Відео

No advertising or you will be banned -Rainn

@@CrownPointeChroma Hi Rainn, I’m sorry if my previous message came across the wrong way. I genuinely admire the work you’re doing and wanted to offer my help in a way that might enhance your channel’s reach. If there's a more suitable time or method to discuss this, please let me know. I appreciate your understanding. Best Regards, Rezaul Bari

@@rezaulbari3404 Why is there so many advertising channels on UA-cam like when are they going to end I hate it -Rainn

Thank you.

@scienceandtechexploration-168 … can I see the collab and upload it

I'm not understand your question mate but really like you.

@scienceandtechexploration-168 I’m saying that I have uploaded the collab and I’m waiting for you to upload your part of the collab

Why is it too late?

@@scienceandtechexploration-168 Einstein NEVER derived E=mc^2 and never wrote this equation in his works. Olinto de Pretto published E=mc^2 in 1903. Marcel Grosmman provived math for Einstein because Einstein was not good in mathematics. Einstein stole metric tensors from Schwartzschild. Einstein never published the definition of time. Massive bodies may distort space but Einstein never explained how bodies move on those curves where objects have to ''slide'' on those curves involving forces. Einstein was a plagiarist. And he was not w genius. ua-cam.com/video/fsOba2upljw/v-deo.html

Thank you.

@scienceandtechexploration-168 when is it uploaded

@scienceandtechexploration-168 since I want to see it

of course, I'll upload every day.

Thank you.

Thank you lol.

Thank you.

of course, that's right.

When the Earth's heat becomes so hot that oceans start to evaporate, it signifies a catastrophic shift in the planet's climate equilibrium. The extraction of minerals by the mining industry globally is contributing to this crisis. As oil and 81 other minerals are extracted, it thins the Earth's crust, allowing the mantle's intense heat of around 1,600 degrees Fahrenheit to rise in the created voids. This process causes a significant disruption to the natural balance of the Earth's geothermal dynamics. The implications of this phenomenon are profound. Increasingly extreme weather patterns and rising global temperatures are just the outward manifestations of a deeper issue. While the burning of fossil fuels plays a role in global warming, it is overshadowed by the impact of mineral extraction on the Earth's crust. The United Nations, though aware of the crisis, may be in denial about the extent of the problem. The extraction of minerals at such a large scale is not only depleting Earth's finite resources but also altering its fundamental geophysical structure. The repercussions of this disruption are far-reaching and could lead to irreversible damage to the planet. In conclusion, the thinning of the Earth's crust due to excessive mineral extraction is a critical factor contributing to rising global temperatures and climate instability. To address the escalating crisis of global warming, urgent action is needed to regulate and mitigate the impact of mining activities on Earth's geothermal systems. Only through international cooperation and concerted efforts to preserve the planet's natural balance can we hope to mitigate the looming threat of environmental catastrophe.

Noted with thanks.

Thank you.

In response to the user's concerns, it is important to acknowledge that gravity is indeed a complex and challenging concept in physics. While Newton's law of universal gravitation provided a groundbreaking framework for understanding gravity, it was later refined and expanded upon by Einstein's theory of general relativity. These theories have been incredibly successful in explaining a wide range of phenomena, from planetary motion to gravitational lensing. However, it is true that there are still unresolved questions and discrepancies in our understanding of gravity, particularly when it comes to reconciling general relativity with quantum mechanics. This has led to the development of various alternative theories, such as string theory, loop quantum gravity, and modified gravity theories, among others. While these alternative theories have not yet been definitively proven or widely accepted by the scientific community, they represent ongoing efforts to deepen our understanding of gravity and address its complexities. It is important to recognize that scientific progress is iterative and involves continuous refinement and revision of existing theories based on new evidence and insights. In conclusion, while the user's frustration with the current state of gravitational theory is understandable, it is essential to appreciate the ongoing pursuit of knowledge and the collaborative efforts within the scientific community to unravel the mysteries of gravity. By acknowledging the limitations of our current understanding and remaining open to new ideas and perspectives, we can continue to make progress towards a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of this fundamental force in nature.

