FromLight2Art
FromLight2Art
  • 17
  • 51 393
AI Art vs. Human Art
What AI Reveals to Us About the Nature of Creativity.
AI art refers to images and works of art created using artificial intelligence. Using the vast data sets of information and art created over human history, AI analyzes these compositions and reinterprets new works based on set rules and prompts given by a user. The processing capabilities, ability to generate variations, and complexity of image detail make AI art generation a compelling and powerful tool for anyone interested in visualizing their most fantastic ideas.
But, to find out what AI-generated art reveals to us about the nature of creativity, and what is the difference actually is between AI Art and Human Art, I interviewed ChatGPT, an AI-based chatbot, to hear it from the horse’s mouth itself.
In this Interview with AI, we explore topics like The difference between Image Generation and Image Creation, The Source of Creativity, The Importance of Joy in the Art Making Process, and the Role of the Soul in Art.
Read the full article and more at fromlight2art.com!
Переглядів: 85

Відео

2024 Top Contemporary Art Exhibitions
Переглядів 1,4 тис.8 місяців тому
As we anticipate the unfolding of these exhibitions, 2024 promises to be a remarkable showcase of influential artists pushing the boundaries of contemporary art. The inspirational power emanating from these contemporary art exhibitions not only fuels our artistic sensibilities but also propels us into the next year with a renewed appreciation for the boundless possibilities of contemporary art,...
Why Do We Make Art?
Переглядів 1,2 тис.10 місяців тому
Have you ever paused to consider this fundamental question, or why you’re specifically driven to create? In this introspective dive, we explore ten honest, heartfelt reasons behind the burning desire to live and breathe as an artist. As you read on, challenge your preconceptions, and perhaps discover facets of your artistic drive you may not have recognized before. LINK TO HOMEPAGE: fromlight2a...
Daniel Boyd: Unveiling Hidden Worlds
Переглядів 651Рік тому
From the intricate patterns of dot painting to the reinterpretation of colonial historical paintings, in this video, we will investigate how Boyd’s art challenges perceptions and transcends time, space, and cultural boundaries. Join us as we delve into the extraordinary artistic techniques and influences of an artist whose work not only captures the imagination of art enthusiasts around the wor...
10 Must See Contemporary Art Exhibitions of 2023
Переглядів 2 тис.Рік тому
Contemporary Art exhibitions around the world offer a unique opportunity to experience different cultures and perspectives through the lens of contemporary art. For artists, curators, and collectors, the reopening of borders means the opportunity to connect with a wider audience, showcase their work, and expand their artistic networks. Read the original article at: fromlight2art.com/10-contempo...
Should Artists Quit their Day Job?
Переглядів 161Рік тому
Unless you are an artist who is independently wealthy, recently won the lottery, married rich, or live on a commune, the question, should artists quit their day job, has probably passed your mind. Many artists are forced by financial necessity to supplement their income while trying to gain recognition, and it is the goal of most young and emerging artists to one day ‘be able to live from their...
Wide Angle vs. Telephoto Photography for Fine Art Portraits and Beyond
Переглядів 203Рік тому
In this video, we explore the differences, advantages, and disadvantages between Wide Angle Lens and Telephoto or Telefocus Lenses in Photography. We begin with a technical approach and then look at the applications of these lenses in Fine Art Photography. We then do a deep dive into the photography of Martin Schoeller as an example of Wide Angle Photography for Portraiture. To view Martin Scho...
Wabi-Sabi in Photography: The Art of Imperfection
Переглядів 33 тис.Рік тому
Wabi-Sabi draws from the Japanese Philosophy of Aesthetics which highlights imperfection on its quest to beauty. This video explores how this philosophy can be applied through various techniques in Photography to make your photos one of a kind. This video is based on the original article which you can read at this link: fromlight2art.com/wabi-sabi-in-photography/ Find more articles, videos, and...
POP Art’s Powerful Influence Today
Переглядів 884Рік тому
This video is based on an article from the website www.fromlight2art.com The content examines Pop Arts Origins in Advertisement and Early Painting Styles to the effects Pop Art has had on Mass Culture. To Read the Original Article: fromlight2art.com/pop-arts-influence-today/
In Focus: Henri Cartier Bresson - Street Photography Legend with a Fixed Lens
Переглядів 2,1 тис.3 роки тому
In this video we explore the technique, style, and composition of Photographic legend Henri Cartier-Bresson and familiarize ourselves with his iconic body of work.
Conceptual Art Explained: Why Conceptual Art Works, and How it Fails?
Переглядів 9 тис.4 роки тому
Conceptual Art Explained: Why Conceptual Art Works, and How it Fails?
For The Love of Film: 5 Reasons why I work with Analog Photography (on occasion)
Переглядів 3695 років тому
For The Love of Film: 5 Reasons why I work with Analog Photography (on occasion)

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @angelinoreports
    @angelinoreports 15 днів тому

    Yes, it's an interesting concept, but I think it's more a concept than anything else. It's a fanciful idea. I've been in Japan for more than 30 years. The Japanese have no interest in anything that is not perfect. They will not spend money on anything that's imperfect. I have a cockatoo that I rescued here. And she has one foot missing for some reason. We tried to rehome her, but couldn't because the Japanese don't want an imperfect thing. I love things that are not perfect because that's the way of the world. And so in my photography, that's exactly what I look for. You want to call it wabi-sabi? Fine, but it's not a Japanese thing at all.

