42BR Barristers
42BR Barristers
  • 110
  • 78 022
Adapting Adoption to the Modern World
This seminar addresses current practice with respect to post-adoption contact, whether letterbox contact should still be seen as the appropriate regime for most cases and how the court might alter its practice and approach to better meet the needs of adopted children.
Downloadable slides available here - bit.ly/3Z8jIik.
Переглядів: 57

Відео

Disclosure - an absolute duty or not?
Переглядів 227Місяць тому
During this webinar Gemma Taylor KC and Ann Osborne explore the duties of Local Authorities to notify parents and foreign authorities of proceedings, to disclose papers within proceedings to parents, how/when those duties can be discharged/limited and the procedure for applying to restrict/discharge an Local Authority’s duty to notify or provide disclosure.
TOLATA Update 2024
Переглядів 144Місяць тому
In our latest Financial Remedies webinar, Jeremy Hall and Desmond Kilcoyne discuss recent developments and case updates in TOLATA cases. Downloadable slides available here - bit.ly/3YjeorO
Hoarding Litigation: What to do and what not to do
Переглядів 372Місяць тому
Iris Ferber KC and Krishma Patel present our latest housing webinar, dealing with litigation involving hoarding issues. This webinar covers: • Following internal policies • Taking action short of litigation • Injunctions, and injunction capacity • Litigation capacity • The relevance of disability • Seeking possession Downloadable handout available here - bit.ly/3Wq3UUZ
Financial Remedies Update 2024
Переглядів 153Місяць тому
Siân Smith and Hannah Justiva will discuss the most recent developments in financial remedies, including case law and procedure. Downloadable slides available here - bit.ly/3WflR90
Virtual Pupillage Open Evening 2024
Переглядів 36Місяць тому
42BR Barristers is delighted to share their 2024 edition of our annual Pupillage Open Evening. Designed to provide prospective pupils with an insight into life at 42BR, our open evening's are also a great way of getting to know our members and ask questions you may have. Agenda This year, we heard from one of our newest tenants, Max Montgomery, who spoke about his pupillage year at 42BR, taking...
Beyond Parental Control. Is anyone to blame?
Переглядів 4132 місяці тому
When proceedings commence because a child is ‘beyond parental control’ to what extent is it necessary or helpful to pursue in addition threshold findings that a child has also suffered significant harm as a consequence of the care they have received? Do such findings shift the ‘blame’ away from the parents and onto the child? In this webinar, George Butler (42BR Barristers) is joined by Dr Ben ...
Animals and Property Rights
Переглядів 702 місяці тому
This webinar, featuring Marcia Hyde, Edmund Walters and Paul Fuller, explores the law which defines animals as property and chattels compared with the emerging idea that animals can own property - specifically land.
Public Law Update
Переглядів 3183 місяці тому
Amanda Jepson and Carolina Bax provide a concise round up of the most relevant cases to have been reported in the last 12 months. Downloadable handout available here - bit.ly/4ayJpdR
Are supervision orders worth the paper they are printed on?
Переглядів 1493 місяці тому
The final report of the Public Law Working Group published on 01.03.21 focused on Supervision Orders as standalone orders to assist the return of children home or to family members. During this webinar, Jo Porter, will consider the findings of the report together with the current guidance on the use of Supervision Orders, including statistics around their use and outcomes for children. The prop...
Part 4: Remedies for Unlawful Discrimination
