- 35
- 143 825
George Ortiz
Приєднався 10 лип 2007
Відео
My call sign is: "3 in hot and 3 off safe..."
Переглядів 5287 років тому
My call sign is: "3 in hot and 3 off safe..."
One of my T-45 solo's with commentary
Переглядів 5737 років тому
One of my T-45 solo's with commentary
1st solo Part 1 T 45C Goshawk NAS Meridian Mississippi
Переглядів 1,4 тис.8 років тому
1st solo Part 1 T 45C Goshawk NAS Meridian Mississippi
Solo Bombing Run followed by a 4 Ship bombing run that got cancelled I am the dash four and am fly
Переглядів 2598 років тому
Solo Bombing Run followed by a 4 Ship bombing run that got cancelled I am the dash four and am fly
Recovery from cancelled 4 Ship Bombing run with a flight of 4 I am dash 4
Переглядів 958 років тому
Recovery from cancelled 4 Ship Bombing run with a flight of 4 I am dash 4
1st solo Part 2 T 45C Goshawk recovery and bouncing touch and go's
Переглядів 4558 років тому
1st solo Part 2 T 45C Goshawk recovery and bouncing touch and go's
1st solo Part 3 T 45C Goshawk recovery and bouncing touch and go's
Переглядів 2568 років тому
1st solo Part 3 T 45C Goshawk recovery and bouncing touch and go's
RAPPELLING FOLLOWED BY KARATE BELT TEST UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY 1997
Переглядів 2328 років тому
RAPPELLING FOLLOWED BY KARATE BELT TEST UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY 1997
CQ DAY 1 PART 2 - My Call sign again is "golf one two or golf twelve 12"
Переглядів 4,4 тис.8 років тому
CQ DAY 1 PART 2 - My Call sign again is "golf one two or golf twelve 12"
Carrier Qualification DAY 1 PART 1 - my call sign is "golf 12 (one-two)"
Переглядів 129 тис.8 років тому
Carrier Qualification DAY 1 PART 1 - my call sign is "golf 12 (one-two)"
Whats more stressfull? Being the CQ student. Being the IP in back with CQ student in front. Being squadron commander if CQ'ing students Being Commander Air Group (CAG) on this rotation charged with CQ'ing nuggets. Being a maintainer of these T-45's that are being beat up? I am curious do students train with T-45's with stores, like simulated 'blue' stores. Tanks, bombs, rocket pods, AIM-9. All inert , of course. Or are T-45's at sea always clean? At what in student's academic syllabus does weapons employment, tactics, and cyclic operations take place? After T-45 the student has to Fleet Replacement Squadron to qualify on particular type. Correct?
Hit the boat Oct 66…long time ago….still remember how much fun it was…glorious…..still think I could do it….dreaming of course….👨✈️
no females qualified
I'm sorry, but the carrier's deck should be illuminated enough at night for pilots to see it. As in, less on moon lit evenings, more on super dark / bad weather. There's just no longer justification to make it SO dangerous when RADAR and IR make it visible to weapons ... and the only people it harms are those who're required to land on carriers.
Nice rudder shaker on the CAT shot, good thing you were solo or that would have been game over for qualing
thanks george
26 years ago I did my first trap for carrier qual. My career went so so fast. It only seems like yesterday.
What was the "W" in the Hud? Looks spooky. I cringe when I have to land at 5000 ft at night. Carrier pilots have huge...... Go NAVY and Thank You !!
Hello. Who says "roger ball"?
Basically landing on a carrier with a fast jet…looks like a controlled crash.
Why is there a rescue beacon audible in the background?
Sounds like someone went in, since they sent up a coastie helo. Probably a civilian
FLY NAVY
Them "touch & go" hours paid off...
Call the ball lol
Watching you guys drive the plane right up to the edge of the deck and over the water gives me the willies. Big time respect, guys!
fly*
why do they turn so tightly on the last leg? it seems like they limit the amount of time to get stabilized on the glide slope. I don't see why they don't line up miles out and intersect the glide slope higher up
usually between 17-23 sec... this to facilitate plenty of aircraft in a short amount of time.. but at night or "bad weather" conditions, they usually do a case 3 or a long final approach...
R~5 5 5FFF555FFF
What a champ
That E-bracket is all over the place :) Thanks for sharing, this is super interesting.
Don't know you but I am proud of you!
What’re you flying? A Hornet?
@Tyre T-45 Goshawk
Looked to me like you did a phenom job that day. Only minor gripes over the radio.
I know that this comment will get eventually he forgotten about over time, but sometimes I like to go outside in the garden and completely bury myself in dirt and pretend I'm a carrot. 🥕
Cool story bro
This pilot is attempting to qualify as a Naval Aviator. He is practicing one of the most difficult skills known to man; landing a fighter jet on an aircraft carrier. In order to perform this skill, the pilot has to land his bird at full afterburner; so he can get airborne if he misses the cable. You'll notice he bolted twice and had to go around before he caught the wire. Its extremely dangerous to do what they do. They are the best. Go Navy.
