Biblical Studies and Reviews, Stephen Hackett
Biblical Studies and Reviews, Stephen Hackett
  • 359
  • 725 358
The Bible Was Right All Along (Archaeology)
Discover how archaeology is uncovering evidence that confirms the accuracy of the Bible! From ancient Hebrew weights found in Gezer to the House of David inscription in Dan, these findings shed light on historical figures like David. Subscribe now to learn how archaeology is proving that "The Bible Was Right All Along.
To pick up the book mentioned in the video use this exclusive affiliate link: amzn.to/3xj7R5v
For the full video see: ua-cam.com/video/dJjSa4LwJ4s/v-deo.html
Переглядів: 462

Відео

VERIFIED! The Bible's STARTLING accuracy & reliability!
Переглядів 2,2 тис.14 годин тому
Join us on a fascinating journey through the historical credibility of the Bible, as we uncover the significance of archaeology in confirming biblical accounts. Stick around to hear from a specialist with decades of experience in studying how archaeology illuminates the Bible. Don't miss out on this eye-opening exploration. Introduction 0:00 Point 1: 0:34 Point 2: 3:55 Point 3: 6:17 Point 4: 7:...
Why Do Christians Worship on Sunday?
Переглядів 66921 день тому
Why Do Christians Worship on Sunday?
WORST TRANSLATION! ⚠️ Raising Cain w/ Pastor Dwayne
Переглядів 69021 день тому
WORST TRANSLATION! ⚠️ Raising Cain w/ Pastor Dwayne
The Lost Verses: Bible Mystery Unveiled
Переглядів 5 тис.Місяць тому
The Lost Verses: Bible Mystery Unveiled
How to Pronounce GREEK BIBLE WORDS (A Comprehensive Guide)
Переглядів 504Місяць тому
How to Pronounce GREEK BIBLE WORDS (A Comprehensive Guide)
The Ultimate Showdown!! Septuagint vs Hebrew Bible
Переглядів 13 тис.Місяць тому
The Ultimate Showdown!! Septuagint vs Hebrew Bible
Unmasking Excluded New Testament Books: FALSELY ATTRIBUTED
Переглядів 6042 місяці тому
Unmasking Excluded New Testament Books: FALSELY ATTRIBUTED
Apocrypha
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 місяці тому
Apocrypha
The 4 CRITERIA to establish the NT Canon in the EARLY CHURCH
Переглядів 5973 місяці тому
The 4 CRITERIA to establish the NT Canon in the EARLY CHURCH
Old Earth vs Young Earth Creationism
Переглядів 9283 місяці тому
Old Earth vs Young Earth Creationism
Major Update on Greek NT Project!
Переглядів 1,8 тис.4 місяці тому
Major Update on Greek NT Project!
Full Preterism Critically Examined
Переглядів 8764 місяці тому
Full Preterism Critically Examined
Greek Alphabet Modern Pronunciation
Переглядів 4374 місяці тому
Greek Alphabet Modern Pronunciation
Christianity is true.
Переглядів 2,6 тис.5 місяців тому
Christianity is true.
The Intriguing Secret Behind the 153 Fish Mystery
Переглядів 8725 місяців тому
The Intriguing Secret Behind the 153 Fish Mystery
MISLEADING!! How Ehrman STACKS THE DECK!
Переглядів 1 тис.5 місяців тому
MISLEADING!! How Ehrman STACKS THE DECK!
Unboxing! Beautiful wide-margin KJV
Переглядів 6546 місяців тому
Unboxing! Beautiful wide-margin KJV
High QUALITY Bible translation: For the GLORY OF GOD not the PROFIT of man.
Переглядів 2,8 тис.6 місяців тому
High QUALITY Bible translation: For the GLORY OF GOD not the PROFIT of man.
The Case for Modern Pronunciation for Biblical Greek (Neohellenic vs Erasmian vs Reconstructed)
Переглядів 2,9 тис.7 місяців тому
The Case for Modern Pronunciation for Biblical Greek (Neohellenic vs Erasmian vs Reconstructed)
How about Old Testament textual criticism? Questions for Dr. Maurice Robinson
Переглядів 1,9 тис.7 місяців тому
How about Old Testament textual criticism? Questions for Dr. Maurice Robinson
Most Unique Commentary! Glossa Ordinaria
Переглядів 9507 місяців тому
Most Unique Commentary! Glossa Ordinaria
Earliest is BEST? Dr. Robinson responds to James White's objections
Переглядів 4,5 тис.8 місяців тому
Earliest is BEST? Dr. Robinson responds to James White's objections
Review: A Reader’s Hebrew and Greek Bible
Переглядів 1,6 тис.9 місяців тому
Review: A Reader’s Hebrew and Greek Bible
The REAL reason why they REJECT the Byzantine Text (Objections to the Byzantine text. ANSWERED)
Переглядів 3,9 тис.9 місяців тому
The REAL reason why they REJECT the Byzantine Text (Objections to the Byzantine text. ANSWERED)
Dr. Robinson DEBUNKS THIS myth about the Byzantine text.
Переглядів 6 тис.9 місяців тому
Dr. Robinson DEBUNKS THIS myth about the Byzantine text.
Dan Wallace's BEST objections against the Byzantine Text (Part 1)
Переглядів 5 тис.10 місяців тому
Dan Wallace's BEST objections against the Byzantine Text (Part 1)
Bart Ehrman's ERRORS answered by Dr. Maurice Robinson.
Переглядів 1,8 тис.10 місяців тому
Bart Ehrman's ERRORS answered by Dr. Maurice Robinson.
Why this EXPERT changed his mind! Byzantine Priority: Interview with Dr. Maurice Robinson.
Переглядів 5 тис.10 місяців тому
Why this EXPERT changed his mind! Byzantine Priority: Interview with Dr. Maurice Robinson.
Supercharge Your Bible Study with These Tips!
Переглядів 1,2 тис.10 місяців тому
Supercharge Your Bible Study with These Tips!

