Відео

The other videos show it cutting (shorts are limited to 1 minute). This was an experiment with editing.

The car is the star of the show, and it does not talk - yet.

FSD 12.4.3 removes the steering wheel nag.

@@ericgregori I have V12.5 FSD (Supervised) and that was downloaded yesterday. How can I get the 12.4?

12.3.6 is smoother than 12.4.3, but 12.5 is amazing.

Also, regulators in the UK would not allow a simple minded buggy FSD software on public streets over there. UK does not put the public at risk.

I have my X drive to work in FSD during rush hour traffic with the same outcome🤷‍♂️

17:00 handling a lane closure like a human

Tesla FSD 12.4.3 Drive from Manhattan to Brooklyn: ua-cam.com/video/niLW1fF00Es/v-deo.htmlsi=QIGYom4FacQFrYSW Tesla's FSD 12.4.3 First Impressions & Major Challenge in Chicago: ua-cam.com/video/bcvH5wwf7Oo/v-deo.htmlsi=2e6JqLyriYfNTnGQ Part 2 - FSD 12.4.3 Ultra Stress Test in Chicago Downtown: ua-cam.com/video/teFmrN6RdqI/v-deo.htmlsi=lvASaf__wW2hFr7L I encourage you to subscribe to TechGeek Tesla. He does Chicago drives. "Because there is no standard definition for “good driving,” people tend to use their own unique, individual definitions. So, a slow and cautious driver could have a totally different definition of “good driving” than someone who likes to drive fast and aggressively."

@@ericgregori I’m also in the Chicago area with a commute from far west side to Elmhurst. This includes a fun quick trip on I294.

6,420,000 auto accidents in the United States in a year. 98% of crashes are caused by human error. Every 5 seconds a car crash occurs 115 people die every day in vehicle crashes in the United States... one death every 13 minutes. It is the leading cause of death ages 1-35 10 Shocking Parking Lot Accident Statistics One in Five Vehicle Accidents Occur in Parking Lots Over 500 People Die Every Year in Parking Lots and Garages 50,000 Car Accidents Occur in U.S. Parking Lots and Garages Annually Over 60,000 People Are Injured in Parking Lots Every Year 25% Of Parking Lot Accidents Involve Backing Up One-Third of Drivers Admit to Not Paying Attention While Driving in Lots At Least 80% Of Bumper Scratches Occur During Parking 14% Of All Car Insurance Claims Involve Parking Lot Incidents Parking Lot Accidents Peak at 5:00 PM on Saturdays Parking Lot Accidents Increase the Holiday Shopping Season

@@ericgregori All of your car crash statistics in USA will not be helped by FSD: FSD cannot drive for even 1 hour on a challenging route, without making mistakes. Less than 1 percent of cars in America are Tesla. And an even tinier percentage have paid for the buggy beta FSD software. A dumb level 2 assistant.

I let an AI drive my car, why not let it do the narration.

The car is being driven by a bot, an AI. If I can use AI to drive my car, why not use it for narration.

The captain is ultimately responsible. FSD is a pilot that needs to be supervised by a captain.

Uncanny valley - The uncanny valley is a term that describes the sense of discomfort or unease we experience when we encounter a robot with certain human-like characteristics. Evoking a negative emotional response in humans.

@@ericgregori It's nice to know that there is a specific term to describe the unease felt by humans , in the presence of superior robotic intelligence masquerading as a vehicle. Or refrigerator 😁

I have never felt unsafe using FSD. It is not perfect, but it is safe. @WholeMars - San Francisco FSD videos @techgeektesla - Chicago FSD videos @BlackTesla - Not sure where he drives

@@ericgregori honestly forgot the guys UA-cam page but some of them were like the Tesla would confuse a gravel lot for road and take a trip off road to reach a point dropping off something the size of a curb in the process and there was another vid of his where the fsd wouldn’t go straight for this one section of road that was under construction and kept trying to drive him off of the side of a hill there was another guy I saw showing how fsd came to a full stop on the high way for a red light on a side road or on ramp some of these situations are more what I meant outside of the places fsd is used everyday is where the real testing lies

The NCAP tested the Model Y and rated it the safest car on the road. See the test for yourself: ua-cam.com/video/dKaN3f2zmCQ/v-deo.html

I wonder if this is why it stopped before going around? "On January 1, 2015, an addendum to Scott’s law went into effect in Illinois requiring motorists to slow down when they are approaching recycling trucks. This was an addition to an existing law that required vehicles to slow down when approaching garbage trucks. The law requires that a driver change lanes (if possible) or slow down below the posted speed limit, or risk a penalty of up to $10,000."

