Відео

Thank you Jason! This was very thought provoking!

Thank you for inspiring me today and for reminding me that there are certain things I can't control, including people. This message was so meaningful to me. My love and prayers are with you. ❤️🙏🦋

😡 'promosm'

This is a work of fiction folks. The author self published it. It is not from the Vatican. Remember The Blair Witch movie? The marketing portrayed it as real for hype. 🤷🏻‍♂️ This book is fanfiction and clever marketing.

Loved the songs and sermon today!❤

Have a blessed Easter everyone! ❤🎉

Question: are there really contradictions in the bible or are they just misunderstood?, I really want the answer Thank you and GOD BLESS

That was very good and creative. Please do one on the nicoleatins

Well done!!! Thanks. ✝

Part Three: I plan to leave this alone after this. If you had said anything else about Outer Darkness, it probably wouldn't bug me this much. But making it a place of suffering for believers.., really, really bad stuff. Anyway, here is the final question. Is Jude (entire letter) speaking of actual believers, or false believers? (Answer appears in verse 19). If he is speaking of unsaved individuals, why does he say they will go to "The blackest darkness" (verse 13)? And why does Jude say that they will be there forever? Is the darkness a place for believers, or a place for unbelievers?

Part Two: I realized what you could say against my previous argument. So, I thought I'd answer that possible objection. You could say, "Many are called but few are chosen" refers to the original call in the parable. When the King called the original guests (Israel). Then the King called everyone (including Gentiles). Yes, that is what that means. But it also includes those who show up without their garments. The man who was thrown into outer darkness (darkness outside) was not wearing a wedding garment. Wouldn't this be like someone who said, "Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?" He is trying to be in Heaven, but he was thrown out. Isn't that like when Jesus says "Depart from me"? It seems clear to me that this man is part of those who were not chosen. Who else is outside of the banquet hall? Aren't the original guests also outside? And those who didn't answer the call, aren't they outside as well? If the man is thrown out with them, is he in the banquet hall?

Part One: Dangerous and unnecessary. Subject of the Kingdom is not the same as "Servant". Subject is literally anyone in the entire Kingdom. But Pastor, did you read the very next verse? Jesus refutes your idea. ...outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’ 14 *For many are called, but few are chosen.”* Jesus says the man who was thrown into "the darkness outside" was not chosen. If he wasn't chosen, he wasn't a believer. It isn't necessary to find a way to make outer darkness mean anything other than Hell. I'm glad that you agree that Matthew 13:42 is Hell. But I don't understand why you want to turn outer darkness into an extended period of suffering (weeping and gnashing of teeth for the entire duration of the wedding feast) for some believers. That is called Purgatory. And it's heresy. Please reconsider. Edit (Don't reconsider on my account. Reconsider on yours. Even the best bible teachers mess up sometimes Peter for instance. If I'm right, correct yourself. If I'm wrong, correct me)

Thank you, SO enlightening! I am excited to learn more next week!

"Time shall be no longer" "Time's up" "Delay shall be no longer" That's how you can use "Chronos" to mean delay. If it meant what you said it does, then this is a very strange place to put this verse. When the Angel says this, there will still be 1003.5 years left of natural time, at least. We don't know if something comes after or not. So, since it can't mean that time itself is ending, it must mean "Time's up". I do believe that time itself will end someday. So Amen on that. But, that can't be what this Angel is saying. It would not make sense at that time.

I picture God as an extremely patient father. This is going to sound a little weird. I have a Chihuahua. I love that dog, but sometimes (today, for instance), she gets nervous and pees on my bed. After saying my initial "No", I pick her up, and pet her. I let her know that I still love her. Her mistake is irrelevant. I would really rather that she didn't pee in my bed. But it isn't going to change anything for me. That's how I see God.

Revelation 15. These are the saints that had victory over the beast. They are standing on a sea of glass mingled with fire. What does that sound like? Does that sound like Heaven? Look up the effects of a nuclear blast. It would fit that description perfectly. I think this passage is describing a whole bunch of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego's. But I think I'm going to back off a lot more on this. Daniel 11:33 says I can explain it when it happens. Just as the pre Tribbers joke about explaining it on the way up.

Compare the Sixth Seal, Seventh Trumpet, and the Seventh Bowl. Write down each event. Then, compare Ezekiel 38 (18-23). When you're done with that, look at the 7th Trumpet again. This passage declares Christ's final victory. That He is now the ruler of the world. But pre Tribbers say that He won't rule until several years after this. If these are all the same event from three (or four) different viewpoints, then the final victory declared in Revelation 11 makes sense. I bring this up because you used the sixth seal to support a pre Tribulation Rapture. I've never heard any argument against the three in Revelation except "because it isn't the same event". Which is more wishful thinking of American preachers. And the only argument I've heard against the one in Ezekiel is "6th part of thee" (I think you'll know what I mean). And this has been debunked as bad translating, and isn't included in any modern translation. So the question is, can you prove that the Sixth Seal, Seventh Trumpet, Seventh Bowl and Ezekiel 38 (and 39) are not the same event?

"We are not appointed to wrath" has never been a good pre Tribulation argument. When God poured His wrath on Egypt, Did He remove Israel before or after? Did Israel suffer directly from any of that wrath? (I'll start separating my different arguments into different comments. That way, if you decide to answer one argument, you won't have a giant comment on the screen. You don't need to read this part if you answer this 🙂)

Jason, would like to be notified to see the Question and answer videos. Thank you.

