Відео

Thank you, Jenny.🎉

You are correct. Thank you for bringing this up. I was hoping for an opportunity to explain my use of the word, "we." "We" humans is my intended use. Humanity is us. "We" are the human condition. "We" are history. (You are uniquely and specifically yourself🎉)

Thank you.

How very wonderful to have a child who can see the world with new and fresh perspectives.🎉

@GemmasJourneyGrace Thank you, Gemma! Taking photos during the 1860's must have been very difficult, indeed. Have you ever developed film in a darkroom? It is like a science experiment. I would love to see your pictures and observe your discerning eye behind the camera. (BTW, the words photography and cartography sound similar. I used the latter, but love talking about the former.)

@@AuditingWithAutism hey Kyle no iv never developed photos in a dark room before my late grandmother used to have someone do her pictures for her but she has passed away so I never asked about it.

@GemmasJourneyGrace I feel we are lucky to have camera phones these days. The harsh smells in the darkroom were enough to push some people away from using it. I really enjoy looking at your snaps of yourself in cute outfits and such. It kinda brightens my day. (Truth)

@@AuditingWithAutism aww thank you so much Kyle that means a lot to me , i love dressing up its a escape from reality and it is my happy place being back in the Elvis era and putting on the jewellery and shoes and scarves and hats makes me feel incredible. There will be more pictures this week , keep checking my community tab :)

Nice one. In a, be the language (change) we want to see in the world, kind of a way. Thanks for watching.

"The world is full of objects, but that's what they remain until intellectual interaction, then they become facts." (Wittgenstein's book: Tractatus) But: An idea (poetry) points to the unseen like a map pointing the way out of the woods to a lost hiker. An idea shows the hiker to see not where he is, per se, but to see the forest for the trees; to see the bigger picture.

LOL😂

No offence dude, I’m sure your video is very well-meaning and helpful for autism

@micklowrey1522 No offense. I thought it was a funny comment, ironically. Burr is a favourite funny bone I like to hit once in a while.

@@AuditingWithAutism oh yeah he’s a real funny-in-real-life-too guy

If a proposition has no possible opposite, it is a "Law," or the fundamental framework for our concept of reality and therefore unchangeable. If a proposition has a possible opposite, it is showing us "forms," which are necessarily changeable, and therefore must be an expression of that which is unchangeable. 🎉

A chair is made for sitting, a bed for laying, a computer program for the aim of the person who wrote it - so it would seem that which is created is made with intention. The universe has apparent order (physics), just as intended!?

​@@AuditingWithAutism The apparent order you see is a mental state. No mental state contains reality. Our brains can only hold small stories and relationships from a evolutionary utilitarian perspective. Narratives can't hold truth, like a cup can't hold the ocean. Just on the examples you gave, Chair, Bed, computer, these are human inventions, of course they have utility. That conclusion of utility, does not transfer to the universe, since we had nothing to do with its creation. What can you say about the areas of the universe where we know to be inhospitable , burning or freezing for billions of years, who created them ? and who asses its utility? Again the real meaning of "The tao that can be spoken is not the real Tao" is that If you can talk about it, its not the ultimate truth of the universe. So no human argument can prove anything. (that includes this of witgenstein) No specific god can be instantiated into existence through brain twists.

@@AuditingWithAutism The apparent order you see is a mental state. No mental state contains reality. Our brains can only hold small stories and relationships from an evolutionary utilitarian perspective. Narratives can't hold truth, like a cup can't hold the ocean. Just on the examples you gave, Chair, Bed, computer, these are human inventions, of course they have utility. That conclusion of utility, does not transfer to the universe, since we had nothing to do with its creation. What can you say about the areas of the universe where we know to be inhospitable , burning or freezing for billions of years, who created them ? and who asses its utility? Again the real meaning of "The Tao that can be spoken is not the real Tao" is that If you can talk about it, its not the ultimate truth of the universe. So no human argument can prove anything. (that includes this of Wittgenstein) No specific god can be instantiated into existence through brain twists