The cameras look through the windshield. See this video: ua-cam.com/video/9CiGrQfn-60/v-deo.html

"Auto - Model Y detects precipitation and adjusts the wiping speed and intensity. Pressing the wiper button while the wipers are set to Auto temporarily increases the sensitivity of the wipers." www.notateslaapp.com/news/2054/you-can-now-increase-tesla-auto-wipers-sensitivity-and-autopark-can-park-in-smaller-spaces

please like and subscribe 😀

You're running FSD with cabin camera covered?

Level 3 capable. Level 3 certified is not fully defined yet. See references in description.

Stereo vision is one of the algorithms used. Humans can drive with only one eye open, so it is possible to derive speed and distance without stereo vision. ua-cam.com/video/AGiW3l7Vydg/v-deo.htmlsi=_vsH0ttprqe4K4Ix&t=2867

I have disengaged six times in 1500 miles and question whether I should have disengaged for four of the six. As I use the system, I trust it more, but with every new release, I need to reset my trust.

Thanks

Yeah, after finishing this video; this is exactly what happened to me. Your discussion of cross checking out the window and the FSD screen gives me a great idea of how to do a better job supervising. Thank you for your teaching!

@@TheBladeSephara Based on my experience with FSD, I firmly believe it is safe for humans but not always for paint. The few times I have disengaged have been to save my paint. Thanks for the like.

@@ericgregori Thanks so much for your reply! That's a great way to put it. I agree. I think if I had left FSD on those two times, I would've gotten some DIY racing stripes in my white coat but been okay.

Bats do not drive cars.

@@ericgregori but they see better if the Sight is compromised.

It is more than good enough.

I use it every day, it’s very good

* Mercedes, so-called level 3 system, which Mercedes-Benz (DDAIF) just started to roll out in the U.S., allows for conditional automation (hands off, eyes off). The conditions at this stage are specific and extremely limited; the outside environment must be clear and bright, the route must have been previously mapped by Mercedes, the car must be going less than 40 mph and there must be a car in front of the Mercedes. . The liability laws have not been written yet (see reference in the description). * This is level 3 capable self-driving. Not robotaxi. * Tesla is the leader in camera-only full self-driving. Nobody else is close. * Have you tried FSD 12.3.6? I have over 100 videos on my channel showing what FSD can do, and dozens of other channels show the same thing. The proof is there for anyone to see. * Waymo has $50K worth of sensors, including LIDAR, but it still gets into accidents and needs a remote human driver. "Level 3, or "conditional automation", is a level of driving automation that allows a car to drive itself under certain conditions. Level 3 vehicles can steer and control their speed, monitor their surroundings, and make decisions like accelerating past a slower vehicle. However, the driver must still be alert and ready to take over if the system can't complete a task."

@@ericgregori Yes, Mercedes level 3 has certain conditions. But when those conditions are met THEY take 100% liability, in other words they believe that it will be utterly safe and stand by their technology. Tesla on the other hand has been level 2 now for a decade and every 'game changing update' still made a tad better level 2 than before and NOT level 3. Telsa doesn't take liability no matter the conditions. Let me repeat that, Tesla takes ZERO liability no matter how or when or where you use it. Tesla has no confidence that the system won't fail even on country roads on a sunny day while driving 20Mph. Telsa only relying on camera's is not because they know that other types of sensors wouldn't help but because they don't want to endure the costs of those systems. Them being cheap there for is not the good thing you seem to think

@@PDVism Opinion != fact Fact: Tesla FSD is level 3 capable but level 2 certified. Using only cameras, Tesla FSD is far more capable than any other automated driving system on the US market. Fact: Tesla FSD can drive the car anywhere, but the supervising driver is always legally responsible. Fact: The Mercedes system is far less capable than the Tesla FSD, but under strict terms (a few highways in Nevada and California), it is level 3 certified. Your whole argument is based on Mercedes taking legal liability, but that is not the case: "There seems to be widespread confusion about who will take the blame if the shiny new Mercedes-Benz Drive Pilot feature is involved in a crash in the US. The media is awash with non-specific claims that amount to "probably Mercedes-Benz will take responsibility." (See here, here, here, and here) But the short answer is: it will almost certainly be the human driver taking the initial blame, and they might well be stuck with it -- unless they can pony up serious resources to succeed at a multi-year engineering analysis effort to prove a design defect. This one gets complicated. So it is understandable that journalists on deadline simply repeat misleading Mercedes-Benz (MB) marketing claims without necessarily understanding the nuances. This is a classic case of "the large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" lawyer phrasing. The large print in this case is "MERCEDES-BENZ TAKES RESPONSIBILITY" and the small print is "but we're not talking about negligent driving behavior that causes a crash." The crux of the matter is that MB takes responsibility for product defect liability (which they have to any way -- they have no choice in the matter). But they are clearly not taking responsibility for tort liability related to a crash (i.e., "blame" and related concepts), which is the question everyone is trying to ask them."

