The Global Warming Policy Foundation
The Global Warming Policy Foundation
  • 14
  • 241 618

Відео

Europe's Net Zero Rebellion - Speech by Dr Benny Peiser
Переглядів 7336 місяців тому
Europe's Net Zero Rebellion - Speech by Dr Benny Peiser
GWPF's Dr Benny Peiser talks to Jonny Gould about the energy transition
Переглядів 46511 місяців тому
GWPF's Dr Benny Peiser talks to Jonny Gould about the energy transition
2016 Annual GWPF Lecture - Matt Ridley - Global Warming Versus Global Greening
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Рік тому
Matt Ridley delivers the 2016 Annual GWPF Lecture at the Royal Society, London 17 October
2017 Annual GWPF Lecture - Tony Abbott MP - Daring to Doubt
Переглядів 193Рік тому
The Honourable Tony Abbott MP delivers the 2017 Annual GWPF Lecture in London, 09 October. www.thegwpf.org/publications/tony-abbott-daring-to-doubt-2/
2015 Annual GWPF Lecture - Patrick Moore - Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide
Переглядів 458Рік тому
Patrick Moore delivers the 2015 Annual GWPF Lecture London, October 2015 Read transcript: www.thegwpf.org/publications/patrick-moore-should-we-celebrate-carbon-dioxide-2/
2014 Annual GWPF Lecture - Owen Paterson - Keeping The Lights On
Переглядів 70Рік тому
Rt Hon Owen Paterson MP delivered the 2014 Annual GWPF Lecture at the Institute of Mechanical Engineers Read more: www.thegwpf.org/publications/owen-paterson-keeping-the-lights-on/
2013 Annual GWPF Lecture - John Howard - One Religion is Enough
Переглядів 123Рік тому
2013 Annual GWPF Lecture The Honourable John Howard, former Prime Minister of Australia "One Religion Is Enough" London 5 November 2013
2012 Annual GWPF Lecture - Professor Fritz Vahrenholt - Second Thoughts of an Environmentalist
Переглядів 154Рік тому
Read more at www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2012/10/Vahrenholt-2012-Annual-GWPF-Lecture.pdf
2023 Annual GWPF Lecture - Lord Frost: Not Dark Yet, But It's Getting There
Переглядів 3,9 тис.Рік тому
Lord Frost gives the 2023 Annual GWPF Lecture on the question, is Net Zero compatible with mass prosperity?
2011 Annual GWPF Lecture Cardinal George Pell One Christian Perspective on Climate Change
Переглядів 649Рік тому
In his GWPF lecture, Cardinal Pell questioned the morality and costs of imposing heavy financial burdens on households and families, in particular the poor, in the name of saving the planet and in the hope of curbing the rise of global temperatures.
2018 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Richard Lindzen Global Warming For The Two Cultures
Переглядів 86 тис.2 роки тому
2018 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Richard Lindzen Global Warming For The Two Cultures London 8 October 2018 Institution of Mechanical Engineers
2019 Annual GWPF Lecture - Prof Michael Kelly: Energy Utopias and Engineering Reality
Переглядів 32 тис.2 роки тому
2019 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Michael Kelly FRS FREng Energy Utopias and Engineering Reality London, 11 November 2019 Institution of Mechanical Engineers Read the full transcript here: www.thegwpf.org/prof-michael-kelly-energy-policy-needs-herds-of-unicorns/
2021 Annual GWPF Lecture | Steven E Koonin | Unsettled
Переглядів 89 тис.2 роки тому
Professor Steven E. Koonin, New York University, and former Under Secretary for Science in the US Department of Energy, gives the 2021 Annual GWPF lecture on 'Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters'. London, Tuesday 16th November

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @CDN_Marcy
    @CDN_Marcy 12 днів тому

    I pray all of our scientists are kept safe.

  • @kiki459
    @kiki459 14 днів тому

    Merci d'exister Dr Judith Curry .

