Three Pines Productions
Three Pines Productions
  • 2
  • 80 615
The Gordon House: Frank Lloyd Wright's Oregon Usonian
A look at Frank Lloyd Wright's Gordon House from a new perspective. Filmed in June of 2019, this video captures the house with aerial footage; the first time that the Gordon House has been recorded via drone. The Gordon House is located at The Oregon Garden of Silverton, OR. It was originally constructed on the south bank of the Willamette River near Wilsonville, OR, but was relocated to its present location in 2001 under the threat of demolition. Tours are available through www.thegordonhouse.org
Переглядів: 80 077

Відео

SP 4449: August 28, 2019
Переглядів 5495 років тому
On August 28th, 2019, the SP 4449 made several runs between Portland's Oregon Rail Heritage Center and Oaks Park. This channel is the owner of this video footage. The footage was also used by the ORHF channel with permission. Music from Bensound.com

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @lesliespann6420
    @lesliespann6420 3 місяці тому

    Wish we could have seen INSIDE the home, where the LIVING took place…

  • @studiosorek1432
    @studiosorek1432 6 місяців тому

    Frank Lloyd Wright was more than a great designer. He invented the world of the suburbs. The exit to nature that was stopped because of traffic jams, and came back to life thanks to the Internet and working from home. He is still influential.

  • @user-cd3nb6yg8z
    @user-cd3nb6yg8z 7 місяців тому

    We luckily stumbled upon this and showed up just as a small tour of 5 started. It was very interesting to learn about the owners and how they lived. It’s too bad the video didn’t showcase the inside. There are a lot of noteworthy details. The docent led tour was 👏🏻👏🏻

  • @magicknight13
    @magicknight13 Рік тому

    My favorite architect!!!

  • @nickmanofredda8803
    @nickmanofredda8803 Рік тому

    pwm.im-cdn.it/image/777185816/xxl.jpg

  • @tigerphid9677
    @tigerphid9677 Рік тому

    Wright used brick, wood and stone and 'warm' tones to create "organic" architecture that integrated with nature. The Bauhaus built with 'cool' concrete, glass and steel to separate architecture from nature.

  • @creolelady182
    @creolelady182 Рік тому

    I am glad they saved this masterpiece. What idiot would eve think about destroying a piece of art

  • @TechMetalRules
    @TechMetalRules Рік тому

    Very similar to the Bachman-Wilson house.

  • @brentdobson5264
    @brentdobson5264 Рік тому

    Am " kind " of stunned by Frank Lloyd Wright's thoughts voiced over and how surreal is their absolute truth as one scans the house before one's eyes . Frank Lloyd Wright escaped a limited trance state . To see this house and hear his thoughts on " advanced " architecture for those ready for it is to be awakened from a deep trance . ❤

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies Рік тому

    The greatest architect of all time, and I am sure - of all times to come!

  • @arthurteddy91
    @arthurteddy91 Рік тому

    I've gotten to tour this home, it's absolutely gorgeous!!

  • @joelwalker5834
    @joelwalker5834 Рік тому

    Thank you, whoever you are, for shutting up and letting Mr. Wright and his designs do the talking.

  • @dagwould
    @dagwould Рік тому

    A great pity that Wrights sensitivity to place, form, and people hasn't been more influential in modern architecture. His best work had a human warmth and, dare I say, 'love' that is rare in modern buildings.

  • @boulejazz
    @boulejazz Рік тому

    "The space within becomes the reality of the building"

  • @phraktl
    @phraktl Рік тому

    Thank you for sharing this.

  • @allenwood9967
    @allenwood9967 2 роки тому

    Frank Lloyd Wright wasn't only an architect he was a visionary, he stepped beyond the convention to bring a style that is years ahead of it's time 🙌

  • @ReXeXeR
    @ReXeXeR 2 роки тому

    Excellent.

  • @Krizbonz
    @Krizbonz 2 роки тому

    In 2001 the house was relocated? What lol

    • @majorneptunejr
      @majorneptunejr Рік тому

      It had to be relocated because the owners only wanted the land. It was the only way to save the house.

