Відео

No bc she said “seek therapy” and people took it seriously?? If someone says that and you take it seriously maybe you should go to therapy😭

Kris is right and also just joking at the people and books that’s what she does

Kris absolutely shouldn’t have been forced to apologize. People are pussies

also, note the Snow white movie was going to be under the daily wire. Snow white is not owned by Disney. anyone can make a Snow white book or movie. it's a copyright free material.

I'd like to make a correction thanks to some feedback: Crowder didn't leave the daily wire, he was offered a four year $50 million deal that he called a "slave contract". Although the CEO of the daily wire Jeremy Boreing clapped back in a video saying "Crowder only needed to work 4 days a week and produce 192 episodes of his daily show per year." Bottom line is Crowder did not join the daily wire. love you guys!!

You best believe if someone told me 24690 was one of their favorite dark romance books id judge the hell out if them bc that disturbing asf so for people to get mad at Kris for saying people praising the book concerns her IS THE PROBLEM bc there was nothing wrong with what she said. And throughout the whole video she clearly stated MULTIPLE time it was her opinion. Booktok is just being dramatic and sensitive bc she doesnt agree with their opinion

Raegan should have known wtf she’d be getting into by this role…. Wild 4:37 bro you need to do better research… crowder didn’t leave daily wire, he was offered a deal that he turned down…

If it takes a literal book expert (a librarian vs a Costco employee) to distinguish that it's not a children's book, I feel like it proves her point. And saying just because it's a cutesy animation style cover doesn't mean it's for kids is not a good argument. There are regulations against nicotine product packaging being colorful and shiny so kids are less likely to be interested in the products, not because we think adults can't have colorful and shiny things too bfr

She just normal teenager, living her life

All these girl just jealous they can’t cook

This shit is soo weird

Rebeca's story is amazing, same as Simone, two black girls with humble origins searching for their dreams. It's amazing by itself and their competition only makes it better, as they're supportive and respectful to each other. Brazil had other generations of great gymnasts as Daiane dos Santos and Daniele Hypólito, and seeing Rebeca in the top now seems like a full circle that ends beautifully but also serves as inspiration for new gens. ♥️

For people you claim to like smut and the like, they get highly sensitive when someone dissgrees or cslls them out. Are we forgetting how smuttok was with that hockey player and his wife,? Or that teenage boy with the motorcycle helmet? Sorry, not Sorry but smuttok is becoming more unhinged IMO. And feel like they are kinda of proving her point, by their reactions 😂😂🤷🏿‍♀️🤦🏿‍♀️

It wasn't what kallmekris said, it's the audience she said it to. Kris has culminated (especially recently) the true crime girlies which have a huge crossover with the smut reader girlies. This video was in poor taste because it shows she didn't understand her target audience and their opinions. As for her points on the cover, yeah I can see how Icebreaker gets mistaken as a kids book, but it's no different from adult cartoons or anime. Happy Tree Friends immediatly comes to mind. The blurb makes it clear it's about college age students and parents need to be just a bit more involved in what they're buying for their teen. If a teen is old enough to buy the books for themselves, then they are probably old enough and mature enough to read them.

Do you guys think Jack should have gotten unbanned from Kick?

😏😏😏😏😏😏😎😎😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏🙂‍↕️

sick video

I am on kris side because some of these books are very crazy. but also the fact that people are getting so upset and I know Canyon made a video and everyone got really upset too. also I have been to the libraries and a few bookstores and I have seen that book being misplaced before and I was like oh my God. so it does happen. I think if there was a giant sticker saying adults only on it would probably help a lot more.

Imagine some mid aged person invested there life savings into it and then a kid takes it all and flips you off in the process😂

It’s the same sad lonely( usually obese women )people that have no love life or friends out of their fantasy.