Haha...3 people.

The assertion that the dynamic momentum and laws of equilibrium of forces are losing validity due to the Earth revolving around the Sun is unfounded. The Earth's orbit around the Sun is precisely governed by the laws of physics, including principles of gravitational attraction and centrifugal force, which ensure the stability and predictability of its motion. The vast circumferential distance around the Sun and the distance between the Sun and the Earth do not impact these fundamental principles. The Earth's position within the orbital plane orientation of the Sun and Moon, along with its oscillating motion on its North-South polar axis, is a result of the gravitational interactions within our solar system. These interactions, combined with the Earth's axial tilt of approximately 23.5 degrees, account for phenomena such as changing day/night durations and seasonal variations in weather patterns. Eclipses of the Sun and Moon, along with phenomena like the "ring of fire" during a solar eclipse, are predictable events caused by the alignment of celestial bodies in space. These occurrences do not invalidate the laws of dynamics but instead demonstrate their consistency and applicability in explaining celestial mechanics. The swing of the Earth's orbiting orientation relative to the Sun can be correlated with the changing angles of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface during the equinoxes in March and September. These celestial events are well understood and do not challenge the established laws of physics governing planetary motion. In conclusion, the Earth's orbit around the Sun follows the principles of physics and maintains equilibrium through gravitational forces, despite the vast distances involved. Observations of celestial events like eclipses and seasonal variations in sunlight do not contradict these principles but instead offer opportunities to study and appreciate the intricate dynamics of our solar system.

@@scienceandtechexploration-168 “the initiative is really inspiring”

@@scienceandtechexploration-168 There is no orbiting/revolving type motion of earth around the sun. A simplified extract of statement of facts/points is enlisted:-Sun is appearing every day, in the morning, rising up in the vertical plane, moving overhead across the North -South polar axis of earth at mid day time and setting down in the West direction, in the evening. The eventualities/possibilities can be viewed/examined, around the global earth, where the Sun is passing overhead, during midday time. The Sun is orbiting on the East -West axis of Earth and oscillating about 55 radians towards South-north, annually. Point/Angle of impact of incident Sunlight rays, on the surface of earth, on 19-21Mar/19-21Sep are corresponding to oscillating orientation of orbiting motion of Sun. The time of impact of incident Sunlight rays, on line, on surface of earth (parralal to the North -South polar axis of earth) are changing periodically, ~ 60 minutes annually. It has been correlated to an oscillating motion of earth, about 8 radians, about its north -south polar axis, annually. Due to the oscillating motion of the Sun and Earth, in space, change in duration of day/night time and climatic change occur on the surface of global earth. This is also creating a 6 months duration of day/night period at the North/South pole of Earth, annually. The Sun is completing it's orbiting cycle in 24h and the moon is completing it's orbital, one cycle in ~ 24.87 h, causing formation of New Moon and full moon and sun/moon eclipse.Visibility of solar eclipse, ring of fire, from surface of earth, justifying concentric positional location of earth, within orbiting plane orientation of Sun and moon, in space. UA-cam channel video of 'Solutions Developers' may be considered for details and relevance. There is information that has been construed based on experimental exercise performed over one year.