  • @valdivia1234567
    @valdivia1234567 27 днів тому

    I used to be a firm human-caused climate believer. I wasn't a cultist like a lot of people, but definitely believed everything I read and heard. When I realized that climatologists and meteorologists who differed with those widely accepted conclusions were immediately vilified and ostracized, I knew something was wrong.

  • @mr.miyagi9004
    @mr.miyagi9004 Місяць тому

    There’s a lot of stuff she’s saying that just isn’t true or exaggerated E.g: the sun and volcanoes are one of the causes of natural climate change. Which is just false, our vehicles produce over 100x more co2 than volcanoes every year. I didn’t hear her address how I’m the late 1990 some of the first people to hire a team of indépendant researchers to research about climate change where big oil companies which found out it is real and a danger but kept the info hidden. These aren’t conspiracies. Look them up and do your research

  • @martinzumstein351
    @martinzumstein351 Місяць тому

    Her lecture 8 years ago (also on UA-cam) was much better.

  • @richarddrum9970
    @richarddrum9970 Місяць тому

    Well all kidding aside, when someone can explain the process for the earth’s cooling enough to create the Laurentide Ice Sheet that covered North America with glaciers a mile thick about 20,000 years ago and then melt all that ice raising the worlds oceans by hundreds of feet, all occurring without any influence by humans or fossil fuels, then I might begin to believe that we puny humans can create a global disaster by driving to the grocery store.

  • @winlinuser
    @winlinuser Місяць тому

    Reposted to FB and GAB

  • @robdavidson4945
    @robdavidson4945 Місяць тому

    A great dose of Climate Sanity.

  • @Gizepi
    @Gizepi Місяць тому

    She's speaking shite.

  • @dnboro
    @dnboro 2 місяці тому

    Does the GWPF delete all the comments they don't like. Ironic given the claims that scientists like Dr Curry are silenced.

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker Місяць тому

      I'm permanently fully banned a year or two on "Heartland" "Tom Nelson" "CDN John Robson" "Mister Yong Tuition" because my verifiable science don't help their Business Models. GWPF l dunno, you got on. I do find it funny that so many of these Total Fakers with their Rights to Free Speech and Bare Arms simply Censor valid physics that utterly destroys theior total rubbish (usually about taxes not science anyway). Here, I'll test the GWPF again ... The reason why Judith is a certifiable imbecile is quite simply that she's stated "If Antarctica does lose ice it'll be because of volcanoes". Only an imbecile could make that statement, and that's a FACT. (Hint: Antarctica sheds all its ice around the edges. You know, the place where the .... OCEAN OCEAN OCEAN OCEAN is).

  • @CDN_Marcy
    @CDN_Marcy 2 місяці тому

    This video is certainly censored 🤬

  • @Leypath14
    @Leypath14 2 місяці тому

    Erudite, eloquent and brimming with sober common sense. Just what a lecture should be.

  • @Nunawading
    @Nunawading 3 місяці тому

    Good

  • @mrunning10
    @mrunning10 3 місяці тому

    Judith Curry is HORSESHIT conspiracy. @7:35 what utter fucking HORSESHIT. "controlling the climate" "Solution: global" so according to Dr. Judy it isn't the co2? it's control on a global scale? What utter HORSESHIT. Dr. Judy Curry is a horseshit conspiracy LIAR.

  • @PieterHanja
    @PieterHanja 3 місяці тому

    Interview_ ua-cam.com/video/3OX2aUvG51I/v-deo.html

  • @ianhamilton3113
    @ianhamilton3113 4 місяці тому

    But what if you're wrong? Who funds you? Big oil? Better safe than sorry. Oh and renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels anyway.

  • @patricklincoln5942
    @patricklincoln5942 4 місяці тому

    What is this? "The Global Warming Policy Foundation"?? Who are they? Who funds them? You have to wonder.