Hi didn’t bolter. They are doing carrier qualification. They touch and go with the hook up then get back into the pattern rinse and repeat until you get told to put the hook down.
did not die sweeeet
Audio is mono, needs to be mixed to both channels, LOL.
Did they say which wires you caught? I didn't hear it. I did hear them tell you about your landing, etc "stay on centerline" etc.
His third go around was interesting he almost stalled it. So interesting to watch. The guy handles it very artfully and it makes me laugh how calm these guys are on the radio. I'd be white knuckled the entire way. Also make note the HUD doesn't show the aoa indexer which is a good quick way to know how to use your trim quickly. Of course the E bracket is primarily what they use.
He landed off his third approach....
Great HUD content. I take it you pass with flying colours, look forward to watching the rest of ur vids.
I took some flying lessons and managed to survive 3 solos before I pulled the plug on it. Landing on regular runway was hard for me. I took my 20 hours in a Cessna 150 and lived to talk about it. I can't imagine me trying to land anything bigger than an ultralight on a ship. I spent a lot of my time in vultures row when I was off duty. I was an AO TAD to AIMD.
What is this video about?
You haven't heard about this video? It's crazy bruh!
Slightly tense see Carrier landing bam, landed. Pilot obviously looking out of Port side of cockpit in a curved approach. This gives pilot a better view with the wing dropped than a long straight in run with the nose in the way. Learned in WWII with big engines in the way, it saves lives.
I was a F-14 Tomcat and F-18 Hornet maintainer. Loved every minute of Naval Aviation.
In my day ( 1965-77) my 1st qual we had Platt only, and a dangerously underpowered T2A. First night Qual was on a carrier that had hydraulic cats, and it kinda hurt. Great flying guy. Thanks.
I hit the boat in a T-2 Buckeye… I feel like a Dinosaur
I wish there was a pause and an explanation of the numbers on the screen. I understand some of it but not all.
Go ahead and ask what you need to know, i'll be glad to tell you.
@@Khasbin What I mean is some graphic arrows pointing one t a time and telling us what that is and what it is for. Or one graphic with each item labeled in an explanation box. follow me?
@@erbenton07Left Box is Speed (Knots) and the right box is Altitude (rounded to 10's of feet) Markers in he center are indication of pitch (Solid lines when positive, dahsed lines when negative... And always running through the center of the HUD) Little airplane shaped symbol is the Velocity Vector (Indicates where your aircraft is headed NOT where the nose is pointed) The decimal number next to "TCN" Ex. "1.0 TCN" is the distance from the Boats TACAN beacon.
I had no idea that the Goshawk could tool around that slow (Alpha was around 14.5). Dirty I guess. And oh that taxi was scary. I mean, you overrun the apron at a municipal airport and you may lay some tracks in the grass. Before you spun around all I saw was water. I understand that the nose wheel is back from the nose and the POV was higher up but it's still disconcerting. Very exciting to watch. Thank you.
All Navy pilots learn the circular, carrier landing approach of this T-45 pilot that is dramatically harder and different from the usual box-type approaches to expedite landing of multiple aircraft vulnerable to enemy fire in the slower and more trainable, linear box approaches. Here in the video, unknowingly at first, we don't see the carrier on camera until the last 3-5 seconds before rolling wings level and setting for landing - unlike ANY other approach. Yet the carrier or circular approach is the first and only approach new Navy pilots learn, ALL still destined for carrier pilot duty in basic flight training. What allows that to happen is the maneuver, when done many times over with standard, always sea level, downwind or close to it conditions and same aircraft allows a simultaneous 1) throttle setting, 2) set bank and 3) set pitch setting that when done at a predictably standard, preestablished point, airspeed and altitude allow a 3-5 second window of short final to stop the turn on centerline or "ball"?, set wings level, flare, and set to chop or advance power instantly. Fly Navy!
Still I don't know how anybody does this especially at night. God I love our military members.
@@The_Sword3 Deservedly so. You have to be able to do it 24/7/365 as a matter of course or its not doable as national policy. The circular approach to landing was just something more to rely upon, (numbers, settings, procedure) that was developed in the crucible of warfare past, carrier combat operations, that require superior skill training and practice to be done at all. It was adopted because it saved lotsa lives/time (exposure to enemy fire)/gas in combat. Learning it in ALL landings, first, exclusively in Navy flight training insures the best mastery of the necessary skills involved in such outrageously demanding maritime aviation as such. Fly Navy.