  • @threepines
    @threepines 2 роки тому

    Very nice drone work, but you may want to change your name as we've been in business since 2007 and have customers in your state. I couldn't find your contact information so am contacting you here.

  • @hatzlmike1
    @hatzlmike1 2 роки тому

    Democrats were the ones wanting to destroy it.

  • @hatzlmike1
    @hatzlmike1 2 роки тому

    Very Good.

  • @patrickmccarron5059
    @patrickmccarron5059 3 роки тому

    Can we go inside?

  • @patrickmccarron5059
    @patrickmccarron5059 3 роки тому

    Flat roofs are a bitch to maintain and leak. I like the look, but the maintenance probably not fun, especially if you live in a wet climate.

  • @jeffblowers5386
    @jeffblowers5386 3 роки тому

    Thanks for adding Frankle and writes words. It captures his philosophy very concisely

  • @whylie74
    @whylie74 3 роки тому

    Shabby, it deserves better.

  • @nickdannunzio7683
    @nickdannunzio7683 3 роки тому

    What a piss-poor vid...

  • @rolo6932
    @rolo6932 3 роки тому

    The new owners wanted to demolished this beauty! WTF is wrong with the people? I`m glad the house was saved!

    • @sharksport01
      @sharksport01 2 роки тому

      Imagine what they built.

    • @majorneptunejr
      @majorneptunejr Рік тому

      @@sharksport01 There are way too many examples of greats houses even historical houses being torn down only to be replaced with some ugly tasteless monstrosity.

    • @dasikakn
      @dasikakn Рік тому

      They saved the house by moving it off the property, but Wright designed for the very specific location. Even moving the house as a solution is still a disappointing one. Sad that the Gordon descendants didn’t care enough to stipulate in the contract that it couldn’t be torn down. The buyer is not the only foolish one here.

  • @bigbufobufo
    @bigbufobufo 3 роки тому

    It’s a gem why would you want to demolish it?

  • @garylockman9937
    @garylockman9937 3 роки тому

    It’s great that this house was saved. But the video shows too much roof and not enough of the interior.

    • @ozzietadziu
      @ozzietadziu 3 роки тому

      Exactly my thought. We visited there in 2017 and I was taken by the interior spaces. Very livable except for the lack of any windows in the kitchen. The skylight lets in a lot of light but no view. As an amateur chef I would find it claustrophobic.

    • @dasikakn
      @dasikakn Рік тому

      Yeah this video doesn’t do it justice. I liked the aerial elevations which were like an abstract painting, but they dwell on it too frequently.

    • @Dutch1954
      @Dutch1954 Рік тому

      More than 9 minutes wasted, yes we know this house, we know ALL of Wright's work, inside out, upside down. But is the interior shown to allow examination of the quality of the reconstruction, the entire reason it was saved in the first place? FAIL.

  • @carolynmcroberts7428
    @carolynmcroberts7428 4 роки тому

    Why did they not show the inside?

    • @mgman6000
      @mgman6000 2 роки тому

      My thoughts exactly

    • @majorneptunejr
      @majorneptunejr Рік тому

      This was a drone shot. They probably did not have access to the inside.

  • @philcooley5443
    @philcooley5443 4 роки тому

    There is a neighborhood in Phoenix that has all FLW inspired homes that are nearly 50 years old. They are all very cool.

  • @CHEFSUMDAY
    @CHEFSUMDAY 4 роки тому

    If you wanna sleep dream live have fun buy a Frank Lloyd Wright home Like I did the home was built in 1953 I have a very high stress job and I can't wait to come home to see the trees

  • @krunoslavpap9759
    @krunoslavpap9759 4 роки тому

    The house is beautiful, like a functional abstract sculpture.

  • @Gee4747
    @Gee4747 4 роки тому

    Speed 1.7 makes it interesting

  • @Gee4747
    @Gee4747 4 роки тому

    Had a fabulous time looking over F L W homes on my travels Gordon

    • @dagwould
      @dagwould Рік тому

      Me too, nothing better than exploring Chicago to come upon a FLW house.