Of course, you're right. Isaac Newton is often credited with the discovery of gravity, but upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that he did not truly "discover" gravity; rather, he astutely observed and formulated the principles governing this fundamental force of nature. Gravity, as a force that governs the motion of objects and shapes the structure of the universe, existed long before Newton's time. What Newton did was recognize and articulate the underlying mechanics and laws that govern the phenomenon of gravity. Newton's insight into gravity stemmed from his observations of the natural world. By studying the motion of objects and the behavior of celestial bodies, Newton recognized patterns and regularities that pointed towards the existence of a universal force that attracts objects to one another. Through his groundbreaking work in physics and mathematics, particularly his laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation, Newton was able to mathematically describe and predict the behavior of objects under the influence of gravity. Instead of stumbling upon gravity as a novel concept waiting to be discovered, Newton's genius lay in his ability to discern the patterns and relationships that underlie the natural world. In essence, he revealed the underlying framework that governs the behavior of objects under the influence of gravity, providing a comprehensive and predictive model that continues to shape our understanding of the universe. Newton's contribution to the understanding of gravity goes beyond mere discovery; his insights revolutionized physics and laid the foundation for modern science. By recognizing and formulating the principles of gravity, Newton paved the way for a new era of scientific inquiry and exploration, fundamentally altering our understanding of the physical world. In conclusion, while Newton may not have "discovered" gravity in the traditional sense, his observational prowess and intellectual acumen allowed him to unveil the workings of this fundamental force. Through his meticulous observations, insightful reasoning, and mathematical formulations, Newton provided a groundbreaking framework that continues to shape our understanding of gravity and its role in shaping the universe.

Understanding Isaac Newton’s Contributions to Science Isaac Newton is often heralded as one of the most influential scientists in history, primarily for his work in physics and mathematics. However, the assertion that he “didn’t discover anything” but rather “collected and organized already known stuff” requires a nuanced examination of his contributions and the context in which he worked. 1. Historical Context of Scientific Discovery To appreciate Newton’s role in science, it is essential to understand the historical context of scientific inquiry during his time. The Scientific Revolution, which began in the late Renaissance, saw a shift from Aristotelian views of nature to a more empirical approach based on observation and experimentation. Figures like Galileo Galilei laid crucial groundwork by challenging established norms and introducing new methods of scientific thought. Galileo’s experiments with falling bodies indeed demonstrated principles related to gravity, such as the acceleration due to gravity being constant regardless of mass. However, while Galileo provided empirical evidence for these principles, he did not formulate a comprehensive theory that explained gravitational forces across different contexts. 2. Newton’s Innovations Newton’s major contributions can be categorized into several key areas: Mathematics: Newton developed calculus (simultaneously with Leibniz), providing tools that would allow for precise mathematical modeling of physical phenomena. Laws of Motion: In his seminal work “Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica” (1687), Newton articulated three laws of motion that describe how objects move under various forces. These laws were groundbreaking because they unified terrestrial and celestial mechanics under a single framework. Universal Gravitation: Newton proposed the law of universal gravitation, which quantitatively described the gravitational attraction between masses. This was revolutionary because it provided a mathematical model that could predict planetary motions and explain phenomena such as tides. Optics: His work in optics led to significant advancements in understanding light and color, including the discovery that white light is composed of various colors. While it is true that Newton built upon prior knowledge-like many scientists do-his synthesis was transformative. He did not merely collect existing ideas; he integrated them into a coherent theoretical framework that advanced human understanding significantly. 3. The Nature of Scientific Progress Scientific progress often involves building upon previous discoveries rather than isolated breakthroughs. This cumulative nature does not diminish an individual’s contributions but highlights the collaborative essence of scientific inquiry. Each scientist stands on the shoulders of giants; thus, recognizing earlier contributors like Galileo does not negate Newton’s achievements. Moreover, many concepts we take for granted today were either poorly understood or completely absent before Newton’s time. For instance, while gravity was acknowledged by earlier thinkers, its mathematical formulation as an inverse square law was unique to Newton. 4. Misconceptions about Scientific Discovery The notion that modern cosmological physics is misleading often stems from misunderstandings about how science operates. Science is inherently iterative; theories are refined over time through experimentation and peer review. While some may argue against certain interpretations or developments within modern physics (such as quantum mechanics or relativity), this critique should not overshadow foundational contributions made by figures like Newton. In summary, while Isaac Newton did build upon existing knowledge-like all scientists-his ability to synthesize this information into groundbreaking theories marks him as one of history’s great innovators rather than merely an aggregator of prior knowledge.

