Відео

Yes. She's downright, giddy!

He may be experienced but... we have eyes

Shut up, Loser!!

Haven't seen too many men who defend Amber simp for her, but I see SO MANY women simping for Johnny (posting his pics from the 90s too lol). Yeah, I watched the testimony and all. Still on her side. And in the UK he was found to be guilty

I think we need more case law examples here. Women can't afford it, so men will be doing this. My ex demanded I get the psych eval. Expensive waste of time. It backfired on him, and he was terrified that doctor would testify, so at the last minute before trial, he agreed to drop his restraining order. However, nothing changed, I did not get back into my house or get back into my children's lives. The court did not apologize to me for the years of lost time with my children. No idea what he told the kids. Do they not know he lost? The damage had been done. That was almost a decade ago. My life is over. There is no way to fight evil this great. We need free legal representation from lawyers who understand what we are up against.

Dr. Curry isn't board certified and met Amber 2x. She never treated Amber and Amber was never her patient. Even if a woman has BPD, there's overwhelming evidence of JD abusing Amber. Amber's mental state is irrelevant.

I've seen an abusive lady pull his book on her ex, merely because got furious over her mistreatment. She had bpd. And committed reactive abuse. She claimed he abused because he verbally stood up to her. All her did was block her and she got a slightly sprained wrist. He had told her his previous girlfriend was abusive. That's how she knew he was a target. Lundy doesn't understand bpd wives. Erin pizzey and the emotional terrorist

The issues with that is that the MMPI is not a diagnostic tool but an assessment tool. Basically it shines a light on places we should look. There are so many comorbid traits with BPD, HPD, and PTSD that you’d had to have the individual take the MMPI and then spend considerable time with a professional who can flesh out what’s actually going on. Without that, anyone can skew MMPI results to mean whatever they want them to mean.

@@samanthamcnamara7682 1) This doesn‘t negate in any way that Bankrofts account of how the assessment was made, was plainly false & therefore not scientifically honest. 2) To exclude comorbidity with PTSD Ms. Heard was assessed with the CAPS-5 test. Result: She didn‘t suffer from ptsd. (In fact from selfreport Ms. Heard rated so high on the ptsd-symptom items, that it would make her the worst case of ptsd ever occured in the history of clinically treating with this disorder, which is an indicator of significant report distortion) 3) Ms. Heard’s assessment in this case was done by Dr. Shannon Curry, clinical & forensic psychologist with 15 years of experience in the field. Dr. Curry made her assessment methodologically transparent (which in addition to CAPS-5 and MMPI-2 involved of course an exhaustive personal examination).

Nice misdirection. I guess it’s inconvenient for your narrative that the evaluator that “diagnosed” her never met Amber and never administered this measure, relying instead on Depp’s files, an incredibly incomplete and biased means of gathering evidence, and went to dinner with her paying customer, Johnny Depp. Highly unusual, and unethical because it lacks objectivity. That’s not how accurate diagnoses are performed, in fact it’s unethical. While Heard’s medical records from seeking treatment throughout her relationship were excluded by the Judge.

@Slipstitch Hollow She's a liar and that's why she lost. I don't want to walk you through this, because your mind is already made up. Look up any legal commenter on UA-cam, and they'll tell you why you're wrong.

@Slipstitch Hollow She is, as proven over a 6 week trial, by a jury of her peers. There was an expert on IPV. She lied. That's why the CHLA doesn't have the money she promised, and why she owes JD $8,350,000. She lost. It means nothing for anyone other than the two of them. Every minute of the trial is available to stream. You should do that.

@Slipstitch Hollow She never signed the pledge. And she didn't start sending money until they offered her an ambassadorship. And remember the CHLA? She never even responded to their e-mails. You'd know this if you watched the trial. Her legal fees are covered by her insurance - they even had a representative with her in court. So she just pocketed that money. Tell you what. Go watch the first two hours of Camilles cross examination of Amber. It goes into a lot of details. I think both you, and the experts in this video, would learn a lot about Amber and her credibility. I believed Amber up until this trial. The evidence just isn't there. The behaviour patterns these people discuss aren't there. When you've watched the cross, watch the cross on rebuttal. That makes those things even more obvious. She's a liar. She's exploiting people like these experts who rely on patterns and not specific evidence. Try disproving any of what I just said. Watch the testimony from trial. Prove me wrong. I bet you can't

@Slipstitch Hollow So you didn't watch it. Cause the pledge us a tiny part of it. She still didn't sign the papers. It's classic of abuse apologists to explain away all the incriminating stuff like you're doing now. Camille exposed a lot more lies from her. Go watch. The Geek Buzz has been debunked more times than I can count. I'm saying you should watch the trial, and you refuse to. Is it because you're afraid I might be right? Or is it because you're covering for an abuser?

