Відео

ua-cam.com/video/y8yrlTWWqbk/v-deo.htmlsi=J4e-cWxdyGTAuj_- this is 765lt vs m1000r

nah

yea amg gtr would kill this 911 ngl

why are you talking

@@2fast4youiguess75 aye i been active since some time again 🫡

ye after a year 🤔

the car ain't even bad 😭

same

If the STO was AWD itd be slower..

nah

maybe i haven't played in so long

Show me

@@2fast4youiguess75 ua-cam.com/video/zGnV4kqs__U/v-deo.html This Is the clip, you can see that It's wet and cold at the start of the video. It's released In the middle of November and In this video ua-cam.com/video/L1BgOymN5wc/v-deo.html&t you can see that the pinned comment says that the car Is on winter tires which are limited to 270kmh and It's the same press car as In the first video I've linked.

How does it have more torque if its the same engine 🥴🥴, and awd makes it heavier so the accel is slightly slower

@@2fast4youiguess75 The AWD makes It faster, the Performante can do 0-100 In 2.5 seconds because there Is more traction. The RWD In the STO means more wheel spin off the line hence the slower 0-100 time and It's around 3 seconds. The AWD also makes It faster out of a corner for the exact same reason. Also, Performante footage you used was on a WET day near the end of fall and the car was on winter tires which are limited to 270kmh and are obviously slower.

AWD makes cars slower eventually,too much weight and drivetrain loss

@@2fast4youiguess75 "too much weight" The STO hasn't lost much weight considering how much change It has seen. 75% of the body panels are carbon, It's got carbon door cards, lighter front windshield, lighter magnesium wheels and no front differential and the car lost about 43 kilograms compared to the Performante. I'm gonna assume about 25% of that 43 kilogram weight loss came from the carbon fiber body panels, the door cards, the magnesium wheels and the front windshield cause the removal of the AWD reduced 33kg. I am not the only one who seemed to notice this as many car journalists have pointed It out as well that the car hasn't lost that much weight considering the change. Also, 33 kilograms Is literally a factor which can depend on the weight of the driver. As for the AWD train loss, the Performante doesn't lose that much, 564WHP of the 640. I don't know about the STO since I haven't been able to find any figures yet. Assuming the STO has about 20 - 30 more whp than the Performante since It's RWD, that still wouldn't make It faster on a straight because the STO makes 53% more downforce than the Performante, meaning more drag, meaning less aerodynamic than the Performante and therefore lower top end.

What about drivetrain loss tho, that’s why RWD is better than AWD for accel on a roll most of the time

🫡

We’ll see who needed 400+ more horsepower and 600 less pounds 😐

@@2fast4youiguess75 why pissed? Standard agera beats 900 HP Porsche the speedometer you took its slowest thing in entire world Lmfao Agera R skywalks 900 HP Porsche 918 spyder wassaich package Not even close Lmfao Watch the real races kid before you talk Ain't no 900 HP Porsche beating a Koenigseggs having 1100+ HP

I love the excuses 😉

Aight