Переглядів 3544 місяці тому
Angela Piears and Gillian Crew conclude our Disability Discrimination for Housing Lawyers series, covering the following: • Procedures and Tactics • Injunctions • Damages (including 'Injury to feelings' awards) • Aggravated damages • Exemplary damages
Private Law Update 2024
Переглядів 2705 місяців тому
Siân Smith and Catrin Howells conclude our private law webinar series by reviewing the latest news and key decisions in private law proceedings of 2024. Downloadable slides available here: bit.ly/3TX9NHY
Protecting Wildlife through the Rule of Law
Переглядів 1115 місяців тому
Joined by Carol Day of Leigh Day, 42BR's Marcia Hyde and Richard Furniss discuss topics such as Habitat Preservation, Badger Culling, Gamebird Introduction, Protecting Wild Birds, Beaver Reintroduction, and the ongoing issue of Raptor Persecution.
Covert Recordings in Private Law Proceedings
Переглядів 5745 місяців тому
As part of our private law webinar series, Jennifer Youngs and Lee Kelleher present a practical summary to covert recordings within private law proceedings. Downloadable slides available here - bit.ly/43tDR2B
An Introduction to Disability Discrimination: Part 3 - Section 15 Claims
Переглядів 5315 місяців тому
Neil Clark and Max Gordon continue our Disability Discrimination Law for Housing Lawyers series, discussing Section 15 Claims of Discrimination Arising from Disability. Neil and Max cover the following: • Operation of s15 Equality Act 2010: an overview • The elements of a claim • What is 'unfavourable treatment'? • The causation test: 'something arising in consequence of the tenant's disability...
Can't you make it stop?
Переглядів 2726 місяців тому
Can't you make it stop?
An Introduction to Disability Discrimination Law: Part 2 - Reasonable Adjustments
Переглядів 6076 місяців тому
An Introduction to Disability Discrimination Law: Part 2 - Reasonable Adjustments
Digital Forensics in Family Law: Uncovering the Truth in the Digital Age
Переглядів 3006 місяців тому
Digital Forensics in Family Law: Uncovering the Truth in the Digital Age
First Appointments: getting your ducks in a row
Переглядів 2618 місяців тому
First Appointments: getting your ducks in a row
Master the Art of Striking Out! The law, the rules, the tactics- how to strike out employment claims
Переглядів 1,8 тис.9 місяців тому
Master the Art of Striking Out! The law, the rules, the tactics- how to strike out employment claims
The proportionality of care orders and the impact of Re H-W (Children) (No 2) [2022] UKSC 17
Переглядів 2299 місяців тому
The proportionality of care orders and the impact of Re H-W (Children) (No 2) [2022] UKSC 17
An Introduction to Discrimination Law - for Housing Lawyers - Part 1- What is “disability”?
Переглядів 4779 місяців тому
An Introduction to Discrimination Law - for Housing Lawyers - Part 1- What is “disability”?
Case Law Pick 'n' Mix
Переглядів 1499 місяців тому
Case Law Pick 'n' Mix
Assessments of Ethnic Minority Families - When in Rome do as the Romans do?
Переглядів 1279 місяців тому
Assessments of Ethnic Minority Families - When in Rome do as the Romans do?
Animal Violence and the Rights of the Child
Переглядів 13110 місяців тому
Animal Violence and the Rights of the Child
Check your privilege
Переглядів 44511 місяців тому
Check your privilege
42BR Barristers
Переглядів 26311 місяців тому
42BR Barristers
Witness Statements in Family Law Proceedings
Переглядів 714Рік тому
Witness Statements in Family Law Proceedings
Schedules of Loss: a practical guide to getting it right
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Рік тому
Schedules of Loss: a practical guide to getting it right
The Enforcement Problem
Переглядів 149Рік тому
The Enforcement Problem

