- 30
- 328 606
Thermodynamics by Narlin
Приєднався 13 лип 2016
Thermodynamics constitutes the mathematical formalization of the simple nursery rhyme; Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall. Humpty Dumpty took a great fall. All the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put Humpty together again.
Partial Molar Volume II
This video shows how to calculate partial molar volume in Excel with no data fitting required. The partial molar volume is determined for an ethanol water mixture over the entire mole fraction range. The method used is to form a numeric derivative, dV/dn by interpolating density data that is very near to known data. For a little more of the theory behind what’s going on, see
ua-cam.com/video/90b5DS6ARzE/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/90b5DS6ARzE/v-deo.html
Переглядів: 5 237
Відео
Partial Molar Volume
Переглядів 42 тис.7 років тому
The partial molar volume is determined for an ethanol water mixture over the entire mole fraction range. The method used is to fit an equation to data that consist of Molar volume vs mole fraction of one component, and then take the derivative of that equation to use in an algebraic expression for partial molar volume. The 1st part of the video goes thru the math and the second part shows a num...
Polytropic Process
Переглядів 38 тис.7 років тому
The polytropic process for thermodynamics is PVn =constant. This video covers the integration of the work equation using this thermodynamic process. It also details some of the n values that may be encountered. There is another video entitled Isentropic Processes that covers the similar process for when n = gamma, the ratio of heat capacities. Get it at ua-cam.com/video/cV6vXZOSuIc/v-deo.html .
Isentropic Process
Переглядів 9 тис.7 років тому
The video is a derivation of the Isentropic Process, which is a special case of a polytropic process. In the polytropic process, PVn = constant. In this special case, we have adiabatic (q=0), ideal gas, reversible conditions. For an explanation of all this gobbly-gook, see the video on Polytropic processes. That video can be found at ua-cam.com/video/AH924UA_N9U/v-deo.html I have a much more co...
Enthalpy Change with Temperature
Переглядів 22 тис.7 років тому
We show how to calculate ΔH (enthalpy) whenever we are given ΔH1 at some known temperature. It is common to know ΔH⁰ (at 298.15K) for the heat of formation and that can be used at the ΔH1. The video starts off at a 7th grade level, presenting Δq = mass*Cp*ΔT where Cp is held constant. It advances quickly to the college engineering level where Cp is a function of temperature and integration of a...
Steam Quality
Переглядів 2,2 тис.7 років тому
We show how to calculate the mass fraction of vapor over a liquid in a pure biphasic mixture. That vapor mass fraction is called Steam Quality when the substance is water. We go through 2 example calculations.
Cp - Cv=R; Another Way
Переглядів 1,1 тис.7 років тому
This video derives Cp-Cv = R by a method that uses more math symbols and perhaps a tiny bit of calculus. I have another video witch does pretty much the same derivation, but is nearly algebra based. The link to that video is ua-cam.com/video/G9Vq-fFXYyM/v-deo.html Also, a link to the video that derives (1/2)mv2 = (3/2)NkT is here; ua-cam.com/video/E0OC2Q56EZo/v-deo.html please note: Na x k = R ...
Clausius Clapeyron
Переглядів 3,8 тис.7 років тому
This video goes through a derivation of the Clausius Clapeyron equation for relating two phases of a substance to each other. In particular, I am using the example of ice and water vapor for sublimation. The equation derivation is done starting with the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics, including definitions for enthalpy and Gibbs energy. At the end of the video, there is an example of using t...
Legendre II
Переглядів 9 тис.7 років тому
The Legendre transform arithmetic is shown in its simplest possible rendition without using partial differential equations. This is a better way to remember the 4 major thermodynamic energy potentials than using the thermodynamic square mnemonic. There is actually less to memorize this way and it is more likely to be beneficial in other ways.
Coffee and Cream
Переглядів 2528 років тому
Suppose we pour 25 mL of cream at 5°C into 200 mL of coffee at 70°C. What will be the final temperature? How much is the entropy change of the coffee, the cream, and the universe? The video gives a solution to this problem. There is a Geogebra applet online that will solve the problem with user input for the parameters. www.geogebra.org/material/edit/id/Gmt3ZrUS
Entropy Relation to T, P, V
Переглядів 1,2 тис.8 років тому
Entropy as calculated in problem sets often uses the 3 equations shown in this video. We do a quick derivation and as well, introduce 4 equations that should be remembered by anyone working in thermodynamics.