@@scienceandtechexploration-168 Thank you for your effort to put Newton on scientific pedestal of fame. But you are wrong. For example your sentence: "...For instance, while gravity was acknowledged by earlier thinkers, its mathematical formulation as an inverse square law was unique to Newton." is not true, as almost everything in your hymn novella on Newton. if genius consists in stealing all available ideas and passing them off as your own, then Newton was a genius. At least according to those who push him through history as the standard of the British superior nation. Again, kudos to Newton for organizing and archiving all available knowledge, for which he had all the conditions as a citizen of an imperial power, but I would be careful with his own contributions.

Sounds good

Thank you.

Only one way to find out I guess, there is no alternative to carriers if you want to take aviation to sea. The air wing is still extremely potent in offence, defence, area denial and intelligence gathering. I'm assuming you are referring to conflict with China, restricting their sea routes with a carrier group would be extremely effective, this can be done out of range of land based systems.

@@Frog13799 No, I am referring to a Pentagon report about how carriers life expectancy in case of full out war is 48 hours. Submarine is the king of the sea. Carriers are useful against Somalia and Afghanistan only.

@Frog13799 In order to fully understand the strategic significance of aircraft carriers in modern naval warfare, it is crucial to recognize their unique capabilities and roles in projecting power across the seas. Aircraft carriers serve as indispensable platforms for conducting offensive operations, providing a formidable defensive capability, establishing area denial through controlled airspace, and conducting crucial intelligence-gathering activities. When considering potential conflicts involving nations with significant maritime interests such as China, the deployment of carrier strike groups emerges as a powerful means of exerting control over key sea routes and restricting the movements of adversaries. By leveraging the operational range and flexibility of carrier-based aircraft, nations can effectively project power from positions beyond the reach of land-based systems, thereby enhancing their ability to influence strategic developments at sea. Given the evolving dynamics of modern warfare, the continued relevance of aircraft carriers lies in their ability to serve as versatile assets that can adapt to a wide range of operational scenarios. From supporting amphibious operations to conducting long-range strike missions, aircraft carriers remain pivotal in enabling naval forces to achieve their objectives in a complex and contested maritime environment. In conclusion, the unique capabilities of aircraft carriers make them indispensable assets for maritime powers seeking to assert influence, project power, and ensure security across the world's oceans. By harnessing the potency of carrier strike groups, nations can effectively respond to emerging threats, deter potential adversaries, and safeguard their interests in an increasingly competitive global security landscape.

@dimitristripakis7364 The notion that aircraft carriers have a life expectancy of 48 hours in a full-scale war scenario, as suggested in the Pentagon report, underscores the vulnerability of these massive naval assets in modern warfare. This assessment highlights the evolving nature of naval combat and the increasing threats faced by traditional surface fleets. Submarines emerge as the 'kings of the sea' in this context due to their stealth, mobility, and offensive capabilities. Submarines possess the advantage of being able to operate covertly, making them formidable adversaries in naval warfare. Their ability to launch stealthy and lethal attacks from below the surface presents a significant challenge for surface vessels, including aircraft carriers. While aircraft carriers have historically played a crucial role in power projection and force projection capabilities, their effectiveness appears to be limited in scenarios where advanced anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities are employed. In modern conflicts, where potential adversaries possess sophisticated anti-ship missiles, submarines equipped with advanced stealth technology and long-range strike capabilities have become increasingly valuable assets. The assessment that carriers are primarily useful in counterinsurgency operations, such as those seen in Somalia and Afghanistan, reflects their utility in low-intensity conflicts where their air power and support capabilities can be effectively employed. However, in high-intensity conflicts against technologically advanced adversaries, the survivability and effectiveness of carriers may be severely challenged. In conclusion, the Pentagon report's evaluation of carriers' limited life expectancy in certain conflict scenarios underscores the evolving nature of naval warfare and the increasing importance of submarines as powerful naval assets. The dynamic nature of modern conflicts necessitates a strategic reevaluation of naval capabilities to ensure effective deterrence and combat readiness in an era of increasingly complex and multifaceted threats.