@@The_Sword3 Imagine routine formation flying over unfamiliar water and/or terrain, at night, armed and fueled to capacity, often with lights out, mere feet away from instantaneously wiping out at least 2 of the finest pilots you can imagine, personally, for hours - just to arrive at the tuffest fight(s) of your life - as a routine mission; just another day, . . . well-placed love - all for you and me, us.
@@jeffwalther3935 That's not even the crazy part. The real insanity is imagining coming home in the dark with an f-14 full of holes, wings not sweeping right, avionics damage from a missile, etc, and then having to land that kind of junk on a carrier while exhausted after said mission while dealing with unusual handling, increased approach speeds, etc. I can do this every day in my Top Gun game but I can only imagine the stress in reality.
@@questioneverything4633 Roger that. That is the bad part of the whole experience that ya don't see or know until you're in it. That is, that the public perception of piloting never showed the enormous amount of personal effort, tedium and drudgery of almost entire responsibility for gathering, and maintaining your personal health/hygiene, get ALL the right information and equipment in and out of new or different aircraft, irregular sleeping cycles and constant fatigue, the disorientation of constant sun displacement in maneuvers during the day and/or the fear of getting lost out there on the trackless sea and sky - alone - unless and even if you do all these things right all the time. In reconsidering the physiological aspects of the ordeal, I realized that the longest attack or patrol missions went to the Air Force or land-based Navy squadrons; that shortening that range and time in the cockpit to manageable distances was the whole idea behind aircraft carriers.
You can hear the freq bleed over of the ELT.....🤣
Does the ELT automatically activate on a bolt? Or, is he just monitoring on the downwind?
sounds like someone pulled the locator beacon somewhere. good stuff
One improvement in this footage over all the other beautiful GoPro captures out there is the field of view, which in this video is closer to the human eye. Having a few hundred traps under my belt, the view of the carrier when the jet "rolls into the groove" in YT videos is usually distorted - the boat appears way too far away. I realize that the use of a wide angle lens increases the field of view and certainly gives the viewer a bigger picture of what is going on, but distances are exaggerated - tight formation doesn't appear so tight, cramped cockpits seem roomier, and flat horizons show some curvature. But in this video, when the ship comes into view (4:57, 10:46, etc.) the perspective seems about right.
Ahhh. Answers my question of why he seems so close on final and track is slightly right. Thanks.
So what your saying is the Earth is flat?! J/k J/k
Thank you for your service Sir!
@@camsmeltzer9388 True gun camera vs wide-angle go-pro in the cockpit.
@@stevewilliams1197 He doesn't care and doesn't want some random strangers thanks. Don't do this to random veterans.
Understand now video quality. My attention span is low - it looks like some editing would improve the flow of the story- well done for the accomplishment!
Thank you for your service.
If you land in an airfield instead of a carrier, do you flare the T-45?
You always flare to some degree for normal airfield landings. Unless you crash.
Primo
Primo me nene luv u man
Golf 12 Paddles.... Undergraduate CQ and Paddles already breaking his balls over centerline drift on just his second trap. Which he kind of has to, but man, the error for margin is very small right of the bat.
@@TFT-bp8zk doh! And I pride myself on my elecutive combat skills. You got me!
Video quality: something you guys need to understand is the boat runs a lot of radar, which plays havoc with magnetic video recording. When we shot video from Vulture Row, we had to wrap our cameras in aluminum foil or it would look like, well, this. You'll notice the video is better when he's out away from the boat and deteriorates as he gets closer and is at its worst on deck. The T-45 doesn't come with digital 4K. :)
Thanks for explaining about the quality of the video due to radar interference, but even when away from the ship, when the video is at its very best, it still looks like 1970s monochrome technology. The water is only a shade or two of gray darker than the sky.
@@antoniog9814 That's because it's basically 1970s monochrome technology. I don't know what you want out of it.
@@SogenOkami Taking into account the level of sophistication in general aviation technology, not to mention the advancement in video technology in the last 20 years, one would assume the military would be utilizing better video displays.
@@antoniog9814 The problem you're facing is no one cares because it's simply for documentation and review purposes, not for making UA-cam content. To upgrade the system, you can't just yank stuff out and tape new stuff in the same way we just buy a camera off Amazon and throw the old one away. Planes are only now including abstraction layers in their software where as this one is way before that time. It's be more an equivalent to us as building the camera, writing the software for it ourselves, and then testing to see if it can withstand all the electromagnetic radiation coming off that ship, and writing the drivers to connect it to a PC all ourselves. Or you can just use what's preinstalled that already works.
I wonder if their insides get as scrambled as the video does.
excellent ! Do we hear other planes landing during your maneuvers on the bridge ? or is there one frequency for you alone ?
Hey man, can you preach me through from graduation of high school to where you are now like how you got there. This is my dream job and I know everything about aviation but school is pretty expensive.
The Marines have to wear a diaper when they do this. Don't know why. Kind of strange.