10:41 she’s an idiot

It was sort of funny how in the video you mentioned Game of Thrones because actually they were commenting on 'WELL HOW CAN SHE LIKE GAME OF THRONES BUT SHIT ON US!!!" XD I was commenting back the difference between Game of Thrones (mostly the book because the first one is 869 pages long) only has small themes sprinkled throughout the series of problematic topics that are woven into a larger plotline of an Epic Fantasy whereas books like Birthday Girl, Credance, and 24690...that's basically the whole plotline XD

If a Costco employee looked at the book cover and assumed it was YA or for younger kids, doesn’t that defeat the point that the book cover doesn’t look like YA? It absolutely looks like 90% of the YA books you’ll find in any big box store or book store.

Bruh it’s not that serious 💀

Smut is detailed sex scenes. So you're right, not Twilight. And I liked one of the books she talked about. I just didn't get offended because everyone is entitled to their feelings and opinions. The people who like or even love these books should appreciate that. Imagen not having the freedom of speech. these books wouldn't exist. Instead of tearing down someone who's opinions you disagree with (ABOUT A BOOK), Maybe you should just move on and watch content you do like and agree with.

Icebreaker doesn’t look like it stars children, but one could easily argue it looks like it stars teenagers. I’m not a smut reader so havent heard Icebreaker is smut until recently, I’ve always assumed it was a YA romance. YA books are being read by children, and I don’t think a U on the jersey is enough to show it’s not about high school. Who’s gonna look at a book cover, assume it’s a kids book, then look closer at the jersey to double check if it’s marked university or high school?

Omg these people are so sensitive lol

oof theresa turned her comments off

my theory: the ppl getting mad at kris don’t get any smuff irl

Hehehe yesssss, oh my this... ive been wondering where this clip was from. ❤

Honestly, people are too sensitive, they are taking everything too seriously, Also 10:16 it does, infact look like a book for tweens, AND not all books for tweens ARE ABOUT 10 YEAR OLDS, it looks like a kids book that one of my friends would've picked up, thinking it was a book like SMILE, or Babysitters club. That being said. In middle school I was an AVID smut reader and it was seriously bad for my brain and mental health, admittedly it was actually fanfiction that drew me in, but I just think overall society has normalized porn way to much

I think some of this comes downt to newish readers not understanding the etiquette - we all judge books by their cover and theres standard trops for each genre. Traditionally smut books were in thf bodice ripper style with a shirtless man qnd maybe the love intrest as an actual photo or the modern ebook smut stuletwith know one on thr cover but with dark colours. These new covers look like ya romace with an illustrated couple on the cover with light colours and people like them because they're "discreet" as if nobody knows (if you want discreet read an ebook or audiobook) its the same with people taking fanfic (thst can be smutty) and binding them amd selling them to the booktok girlies as if thet doesn't put fanfic in danger because of copyright

Kris isn't wrong, especially when it comes to the topic of Icebreaker and the art style. For literal YEARS I thought it was a cute high school romance. And I know others did too because for the first couple months it was released it was in the kids section of my local Barnes & Noble and target. Which is where I first heard about it, and let me to think that it was an innocent kids book.

Kris is 100% correct

I didn't know Icebreaker was a smut book I literally saw it in the children section of my local Walmart. I feel like it would be a good idea that when there is explicit matters like this in books that there should be a warning just like there are on video games. I understand how it could be a slippery slope when it comes to censorship and keeping teens/children from important subjects. Yes it is important for teens to be able to understand and explore their sexuality in safe ways but also allowing to be accessible by children with unsuspecting parents who just hear 'it's a popular book for youth' will buy it for their kids. As someone who was a preteen/teen through the twilight books and movies coming out I can say I was uncomfortable with the sex scenes even at that age and was shocked when I would see middle schoolers carrying around these books or going to see the movies. Though I believe it important for parents to look into what media their children are consuming, when you see a book in the teens/kids sections, they're no doubt more likely to assume that it is material actually suitable for their child especially when having a more cutesy cover. Having some sort of warning or label on the back of the book and regulating sexual content like they do for video games really would make a difference in my opinion. It wouldn't fix the issue completely of course but at least it would lower the chances of these kinds of books ending up in kids hands.

