Відео

Love it

❤ Awesome 👍

rhetorical nonsense

🌈 Promo*SM

I fail to see how DBH can make this assessment. Just because quantum mechanics (and potential multiverses) exist doesn’t seem to imply or require the necessity for any spiritual realm, let alone one even remotely connected to the bologna that ALL theology and religious myth significantly more clearly are. I wasted decades of my life attempting to understand reality through theological windows until they finally shattered and permitted me to see that there was a whole world outside for my mind to explore.

"We have no world, but the world that comes to us through consciousness. " -David Bentley Hart

We may not be conscious at all.

If you think life is mechanical, be a mechanic. If you think God gives you purpose, enter Jesus.

So we're back to "us" being the center of the universe with everything "revolving" around us.

Through Christ God saved all! 1 Timothy 4:10 - The New International Version (NIV) 10 That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe. 1 Cor 15:22 for even as in Adam all die, so also in the Christ all shall be made alive 1 John 2:2 New International Version 2 He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.

"A Physicalist Picture of Reality is Likely False" So When Van Gogh painted the Irises. His Painting was Real but the Irises on the Painting were Not. Big Statement Anyway You Look at it. One Obvious Test for Science to Prove It's Understanding of Consciousness is to Create a Consciousness Not Based on Life. Whilst there are Obvious Attempts at this Via Computers. This Would Not be Easy and Would have to Withstand Short and Long Term Testing by a Variety of Test Personal/Methods. Hence it Would Take a Long Time to Prove Artificial Consciousness. But So what, Not All Religious People Fear Knowledge but Many Do Oppose the Use of Knowledge for Harm. Ah but what Definition of Harm am I Using ?.

People should perhaps learn the difference between a philosophical naturalist and a methodological naturalist. And also, people,should not claim magic exists when they cannot demonstrate magic exists. Real magic is fake. Fake magic is real. The same applies to God.

He needs to interview BK.. Bernardo Kastrup.

Buddha observes that the world contains “experiential dualism “. We observe ourselves as “minds” But he insists on “annata”. NO SPIRIT. “Atman… the world soul” is illusory. This is the break from Brahmanism and later Hinduism. The only real dualism is matter and energy, which are logically interchangeable. Consciousness is emergent from brain. Boo hoo.

Mind over Matter ? But aren't Energy and Matter Equivalents ?

The end is really the key: physicalism is a presupposition and most if not all of the arguments in its favor start with the assumption that it is true.

Finally, someone who gets it.

If 'mind' does not need a physical substrate, show me a single disembodied 'mind'. He's also using 'more and more researchers' think something with no real evidence. Finally, 'phsyicalism' may be a bit of a presupposition, if only because there is no evidence otherwise.

David Bentley Hart is a deluded idiot. Read his book The Doors of the Sea. The weakest apologetics I have ever read.

How can you come to a scientific conclusion when you start from a place of being brainwashed that there is a god?

Wht are they wearing the same gray suit and black turtleneck?

Nice video of a man talking himself into a pretzel.

Very intelligent person.

Self awareness.

Excellent. This man covers a huge territory in just eight minutes and does so with remarkable clarity. If you don't get it on first listening, it's worth a repeat or two, especially if you take the trouble to research some of the terms he uses. You rarely find the fundamentals of science and metaphysics presented so concisely.

This is so good! Would love to have the lyrics though. Love from Sweden.

I am a Christian and I struggle with the Gay thing, I don't have a yes or no answer. I just know these people don't actually have a choice who they are attracted too and that makes it extraordinarily hard because we all want intimacy.

Only a heretic could say with a straight face that physicalism is only "likely" to be false.

When he asked, is there anything wrong with being gay? He knows what he believes in in the answer, but he doesn’t want to get canceled. He doesn’t want to be attacked by having his own opinion. We gotta stop caring about what people think of us and stand up for what we believe in

Jeese wants a husband too😂

savior of all men, moreso those that believe

the message and song are fire

Amen!

Crazy that Winger calls Universal Salvation in Christ a "heresy" but he does not call limited atonement a heresy, even though the false doctrine of Limited Atonement makes God out to be a malicious monster, not the Father God who is Love made manifest in Christ. I guess that makes Mike Winger a heretic, lol.

🔥 Can we see the lyrics please? Thank you! ♥️

Obvious A.I. voice is obvious

I am an atheist, so we will disagree on the existence of God. However, I completely agree that if God exists, universalism should be true. BTW, would the peoblem of Hell be a reason for you to reject Islam, as Islam cannot accomodate universalism without ruining itself?

A very fine exposition of the issues but for the normal viewer this is densely difficult. Because it is difficult and assumes the viewer knows something of philosophical terms. Judging by the comments below, the previous viewers know little and want to know even less.

The Good News = the work has already* been done. You are already* Saved via Calvary. The end.

I'd leave a like but it's at 69 and I can't ruin that.

Dope!

This doctrine is not truth

Once I learned about salvation of all, I see that people tell you that you don't believe the word of God are some of the same people who decide to pick and choose which Bible they feel to read each day. Plenty of these people reject that the KJV is the word of God preserved. Which granted, I do understand many who do abuse it and I know God can get people to believe in anyway he wants. What is interesting is these people are also who go outside the English language too, but when you do it now it's wrong. It's wrong when it doesn't suit their way of seeing scripture.

The part that blows my mind is that, you could cut the brain open and you wouldn't see thoughts or experience. Where are they?

What kind of BS word is 'physicalist'?

1:05:08 bookmark

Death=/=annihilation. The wicked are not annihilated after the first death because they will see life again, and resurrected unto judgement. However, they will not be resurrected after their second death which destroys them body and soul, never to be see life again and effectively "annihilates" them. Jesus cannot be annihilated because he is divine, and innately immortal, therefore he can never truly cease to live in all capacities. However, He did in fact die *in the flesh* . "He was put to death in *the body* but made alive in the Spirit" (1 Peter 3:18). I think a better subject for Doug to explain is why he believes the punishment the wicked face is eternal torment, rather than the atoning death that Jesus suffered on the cross, which caused His body to cease to be conscious or show any signs of life. The wages of sin is death after all, not eternal life in flames with body and soul united.

Heretic? There is absolutely NOTHING in the Bible that states that you must believe in eternal hell in order to be a Christian.

Good job

Mike likes to hear himself speak. He gets on my nerves. He manilulates Gods word to prove his nonsense