​@@AuditingWithAutismthis is the same argument I use in favour of the universe having a purpose. However there is a caveat to my theory and that is that anything which is created does not know what it's own purpose is because the purpose comes from the intention of the Creator so only the creator of a thing knows what that purpose actually is. This means that the Universe has a purpose and we have a purpose but because we did not create ourselves we cannot know what that purpose is

The whole modern conception of the world is founded on the illusion that the so-called laws of nature are the explanations of natural phenomena. Thus people today stop at the laws of nature, treating them as something inviolable, just as God and Fate were treated in past ages. And in fact both were right and both wrong; though the view of the ancients is clearer insofar as they have an acknowledged terminus, while the modern system tries to make it look as if everything were explained. - Wittgenstein, Tractatus, 6.371-2

You; if you haven't yet, read the novel Wittegensteins Mistress

It's just not true. These things are not a linear progression. Rather they correspond to one another in structural ways. They are nested in a way that is analogous to how sciences relate to one another. Physics is not more correct than chemistry or biology. Rather, these things are descriptive of the world at different scales and functions. Theology and philosophy are not precursors of science. Nor is science some necessarily modern and exclusively truth preserving domain. All three have a spectrum of utility and veracity. Philosophy is most commony divided into domains that seek to distill questions, concepts values. Science is about the cross reference of data with hypothesis to produce explanation, prediction, repetition and invention. Theology is about organizing ones judgments and preferences into a totalizing view of the world. I think everyone has their personal worldview. As well as an applied ethics, political theory and so forth.

Thank you for a great comment. I was kinda waiting for this one. I agree with all you mention, but the principle of Law (as I mentioned in the video) gives us the proposition: The universe exists. Can I imagine it also not existing? If the answer is "No," then we are talking about the very framework for physics, which, as you say, gives us the other sciences. This framework is the universe itself. Physics are immutable truths that we use mathematics to describe. Making math so very reliable. Chemistry, for example, is defined as change itself. Physics, like photons and electrons, for example, do not change.🎉

@@beksinski wow you were right until you went to theology. I'm sorry but no, it is not merely organizing one's judgements into a totalizing view of the world. It involves postulating things which are almost always impossible to prove and are therefore irrational. Lets also not pretend all religious people have "good personal reasons" for thinking there is a God. These are overwhelmingly bad reasons masquerading as good ones. Namely that they grew up in a religious community and so became religious themselves, or failed to understand the dozens of ways that arguments for God's existence (frequently centuries old) are either logically contradictory, invalid, or have premises that can simply never be proven. The teleological, ontological, cosmological, moral, and historical arguments for God's existence have all been debunked millions of times. And we have instead observed a cult-like worship of unprovable ideas leading to much suffering in the middle east and in Europe historically. It is morally offensive to even suggest some place for theology amongst philosophy and science. That's like saying rape should be put on a pedestal with beauty and intelligence as desirable virtues. Religion is a dumb cult dominated by hicks in the global south, and fanatics in the East. There is nothing deeper to it, and there never will be

@@jayneshort8603 Thanks. He is a good boy.

Hi Jemma! Please allow me to give you an early, "Happy Birthday!!" I hope it's the best. Thank you for a very nice comment.

Thank you.

Thank you.🎉

@jamesnock5572 Well, I had high hopes for this one, but an average performance came out. I love the song so much I went ahead and published it anyway. Thanks for the kind sentiment.

@jamesnock5572 Thanks. Yeah, me too. Bowie broke some kind of ceiling for the rest of us, and Kurt honored that so well in performing this song. The lyrics are gold.

@jamesnock5572 Thank you for the compliments. Good work on 17 pull-ups in a row at 46(ish)! You are in the top 1% of TRAINING athletes. My workout consists of only chopping wood or digging earth. And walking the dog. But at 7 or 8 pull-ups at 54(ish), I am satisfied. Never stop.✌️

@@clipsclips8526 Thank you very much. ❤️

@@AuditingWithAutism of course!:)

I can see that you are talented. I hope you pick it up and start strumming again.🤞