@Slipstitch Hollow Just watch the trial. Shouldn't be anything in there that's bad, right? Don't care anymore. You're not salvageable.

If you’d actually read the book you’d see Depp’s behavior spelled out clearly all over it. He’s not trying to sell a book. He literally tells people to download the free PDF because he’d rather victims be able to get the info to get out than make money. The ones looking for money are the ones pushing to vindicate Depp because they know he has more Stans. There’s zero dollars in defending Heard.

For ALLL survivors? Stop speaking for others, I am a survivor and I believe Amber and despise the piece of trash that is Depp. So no, not ALL survivors, maybe YOU.

Maybe you need to reevaluate your stance considering a highly respected DV expert like Lundy Bancroft who has decades of experience/research in the field - recognizes that Depp is indeed a wifebeater (as declared in The Sun UK trial) and is manipulating the public into believing he's the victim.

Below is unseen evidence from UK trial that was not allowed in the Us trial which encompasses much of her medical records. Her injuries can be seen throughout the trial including evidence her nose was broken. If you are talking about her SA the vast majority of victims receive no medical care and no justice for what is done to them because of a society that punishes women for speaking out just like you are doing here (who often have far less evidence than Amber Heard had). Below is evidence I copied quickly from sources that lay out a fraction of the evidence that Amber Heard has brought forward that was not allowed to be used in the course case including testimony and medical notes from doctors, nurses and therapists. I am not writing this for you but for the sane people who will read your comment and think that Johnny Depp wasn't abusive and hopefully change their mind because you may not be open to listening. -------- - Dr. Laurel Anderson, testified that Amber reported that she was slapped, hit in the head, had her hair pulled, and was kicked in the leg by Depp. Amber reported to Anderson that it was Depp that first to initiate any violence, and that she hid in the bathroom to protect herself from Depp, and also information about the cellphone incident. Amber’s lawyer says that the court also excluded notes from the couple’s counseling sessions, and Depp’s team objected due to hearsay. - Dr. Kipper testified that Amber voiced concerns about Depp’s behaviour when using drugs and alcohol, and reported that Depp tried to fight and push her during the Bahamas detox, and that he told Depp to “bury the dragon” in relation to the “negative feelings (Depp) has inside him.” An email was also excluded from Kipper to Depp’s sister regarding Depp’s drug treatment. The email from Kipper said that Depp “had fundamental issues with anger, romanticized the drug culture, and had no patience if his needs were not met.” - Debbie Lloyd testified that Amber again voiced concerns about Depp’s behaviour when using drugs and alcohol, and stated that he would “work himself up into a rage and try to fight (Amber)” during the Bahamas detox. Lloyd also kept nursing notes about these issues, but Depp’s team objected due to hearsay. - Erin Falati testified that Amber reported to her that she was “freaked out” by the December 2015 headbutting incident, and there were texts between the two discussing the incident. There were also texts between the two after the May 2015 phone incident. Depp’s team again objected due to hearsay. - Dr. Amy Banks, a clinical psychologist and relationship consultant who also worked with Depp and Amber. Banks testified that Amber reported that Depp hit her, and that he also “cut his finger off” and burnt himself with a cigarette. Amber also reported to Banks that Depp initiated the violence, while in a session with Depp, and he did not deny what Amber had said. Dr. Banks also testified that she believed Amber’s accusations, and that she was a victim of domestic abuse. Again, objected due to hearsay, and that Banks’ opinion that Amber was a victim of DB was “improper expert opinion.” Her testimony has not been shown at all to the jury. - Dr. Cowan, Amber’s therapist. Dr. Cowan testified that Amber reported the abuse to him, as well as medical notes and text messages. A text message from Amber was sent after the headbutting incident that said “Johnny did a number on me.” It was objected due to hearsay. His testimony has not been shown. - Dr. Alan Blaustein, Depp’s psychologist, testified that Depp reported he cut himself and burnt himself with cigarettes as a child, along with more information about the drugs he was taking. Objected due to speculation and hearsay. - Dr. Bonnie Jacobs. Treatment notes showed Amber reporting violence from Depp, including sexual assault. These were objected due to hearsay, and her entire testimony has not been shown. - Stephen Deuters (Depp's employee) texts to Amber Heard confirming he saw Johnny Depp kick her on the Boston plane flight were objected to by his lawyers and not entered into evidence for the jury to consider. - Johnny Depp stated he never hit Amber Heard until a recording was shown that proved he headbutted her.