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @MichaelAnderson-ng6nz
    @MichaelAnderson-ng6nz Годину тому

    Where can I buy the scrivener Text?

  • @tanykiat
    @tanykiat 5 годин тому

    A. Haire Forster's Paper "The Pronunciation of Greek in New Testament Times" almost a hundred years ago already highlighted that the Modern pronunciation is likely close to Koine.

  • @Simrealism
    @Simrealism 6 годин тому

    I'm learning a Koine Pronunciation based around 100 - 300 A.D because when I read The New Testament in Greek I want to hear what the thoughts of the authors may have sounded like and not those of Yorgos Lanthimos

  • @danm8336
    @danm8336 14 годин тому

    Is the traditional Greek text also known as the majority text? Also, is the majority text the same thing as the Byzantine text? I’m interested in the majority text position after watching one of Matthew Everhard videos. Is there any good books or videos to learn more about this for someone who doesn’t know Hebrew or Greek? This video has good points.

  • @jperez7893
    @jperez7893 15 годин тому

    are you aware of the vatican folio #140? it is an aramaic copy of the 4 gospels that was transported by joseph assemani from the chaldean patriarchate in 1718. it was made in the year 389 of the greeks or 78 ad. it is not known if this manuscript still exists in the vatican or if it was destroyed by the napoleonic troops or are still in france somewhere, maybe the louvre, bibliotheque nationale, or french archives

    • @BiblicalStudiesandReviews
      @BiblicalStudiesandReviews 14 годин тому

      I think you or someone else mentioned it in a comment. I’ve never researched it. Do you have any references for that?