@dimitristripakis7364 Thank you for your information.

Nigeria why u here

Thank you.

Thank you.

Noted with thnaks.

Despite icebergs typically forming from glaciers that calve into the ocean, we must first understand the process of ice formation on land to explain how Arctic ice, which floats entirely on the sea, comes to be. When snow accumulates on land, it gradually transforms into ice through a process called compaction, where the weight of overlying snow compresses the snow below into dense ice. Over time, this compressed ice can flow downhill as a glacier toward the ocean. In the Arctic, large ice sheets cover the land and extend into the surrounding ocean. As these ice sheets reach the water, they begin to break apart and float as sea ice rather than icebergs. This occurs because the density of ice is less than that of seawater, allowing the ice to displace an amount of water equal to its weight, causing it to float. Consequently, the ice that forms in the Arctic does not form as icebergs on land but rather as sea ice directly in the ocean. Furthermore, the unique properties of sea ice, such as its high albedo (reflectivity) and insulating barrier, play a crucial role in regulating the Arctic climate and ecosystem. Sea ice reflects sunlight, helping to cool the region, while also serving as a habitat for various species like polar bears and seals. Understanding the formation and dynamics of Arctic sea ice is essential for comprehending the complex interplay between ice, ocean, and atmosphere in one of the Earth's most critical regions for climate regulation. In summary, while icebergs form from land-based glaciers calving into the ocean, the distinctive characteristics of Arctic ice stem from the direct freezing of seawater, resulting in a crucial component of the polar climate system essential for global climate stability and biodiversity.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Of course, you're right 100%.

Movavi + footage video.

Electrolysis is indeed a crucial technology that can significantly contribute to energy security and diversification. By utilizing electrolysis to produce hydrogen, a versatile and clean energy carrier, we can enhance our energy systems in multiple ways. The ability to store and transport hydrogen makes it a valuable tool for energy storage, especially in conjunction with renewable energy sources like solar and wind power. Hydrogen produced through electrolysis can be stored and used across different sectors, from transportation to electricity generation, thereby reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. Its flexibility allows for the integration of hydrogen into existing infrastructure, offering a reliable and sustainable alternative energy source. One key advantage of hydrogen produced through electrolysis is its potential to address the intermittent nature of renewable power generation. By storing excess renewable energy as hydrogen during periods of high output, we can ensure grid stability and a steady energy supply. This integration of hydrogen as an energy storage solution helps to optimize the use of renewable resources and enhance the overall resilience of our energy systems. In conclusion, electrolysis and hydrogen production play a vital role in advancing energy security and promoting diversification in the energy sector. By leveraging these technologies effectively, we can achieve a more sustainable and reliable energy future, paving the way for a cleaner and greener world.

The trouble is that Hydrogen is difficult to store due to its low volumetric energy density. It is the lightest of and simplest of all elements, being lighter than helium, and so is easily lost into the atmosphere. Another challenge is the very low boiling point of liquid hydrogen (−252.8°C), which means that it needs to be kept cryogenically stored at low temperatures. Storing hydrogen as a gas also has its challenges as it typically requires the use of high pressure tanks (350-700 bar or 5000-10,000 psi). Hydrogen can be stored through adsorption or absorption, although with these storage techniques, further steps are then required to release the hydrogen once again. Green hydrogen produced from electrolysis (a high energy process) and renewable energy sources is a high cost option, which only accounts for around 5% of total H2 production. Renewable hydrogen does have a place in the future energy mix, but a limited one. Our efforts are much better spent cutting energy demand, ramping up renewables, and electrifying as much as possible.