With Kris all the way! People don't understand that Icebreaker isn't intentionally being bought by parents who know what the book is really about, this book is legit being put in kids' sections and HS libraries because the author HERSELF did not market the book for what it really was. I know people who liked Icebreaker but even they were surprised by what it was because there was nothing from the marketing that suggested it was basically hard core 🌽. And ppl are criticizing her for having GOT on her shelf as if it's that same as Haunting Adeline. 🙄Yeah, Icebreaker is pretty unproblematic compared to the rest of them, but it still causes problems. And it's also a shit book, so there's that. Don't even get me started on books like Haunting Adeline or ACOTAR, tho, I'd be here forever. And it was clear she wasn't calling out ALL smut readers, just specifically one's that are either 🌽addicts or sexualize SA. They all excuse it saying "it's just fiction it doesn't effect reality" but they don't understand that all books are inherently political and reflect real world values and morals. Not to mention the sexualization of REAL random bikers/hockey boys, some even MINORS, on tiktok because of their crazy asses. God, and don't get me STARTED on how this is actually promoting desensitization of DV or SA to teenage girls and that normalizing this type of "dark romance" is, in fact, going to lead to girls pining after terrible men/boys because they don't understand they're not chasing a concept. I could go on, but I'm sure no one wants to hear me rant any further. TLDR: Kris rightfully called out the disgustingly normalized behavior and topics of "booktok" and "booktok girls" and they got mad and started calling her misogynistic for it.

I just think it’s a tired video topic that’s been done so so so many times. She didn’t say anything I haven’t already heard before.

Regarding the book cover, imo it looks a lot like something that would be directed at highschoolers. It's not just the artstyle, but it's also just how it looks like a cute romance the centers around hocky, that paired with the title don't really imply anything beyond that. And in my experianxe most highschoolers and younger kids won't be reading the synopsis, not that I know what the synopsis even says, but I can see highschoolers and younger picking out the book purely because of the cute cover and title.

Kris didn't do anything wrong, booktok is known for overreacting when people call them weird. I used to watch her skits often on tiktok and I saw that video in my recommended when it came out. She's not being mean or anything it's just her content style is to be silly and poke fun. Thanks for this video btw I had no idea that booktok was losing their minds over her video. Edit: I forgot about the part where she said that the books were in kids sections of libraries. That's not great on her part since it wasn't true, but I don't think her overall video was bad because of it. Aside from that I think she was being a bit more aggressive than needed at first, but a lot of youtubers do that because it boosts engagement. I can't sit here and tone police her for something most popular youtubers do, it wouldn't be fair.

As someone who actively reads smut, I think she made very valid points and people are allowed to have opinions on these books. These books were made for a specific audience and it isn't for everybody. It's literally just a genre of book and not that big of a deal for these people who read the books to get so heated over.

Honestly I agree with her points to some degree

Imagine getting so utterly offended over a book u call someone a liar and just hate on them

bruh my younger brother in 5th grade is reading these

I had icebreaker in middle school. The girl in the glasses kind of pissed me off with the misinformation lable, lol, and saying it doesn't happen makes her just look stupid af.

I’m on Kris’ side. At no point does she intentionally go after the people reading. The most she does is poke fun of the writing and make hyperboles.

I’m going with kris on this one. The cover of icebreaker looks like a kids book about hockey. Test it: Take away the title and make a poll asking “if you had to guess what this book was about, what would you say it was?”. She’s right about desensitization, it applies from spicy food to all out abuse. She did say she wasn’t trying to yuck anyone’s yum, and humans ARE weird animals. It’s not elitist or putting anyone down, it’s an observation about -the-human-animal-, this is how almost every psychologist and anthropologist (hell…biologist?) sees humanity. And starting at 50 shades?…seems intuitive. Maybe *smut* readers know it’s not where you start, but if you dont read smut and wandered into the section…this is the one that everyone has heard of. It’s tantamount to “needing a truck” and buying an F-150 when what you actually needed was a subaru baja. Booktok has its panties in a twist. (Which is ironic…You’d think they’d like that. )

Whose side are you guys on? 👨‍⚖️