  • @annahall9610
    @annahall9610 4 місяці тому

    I f governments are rushing change to renewables, could it be because the cost of fossil fuels are creating high inflation on goods and services world wide, also it seems people procrastinate and tend to be reluctant to change so motivation must be prompted and while there is discrepancy amongst scientists, about the planet warming fossil fuels do have detrimental consequences on humans and animals as well as the environment and when disasters occurr such as Milford Sound Canada, economic consequences as well

  • @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213
    @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213 4 місяці тому

    The idea we can grow food at scale, with an additional 6 degree C increase in average global temperature is ludicrous. Arguing about the rate of warming, melting or rising sea level is childish rhetoric.

  • @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213
    @davidmchugh-hypnotherapist7213 4 місяці тому

    How to solve a dilemma by rhetoric. Dr Curry is more political than scientific.

  • @tim2muntu954
    @tim2muntu954 4 місяці тому

    That the inaccurate Climate forecasts are not scattered evenly between cooling and heating, but ALWAYS on the alarmist heating side is clear evidence of systemic bias in the Climate Change community.

  • @ashgall8118
    @ashgall8118 4 місяці тому

    "Everything affects climate change" not just humans. Climate Change is going to be the biggest deflection in history to keep people from asking about the real problems in the world today. Sure, they want us to believe that 87% of scientists today believe humans are responsible for climate change when actually 100% believe we have an impact, but not to the extent the politicians and others want us to believe. It's a huge cash cow for them if they can keep us thinking it will kill us if we don't fix it. Ever notice how interviewers never ask these scientists what the ideal amount of CO2 is needed or ideal to sustain life on Earth? If we all sit in a theatre or university class, the CO2 level will be around 1500ppm to 2000ppm after 3 hours. If the CO2 level gets below 150ppm all insects die, all birds die, all animals die, all plants die, and all humans die. Does no-one notice that the Earth is getting greener because of increased CO2? A greener Earth means more crops and therefore more food to feed the World's hungry. Don't fall for this fake agenda. Climatologists are hypocrites, running around in big vehicles and flying all over the world spewing pollutants into the air we breathe. They should be sailing overseas on wooden sail ships or travelling over land on bicycles to reduce their contribution to CO2 in the atmosphere. The dinosaurs didn't kill the planet and they were much bigger than humans. The CO2 levels have gone up and down for billions of years and they will in the future. The planet will take care of itself.

  • @gretaogperlarsen7417
    @gretaogperlarsen7417 5 місяців тому

    Hvordan får vi politikere til at se denne video? Politikere kan ikke selv sætte sig ind i CO2's rolle i klimaet - de er hoppet på en klimareligion/tro som de tror blindt på. Det koster enorme summer og enorme ressourcer for EU. Den kinesiske diktator er klogere end EU's politikere. Dem der har estimeret prisen på grøn omstilling kommer med tal så svimlende - det er alt sammen spild og kunne alternativt bruges på forskning, børn, uddannelse, unge, gamle, hospitaler et cetera.

  • @helenepopulos2438
    @helenepopulos2438 5 місяців тому

    Simply excelent!

  • @mark747captain
    @mark747captain 5 місяців тому

    Dr. Curry is a wonderful woman who has broken away from the lies, it's all about money, money, money. Everything she says is correct. So, when the money runs out whom are they going to go after, themselves? Typical Communistic tacticts, 'if we can't control you we'll 'attempt' to wipe you out... And then they are next.

  • @nobillismccaw7450
    @nobillismccaw7450 5 місяців тому

    When the UN demands population reduction, my response is “you first.”

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

      Do you have ANY fucking point to make?

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 5 місяців тому

      The UN has no plans to eliminate people. You really believe that swill from the internet? Check your critical thinking skills.

