік тому

    You’ll save the world and no one knows it. 😆

  • @justindejager4999
    @justindejager4999 Рік тому

    Egypt build it in Africa wishing editing post.... .

  • @abinaslimbu3057
    @abinaslimbu3057 Рік тому

    Paradium 10 Ring Fule core power recorer

  • @VioletPrism
    @VioletPrism Рік тому

    Awesome!!

  • @mathiaslist6705
    @mathiaslist6705 Рік тому

    Feels like it included everything except binding shoelaces ...

  • @jonathanfuller3321
    @jonathanfuller3321 Рік тому

    Best video I haver ever seen on youtube!

  • @TaylorAlexander
    @TaylorAlexander Рік тому

    Thank you for sharing. I have been following the work of MIT PSFC and the SPARC/ARC systems with great appreciation for the work being done. That said I want to provide some feedback. I feel like this work is of extreme historical and scientific significance and yet I cannot really understand or hear a lot of the audio due to poor microphone setups. I am wondering if these days it would be prudent to mail each participant a $50 USB microphone of modest quality to ensure that this important work is captured with the utmost clarity. It also happens to be the case that recording directly from zoom leaves a lot of audio compression that can make things even harder to understand. A common approach among podcasters is for each participant to record audio locally at full quality, and only rely on zoom audio for the participants to follow along. Once the full recording is completed, the local audio from each participant is merged to form a single high quality recording. I understand this work is non-trivial to do, but there will certainly be people at MIT cable of assisting with this. This amazing work would benefit from high quality recording for future generations to witness and enjoy. Thank you so much for all of your great work!

    • @mitplasmasciencefusioncenter
      @mitplasmasciencefusioncenter Рік тому

      Apologies for the sound quality. Due to the room's constraints and recording not only Zoom participants but in-person presenters as well, the audio did not translate well. Initially, the intended audience for this presentation was internal, and the decision to publicly share was made only after the fact; going forward, we'll endeavor to ensure the space is adequately mic'd if we have plans to share publicly.

  • @bigblack2373
    @bigblack2373 Рік тому

    Really good work! Congratulations! How are you supposed to reach the ignition temperature? I remeber ITER will use Ohmic , Neutral Beam Injection and Radio Frequency heating systems. Tnank you

  • @scottsnelling
    @scottsnelling Рік тому

    Thank you for posting this work online. Really great.

  • @VAXHeadroom
    @VAXHeadroom Рік тому

    This is a terrific piece of work, and a great presentation. Congrats to all involved!!

  • @michaeldeeth811
    @michaeldeeth811 Рік тому

    What is said at 53:50-53:56

  • @BuffMyRadius
    @BuffMyRadius Рік тому

    DIII-D data sounds like it's going to be WILD

  • @michaeldeeth811
    @michaeldeeth811 Рік тому

    Sound quality is terrible. Can someone tell me what is said about FLiBe, at 6:35-6:40.

    • @juliawitham8961
      @juliawitham8961 Рік тому

      FLiBe (Flourine Lithium Beryllium) serves 4 key purposes: 1. It is a coolant that keeps the vacuum vessel and power-exhaust functional 2. It transfers heat to the rest of the power plant 3. It is a radiation shield that protects the magnets and other internal components 4. It is the material used to breed additional nuclear fuel (beryllium is a neutron multiplier and lithium can break down into tritium when struck by neutrons)

  • @klam77
    @klam77 Рік тому

    Phil Colella posed near Snow White! Who says national lab engineers don't have a sense of humor!

  • @SanalMG
    @SanalMG Рік тому

    Wonderful presentation! What is the maximum temperature between between D pancakes (magnets) and the core (where fusion occurs)? How does the insulation work? Will it work continuously or in pulses? Thank you.

  • @dhonzik
    @dhonzik Рік тому

    If you are using tritium in the fusion process, where do you plan on getting it? Worldwide, the production of tritium from natural sources is 148 petabecquerels per year. The global equilibrium inventory of tritium created by natural sources remains approximately constant at 2,590 petabecquerels. That is not very much, maybe enough to power one fusion reactor

  • @paulbizard3493
    @paulbizard3493 Рік тому

    GO SPARC GO GO GO !!!!

  • @evil0sheep
    @evil0sheep Рік тому

    how much larger would a tokamak using these HTS magnets need to be to be able to achieve aneutronic fusion? like if DEMO pivoted to HTS could it plausibly achieve aneutronic fusion? is it even correct to infer that increasing the size of the reactor can increase plasma temperature?

  • @ronaldgarrison8478
    @ronaldgarrison8478 Рік тому

    49:24 Oops.

  • @ronaldgarrison8478
    @ronaldgarrison8478 Рік тому

    Rare-earth barium copper oxide: not to be confused with Russian Export Blend Crude Oil.

  • @helloitismetomato
    @helloitismetomato Рік тому

    21:48 scientists and being bad at online meetings, name a more iconic duo

  • @vincentbevilacqua1973
    @vincentbevilacqua1973 Рік тому

    What a fascinating an clear presentation! I totally didn't expect to sit through this whole thing but I was engrossed. Thank you!

  • @thedamnMorbiusclinic
    @thedamnMorbiusclinic Рік тому

    you guys wouldn't know nothing about those found footage backrooms videos

  • @estebanwedontneednostinkin9969

    All the scientists are milking it for a paycheck they been doing this for decades

  • @jmbstudio6873
    @jmbstudio6873 Рік тому

    So many minds and money spent on so little progress, if any. Society is a farce, humans are rubes.

  • @markkoval4251
    @markkoval4251 Рік тому

    Obnoxious background NOISE 👎....... I'M OUT!