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @kc-qs8qg
    @kc-qs8qg 2 дні тому

    this is good - thank you...

  • @stevenmackay3342
    @stevenmackay3342 10 днів тому

    I've watched this a few times to try and quantify a claim I have underway....

  • @IntelligentEating
    @IntelligentEating 18 днів тому

    42 was the answer. But what is the question….

  • @user-qv2jh9mv7b
    @user-qv2jh9mv7b 28 днів тому

    Thank you so much. Im battling a revenge eviction currently and you reassured me greatly as well as helped me understand so much more. Id love to know if there's a video tuto thatd tell me how to defend such a mess as mine. It's not due to repair but money the letting agency didn't pass on which my landlord seeks to evict me over.

  • @krzemianowski
    @krzemianowski Місяць тому

    I have been served NTQ but I have mental health problems. and as results of that my coop punished me and trough me out from our comity panel and told me that I have less rights then other tenants because I have been put on NTQ? is that true that I can have reduce rights as a Tennent even if I have agreement to repay my areas which I'm following ? please help me if you can ?

  • @femkeom4960
    @femkeom4960 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for this interesting webinar! Greetings from an animal rights enthusiast from the Netherlands.

  • @user-tw9ii7fc4o
    @user-tw9ii7fc4o 2 місяці тому

    Another tool to steal children

  • @Freedom4PalestineEndZioNazism
    @Freedom4PalestineEndZioNazism 3 місяці тому

    Great to see this video up.

  • @Keke1980s
    @Keke1980s 3 місяці тому

    Thank you Amanda, & Caroline 👌🏽

  • @wahab364
    @wahab364 4 місяці тому

    Girl power, thank you ladies ❤

  • @derekcruickshank
    @derekcruickshank 4 місяці тому

    'promo sm' 💃

  • @ki196
    @ki196 5 місяців тому

    Excellent starting point for a novice. Thank you. More like these please!

  • @johnshaw8013
    @johnshaw8013 6 місяців тому

    How much difference is there between this, and a mortgage repossession?

    • @saraswatkin9226
      @saraswatkin9226 24 дні тому

      Courts discriminate against Litigants in Person .

  • @simondaniel446
    @simondaniel446 6 місяців тому

    very basic infor. housing solicitors are basically paralegal work and any litigant in person can do it.

  • @terencebrooks9253
    @terencebrooks9253 7 місяців тому

    Brilliant 👏 👏 anymore videos ??

  • @inquisitive1911
    @inquisitive1911 7 місяців тому

    At what point must an ET judge in Scotland agree or refuse a section 50 request for anonymity? Before the hearing, during or after the hearing? I also say that in terms to make it a private hearing with nobody in the viewing gallery, the requestor (claimant) of the section 50 does not want identified by the public. Is the judge allowed to do a u-turn on his decision, so i.e. if he says at the start that section 50 is granted, and then he allows the respondent's relative (close family) into the viewing gallery half way through the ET, is that allowed? Is there a timeframe upon which the judge must decide for sure that he is granting (or not) the section 50 request?? The request for anonymity stated section 50 without stating 3a, 3b or 3c specifically. The reason given by the requestor was that the requestor was not 'out' in public as a gay person and wished to maintain that privacy. Thank you.

  • @nikkion2140
    @nikkion2140 8 місяців тому

    Would be great if you have a summary flow chart what preparation(s) and forms to be done before First Appointment.

  • @nikkion2140
    @nikkion2140 8 місяців тому

    Would be helpful if you can list all case law in description box. Thanks.

  • @nikkion2140
    @nikkion2140 8 місяців тому

    Thank You. Very informative.

  • @danielholdsworth2121
    @danielholdsworth2121 9 місяців тому

    If the Respondent fails to exchange documents on the agreed date, several weeks go by and still no exchange however the litigent in person has. In addition the Respondent has made slanderous replies in the et3 and failed to obtain key statements from 3 of their employees whose evidence will support the claim. Are these sufficient grounds to go for a strike out and request a summary decision.

    • @kc-qs8qg
      @kc-qs8qg 8 місяців тому

      maybe an unless order??

  • @danielholdsworth2121
    @danielholdsworth2121 9 місяців тому

    When do you actualy become under oath? Is it during the final hearing or before...

