Відео

Matt destroyed Petersen in the ACTUAL debate.

not accredited, not industry certified, only legal in Arizona, and disclaimed of having any value to anything per his own terms of service. It is a scam just like Trump University.

I'm afraid Peterson is psychologically wrong. Nietzsche and not least Dostojewski contradict him most strongly on his point. Raskolnikow acted against a secular law and to this law only he submits. In a moral sense he did not regret anything, did not feel any remorse throughout the intire course of the story. While refering to his Genealogy Of Morals, Nietzsche once said: _..the psychology of conscience.. is not, as you may believe, the voice of God in man; it is the instinct of cruelty, which turns inwards once it is unable to discharge itself outwardly._ A murder is an outward action. Dostojewski shared four years one bedroom with murderers in a Sibirian prison camp. Discribing his experience in the House of the Dead he said: _… during many years I never remarked the least sign of repentance, not even the slightest uneasiness with regard to the crime committed._ Raskolnikow never lost his self-respect. That is what the book is all about. Here are his words in the epilogue of Crime and Punishment: _Oh, sceptics and halfpenny philosophers, why do you halt half-way! Why does my action strike them as so horrible?_ he said to himself. _Is it because it was a crime? What is meant by crime? My conscience is at rest. Of course, it was a legal crime, of course, the letter of the law was broken and blood was shed. Well, punish me for the letter of the law... and that's enough. Of course, in that case many of the benefactors of mankind who snatched power for themselves instead of inheriting it ought to have been punished at their first steps. But those men succeeded and so they were right, and I didn't, and so I had no right to have taken that step._

this is what i don't get about people. like at what point of me not caring about all of they're crap will the world start showing mercy? like at what point of taking can I expect they will stop or do i consider these creatures non-human

Their good at writing and language, which is what this system was suited for.

Polygamy was the norm for thousands of years until religion started to control the minds of people

Is he talking about Foreman? I know we all might look alike but dayum? How can anyone confuse Foreman and Frazier SMH

Tiamat loves all her creations, even Yahweh. All will be saved! ♾️

She gave birth to everything. SHE IS THE TRUE ORIGINAL CREATRESS OF ALL! SHE WILL RULE AGAIN WITH LOVE, WISDOM, AND HARMONY. AWOMAN! 🩷😎💚😁🤙✌️👍🫶♾️

Kingu is Tiamat's 🩷😎💚😁🤙✌️👍🫶♾️

🩷😎💚😁🤙✌️👍🫶♾️

What did he just say? All that intellect it's a darn shame I never got anything of value out of it ! Just flipping, fancy wording! No common sense here at all ! Moving On Nothing to learn here ! My baby makes better sense !

You missed the meat. You missed the previous statement of WHAT the father is to encourage. 😂

Nice imagination Dr. 😂😂

Amen

But competence and genuine reciprocity grant you power. So everything IS based on power.

Mushrooms made me realize I needed to quit using drugs 😂

I love how the caption is super accurate about which book he’s referencing.

When will Jordan practice his advice with himself. He constantly demands that his word is infallible, but he actually tried to be deceptive even before this video was made. Look at how he started trying to deceive the courts in 2009 regarding the Sordi case. At the same time Jordan will not address that DURING SUSPENSION, LICENSEES MAY NOT PRACTICE PSYCHOLOGY OR REFER TO THEMSELVES AS PSYCHOLOGISTS. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request. Jordan is a Jim Jones or David Koresh wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.

⁠Subjective morality would mean morals are based on opinions, not facts. Meaning there are no objective moral values or duties. However, to accept this means you have to willfully live a delusion. You would live pretending that there is right and wrong, when you know there isn’t such a thing. I don’t advocate lying to yourself.

Dillahunty is factually correct here

But Jordan has got a very serious problem, he is still referring to himself as a psychologist. DURING SUSPENSION, LICENSEES MAY NOT PRACTICE PSYCHOLOGY OR REFER TO THEMSELVES AS PSYCHOLOGISTS. As indicated above in "Probation," suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.

But Jordan promotes SELECTIVE perception and even worse provides SELECTIVE opinions that have been proven unscientific. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.

Jordan seems to not address his own misconduct, and tries to avoid it. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.

This is nonsense, and has not basis. The fact is the bible is a fantasy book, and the internet contains SCIENTIFIC derived and validated knowledge. Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.

She so deliberately attempts to put words in JP's mouth as to be absurd. She sounds more like harpy fishwife than a professional journalist. Lol

Conflating acting like you believe in something and claiming you actually believe in something is dishonest.

I have iq of 84

Soon as I learned it's not a one way street in reciprocity my whole life changed.

Jordan Peterson you are too kind to women. The reality is that female math nerds are no more verbally gifted than male math nerds. Few people would turn down the opportunity to pursue maths. So if someone passes down the chance, that indicates that they weren’t so gifted in the first place. Boys are more likely to be mathematically gifted than girls.

☺️

Nothing but unfounded assertions. Typical Jordan Peterson, focusing on marriage as a magic pill is ridiculous and just him trying to assert his beliefs as logical conclusion. The longer this man speaks the more out lunch he gets on what was asked of him. Abortions are sometimes a medically necessary procedure, this intellectually dishonest man acts as if everyone who ends up getting an abortion is exactly what they wanted. Give your head a shake, watch After Tiller, you sound like a fundamentalist.

When I read this part of the bible.. I had a weird feeling Adam and Eve could have been forgiven by God, if Adam just straight manned- up and admitted to his mistake..

"Hey man".

god is all knowing he knew they would do that and punished them anyway and he lied what a guy

Yeah, the abstract is supposed to limit a ruler. How did it worked out? Constitutional monarchy exists for a reason.

What a load of idiotic word salad. Amazing that people feel this guy is smart. He's an idiot.

Who named Adam & Eve could that entity not have named all the animals as well.

I’m an atheist

The zone of proximal development represents what a learner is capable of doing on their own and what they are capable doing under guidance from a more skilled mentor. Vygotsky stated that a learner's capabilities are expanded while being guided by a more skilled peer. It is a concept from Childhood Development studies and educational psychology. It has little to nothing to do with self-improvement. Peterson's misuse of the definition of this concept makes his argument complete bullshit. It sounds true, but it's completely invalid. He is the perfect example of someone who's delivery sounds good, but his arguments can be dismantled with about 5 minutes of fact-checking.

Crime and Punishment doesn't reveal anything. it directs it's characters in ways that serve Dostoyevky's beliefs, which does not necessarily have any bearing on real human behaviour and psychology.

He isn't exploring anything, he's just repeating a self-serving story of Dostoyevsky's that utilises a caricature of a human being. Peterson either doesn't understand human morality or he's just being dishonest.

me low IQ doesn't understand

No. it's not a complicated question at all. A genuine atheist is someone who doesn't believe that gods exist. Peterson seems to think that human beings operate on pure logic functions and are obliged to act on the basis of absolutes. Reskolnikov is a clunky construction of a human being that only serves as a vehicle for Dostoyevsky to preach his flawed understanding.

JP is it you personally sending these videos out??

wasn't he the guy that dreamed about fucking his grandma?

There are no gods, simple

I think atheism takes as much faith as anything..... Just my thoughts...... I don't have the answers though..... I'm just a seeker trying to figure out this thing like everyone else.... If they're truthful.

just a happy clapper with big words

Daoist, not dowist