One of those times that I can't say anything except Amen! Can't wait for next week

I wrote this comment 5 times. It keeps coming across as mean. I will just say that your reasoning is circular. You believe in a pre Tribulation Rapture, therefore, this must be a separate appearing. And since it's a separate appearing, you can believe in a pre Tribulation Rapture. 2 Thessalonians 2 1-8. The appearing is in verse 8. It is mentioned after Paul placed our gathering unto Him and the coming of our Lord on the same day. He placed that day after the Abomination of Desolation. Verse 7 can not be the church or Holy Spirit because that would place the rapture before the revealing of the Antichrist, contradicting verse 3. I feel like I need a flow chart to untwist what pre Tribbers have done to this passage. This isn't a salvation issue,... yet. So I'll just leave it here. Even this feels mean to me. Just know that I'm definitely not trying to be mean. You've tried this format before. I liked it then and I like it now.

Great video. Though I vehemently disagree with the second half. The first half was fantastic! Impossible to see that in the text of the Bible without looking deeper into the culture of Asia Minor. Nicely done!

And I forgot to put this in the last comment. Be careful about Todd White. I was praising God when I heard his repentance speech. But I was still sceptical. Here is a video I found about his repentance. Perhaps it's just a first step. Maybe the Holy Spirit is working in him. But it doesn't appear that he should be teaching anything yet. ua-cam.com/video/rnhaBaASFUE/v-deo.html

Wooo! Awesome video! Okay, a few things. First, Happy Anniversary!!! Have fun at the hot springs. Second, American Gospel part 1 is awesome! Best documentary I've seen in years. Can't wait to watch the second one. Third, there has been a whole lot going on in my life this week with this exact subject. Very timely. This video should help.

Hey there! Enjoying the uploads. Why don’t you use smzeus . c o m to help grow your channel?

I'm not trying to give you a hard time. Feel free to ignore this. I won't be offended. John literally said these are to the 7 Churches which ARE in Asia. Rev 1:19, John is ordered to write the things he has seen, the things that are, and the things that will take place after this. That is 3 categories. I don't see a reason to shove things from one category (the Seven Churches are in the category "Things that are") into other categories (they should not be in the category "things that will be"). I know I've been antagonistic lately. I don't mean to be. I'm seeing it from the perspective of iron sharpens iron. If I'm wrong, I hope you can show me. I assume that if you're wrong, you hope the same thing. God bless. I'm still praying for you every day (specifically about the thing you asked me to pray about, I hope that's going well).

Okay. That's a LOT to unpack. I have at least 9 points that need refinement. But I'll do just one for now. You said that the Antichrist will suffer a fatal head wound. I know where you get this idea. Revelation 13:3. It amazes me that people who KNOW that the beast in this passage represents nations can't seem to see past the commentaries. These are the same beasts from Daniel 7, which every commentary admits are representative of nations. Except now they are all in one, a combo beast. A representation of the one world government. If we know that the beast that has the head would is a nation, why do we force scripture to say that it is the Antichrist instead? Can you show me another passage that would confirm the idea that the Antichrist, and not one of the nations, will suffer a fatal head wound?

1 John 3:2-3... I see something there I never noticed before. Pre Tribbers believe the Rapture and the Appearing are different events. But John says that we will be changed when He appears. Why do pre Tribbers say we will be changed 7 years before that? Seriously, this is the first time I noticed this. It just shocked me a little. Not trying to start an argument. Since I firmly believe in a post trib rapture, I believe that the Holy Spirit will bring more of these scriptures out to explain what He's doing. We've seen these scriptures for centuries, but never noticed how they fit before. Just as the people who lived through Jesus' time. It wasn't until the time approached that people began to realize what it meant (such as John the Baptist).

Side note: I didn't get a notification for this one. I got one for a video that seemed like a zoom meeting. This one just showed up in my feed today.

1 Thessalonians 5:4-5 But you, brethren, are not in darkness, so that this Day should overtake you as a thief. You are all sons of light and sons of the day. We are not of the night nor of darkness. Doesn't this specifically exclude believers from the Thief in the Night passages? Edit: Also, you did a very fair job of presenting each view. Nicely done! Edit 2: I see "Fasten your seatbelt" more as, "Get ready for the greatest revival the world has ever seen". :-)

"If it doesn't deal with the gospel, and the essentials of being a Christian, then we need to give freedom and liberty..." Exactly and Amen. And here's the thing. We will all believe the exact same thing in regards to this book someday. Wether you're right, or I'm right, or we were all wrong. We should try to understand, but in the end, it doesn't matter until the end.

Any chance you could get to the point? You are bouncing around like a ping pong ball.

He always, always heals us. 100% of the time. The question is the timing. When the Rapture happens, every single one of us will be given a perfect healing. In a trillion years, will we think that He was slow to heal us? Will we complain about the pain we experienced during this miniscule part of our existence?

Thank you very much for taking the time to reach out to all of us via this video--it's very calming and needed.

Thank You Pastor Jason.

u obviously haven't read the book of Obadiah 😂⚔️☠️

That’s not true Jacb was not envy of Esau.. God said I love Jacob and I hated Esau.. It was already divine purpose by God.. God knew that Esau was going to sell his birthright because God knows everything

That’s not true Jacb was not envy of Esau.. God said I love Jacob and I hated Esau.. It was already divine purpose by God.. God knew that Esau was going to sell his birthright because God knows everything

That’s not true Jacb was not envy of Esau.. God said I love Jacob and I hated Esau.. It was already divine purpose by God.. God knew that Esau was going to sell his birthright because God knows everything

I can't tell you how perfect the timing of this message was! God knew before I did that I was going to need this message. I heard it in church and then went about my day and realized later how much it meant. I had to listen again tonight. Thank you Pastor Jason and Jesus!

The volume is not very loud. I've turned up both volumes on the computer.

It's interesting that the law about Molek is in the same section as sexual immorality. Almost like these two things are related somehow. Molek is just a late term abortion method. Along with being a false god of course.