    • @kc-qs8qg
      @kc-qs8qg 9 місяців тому

      hearing

    • @haza123b4
      @haza123b4 8 місяців тому

      @@kc-qs8qg *Preliminary?*

    • @kc-qs8qg
      @kc-qs8qg 8 місяців тому

      @@haza123b4 the full hearing - that's where the legal principles apply & where the case will be determined by the judge/panel - preliminary is quite informal & other evidence may surface in the lead-up to the full hearing - so, oath or affirmation at full hearing...

    • @haza123b4
      @haza123b4 8 місяців тому

      @@kc-qs8qg *So either preliminary hearings are useless or perjury laws are useless.*

    • @kc-qs8qg
      @kc-qs8qg 8 місяців тому

      @@haza123b4 preliminary hearings are not useless at all, but an essential part of the process - both parties draft the List of Issues and confirm clarity on the particulars of claim so that the judge can case manage it to a full hearing - it has NOTHING whatsoever to do with oath or perjury - a PH gives structure, order and clarity to a case so that both sides & the Tribunal can prepare for a full hearing...

  • @nicholasford506
    @nicholasford506 9 місяців тому

    When the claimant asks for a statement does the claimant state the episodes you will be asking about.

  • @1BrotherFromAnotherMother
    @1BrotherFromAnotherMother 9 місяців тому

    got a case.i am disabled physiocally and mentally. my case is so cpomplrex it is causing me to be sxuicidfal. plz help.

    • @emmacampbell7989
      @emmacampbell7989 5 місяців тому

      Sorry just wondered did you find help with your matter

  • @renovareuk
    @renovareuk 9 місяців тому

    the link does not work for the slides

  • @nichewitt8526
    @nichewitt8526 10 місяців тому

    Oh my god. I could kiss your hands and face. I knew it!! I knew it!! ADHD or not, just because I can't DO the paperwork, doesn't mean my brain doesn't work!!! I am ( as I have stated for months to my friends and family!!!) the victim of Retaliation Eviction, breach of contract, failure to carry out repairs in a timely manner, loss of earnings and emotional damage. No heating put in after 3 requests at 6 monthly intervals. I am so sick of being treated subhuman. Im taking a stand. Thank you. Both of you. You don't know what you just did Thank you

  • @malkentina
    @malkentina 10 місяців тому

    Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Can you confirm that the Convention on the Rights of the Child, dated 20th November 1989, is a legally binding document on the State Parties? Yes. Each State party to a treaty has an obligation to take steps to ensure that everyone in the State can enjoy the rights set out in the treaty. All States parties are obliged to submit regular reports to the Committee on the implementation of the Convention. States must submit an initial report two years after acceding to the Convention and then periodic reports every five years. The Committee examines each report and addresses its concerns and recommendations to the State party in the form of “concluding observations”. Concluding observations are legally binding. ‘ Decision-makers, whether on a political or administrative level, have an obligation to implement, to respect, protect and fulfil the rights of the Convention and that automatically includes the interpretation by the treaty body of these rights, namely the General Comments ‘

  • @1BrotherFromAnotherMother
    @1BrotherFromAnotherMother 11 місяців тому

  • @ibbysworld5966
    @ibbysworld5966 11 місяців тому

    The topic is great. However, your main audience are litigant in persons. I feel like this session could have been explained & succinctly summarised in laymen terms.

  • @DolceVita
    @DolceVita 11 місяців тому

    Hi guys, please can I aska question? Poor soundproofing discussed - it may not come under Defective premises act or Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but could possibly come under FFHH act 2018 if the degree of noise pollution was so great as to make the home uninhabitable? In reality, no property is likely to be so poorly sound proofed as to be uninhabtable, but in principle it could be ?

  • @DolceVita
    @DolceVita 11 місяців тому

    Very helpful video thank you.

  • @davidgleeson9225
    @davidgleeson9225 11 місяців тому

    Brilliant show I'm in a grievance with the council and do you know how adversarial they are it is beyond believe It's a bigger beast than the two of you and it's more than a match for me..