    • @jperez7893
      @jperez7893 14 годин тому

      @@BiblicalStudiesandReviews i saw it here. my motivation is if it is found, the manuscript should be dated ua-cam.com/video/I94Ky6tDxEI/v-deo.html

  • @WH-hi5ew
    @WH-hi5ew 15 годин тому

    A bit like science and the Bible then ; )

  • @nickalsop3833
    @nickalsop3833 17 годин тому

    Stephen, excellent video! Well done.

  • @gumball454
    @gumball454 17 годин тому

    That accuracy when all these mistakes and errors are here: It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. ­­­­­­Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. ­­­­­Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. ­­­­­­ Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. ­­­­­­How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ ­­­­­­Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. ­­­­­ In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. ­­­­­­ Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. ­­­­­­But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. ­­­­­­It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. ­­­­­­In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years.­­­­­­ Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. ­­­­­ It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ ­­­­­­Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? ­­­­­­ Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? ­­­­­­A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ ­­­­­­One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ ­­­­­­Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. ­­­­­­And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. ­­­­­­Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? ­­­­­­ What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? ­­­­­­Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? ­­­­­­Clear-cut contradiction.

  • @billybenson3834
    @billybenson3834 18 годин тому

    He taught the septuagent not the Hebrew. The masoratic text came out 4th century

  • @WilliamDeanIII
    @WilliamDeanIII 18 годин тому

    "Of Things Which Will Soon Come to Pass" by Philip Mauro is a hidden gem and his insights into symbolism is well thought out and justified by careful examination of scripture. Also, it's extremely edifying, which is not always the case in commentaries. Highly recommend this book.

  • @jimmytiler5522
    @jimmytiler5522 21 годину тому

    Ask yourself exactly what is in NY harbour a statue of Freedom or a statue of Mithra(highest form of sunworship from Persia)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The day to bow to Mithra is Sunday(not sonday but sunday)

    • @BiblicalStudiesandReviews
      @BiblicalStudiesandReviews 21 годину тому

      But surely you aren’t opposed to worshipping God any day of the week, are you? Every day belongs to the Lord, right? Even if some people worshipped Mithra on Sunday in the past, doesn’t mean that that day can be stolen from the true God. Just like the rainbow still belongs to God, even if some folks are trying to highjack it. That’s my thoughts, anyway.

    • @jimmytiler5522
      @jimmytiler5522 20 годин тому

      @@BiblicalStudiesandReviews You completely miss the point and do so because ye have been cut off of truth for your abominations. Your not a preacher of truth but lies. Re read what you replied with. Maybe youll see you way but I doubt it for your spoken of in scripture. You are a false prophet as told in scripture for spreading intruths period. Repent or...

  • @erikthegreek1049
    @erikthegreek1049 23 години тому

    So how do you prove that jesus did indeed rise from the dead?

  • @Bander471
    @Bander471 День тому

    Faith is not about which book or person you believe told the truth. The Hebrew Bible is not the first scripture of monotheism nor the last. Nevertheless, they all lead to the one creator.

  • @Kytheus_Errant_2106
    @Kytheus_Errant_2106 День тому

    The first historical attestation of the bible is the Septuagint. The oldest manuscripts are also greek. Many of the oldest hebrew scripts (dead sea scrolls) are coupled with greek copies. Some scholars believe that those hebrew dead sea scrolls were coupled with greek versions because scribes were actually translating the greek into hebrew. The new testament authors knew no hebrew books, and when it seems like they do, its of the dead sea versions, which also agree with the greek. The first clear reception of the hebrew scriptures as you pointed out were in a dispute about whether or not the hebrew scriptures were curruptions. Many of the differences between the Septuagint and the Mazoretic are greek cultic technical terms ie. Ezekiels wheels, names of Greek gods, specific terms about temple activity, and in hebrew they become very simplistic and sometimes nonsensical. There are upwards of an estimated 1.5 million greek words, whereas there are only 5-8,000 hebrew words so the meaning just doesn't translate properly. Everyone knew greek in the 3rd century bc, like english in the west today. We dont know of a single soul who knew hebrew in the 3rd century bc. For these reasons, and plenty more, i believe the scriptures were originally written in greek in the library of alexandria where it is more plausible such a vast project would have taken place, rather then some priests off in a corner translating some dead language for which we have no attestations at the time.

