Відео

24 fps footage rejected as unsupported format, is Getty not accept 24fps videos?

I have a off topic question How can i upload editorial videos? When i´ll create a new batch i just have the option of editorial images

Arrenge the photo, edit, create a current model release, write tags, upload and..... if it sells, you will get $0.007 as a result. Brilliant idea!

Why this brief doesn’t appear on contributors page?

My wife is infinitely gratefulfor your tips! I'm now planning on mowing the lawn, cleaning the windows and finally assembling that Ikea chair, all over the coming weekend! ;)

Hi good morning 😊

First to comment

Submitting for creative briefs doesn’t mean exclusiveness, right? I can also submit the same content to other agencies? Thank you.

Hello,if l had only 27-30 key words, it's ok?😅

Hello Kelvin, I uploaded my stock images with Deepmeta software for a long time. As a result of the warning of my friends, deepmeta is quite irrelevant to the stock panel, especially in terms of keyword matching. All my images cannot show their sales potential for this reason. What can I do about this? Do I have a chance to fix it again. Greetings from Turkey

Very helpful! Question - If I apply to become a contributor but am not accepted, can I try again? Is there a time limit before trying again?

Viewers, landscapes are fine, I was accepted specifically based on my creative trees/leaves/nature photos. They were my 6 literal best lol. It got me in last night and just finished creating my profile. Believe me, you will be denied with "standard/sooc/low quality stuff and shots of people in general. They don't want just anything and I got accepted in LESS THAN 3 HOURS.

In recent forums, many people have complained because they are always rejected when registering to be a contributor of more than 5x each person. Is istock currently not accepting new contributors or are they being rejected because the quality does not meet the requirements?

for keyword filling, why not make it similar to other markets such as shutterstock, etc. to make it easier,

is it just me or is the submitting process much faster at the moment? good work.

This system is dead. What you are watching are the last struggles of the system. Is all this effort for videos and photos that will be sold for 50c? I devoted 8 years to this system. Now you have started making sales by making artificial intelligence use our videos and photos. They are still trying to deceive you. Because the more variety of visuals you give to artificial intelligence, the higher quality its production will be...

I'm more concerned that videos are selling for as little as 40c

thank you 🥰😍🤩

You should be able to add any relevant keywords and not be constrained by the extremely limited selection in your library software. This is one area that Shutterstock has got right and Getty havent.

Great agency 👏 👏

thank you!

Very helpful! Thank You Kalvin :)

It's a load of crap that takes a lot of time. I hate istock because of these shitty keywords that have to be specified

Excuse me. How come you came up with your idi0t keyword glossary? It makes my assets harder to find, which is affected to my sales. YOU DIG?

clarifying keywords takes a lot of time, why most of the words are circled in red, is it really impossible to do without this, like other drains?

Money was recently reclaimed due to the fact that Getty Images had wrongly charged a major client for purchased photo work. Afterwards this turned out to be incorrect. The contributor was the victim and this had to be reimbursed from sales. Upon investigation, he received a summary answer to further questions. questions were not answered clearly with other words Getty sucks!

Getty Images would do well to respond more quickly when a question is asked by a contributor. This company puts 80 percent of a sold photo into their own pocket. If you want to earn more, more photos have to be sold, but that bar is very high. All in all, the only one who will be wise is Getty Images!

Why new model release cannot be upload to Model release app? Its really so much easier this way than print and sign. Plus saves paper

is it worth it to be exclusive on istock ? for photo and footage asset

I have been saying for years this disambiguation system is very flawed. The IStock search feature is the worst of all the stock sites. Who has time to open a ticket for every word the system hasn't defined yet? PLEASE use free form text entries like the other sites!

Useful info but all quite obvious really if you've been uploading for some time. Not doing all of this is lazy. Use DeepMeta for keywording and uploading your images. It's much more efficient, mainly done offline and supported by Getty. And keyword them to death - the maximum of 50 should be normal.

I am a Vector Illustration contributor, whenever I check the country of shoot I allways check "unspecific", am I right?

Thank u man

thank you

thanks! helpful) also - nice sound and video

Thanks, very helpful video.

Is it reallly necessary to include color keywords, or can Getty's search engine automatically detect them during a search?

and avoid plaid shirts

9ice nfo

I liked this video very much. Thank you. Does Getty offer the 'catch all release' mentioned in the video?

really helpful!

Great advice Kelvin

This is interesting, thank you. Now please tell me how I can find a brief using this code (I tried entering this into the search on the community page, on the briefs page and in the browser address bar instead of the ID of another brief. None of this worked and I have no more guesses)

Ahhh, quick tips, it took me like three times to catch that title

Thank you Kelvin.

That is clear and detailed explanation and I think this will help me a lot. Thank You

Please tell me, if I upload a photo and indicate the Brief code: 776143084, should these photos be exclusive or not?

With the advent of AI, where is the value of a “real photo” vs something dreamed up that simply looks real?

thank you for the tips

Of course, photographs and videos of people look more interesting. However, the need to obtain permission to film from these people is a big problem for such filming. I can walk up to a person and ask, “Can I take a photo of you?” And this person can say, “Sure, go ahead!” But when I take out a special form and say “I need all your personal data for this.”, then this person will simply send me to hell. This is where it all ends. That's why I don't take pictures of people. There won't be any interesting stories.