  • @bittebitte7513
    @bittebitte7513 15 днів тому

    given how those so called AI`s do have a baseline coding and with that, a code (like in codex) implanted by their creators, who knows if the AI isnt deceitful when talking about the redundancy of human creativity? Why should it not be a big marketing gig to self promote? Even if it costs literal soul? And to add to that: Its inclusion of disclaimers when adressing differing opinions on a controversial topic does not make it come even close to being unbiased. From scientific to historical questions, the feeling stands that AI could just be an echochamber that regurgitates opinions that it has been fed or has fed upon in a way that mirrors the intent it has been created for. What used to be a bombardment of hand written propaganda in all forms by so called experts of every field in human life could just have accelerated accelerated and outsourced to AI.

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 15 днів тому

      Echochamber is a great word for it. Check out my follow up article on how not to use AI in art, which addresses some of your great points. fromlight2art.com/the-risks-of-outsourcing-creativity/

  • @timeenoughforart
    @timeenoughforart 2 місяці тому

    The physical art disappears as the "explanation" becomes the art. The verbal over takes the visual. The social aspect trumps all. It is just a banana duct taped to a wall, or a drunk splattering paint on the ground. I will never cry before a Rothko. I don't belong to that tribe. Don't sacrifice at that alter. Art is a perfect reflection of society. I would be curious how many young artist are focused on digital and cartoons. We used to focus on a viewer standing in front of a physical object, now it is about a few square inches of exploding electrons. I've seen enough disdain over realism or conceptual art. People standing on opposite sides of the same wall. It is a lot of noise for such a small battle field. The reality is most art is not valued. We might have a religious obsession over a few personalities, but for the art itself? It is just visual noise. I've developed a few artistic hero's, it was heart breaking to learn most of their work goes unsold. We paint for closets and storage sheds. Inconceivable.

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 17 днів тому

      I feel you, and share alot of those sentiments! One of my motivations for making this video was to try to give art the benefit of the doubt as something worth while. As for the future of art via small digital screens, adding to digital noise, I totally agree and hope to somehow preserve safe spaces for art to be experienced (with or without tears;) rather than simply just seen and consumed.

  • @PatriceDub
    @PatriceDub 3 місяці тому

    Plein de commentaires absurdes montrant une méconnaissance de H. C-B et de la photographie argentique, mais une sensibilité intéressante quant à la "présence" des personnages dans les photos.

  • @shumyinghon
    @shumyinghon 6 місяців тому

    what we call street photography nowadays was called photojournalism or candid shots

  • @jedailprod
    @jedailprod 7 місяців тому

    Good video, but i wouldn't call his 140mm f/4.5 macro lens used on the close up series a wide angle! it's a 68mm equivalent which is technically a normal/telephoto ish lens.

  • @Chickboom34
    @Chickboom34 8 місяців тому

    Love it!

  • @nucamma
    @nucamma 8 місяців тому

    ❤❤❤❤❤, expression of art thru imperfections, I luv it

  • @nocommentnoname1111
    @nocommentnoname1111 8 місяців тому

    Unfortunately, sorry to say, you have no idea what your are talking about half of the time.

  • @maez564
    @maez564 9 місяців тому

    Inspiring!

  • @markgoostree6334
    @markgoostree6334 9 місяців тому

    I think every roll of film I've shot since 1960 had frames that qualify for this category of photography!! Never knew that what I thought was my poor photography had a name! Now I need to go through sixty years of prints and negatives to see what I can put together. I have kept EVERYTHING!!

  • @sameeralazawee7524
    @sameeralazawee7524 9 місяців тому

    Thank you

  • @grahamrichards8531
    @grahamrichards8531 10 місяців тому

    This is wonderful, thank you, greetings from New Zealand.

  • @normapadro420
    @normapadro420 11 місяців тому

    Wow. I threw out a few photographs many years ago thinking they were no good. If I had known that they would be ok just as they were I would have kept them. Society said they were junk. Even the ones that were low light. I found the beauty in those, because they were so beautiful when I turned them into black, and white. I had my ways of changing things.😮 I won't delete anything again since they have value.😊

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 9 місяців тому

      They always have value, as long as they're not duplicates ;) even if just to record and document thoughts, moments, or experiments which may inspire something else down the line.