  • @user-yp8dd2qv5o
    @user-yp8dd2qv5o День тому

    One argument for Erasmian is that the vowel lettera have a one to one correspondence with their sounds, making it easier to learn spelling. Today, however, I heard the word φανηροω pronounced and sounded like it could be spelled φανηραω. So the correspondence is not as tight as we may be led to believe. Homonyms may be unavoidable.

  • @ronaldmitchelll9558
    @ronaldmitchelll9558 День тому

    Clouds show HIS way explains the change of kings and judgement brought in that moment

  • @gumball454
    @gumball454 День тому

    If there's a single mistake in the bible you can't even mention the word accuracy........ohh yeah there are many.

    • @SquattRakk
      @SquattRakk День тому

      Name one

    • @gumball454
      @gumball454 День тому

      @@SquattRakk Look brother i didn't even bother myself to make a research i found all this in the second link in Google search and i checked them from the bible one by one here you are: It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. ­­­­­­Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. ­­­­­Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. ­­­­­­ Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. ­­­­­­How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ ­­­­­­Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. ­­­­­ In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. ­­­­­­ Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. ­­­­­­But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. ­­­­­­It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. ­­­­­­In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years.­­­­­­ Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. ­­­­­ It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ ­­­­­­Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? ­­­­­­ Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? ­­­­­­A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ ­­­­­­One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ ­­­­­­Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. ­­­­­­And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. ­­­­­­Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? ­­­­­­ What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? ­­­­­­Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? ­­­­­­Clear-cut contradiction. I hope you stop this mess leading.

    • @gumball454
      @gumball454 17 годин тому

      @@SquattRakk It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. ­­­­­­Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. ­­­­­Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. ­­­­­­ Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. ­­­­­­How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ ­­­­­­Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. ­­­­­ In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. ­­­­­­ Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. ­­­­­­But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. ­­­­­­It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. ­­­­­­In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years.­­­­­­ Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. ­­­­­ It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ ­­­­­­Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? ­­­­­­ Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? ­­­­­­A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ ­­­­­­One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ ­­­­­­Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. ­­­­­­And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. ­­­­­­Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? ­­­­­­ What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? ­­­­­­Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? ­­­­­­Clear-cut contradiction.

    • @gumball454
      @gumball454 17 годин тому

      ​@@SquattRakk It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. ­­­­­­Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. ­­­­­Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. ­­­­­­ Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. ­­­­­­How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ ­­­­­­Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. ­­­­­ In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. ­­­­­­ Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. ­­­­­­But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. ­­­­­­It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. ­­­­­­In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years.­­­­­­ Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. ­­­­­ It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ ­­­­­­Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? ­­­­­­ Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? ­­­­­­A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ ­­­­­­One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ ­­­­­­Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. ­­­­­­And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. ­­­­­­Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? ­­­­­­ What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? ­­­­­­Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? ­­­­­­Clear-cut contradiction.

  • @HansTyndale
    @HansTyndale День тому

    The Great Bible of 1539 does not use the word (file) nor any prior English translations for 1 Samuel 13: 21, it just says the tools needed sharpened, to paraphrase the verse. The Geneva Bible of 1560, Bishops 1568, and KJV 1611 all use the word (file) to translate the Hebrew, Pim. And looking at footnotes in the NRSV that I have, there are frequent occurrences of: Meaning of Hebrew uncertain. I've read that the Septuagint was created because Hebrew was becoming a dead language. Google The Septuagint, the first known translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek, is traditionally thought to have been created in the 3rd century BCE during the reign of King Ptolemy II Philadelphus of Egypt (285-246 BCE). In another place: Most scholars now date the demise of Hebrew as a spoken language at the end of the Roman period or about 200 CE. Hebrew was revived as a spoken language in the 19th C. More historical dates for interested Nerds 1440 Gutenberg invented the printing press in Mainz Germany 1450 Modern English began to be used. 1453 The end of the Medieval Greek period and the beginning of the Modern Greek period is often assigned to the fall of the Byzantine empire. 1528 Erasmus invents Erasmian pronunciation for Koine Greek. Ancient Greek has been spoken since the 3rd millennium BC or earlier. The earliest is a Linear B clay tablet found in Messenia that dates between 1450 & 1350 BC., making Greek the oldest recorded living language. Incidentally, the Septuagint uses the word [χαλκεύειν - Forge] for the Hebrew word [פִים File] in 1 Samuel 13: 21.