  • @sirsultan
    @sirsultan 5 місяців тому

    10/10 lecture. Well explained with reason and core principles

  • @lionofjudah3572
    @lionofjudah3572 5 місяців тому

    Global warming is caused by HUMANS that live a SINFUL LIFESTYLE because HELL located in the earths core has to EXPAND to hold these people. As HELL EXPANDS, the earth gets hotter and hotter, volcanoes erupts and destruction increases. Christ has to return to save his people or no one would survive⁉️

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

      God is watching YOU kill His Gift of Mother Earth and YOU will be JUDGED and CONDEMNED for YOUR Sins.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 4 місяці тому

      God is watching YOU kill His Gift of Mother Earth and YOU will be JUDGED and CONDEMNED for YOUR Sins.

  • @markwilson9935
    @markwilson9935 5 місяців тому

    When the premise is wrong and not fact...all arguments after that are meaningless!

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

      Really intelligent comment Bot, go away.

  • @grindupBaker
    @grindupBaker 5 місяців тому

    The only issue I have with the video is that the person talking is a provable imbecile simply because she stated "If Antarctica starts to lose ice it will be because of volcanoes" and only an actual imbecile could genuinely have that thought in their "brain".Apart from that slight wart it might be all great for all I know.

  • @TomSmith-in1zj
    @TomSmith-in1zj 5 місяців тому

    Where is her data demonstrating that climate change is much ado about nothing? Data.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

      You're kidding right? Data?? Judy Curry??? That's not why she does these "lectures" and she fucking knows she's delivering horseshit and that means Judy Curry is LYING.

  • @andrewgeoghegan3526
    @andrewgeoghegan3526 5 місяців тому

    some people choose to listen to nut jobs !

  • @MegaDeano1963
    @MegaDeano1963 5 місяців тому

    Is that Richard Tice I see , good on him taking an interest

  • @mrunning10
    @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

    "wind and solar power is impairing grid reliability and increasing the cost of electricity." WHAT UTTER LYING HORSESHIT. Judy you LIE.

    • @MegaDeano1963
      @MegaDeano1963 5 місяців тому

      Right now in the UK it rains, and all we're getting out the renewable grid is 6 Gw . So back to gas we go . And we are paying more for every GW renewable energy , and everytime we don't use gas , we make fossil fuel power cost more . This JC is right again

  • @polw3785
    @polw3785 5 місяців тому

    Never forget how the UN wants to reduce the population by several billion! If we start with that premise then why would we trust that all of their policies in relation to controlling all aspects of our lives, especially food supply and health, are working for our good?? Rather, they are working for our collective demise

  • @-LightningRod-
    @-LightningRod- 5 місяців тому

    remarkably short on numbers and overwhelmingly laden with Political Opinion,.. this ain't science.

    • @harryshaw3760
      @harryshaw3760 3 місяці тому

      @@-LightningRod- read the book dude.

    • @-LightningRod-
      @-LightningRod- 3 місяці тому

      @@harryshaw3760 i got the abridged edition and also watched Senator Sheldon Whitehouse completely unravel Judith Currys entire career in a senate hearing. A sad oil soaked extreme fringe opinion with no scientific validity.

    • @harryshaw3760
      @harryshaw3760 3 місяці тому

      @@-LightningRod- Hey Lightnin’ Didn’t know Readers Digest did a version of the Professors’ book You should read the proper one. It has all the science and numbers you are looking for ( or aren’t looking for more likely). I watched Senator Whitehouses’ effort, a bulling demagogic rant IMHO. It’s a pity people can’t sit down and discus this important issue like adults, but that would make the Senator redundant I guess. Oil soaked? The Professor does long range weather projections for Oil companies among others (she might do one for you if you ask). I think your attempt at cancelling the Professor immature and unhelpful. I hope you can maintain a more open minded attitude in the future.

