Відео

Haha! Yes, I am afraid that the chapters are automatically generated and our online dictionaries need rewilding... that being said, we are very glad that you enjoyed it!

Thanks for getting stuck-in. Just wanted to say: rewilding and the restoration of ecosystems (on land and in our oceans) is strongly interconnected with climate change mitigation. Biodiversity and climate are interconnected. Better still, increasing biodiversity can be a powerful tool in mitigating the climate crisis. A growing body of science has outlined that rewilding animal populations to enhance natural carbon capture and storage could further reduce emissions by billions of tonnes annually, an amount of reduction that rivals each of the IPCC's top 5 (see Schmitz et al., Trophic rewilding can expand natural climate solutions, Nature Climate Change). Our topics very much overlap with COP28! Have a look at our website to read some more on this :)

@@GlobalRewilding No. You're confusing which comes first, the planting or the biodiversity increase. As far as re-vegetation goes, that's always best done by humans getting the process started by planting in a big way. First we re-vegetate, then the animals come back. It's not the other way around - breeding animals in desertified barrenness. BTW there is no "climate crisis." Eight inches of sea level rise and 1 degree warmer in 150 years is not a crisis (which is why your climate preachers buy beach front property). When the earth was 10 degrees hotter, ecosystems were pristine; when the earth was 20 degrees hotter, ecosystems were pristine, and so on. Ecosystems can be made pristine at any time via restoration, and the miniscule increase in warmth this past century can't affect them.

Thanks for your further thoughts, "PaladinTrueKnight" (we'd much rather talk to a real person, and we'd like to keep all correspondence on this channel polite and respectful please). We appreciate that what we're saying can appear counter-intuitive as animals breathe out carbon dioxide, right? So how can they possibly help landscapes and seascapes absorb more carbon? And yet, this is what the exciting new emerging science is telling us - that through processes including seed dispersal, trampling and grazing, this is exactly what they do. The clearest example is by preventing fire - a Bison can eat 10-20kg of dry matter per day, preventing wildfires that release huge amounts of carbon to the atmosphere, not to mention air pollution. Other large grazing animals such as Wildebeest, wild horses, wild cattle, Elk and ungulates do the same. The trouble with tree planting is that it is often done with non-native species, in straight lines, nothing like a natural ecosystem. Many studies have shown that such places have very low wildlife richness, are vulnerable to fire and poor for groundwater - and there is emerging evidence that rewilded natural forest regeneration actually draws down more carbon. May we suggest that you go to our website and read the science that we've published in some of the world's top scientific journals? As for the climate crisis, we subscribe to the mainstream scientific consensus, as brought together by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. @@paladintrueknight

Thank you, team! A well-deserved introduction of your work here too. We are excited to have you join our alliance! Thanks for the support...