Відео

No

Glad you found this helpful! 😀

Possibly

Nice! I've actually tried filling it with water and it's loads of fun! :D

Do you actually like the music? I don't remember the name.. I'll tell you when I find it. It was on my piano.

Thanks! 😃

Hi! 😀

@@tuhilsd.i.yscience2736 hi dudr

Hi! Of course I remember you!

I lost number actually

Now you r inter right

@@Akshay-kh3dg yes

Later give me your no

Thanks for the feedback! I didn't know there was such a thing as async loop until you mentioned it. I looked it up, and I see what you mean. It will definitely make it run faster. However, I'm just a beginner at coding, so I don't quite know how to implement it. Anyways, I'll look more into these advanced coding techniques when I have time. The purpose of this video was not to find the fastest time in which a computer can count to a billion, but rather show the insane speed at which modern computers run. That being said, thanks again for your feedback! 😀

i'm no expert on this but 500bil-1.5tril per second seems very high? How is that possible when a processors clock rate is only in the 5billion operations per second range? I'm watching this video to get an idea of how efficient a computer is for doing calculations in it's tick cycle, (see how many cycles to do a very basic calculation) I would certainly not expect it to be above the clock cycle of processor. You seem very I hope you're right, could you please explain a little for me?

@@bobnob4393 K, take some current CPU model, presumably 4Ghz clock speed and 16 cores, 4bil operations per core, 64bil operations for the cpu per second. Depending on how we define "counting", if we maintain the perception of having a number increasing by 1 in a chronological order and with an interval between each operation greater than 0s, then 64bil operations will be the maximum. If you further increase the efficiency by running multiple more counting steps in parallel on a single core using out-of-order execution, you can multiply the speed by a magnitude, although it's hard to estimate it even for the most basic operations and bit manipulations. Essentially consider it counting in parallel in parallel whilst still preserving the individual steps of counting themselves, it's not turning into the addition of greater values than 1 to increase speed. Of course this experiment would also assume that we at least created an environment which doesn't rely on integer operations, this would only throttle efficiency.

Yes, but you need different pipes and fittings to make it usable as a pressure washer.

@@tuhilsd.i.yscience2736 can you please make a video on that one, as DIY bike washer? I saw many videos in UA-cam but none where as good your video 😊

Yeah, it's basically impossible, because we need more than 1 second to count large numbers, and we can't count for 24 hours a day. And why would anyone waste their life counting numbers ?

I don't think 10 billion is possible 😂 The world population is 8 billion.

But there are more phones and computers than the population :)

@@TMSC_1 good point

😂😂😂Lmfao

Thanks 😀

I don't quite remember... I think it was around ₹300, if you don't include the pressure guage.

Idk

😀

Thanks! The reason I didn't use expensive tools is because I didn't have any 😅

Lol

me tooooooo😂

3:28 i guess it is u

Thanks

Yes, it's Lightworks..on computer 😀

First time someone got ♥️ from him

Thx

Thanks

Thanks 😄

Thanks

PVC pipes can easily hold 70-80 psi at room temperature, while cpvc can hold up to 400 psi at room temperature. So you don't need to worry, I only pumped it up to 50psi.

Thanks 😀

U r n a i l s

I have cut them now 😂