    • @-LightningRod-
      @-LightningRod- 3 місяці тому

      @@harryshaw3760 Senator Whitehouse simply reviewed 10 to 15 years of Currys presentations to the Senate ,..wrong for over a decade ,..at this point Judith's claims of all Normal are belied by in her case a half a lifetime of Heat records,..how could you possibly have any other opinion/ Also her predicting business drowned in the toilet because it was laughably wrong and not worth the Money I guess her new career path as an entertainer is appealing to someone like you ,..you really seem to enjoy it even tho,..it is very light on facts or correct predictions from MrsCurry.

    • @harryshaw3760
      @harryshaw3760 3 місяці тому

      @@-LightningRod- hmmm. What I said.

  • @xqt39a
    @xqt39a 5 місяців тому

    I did not hear any remarks about "tipping points" . Paul Beckwith and Hanson both emphasize that an ice free arctic will happen within 20 years. This is guaranteed to happen based on the well documented trends of the reducing area of the summer minimum of arctic ice cover. The summer ice cover is also measurably thinning. This means that the ice cover will suddenly disappear causing a sudden and drastic increase in the amount of heat being absorbed into the arctic ocean. Furthermore scientists that study permafrost are concerned that the rapid rise in temperature could cause a sudden and rapid melting of permafrost causing a "methane burp". Methane is short lived (30 years) but has 80 times the warming impact of CO2 per unit. The methane burp could add significantly to global warming within a year after "the burp". These risks are the elephant in the room that Curry does NOT talk about. Why not? Serious climate scientist such as Beckwith and Hanson put these risks at the top of the list. Curry needs to explicitly talk about these risk to be fully credible.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

      blah blah blah...you're talking about the WEATHER.

    • @xqt39a
      @xqt39a 5 місяців тому

      @@mrunning10 The future disappearance of the arctic ice sheet is NOT weather, nor is a future methane burp. Curry needs to explicitly talk about these risk to be fully credible.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

      @@xqt39a Back to some school please, next time let it not be Hair Styling 101. The future disappearance of the arctic ice sheet is a SINGLE event. A WEATHER event. The sequence of events over TIME of the ice sheet melting, disappearing, season to season is CLIMATE CHANGE. The release of methane occurring now is a WEATHER event, over many seasons is CLIMATE CHANGE. A TREND is climate change, an EVENT like the current arctic ice sheet coverage is the WEATHER. What's your fucking POINT anyway?

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 5 місяців тому

      @xqt39a It isn't actually "suddenly" but it will be at a geometrically-increasing rate (what you'all call "exponential" because you've had no schooling in mathematics). It'll happen at an increasing rate rather than a fixed rate though, for certain.

    • @xqt39a
      @xqt39a 5 місяців тому

      @@grindupBaker what is the difference between geometric and exponential and linear and parabolic ? By suddenly, I mean to imply faster than of these.. these are the tipping points that scare some climate scientists and should not be ignored by the likes of Curry with no explanation!

  • @SteffiReitsch
    @SteffiReitsch 5 місяців тому

    Her thing is being the top MERCHANT OF DOUBT. So when are we supposed to know with absolute certainty ? NEVER! According to her, it could be something natural causing it, something we don't understand... and never will because it's too complicated. The obvious pumping of GIGATONS of known heat trapping gas into the atmosphere 24/7 decade after decade might not be it. Yeah, sure. Every prestigious scientific institution in the world is wrong, but old Curry knows! AAAHAHHAAHAHA For years the tobacco industry pulled the same stunt. In mainstream climate science Curry's a disgraced outlier, a sell out. It doesn't matter anymore, humanity is just going to keep pumping it out, more nails in the coffin, and the planet keeps incrementally warming , f****ing up the climate, no end is sight. We're DOOMED.

  • @anthonymorris5084
    @anthonymorris5084 5 місяців тому

    There is no evidence of a climate crisis. It's ludicrous.

  • @ldm3027
    @ldm3027 5 місяців тому

    complete unadulterated drivel - no wonder the GWPF is such a stupifyingly ineffective group

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 5 місяців тому

      Whoa! Spot On!!!

