Відео

I know. They look terrible too

Thanks. I will check it out.

CPU usage is about 16% or 17% so it's using no more than 6 cores by the math, unless it's not fully loading those cores.

Well I no longer have the older version to test with, so I can only go from memory, but at least for me the performance was much more stable. Of course, ymmv

You're kidding, right? I've probably played Quake 2 over 1,000 hours since 1997. The point of this video was simply to show the tech. Get a grip.

There are cases where I'm CPU limited for sure. Especially at 1440p which is where I play. You can tell when you're CPU limited pretty easily. If you're not hitting your desired frame rate and yet GPU utilization is say at 85% then you're CPU limited. I'll be upgrading to a 9950x in the fall.

@@AMD718 Wait, but pushing more pixels should make you more GPU-bound. I run this game at 1080p and even then GPU utilisation is way higher than CPU.

@@mopeybloke I've set a frame rate limit to 140 fps to stay within my monitors sync range. When fps dips below 140 fps and GPU utilization is below 100% then I am CPU limited. Low CPU utilization is not a good indicator of not being CPU limited as most of that is inaccessible multithreading performance from extra/idle cores.

К сожалению эта ошибка была из-за DXVK

@@user-cv4tx6do7b да, но они вместо фикса тупо вырубили вулкан 🤷

Нам остаётся только надеяться что Vulkan скоро вернётся в Black mesa!

Not sure but did you check the steam discussion threads? Seems others were having crashes with Vulkan dxvk as well. No problems for me

@@AMD718 So this is common event it seems. Then issue is going to be fixed soon I guess. By the way did you noticed any significant differences between Vulkan and native DX9?

@@001firebrand yes, for me the frame rate is significantly improved with dxvk. Unfortunately, I am experiencing some serious shader compilation stutter which does clear up after some playtime but is highly distracting in the meantime

​@@001firebrandЧто я заметил так это значительное увеличение производительности и плавности игрового процесса. Моя видеокарта RX6600 и почему-то из-за неё используя dx9 отсутствует свечение HUD,но оно присутствует при использовании DXVK. Самое интересное при использовании DXVK в Black Mesa меняется освещение. Кстати в первый раз,когда я поставил dxvk у меня были заикания и фризы играть было некомфортно,но со временем всё практически стало нормально остались только редкие микрофризы. После последнего обновления игра даже в dx9 хорошо идёт. Вывод: оптимизация Black Mesa стала намного лучше!

Игра лицензионная? Если пиратка попробуйте переустановить игру,если игра у вас в Steam попробуйте проверить целостность игровых файлов. А в идеале вы должны написать характеристики вашего компьютера,чтобы покончить с вылетом на заставке: Crowbar Collective мне достаточно узнать ваш GPU

There's zero stuttering and basically flat frame times. Buttery smooth. But I'm not the right person to ask because I never had any issues with D2 except maybe a couple years ago on my 6950.

@@AMD718 Thats actually amazing, my friend who has a 7900 XTX says its unplayable + when I had a 6600XT it was abysmal.

@@darth3437 that's crazy. I wonder what could be different. When I went from 1080 Ti to 6900 XT I had problems. Basically it was no faster despite the card being more than 2x the performance of the 1080 Ti. But it got better with driver updates. As you can see in the video there are zero problems even with max settings and 120% res scale.

Probably because it was the public demo which is an older code base and no longer available. The full game is newer code.

XFX Merc 310, thermal paste replaced with kryosheet, U6 Pro putty on vram. Case is an Arctic midi from 2010. Very old and very poor airflow but I'm attached to it like an old car. Here's a picture of it - imgur.com/a/SDtFLCX

@@AMD718 certanly did not expect such comprehensive answer, thanks!

Yes, this uses a small fraction of the GPU imgur.com/NcTmtCs i.imgur.com/NcTmtCs.jpg

@@AMD718 Isn't there a way to go beyond 60fps?

@@arramofficialdj there may be a fps unlock for it but they sometimes cause glitches. I just went with the 60 fps on this one which felt fine, though usually I aim for at least 90 fps, preferably in the 120 to 144 fps range though.

bro

Yes the RTX part is simply eye candy. The Quake 2 remaster that was released a couple months ago looks great and plays great. If I had to choose only one to play, I'd choose the remaster over RTX.