@@ericgregori Lots of words to just admit that Mercedes takes responsibility IF there system should do something wrong while using their product in the manner they want you to while Tesla won't ever take responsibility unless they get sued in which case they'll wait until the last possible moment to settle out of court. Mercedes is like any decent company that takes responsibility for their product when used as intended BUT doesn't if the user is being an idiot. Tesla on the other hand is like that guy on the sidewalk selling you a waterproof watch that he swears you can go deepside diving with that when you get home and dunk it in a glass of water stops working. If you think that Tesla is on the same par as Mercedes concerning autonomous driving can you explain why Mercedes got officially certified while Tesla has some explaining to do to the DOJ because of their BS lies about FULL self driving?

@@PDVism You did not read the whole thing. Mercedes does not take responsibility. I added the MB Pilot + owners manual to the references in the discussion. I also added a reference to where Mercedes admits that they do not take legal responsibility. Mercedes level 3 is a marketing scam. Tesla FSD is real, you can try it at any Tesla dealer. Thousands of people are using it everyday across the US to make their driving safer and more enjoyable. It is unfortunate that the irrational Tesla/Elon hate has clouded peoples judgement to such an extreme that they cannot see the obvious advantages FSD offers and the fundamental shift in driving that it represents, FSD is not perfect, but it gets better with every new (free) update. It is not expensive (only $99.00 a month). It is available on every Tesla purchased in the last 5 or more years. I encourage everyone to watch my videos, and other FSD users on UA-cam to see for yourself what FSD can do. @WholeMars <-- He has a video comparing Tesla FSD to Mercedes. Judge for your self which is more capable and safer. @DrKnowitallKnows @AIDRIVR @ChuckCook

Tesla insurance is actually cheaper the more you use self driving. "Starting in 2029, vehicle manufacturers must make automatic emergency braking, which reduces vehicle and pedestrian crashes, standard in cars and light trucks Making this safety feature standard, rather than a luxury, is part of the Department’s National Roadway Safety Strategy to address the crisis of deaths on our roads" ua-cam.com/users/clipUgkxah1Grbb2oTFmmiBRBb2ag7hu2ZEXr76y?si=7rFZFdtYSofkLkh1

You can blame 'map error' , but the FSD system was unable to *get* *the* *job* *done* . FSD continues to disappoint, after about 4 years in beta.

@@DerekDavis213@DerekDavis213 FSD does not disappoint me; I use it every day. It is, by far, the most advanced autonomous driving system on the market.

@@ericgregori FSD might be the most advanced system, but that ain't saying much. None of the systems are capable of full autonomy. And *nobody* wants to supervise a simple-minded Level 2 assistant that makes mistakes every day.

As I mentioned in the video, it saw the toolbox and would have navigated around it.

There is no disengagement, FSD worked perfectly. There is a timestamp in the lower right corner so you know exactly how long FSD takes to react.

@@ericgregori You intentionally accelerate the video so viewers cannot see the true nature of the buggy beta FSD software. As an engineer, you should be interested in truth and transparency. FSD is wonderful, for a 10 minute trip to the *bakery* for a dozen donuts.

@@DerekDavis213 The video is timestamped for transparency.

@@ericgregori But you ignore my point: an accelerated video *conceals* when FSD is slow and hesitant. Why do you want to show FSD in the most positive light, instead of being honest and unbiased?

@@DerekDavis213 If you want to watch the video in real-time, you can adjust the playback speed using the timestamp as a reference. I have over 100 FSD videos, feel free to watch the 1X videos if you like. Most people will not watch a video if it is too long.

Thanks

Glad it was helpful!

I have had to disengage once over dozens of trips. Tesla may say it is level 2, but it works at level 3. Thus the reason for the videos.

@@ericgregori If Tesla could claim Level 3 , you better believe they would. FSD is a simple minded Level 2 assistant that makes mistakes on any *challenging* drive. FSD is nowhere even close to a human driver .

@@DerekDavis213@DerekDavis213 I have been using it since April 1st and have recorded almost every trip. Your assessment does not match my recorded experience. If you have any data to back your claim, I encourage you to present it. Most other reviews backed up with data are making claims similar to mine.

@@ericgregori Over 40 FSD v12 reviews on UA-cam, go and watch some. you will see interventions or disengagements in almost every video. That's a fact. FSD v12 is much better than v11. Maybe v12 is 97% capable now. But that is *not* *good* *enough* . A human driver is 99.99% proficient .