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 4 місяці тому

      I'm deeply suspicious that GWPF has been subverted by Alarmists and is being run as a 5th Column covert sabotage simply because Judith Curry looks EXACTLY like Ernie of Bert & Ernie muppets in their thumbnail. Why would they do that ? Don't take my word for that, have a butcher's.

  • @MegaDeano1963
    @MegaDeano1963 5 місяців тому

    always great value , Judith Curry is professional and excellent

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 5 місяців тому

      The only issue I have with the video speaker is that the person talking is a provable imbecile simply because she stated "If Antarctica starts to lose ice it will be because of volcanoes" and only an actual imbecile could genuinely have that thought in their "brain".Apart from that slight wart it might be all great for all I know.

  • @BertWald-wp9pz
    @BertWald-wp9pz 5 місяців тому

    Her book is now on Audible for those like me prefer to listen.

  • @advent3774
    @advent3774 5 місяців тому

    Patric Moore ex-co founder of Green Peace left due to the people who came in to run it were all left wing idealists, who had no background in Science and were making very bad decisions! He now has videos on UA-cam explaining the true nature of the climate and how it’s been in the past , and debunks all the doomsday Alarmist theories, as he only deals in facts ! Not conjecture, or Climate Models which just spew out whatever you decide to put in ! Dr. William Happer , Nobel Prize winner is also brilliant on this subject.

    • @rps1689
      @rps1689 5 місяців тому

      So you are not familiar with Moore and how he introduces charts and uses and cherry pics out-of-date data. Look up how he loves to take quotes from scientists that have refuted their own findings or corrected them, and then when he admits he did, goes on ignoring the new findings. He’s somewhat similar to Heller that offers charts and graphs to an audience he counts on not being able to read, but Moore is much more clever using half-truths yet still gives away his game at times. Moore is not a co-founder of Greenpeace. Happer has zero credibility in the field of climate science today. He gets indirect funding and direct support from the Cato institute and Heartland institute that get most of their funding from fossil fuel investors; heck I even know as a fossil fuel investor. He was a particle physicist, not an atmospheric physicist. He has been lying about scientific consensus for quite some time and his claims about satellite data are still cherry-picked and out of date. His only notable achievement in science is he is one of the pioneers in the field of optically polarized atoms.

  • @advent3774
    @advent3774 5 місяців тому

    Try watching Dr. John Robson on UA-cam, he presents all the facts on this subject and takes the Mickey out of the Climate Alarmists! He does it in a fun way , and is very watchable, yet his facts are indisputable, as he backs up his statements with FACTS! Not Consensus.

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 5 місяців тому

      "yet his facts are indisputable" In reality that Historian's "facts" are Crap, all either wrong or irrelevant.

  • @solarwind907
    @solarwind907 5 місяців тому

    Dr. curry has been a climate denier consistently for her whole career. She is unfazed by the mountains of scientific data. The great majority of climate scientists disagree with her, and they have the data to back it up. She is one of the most likable climate deniers I have listened to. Still wrong. Listening to her will get a lot of people killed. However, seems like a very pleasant person.

    • @anthonymorris5084
      @anthonymorris5084 5 місяців тому

      And exactly what kind of data do you think she uses, tea leaves?

    • @solarwind907
      @solarwind907 5 місяців тому

      ​@@anthonymorris5084 look at NASA, NOAA, union of concerned scientists and james Hansens work and get back to me. Look up the “keeling curve”. That is the CO2 in ppm from 1958 to present. I don’t know what she bases her opinion on. I just know it’s not science. Look it up.

    • @anthonymorris5084
      @anthonymorris5084 5 місяців тому

      @@solarwind907 Absurd, you've just accepted that all the scientists who say what you like are authentic and any scientist that says what you don't like is a "climate denier". This is not an argument, it's grasping at straws and seeking reinforcement bias.