  • @SavvyMoneyShow
    @SavvyMoneyShow Рік тому

    What if the company sell the shares you hold in the company to satisfy tax but put it through as income so you lose universal credit and also get taxed twice as a eesult

  • @bennie_pie
    @bennie_pie Рік тому

    As a soon to be litigant in person, with ADHD, a bad habit of reacting emotionally and going off on tangents, I really appreciate the clear and practical guidance in this video which I will use for my witness statement - thank you so much. I will hold off on that stapler purchase! My area of expertise is IT/AI and feel I should caution against sharing sensitive data with ChatGPT until you have changed the default privacy settings. By default your data will be used to train future versions of the language model (and therefore could end up in the public domain) unless you specifically opt out. Additionally it's worth mentioning that the free version, ChatGPT 3.5, is a unreliable as it frequently forgets what you've asked it and will make things up (hallucinates). The paid version (ChatGPT 4) is much better. As an alternative (and my preference) it's worth trying Claude 2 which is free, comparable to ChatGPT 4 except its able to handle massive amounts of text in the prompts and has a much later knowledge cut off. Very useful for interrogating large unwieldy documents. Hope that is helpful. Thanks again for your content!

  • @nh4129
    @nh4129 Рік тому

    Thank you.

  • @Mummabear1111
    @Mummabear1111 Рік тому

    I didn’t have an abusive childhood family court and removal of kids is acute chronic trauma. The abuse in court has to stop.

  • @Mummabear1111
    @Mummabear1111 Рік тому

    Family court causes CPTSD. I’m in Australia and it is horrific.

  • @AlissaSss23
    @AlissaSss23 Рік тому

    What a great, insightful video! ❤

  • @tundeuk
    @tundeuk Рік тому

    This is excellent content. Thank you guys.

  • @DylanEdwards-jz2xc
    @DylanEdwards-jz2xc Рік тому

    Great video, really informative and clearly very knowledgable Barristers.

  • @duiliodaleo8313
    @duiliodaleo8313 Рік тому

    Amazing video. Thank you a lot ! I am a NQ Solicitor and I will have to defend tomorrow on short notice, your video is a lifesaver !

  • @nao123ification
    @nao123ification Рік тому

    VERY GOOD PRESENTATION, THANK YOU

  • @rajeshkhanna5161
    @rajeshkhanna5161 Рік тому

    Great talk from a knowledgeable barrister.

  • @marycollins2379
    @marycollins2379 Рік тому

    Thanks for your video of N5B form, can I just ask you if you have let your property as a house and not a HMO how do you answer Q 17C? Many thanks Mary

  • @hitenkanabar2601
    @hitenkanabar2601 Рік тому

    Hi.......i have a possession of order, the judge said to vacate property forthwith.....cause is illegal sublet, and tresppasser. If hasnt gone (immediately) can instruct high court bailiffs with no further hearing......do i still habe to give 14 days notice

  • @RentalPosts
    @RentalPosts Рік тому

    Thanks for information. Tentants don't leave the property after being served section 21 notice two time in successuion (second time to give them time to move out) and tenants still do not move out and have almost three months worth of rent arrears. Property is managed by letting agents from the begning of rental term and deposit holding complies with the law. Can we use online accelarated possesion order? Is there any video on this topic? Thanks

  • @arnold7457
    @arnold7457 Рік тому

    👇 p̲r̲o̲m̲o̲s̲m̲

  • @mcwyngaard
    @mcwyngaard 2 роки тому

    Valuable advice thanks for your guidance to help 👍

  • @Mysticus11
    @Mysticus11 2 роки тому

    Wow! Hats off and well done 👍🏾

  • @60yoself-taught
    @60yoself-taught 2 роки тому

    If I apply for possession order via PCOL, how do I apply for transfer to high court at the same time? Are the court fees very different?

  • @Mrlistenandlearn
    @Mrlistenandlearn 2 роки тому

    what about if there is no deposit and it's a bond- council tenants do this?