  • @Miroslaw-rs8ip
    @Miroslaw-rs8ip День тому

    We have about 5700 NT witnesses in the Greek not to mention other ancient languages

  • @followtheway164
    @followtheway164 День тому

    Your question is valid. Is it possible Christians could have modified the Septuagint to fit more closely to Christ? Yes. However you have to consider the inverse question for the Masoretic Text. Could the Jews that denied Christ have modified the translation of the MT to seem less like Christ? Also yes. I find it helpful to read both versions.

    • @BiblicalStudiesandReviews
      @BiblicalStudiesandReviews День тому

      I think both are important and needed. I do tend to think it’s less likely that the MT was modified deliberately, since they believed they were dealing with the original and not a translation if that makes sense.

  • @olegig5166
    @olegig5166 2 дні тому

    I wish video makers would stop using the term "The Bible" as in the title of this video. It's kind of like various members of the UN saying "The Constitution." Whose Constitution, Russian, England, France, USA, whose? They're all different, just like the versions are different. One of the biggest problems with Christianity today is when someone uses the term "The Bible", what they really mean is a collection of words relating what they think God should have said.

    • @ozdoublelife
      @ozdoublelife 5 годин тому

      As a devout Christian you make a valid point, well somewhat. I'm not bothered by the comment because I know what the word "bible" means and its etymology. Where you made a very minor mistake is stating collection of "words" when it's a collection of letters and books. Ok ok ok semantics? Sure. And I personally don't have to "think" when there is plenty of evidence from secular and historical sources outside of the "bible." Anywhooo, as you were my friend. Not here to argue nor debate. Simply to clear up a few things. Grace and peace.

  • @e.m.8094
    @e.m.8094 2 дні тому

    Thanks for the book recommendation!

  • @BrianBeam-du4zn
    @BrianBeam-du4zn 2 дні тому

    First 2 comments from skeptics. 😢 Thanks for video

    • @maxtravers1314
      @maxtravers1314 2 дні тому

      If skepticism is a bad thing to you, then I think that says enough

  • @mazidweb
    @mazidweb 2 дні тому

    Excellent 👍

  • @trappedcat3615
    @trappedcat3615 2 дні тому

    Or, scriptures confirms archeology.

    • @LaughingOrange
      @LaughingOrange День тому

      The scripture came first, and archeology is scientific. Scripture, seen as historical documents, can help explain archeological findings, but you should be careful not to make conclusions about archeology based on scripture alone.

    • @trappedcat3615
      @trappedcat3615 День тому

      @@LaughingOrange The point is our understanding of anything is wrong if it contradicts scripture. Scripture has the preeminence in confirming truth. Obviously that does not mean go around using scripture to validate every discovery.

  • @velkyn1
    @velkyn1 2 дні тому

    unsurprisingly, archaeology doesn't support the bible's nonsense. A mention of a "david" doesn't get you to a dead guy resurrecting.

  • @justinbaldwinOG
    @justinbaldwinOG 2 дні тому

    This channel is so awesome! 👏🏼

  • @johnnyjonsson8064
    @johnnyjonsson8064 2 дні тому

    Fundamentalism .