    • @solarwind907
      @solarwind907 5 місяців тому

      @@anthonymorris5084 for some reason my comments are evaporating. This one’s just a test to see if it sticks.

    • @solarwind907
      @solarwind907 5 місяців тому

      @@anthonymorris5084 I don’t except much that “scientists” say. However, if they say something logical. And give me references to where they got the data, then I can read it myself.

  • @solarwind907
    @solarwind907 5 місяців тому

    Yes, climate change is a complex problem. However, the burning of fossil fuels.IS making it a lot worse. When she says scientists disagree, whether warming is a problem, I have no idea where the hell she’s getting her information from. Extreme climatic events are causing insurance companies to cancel insurance. Look it up. We are in crisis mode, we’re not in research it to death/paralysis by analysis mode. She may be a scientist, but she is in a ever shrinking minority of those few degreed professionals, not acknowledging the scientific reality of our warming earth.

  • @karenbarker9474
    @karenbarker9474 5 місяців тому

    Good to see Richard Tice there. Reform party are the only party to follow this common sense policy.

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 5 місяців тому

      Maybe we should get us some of that Reeeeeform Pappy.

  • @karenbarker9474
    @karenbarker9474 5 місяців тому

    Dr Curry should be in charge of climate policy. This is exactly the right way to tackle weather changes. Common sense prevails

  • @Triple070007
    @Triple070007 5 місяців тому

    Wow this is how I remember university lectures back when I went. They were sober, somewhat complex, and thoughtful. So different from emotional, simplistic panic hype and activism that you too often see in colleges now. Hopefully education gets restored to this standard!

    • @anthonymorris5084
      @anthonymorris5084 5 місяців тому

      Marxists are in control of the universities today.

    • @dnboro
      @dnboro 3 місяці тому

      Zero evidence provided that we are not warming or that we are not responsible. Just a conspiracy theory about mainstream science. Basically you just want education to say what you want to hear. For example, at 9:40, "there is disagreement and uncertainty on how much of the recent warming has been caused by humans". Anyone with a good education would question that statement she makes and find that it is an utterly ridiculous and has no basis in science. Yes, the noise in measuring the global average temperature makes it hard to pin down the exact amount of warming at a point in time. But the warming trend (which Judith acknowledges despite claiming many years ago that it stopped and cooling had started - but we should never mention past failed prediction by climate contrarians of course), is driven by climate forcings. We know what these forcing are - things like the sun, albedo, greenhouse gases, aerosols, Milankovic cyles. So by studying the other forcings we KNOW that all of the recent warming is caused by humans. We also know that increasing greenhouse gases is the ONLY climate forcing that will cause the lower atmosphere to warm AND will also cause the upper atmosphere to cool which observations have confirmed. This is the fingerprint of human caused warming. And yet the best Judith can do is waffle on and talk about a scientific conspiracy. What the ... If you want to learn something from real scientists, at real universities, with real evidence that don't depend on fossil funding... www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/

    • @serpentines6356
      @serpentines6356 3 місяці тому

      Yes!!! Hope people learn from the current strangulation of idiocy.

    • @benchevy6969
      @benchevy6969 2 місяці тому

      When was the last lecture you went too?

    • @dnboro
      @dnboro 2 місяці тому

      @@benchevy6969 My lectures on climate change back in the 1980's were based on evidence and laws of physics, just like today's are.

  • @Phenn5589
    @Phenn5589 5 місяців тому

    The proposition in Dr Currys book and summarised in this presentation is obviously the way to go. Which rational person could possibly disagree? Unfortunately, climate change and net zero has been completely hijacked both politically and financially, such that there are significant vested interests pushing the unscientific, un-risk-assessed, emotive approach that facts and rationality will, I fear, not be able to overcome. The alarmism will only end when ordinary people revolt by refusing to comply with current climate policies, where they can, and when climate sensitivity is proven to be much lower than currently IPCC assumed, and its clear the average global temperature shows no correlation with or causation by co2.