1st Law Sign Convention
Переглядів 24 тис.8 років тому
The 1st Law of Thermodynamics is both ΔU = Q W and ΔU = Q - W. Furthermore, I can find sources that attribute either of them to chemistry and the other to physics. Wikipedia says that the Q W convention follows physics. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_law_of_thermodynamics ) Wikipedia also says that with the sign convention used in chemistry the minus sign disappears. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helm...
Flame Temperature I
Переглядів 4,5 тис.8 років тому
Shows and explanation for how to calculate an adiabatic flame temperature of a fuel if you have already balanced the chemical equation. Obviously, the numerical answer will be no better than the chemical equation that is written. Often, those equations do not contain an adequate number of species (as a result of association/dissociation equilibria) to get very close to a measured value. Interes...
Hydrocarbon Combustion
Переглядів 7658 років тому
Balancing the Combustion Equation for a single hydrocarbon fuel. The video presents an algebraic method for balancing the stoichiometric equation. It is a very general method which can be used on any chemical equation. An advantage to balancing the combustion reaction is that it can be done in a general manner for any hydrocarbon being converted to CO2 and Water, therefore allowing one to quick...
Derive Enthalpy at Constant Pressure
Переглядів 12 тис.8 років тому
An Example Problem begins at 7:06 minutes into the video. It is worked first with a constant heat capacity. Essentially the same problem is worked a second time beginning at 8:21 minutes in the video. The difference is that the second time, heat capacity is a function of temperature, and not constant.
Derivation Kinetic Energy = (3/2)nRT
Переглядів 32 тис.8 років тому
Derivation Kinetic Energy = (3/2)nRT
Exact Differentials and Cross Derivative Test
Переглядів 9288 років тому
Exact Differentials and Cross Derivative Test
Hot Air Balloon Ideal Gas Law Problem
Переглядів 5 тис.8 років тому
Hot Air Balloon Ideal Gas Law Problem
Find the Celcius Temperature for Absolute Zero
Переглядів 3628 років тому
Find the Celcius Temperature for Absolute Zero
Derivation of Kinetic Energy Equation
Переглядів 33 тис.8 років тому
Derivation of Kinetic Energy Equation
first work on your writing dude
Nice presentation. I first came across the Legendre transform in Thermodynamics without an explicit reference to what it entailed. "A graphical derivation of the Legendre Transform" by Sam Kennerly (12 April 2011) and "Making sense of the Legendre transform" by Zia, Redish & McKay, American Journal of Physics, vol. 77, (7), July 2009 present enlightening discussions on the Legendre Transform.
Y the graph s incresaing
Hi. Great video, thx. Comparing the two equations (starting at about 4:16) for M_tot, one would, like you mention, think V'_A could be MW__A/rho_soln. You mention that this would give V'_A as a function of density, (and hence imply, I'm guessing, not useful for further calculations...) but don't go into this further, or discuss whether or not MW_A/rho_soln is equal to V'_A. I've used this procedure for calculating partial volumes of a binary soln. given density data, and this worked well. Also, the first eqn. for M_tot using MW_A and MW_B gives an understandable result, however MW_A/rho_soln is still not equal to V'_A as calculated with this method here (which uses the other eqn for M_tot), so I'm very confused about this detail. Why isn't MW_A/rho_soln equal to V'_A?
Clearest thermo explanation of Legendre on YT
Thanks a lot!
Would it not be easier to omit the d and instead put delta
Thank you!