Probably another reason why militaries don't make em shiny 😅

meanwhile your 4070 can't handle call of duty LMAO like your 90 fps in Warzone??? Cus I get 200 WITH NO UPSCALING LMAO I bet your gameplays are amazing at 90 fps

@@Baarkszz 90fps? 🤣🤣🤣 i get 170/220fps in qhd without upscaling 🤡 AMDumbass

y'all sound like couch virgins, let folks enjoy what they bought EDIT: also went ahead and tried your exact claim, u didnt mention frame gen which nets u the 200fps, why not?

@@Baarkszz poor ignorant fanboy AMDumb, in warzone i get 220fps with 4070 💀🤡. But i don't care about this useless t a r d brainless game like cod... i play single player's games. So you are AMT a r d

I don't use hyper-rx. So, no boost or rsr enabled. Only Anti-Lag and Anti-Lag+ ... and RIS at 50% in this case. I almost always use RIS unless the game has excellent in-game sharpening, which isn't very common in my experience.

@@AMD718 Good to know, I think I'll upgrade to 23.9.2. soon and test Anti-Lag+ on Bugfield, just to see how it works there, given how slow the engine is on that game even on my XTX at 5120x1440. Thanks for the quick demonstration though, it's sad that Anti-Lag+ is still going very under the radar so far, it's the thing I missed the most compared to nVidia Reflex, I hate upscalers in general, so I look forward to use FSR3 NAA + AntiLag+ as soon as both will be available.

@@galandilvogler8577 I'm on the same page with you. A lower frame rate is much more tolerable when the latency is minimized. Conversely, 120 fps with high latency will feel soft and rubberbandy. So far Anti-Lag+ seems a decent match for reflex and I'm also looking forward to trying fg with FSR3, at least out of pure curiosity. Let me know how al+ works in starfield when you try it. I don't own the game or I would test it myself.

@@AMD718 Ok, tested quickly in Akila city, where the avg framerate is around 65 (5120x1440, everything maxed out except shadows at High instead of Ultra, no Motion Blur/DoF, no VSR, no FSR, only CAS for sharpening). Without any AL: 52-53ms With standard AL: 43-44ms With AL+: 33-34ms Results seems pretty similar with yours on TW3, except the AL+ which is around 10ms higher (probably because SF is much more CPU intensive than TW3, even though I'm on a 7950X3D, with the game using a CPU Set on cores 0-15 - vcache die - via Process Lasso).

@@galandilvogler8577 Results do sound similar in pattern to what I have seen now in TW3, Ghostwire Tokyo, and (most significantly to date) in Tomb Raider SOTR. Regular Anti-Lag is usually around half-way between no anti-lag and Anti-lag+. Of course, this assumes you're GPU-limited as when I'm not GPU-limited, latency is the same between all three - that is to say very low. For why your SF AL+ was a little higher at 33-34 I'm guessing your base frame time was a little higher (frame rate below 90 fps)?

You're thinking of frame time which is a straight forward calculation. The ms value in this case is latency which is the total sum of all latencies and frame time which occurs in-between the mouse click and the result on the screen. BTW - frame time that you are thinking of is in upper right.

@@AMD718 It’s still strange that AMD at the driver level can directly influence other components, significantly improving their performance. I would believe in a small value, but not x2

Yes I've been fairly impressed with Anti-Lag+ so far. AMD just needs to roll it out to more titles (which they have been doing) and (hopefully) make it work with non-rdna3 hardware.

I'm with rx 6800 hope so. Let's wait for FSR 3.@@AMD718

A solid / locked 120. I don't remember ever dipping below 120. Maybe once or twice but if so it was really quick.

@@AMD718 Nice, I'm planning on upgrading to a similar setup (7800X3D + 7900 XTX) and I was curious. My current PC (i7 6700K + GTX 1080) struggles out in the open in Infinite.

@@clayh254 with that set up you'll be golden. To be honest, I was a bit CPU limited with the 5950 but with the 7800X3D you'll be sitting pretty.

vsync is off. We're below the fps limit and GPU limited and within adaptive sync range (144hz)

​@@AMD718 Sorry, missed it - my bad :) BTW - holding down the "Del" key toggles between AL+ and AL. Hold down the "Right Ctrl" to see the difference AL+ vs Off.

@@hialgo1808 very interesting. AMD didn't document that on the AL+ page I was referencing. Thanks for the tip!

@@AMD718It’s only in the release notes… 🤯

me2