  • @wernerdanler2742
    @wernerdanler2742 4 роки тому

    If you do not show the inside then why bother at all.

  • @c.thompson6638
    @c.thompson6638 4 роки тому

    Nice production all around. Hats off to the team who showcased this beautiful home.

    • @Stormer1633
      @Stormer1633 4 роки тому

      Agreed, beautiful overlay of FLW voice, sharing frank knowledge from the master. The descending and floating camera angles again capturing the of the spirit of the greatest architect Awesome work, FLW would approve

  • @sdeee3842
    @sdeee3842 4 роки тому

    Better moved than destroyed.

  • @oltedders
    @oltedders 4 роки тому

    No interiors? What a disappointment.

    • @house9850
      @house9850 4 роки тому

      I was about to post the same thing

    • @500iq6foot8
      @500iq6foot8 3 роки тому

      Still wouldn't call it a disappointment but I would have liked interior shots

  • @brianjoyce9040
    @brianjoyce9040 4 роки тому

    Beautiful in many ways. Preservation of structure first chore to finish. Refurbished to original state next. Wright’s vision and concept still artistry first. Function, in his mind, simplistic and no one did it better, in simplicity.

  • @libertygiveme1987
    @libertygiveme1987 4 роки тому

    Never was much of a FAN of Frank Lloyd Wright. Just NOT my style. I'm more of a VICTORIAN FAN!!!! He did have some BRILLIANT IDEAS though!!!!

    • @boulejazz
      @boulejazz Рік тому

      Wright hated Victorians. His goal was to create a uniquely American architecture

  • @libertygiveme1987
    @libertygiveme1987 4 роки тому

    A home, I don't care HOW CAREFULLY it is moved, will ALWAYS BE DAMAGED in some way!!!! What a SHAME!!!!

  • @nminodob
    @nminodob 4 роки тому

    FLW fan but face it, we can thank his "genius" for a lot of poured concrete parking structures that are eyesores. I've visited one of his Usonian homes and it's got the most uncomfortable chairs and beds built into it. Nonetheless, when he's good, he's phenomenal!

  • @cassandraralph5906
    @cassandraralph5906 4 роки тому

    Very interesting and clever design

  • @carpademen1066
    @carpademen1066 4 роки тому

    Can just imagine the house built in its place... Philistines !

    • @whisper1776
      @whisper1776 4 роки тому

      I'm glad I took advanced English or I would have never known what that word meant.

  • @slapit145
    @slapit145 4 роки тому

    cool

  • @ericbowles8392
    @ericbowles8392 4 роки тому

    Awesome combination of high tech and steady video and organic scenery with great music selection. Doesn't get much better. Bravo !!!

  • @emilianorobledo1525
    @emilianorobledo1525 4 роки тому

    👍 more architectures productions please.

  • @woodymonte
    @woodymonte 4 роки тому

    I really hate a flat roof........they were the downfall of many of Frank's designs.....they just don't work with nature.

    • @Ardyen317
      @Ardyen317 4 роки тому

      Funny you should mention that. I just watched a PBS special about the Boynton House in Rochester, NY. The owner joked that one of the first questions a FLW house owner asks another owner is: "Does your roof leak?"

    • @jamesmcinnis208
      @jamesmcinnis208 4 роки тому

      @@Ardyen317 not "does" but "how badly does" your roof leak?

    • @rodneybjornstad9016
      @rodneybjornstad9016 2 роки тому

      I always think it is only me that ponders flat roofs that way They ARE beautiful. They are NOT practical in North Dakota 😎 We have 14 inches outside now!

    • @sharksport01
      @sharksport01 2 роки тому

      Its all how its built. Most buildings in most cities have flat roofs. Take a brick and put it in your yard, after a rain does it have a inch of water standing on it?

  • @badapple65
    @badapple65 4 роки тому

    The DJI Spark does a great job. I’m sold. After much research and owning 3 cheaper drones I’m ready for one. Brand new ones can still be found even though they quit producing them. I came here in my search to view FLW designs. Realizing what drone was used is a pleasant surprise.