You're also proving how well the pro-Depp propaganda and misinformation has worked to portray Heard negatively since you're repeating some of the same debunked lies. 1. None of the psychologists who treated her during their marriage diagnosed her with BPD, nor did Dawn Hughes, only Curry who did a shoddy 12hr evaluation and had already decided on the diagnosis before even meeting AH in person. C-PTSD & BPD also have an overlay in symptoms 🤷‍♀️ 2. If she was a gold digger, she would have gone for the 30+ million she was entitled to in the divorce under California law since they did not have a prenup. 3. Says a lot that she was granted a restraining order against him & three high court judges all agreed that she was the victim in their relationship. Don't even care if you believe me, I just want to provide counterfacts to anyone who might fall for the misinformation you're spreading

@@mystifiedlyn EXACTLY JD will rot in hell but the lack of critical thinking and blind faith in edited videos fed to them by an algorithm pushed by his PR team to discredit and further abuse a victim of DV means they will be going there right along with him.

It does though. Maybe you have not reviewed all the evidence in a critical manner, and have relied on youtubers for your opinion. That's OK, as it seems this whole thing is triggering for you. Better no opinion than an uninformed opinion, though

1. Tasya van Ree denies the abuse. The only "evidence" is the fact that Amber was arrested. 2. Where's the evidence that she abused Whitney? 3. JD has a long history of being violent and accusations of assault on movie sets etc, plus he dated a minor when he was in his late 20s (Winona Ryder). He also has a history of speaking about women including his exes in dehumanizing ways and no, not just Amber. His children might not have any relationship with him at all.

@@magdajabonska537 1. Nope. A statement was issued from Amber. Tasya never testified for Amber in court and she’s best friends with Jennifer Howell who testified for Johnny. 2. Jennifer Howell. 3. Wrong. You obviously didn’t watch the trial.

@@Emily-dt2xy "wrong" HAHAHA are you denying he dated 17 year old girls while being an adult, people have talked about him being violent many times, he has accusations of him being violent on set? Yes, Tasya didn't testify for Amber, but GUESS WHAT? most Johnny's exes didn't testify for him, either! "Statement came from Amber" any proof for that? Or just speculation? I'm talking about the one that was published under Tasya's name.

@@magdajabonska537 you are boring me now. Winona Ryder issued a statement to say Johnny is loving and kind and was never abusive to her. You won’t accept that though even though a woman who has direct experience with him accounted for her relationship with him. Is Cher abusing her boyfriend since there’s a massive age gap? Or is it only abusive when the male is older in the dynamic? Kate Moss, Vanessa Paradis, Winona Ryder, Lori Ann Depp (Johnny’s first wife) all stepped toward for him. None of Amber’s exes have come forward either during the trial or since then to defend her. It says it all. A quote in the media 7 years ago allegedly from Tasya does not count. Like the true narc amber is, she was triangulating Tasya right after the split with Johnny. She went back to Tasya. It was all over her social media at the time. If Tasya did make a statement, I have no doubt whatsoever that she was forced via Amber to do so during that time. Tasya has said nothing since then and has had plenty opportunity to speak up during the last 7 years. She also unfollowed Amber after the trail on Instagram. She does not support her. Keep being deluded though. I’m done with this conversation.

@@Emily-dt2xy it doesn't matter if she said he was abusive. SHE WAS A MINOR. UNDER THE AGE OF 18. No, Cher doesn't date a teenager or a minor, if she did then she's a creep. If an adult woman dates a 17 year old boy or a girl, she's a predator too, no matter how nice she is, you p3d0philia defender. 17 year olds are children. And Winona hired Matthew Rosengart to stop her statement about Johnny from being used in court. She also said he used to smash things and was violent even if it wasn't towards her. And well Amber didn't have nearly as many exes as Johnny but Kate Moss is accused of abuse too and Vanessa receives a lot of money from Johnny. Johnny's children didn't speak in favor of him. I'm willing to believe Amber may be a messy or toxic friend. Possibly even a bad person. But I'm even more certain of the fact that Johnny is a trash human being and any man who dates minors and is calling his ex a withering cunt bc she's over 30 is a pile of waste. And I believe he was abusive too.

People on here really simping for a deranged drunk necrophiliac

Wow, you must really like those pirate movies.

I'm currently in a relationship with an older, abusive man. So many of his actions remind me of Johnny Depp. It's been triggering for me to see people siding with Johnny Depp. This interview was very validating for me. It is sad though to see abuse survivors attacking each other. The only ones suffering in this are victims.

@@pinksalamanders thanks for mocking me when I just disclosed I am an abuse survivor.

@@Emily-dt2xy where are they mocking you in their comment? That person was pointing out that they have seen Depp acting in ways that tracked with the abuse THEY experienced. And did you miss the part where they said they, too, are a survivor of DV? Saying “I’m a survivor of DV” does not make you immune to criticism or opposition.