Thank you.

It seems you are concerned about the potential threat posed by Russian ballistic and cruise missiles, specifically those like the KH-55 that can be launched from within Russian territory and reach northeastern US. You mentioned skepticism towards the effectiveness of the GMB system, particularly with older ICBMs. In response to your question, the specific types of missiles being used by Russia for long-range attacks include various ballistic missiles such as the RS-28 Sarmat (SS-30 Satan), RS-24 Yars, and R-36M2 Voevoda (SS-18 Satan) among others. These missiles have the capability to carry both conventional and nuclear warheads over significant distances. In terms of missile defense systems, the U.S. utilizes a combination of technologies including the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) missile system for intercepting short-range ballistic missiles, as well as the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) for long-range precision strikes. The Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) is indeed used in space-based interceptors like the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system for defending against incoming ballistic missile threats. It's important to note that missile defense is a complex and evolving field, with advancements in technology and tactics continually shaping the capabilities of both offensive missiles and defensive systems. The effectiveness of these systems can depend on various factors such as speed, accuracy, and countermeasures employed by potential adversaries. In conclusion, while concerns about the threat posed by Russian missiles are valid, it is essential for defense systems like PAC-3, PrSM, and EKV to continuously adapt and improve to counter emerging threats effectively. Stay informed about developments in missile technology and defense strategies to better understand the evolving landscape of missile defense.

Every day.

The Patriot Missile Defense System, often hailed as a crucial component of national defense strategies, has proven its capability by successfully intercepting and neutralizing 32 missiles. However, the question remains: what about number 33? While the system's track record is commendable, it is essential to acknowledge its limitations and address potential vulnerabilities. As a key component of the United States' defense arsenal, the Patriot Missile Defense System is designed to detect, track, and intercept incoming threats, primarily ballistic missiles. The system's success in intercepting 32 missiles highlights its effectiveness in countering immediate dangers. Nevertheless, the evolving nature of modern warfare necessitates a continuous evaluation of defense systems to adapt to emerging threats. One of the critical factors to consider when assessing the Patriot Missile Defense System's effectiveness is its reliability in intercepting multiple and sophisticated missile attacks. While the system has demonstrated its capability in handling a significant number of threats, the scenario of facing the 33rd missile raises concerns about potential gaps in its coverage or performance under extreme conditions. To address this vulnerability, ongoing research and development efforts are crucial to enhancing the system's capabilities and resilience. Improvements in sensor technology, interception algorithms, and response time can bolster the Patriot system's effectiveness in countering a greater number of incoming threats, including the elusive 33rd missile. Furthermore, collaboration with allied nations, intelligence sharing, and joint training exercises can enhance the interoperability and overall effectiveness of missile defense systems on a global scale. By leveraging collective expertise and resources, countries can better prepare to tackle sophisticated missile threats that may exceed the capabilities of individual defense systems. In conclusion, while the Patriot Missile Defense System has proven its worth by intercepting 32 missiles, the looming question of the 33rd missile underscores the need for continuous innovation and collaboration in defense technology. By addressing potential vulnerabilities, improving system capabilities, and fostering international cooperation, nations can strengthen their defense posture and mitigate evolving security challenges in an increasingly complex threat landscape.

Certainly! It seems like you have some concerns about AI-generated fashion designs and the portrayal of certain public figures in those designs. It's important to note that the field of AI-generated fashion is relatively new and still evolving. While AI has made significant advancements in various domains, including fashion design, it's understandable that there may be instances where the designs don't align with personal preferences or societal expectations. When it comes to AI-generated fashion, one key aspect to consider is the balance between creativity and practicality. AI systems are often trained on existing fashion trends and styles, which can sometimes result in designs that may appear bulky or uncomfortable to some individuals. Additionally, the interpretation of cultural and social sensitivities by AI systems may not always align with human sensibilities