What happens in case of compression where pdv is positive ? It wouldn't cancel
Pressure wont be constant then
HOW AND WHY THE CANDLE FLAME IS ROUND AND BLUE AT “ZERO" GRAVITY IS ALSO CLEARLY EXPLAINED BY WHAT IS E=MC2 (ON BALANCE): The candle flame is round and blue at “zero" gravity for the same reason that WHAT IS THE EARTH is blue ON BALANCE. In “zero" gravity, the flame is cooler, spherical, blue, and centered on the candle wick. There is a PALE blue flame as opposed to what are the familiar candle flames (BRIGHT yellow-white) ON WHAT IS THE EARTH, when this candle flame is TEARDROP in shape, basically yellow, and mostly well above the wick. ON BALANCE, consider the blue flame ON THE EARTH along WITH the colors of WHAT IS THE SUN in the sky. When “coolest”, lava is red (and it is blood red too); but lava is MAINLY ORANGE (ON BALANCE), AND it is even YELLOW (when it is at it's HOTTEST). Also, notice that water is an excellent conductor of ELECTRICITY. CLEARLY, GRAVITY (importantly, as it has been written) is an INTERACTION. Notice the orange AND setting Sun in DIRECT comparison to/WITH what is the fully illuminated, WHITE, AND setting Moon. (The Moon is ALSO BLUE). Excellent. Also, consider what is THE EYE (ON BALANCE). The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The tides are CLEARLY AND necessarily proven to be ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational (on/in what is BALANCE). FANTASTIC. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Beautiful. Green is the color of what is living ON BALANCE. Great. Think about what is fire, of course, ON BALANCE. Indeed, consider what is lightning ON BALANCE (as well) in relation to clouds AND what forms as water. Finally, ON BALANCE, consider that what is the Moon is comparatively “pale” in relation to what is THE EARTH/ground when they are seen from outer “space”. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, what is (CLEARLY) the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE is to be DIRECTLY compared WITH what is (and represents) E=mc2 (on/in BALANCE) !!! Beautiful. ON BALANCE, notice that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Clearly, E=mc2 IS F=ma on balance, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Accordingly, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are (CLEARLY) linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, consider the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. E=mc2 is CLEARLY F=ma on/in BALANCE. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) on balance. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual (IN/ON BALANCE). Magnificent ❤️ !!! Consider what are red, orange, and yellow in comparison with what are blue, indigo, and violet. Think E=mc2 !!! Think MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! GREAT !!!! Think GREEN !!!! Think about “natural” flames in relation to temperature ON BALANCE !! Excellent. By Frank DiMeglio
Legend
why why why delilah
huli hahahahaha
@@marjoreiejercitado6325 huli pero di kulong
1. 2000 J of heat leaves the system and 2500 J of work is done on the system. What is the change in internal energy of the system? 2. A gas is compressed at a constant pressure of 0.800atm from 9.00 L to 2.00 L. In the process, 400 J of energy leaves the gas by heat. (a) What is the work done on the gas? (b) What is the change in its internal energy? 3. A system absorbs 35J of heat and in the process it does 11J of work. (a) If the initial internal energy is 205J what is the final internal energy? (b) The system follows a different thermodynamic path to the same final state and does 15J of work, what is the heat transferred? 4. A thermodynamic system undergoes a process in which its internal energy decreases by 500J. If at the same time 220J of work is done on the system. Fined the heat energy transferred into or from it. 5. What is the change in internal energy of a system if it absorbs 400KJ of heat from the surrounding and does 500KJ of work on the surrounding
How can partial molar volumes of components for quaternary solution be calculated?
nice
Im here because its my science project
What stands MW(A/B) for ? i didn't catch it ://
Molecular Weight i guess
How come you're allowed to use the "dv" like that when integrating? Is that just a rule of integration. Anyway thanks for the video.
How to solve p2/p1=(T2/T1)^(n/n-1)
Well explained.....
ahg wish i saw this sooner
Thankyou sir🥰
finally
Thank you.
Good but please use some dark colour to write
Sorry i can't understand any word
Impossible to understand such good handwriting
Sir please improve your handwriting
Please maintain the handwriting .And I really like this video. Please upload more videos
"polyprotic"
thank you!
for better understanding and better learning do watch ua-cam.com/video/k0PPj_2DZn4/v-deo.html subscribe us and support us
I was just looking for something like this...Finally I got the correct content..thank you
this video is underrated
Nice discussed
thanks for this video, I was able to understand the concept easily
Nice sir get it very well
this is no good explanation, see Khan Academy's derivation, that's way more accurate
very polyprotic of you
Incredible video, very educational.
great video!
Thank you! Your diagram at the beginning was very helpful
Wow! That was fun and you even gave us a cool little applet to do all those calculations. Very nice. Now you can put each of the variables on a graph and see how they change. I wonder about the assumption, however, that the two liquids are the same as water. Each of the solids in the liquid has its own heat capacity, right? So that would change the overall heat capacity of the water plus the solids in it?
You could probably research the heat capacity as a result of the solid additives, but when all was done, you would find that any changes were negligible.
This is a very clear step by step explanation of how a polytrope is calculated from the ideal gas law and two interactive gases. The graphs are clear and show what happens to pressure and volume and temperature when you change the polytrope exponent "eta". I wish an example using astrophysical processes such as interacting interstellar gases or neutron star density and pressure had been given, but I will seek out other video's for that. Thanks for a clear derivation.
😂😂😂😂😂😂👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎
But he was good.
Bruh you took it too long We know; PV=nRT and KE=1/2MV² Where V=√3RT/M THUS KE=(3/2)nRT
V is velocity or volume
what is V=√3RT/M
@@RejaMarjana root mean square velocity
@@劉岳樺-o8u oow thanks, bro
@@RejaMarjana its been 7 months How are you You fine ?
Clear and concise. Thanks!
فراس العلوك
Good video
Confusing
pretty sure you did this wrong but whatever