Відео

Name one place.

There are no codes in Looney, Ogburn, Price or Anderson. The video goes from debunking those, to claiming the author could not possibly have taken artistic license by describing non-existent tides. I mean, come on . That's not how one debunks weak claims. Straw manning (or not knowing better) unwittingly conveys the opposite of what youre hoping. To undermine an argument (in this case a series of arguments) you first have to know what they are.

@@a_lucientes Codes are an essential part of much current nonsense proposing Oxfordian authorship. Alexander Waugh, for example, is immensely popular and uses them endlessly. And with the amount of ink spilled over the author's supposed intimate knowledge of Italy, it seems odd that suddenly it doesn't matter whether he got geographical detail right or not. This is a proposition that, though I most powerfully and potently believe, yet hold it not honesty to have it thus set down.

The Earl of Oxford had nothing to do with Shakespeare's plays, poems, or sonnets.

​@@EndoftheTownProductions He may have been the patron behind a Shakespeare source play. The Famous Victories of Henry V, an anonymous play which Shakespeare used as a source for his Henry IV part 2 and Henry V, includes a historically inaccurate scene with the 11th Earl of Oxford. Shakespeare deleted it.

@@EndoftheTownProductions The Earl of Oxford had everything to do with Shakespeare's plays, poems and sonnets. FIFY!!

@@Jeffhowardmeade The Earl of Oxford, as you know, did not write any of Shakespeare's works, which the Oxfordians believe. There is no evidence in favor of this view.

@@EndoftheTownProductions Of course not. Even if the few vague biographical similarities that they tart up into "parallels" were actually based on Oxford's life, that would not be evidence that he personally wrote them. It would be far more likely that Shakespeare was making fun of him.

What act and scene of Macbeth does Shakespeare mention The Gunpowder Plot?

​@@vetstadiumastroturf5756 Act 1 Scene 1 line 12. "Fair is foul, and foul is fair" is a response to Rev Lancelot Andrews, who delivered a sermon on the deliverance of King James from the Gunpowder Plot. This famous sermon, copied and read at all churches includes the line "Be they faire or foule." Wait...I've presented you with this and all of the other Macbeth references to the Gunpowder Plot how many times now? Yet you continue on as if you've never heard it before. You really don't care about facts, do you?

@@vetstadiumastroturf5756 Porter scene

@@EndoftheTownProductions Go on....What in the "Porter scene" could not have been derived before 1605?

@@Jeffhowardmeade ​ @Jeffhowardmeade LOL! Fair!!! "FAIR" is how "VERE" was pronounced! The publication of Macbeth was possibly spurred by the sermon, but there is no reason to assume that it was written as a response to it...unless you need it to in order to eliminate De Vere from Authorship Contention. More likely Vere was referring to himself: Fair is foul, and foul is fair; (Vere is foul, and foul is Vere) Hover through the fog and filthy air (hoVER through the fog and filthy HEIR) Shakespeare uses the pairing elsewhere. Are we to assume that Sonnet 127 refers the Gunpowder Plot? It doesn't appear to: In the old age, black was not counted FAIR, Or, if it were, it bore not beauty’s name; But now is black beauty’s successive HEIR, And beauty slandered with a bastard shame. For since each hand hath put on nature’s power, *FAIRing the FOUL with art’s false borrowed face,* (Gunpowder Plot? By your logic it must be) Sweet beauty hath no name, no holy bower, But is profaned, if not lives in disgrace. Therefore my mistress’ eyes are raven black, Her eyes so suited, and they mourners seem At such who, not born fair, no beauty lack, Sland’ring creation with a false esteem. Yet so they mourn, becoming of their woe, That every tongue says beauty should look so. So...Equivocation? No. The Medal? No. Fair/Foul? Oh God No! A wish? Pretty much.

So it does!

It's possible but the elongation may not match.

The Ashborne is Hugh Hammersley. He had no connection with Heddingham.

How wonderful they must be thrilling to look at. Do you have any photographs of them, I would love to see them.

Thank you!! 😊