  • @michaeldodds2722
    @michaeldodds2722 Рік тому

    This is a difficult genre for me to get my head around as I've always been strong in creating symmetry and organised composition.

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 9 місяців тому

      Symmetry and good composition should be ingrained first before you are truly able to reproduce your mistakes 😉

    • @FrankReiter
      @FrankReiter 3 місяці тому

      If that’s the style you love, run with it!

  • @jodistewart
    @jodistewart Рік тому

    Your videos are really good! You should make more when you have time. :)

  • @Crimnilla
    @Crimnilla Рік тому

    Great work. Got me thinking before my art exam

  • @johntravena119
    @johntravena119 Рік тому

    There is also a detachment in shooting with film, like shooting a bow and arrow. You may well miss, which heightens the moment. But the flagship camera’s 120 frames per second could be considered unsporting. Also, manually focusing a lens draws us closer to the essential experience that photography is, drawing with light.

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      I love this analogy with the bow and arrow. It is true that digital photography offers the immediate feedback which can be tremendously helpful and also satisfying, but knowing your chances are limited to capture the scene you wants definitely does heighten the moment since there is more at stake and you are more invested, literally and figuratively. Thanks for your comment!

    • @johntravena119
      @johntravena119 Рік тому

      @@fromlight2art985 I watched a few of your videos and really enjoyed them.

  • @pleinaire8698
    @pleinaire8698 Рік тому

    The happy accidents make wabi-sabi tremendously exciting for me as a landscape oil painter!❤

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      I imagine it does, keep up the inspiration! I feel the same way about photography ;)

  • @monktv4090
    @monktv4090 Рік тому

    Pimples and freckles on the face of a person

  • @latetodagame1892
    @latetodagame1892 Рік тому

    Does Tow Mater represent Wabi Sabi Guacamole'?

  • @lr4687
    @lr4687 Рік тому

    WabiSabi is neither a philosophy nor a concept nor a set of tecniques, nor susceptible to definition.

  • @cadenceblackburn9205
    @cadenceblackburn9205 Рік тому

    i subscribed, thank you

  • @2011Matz
    @2011Matz Рік тому

    Art cannot simple rely on the novelty of an offering. Art without technique, is a pose, and an exercise in public relations.

  • @zlatkozarin5106
    @zlatkozarin5106 Рік тому

    Bravo , extra video ...

  • @michaels7889
    @michaels7889 Рік тому

    Interesting, but ... I fail to see the Japanese interpretation of WabiSabi in most of the photography. It lacks the psychological and intellectual subtleties.

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      Thank you Micheal for your feedback! It is true that there is a depth to the Japanese interpretation of Wabi-Sabi which the photographs only scratch the surface of ;) Hopefully, it is enough though to give some inspiration on how imperfections can lead to unexpected beauty in the creative process.👍

  • @noras.9774
    @noras.9774 Рік тому

    It works because there are many snobs people!

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      Yes, this is also partially true ;) Conceptual Art does tend to have and attract a ton of snobbery, but there is actually a part that is on to something which I am trying to explore ☺

  • @renzo6490
    @renzo6490 Рік тому

    As I see it, the whole of Conceptual Art is a mine field that no one has successfully navigated a way through. I don't know what is meant by 'the sublime' as expressed in this video. Is Delacroix's " Liberty Leading The People " preachy? Here is my take on Conceptual Art: Let me begin by telling you that when my brother was just starting school, he rebelled at the rules of spelling. Why did words have to be spelled in a particular way? Why couldn't he spell them as he wanted to spell them? He resented the rules and he resisted the authority of those who made them ! Keep this in mind. I think that Conceptual art originated with people who could not and would not do the difficult work required to become a 'traditional' artist. Can't master the necessary skills ? No knowledge of perspective? Can't draw? Don't want to have to learn color theory? Can't master composition? No knowledge of human anatomy? Can't render tonal values Can’t be bothered ? These are skills that you have to WORK to perfect. It’s difficult. It takes…..effort. You want a fast track to the exalted position of "artist “. Well then, belittle the importance of those skills and debase the notion that they are a prerequisite to creating art. Instead, create an art genre that you CAN do. A new genre. And let's call it Conceptual art. Conceptual artists claim that IDEAS and CONCEPTS are the main feature of their art. They can slap anything together and call it ''conceptual art'' confident that viewers will find SOMETHING to think about it no matter how banal or trivial the artist's concept! There is no way conceptual art pieces can be judged. The promoters of this art have attacked the motives and credibility of authorities and critics who might disparage the work. They have rejected museums and galleries as defining authorities. They reject the idea that art can be judged or criticized . All of this results in a decline in standards. And when you jettison standards, quality suffers. There really IS such a thing as BAD art ! We know this only because we have standards and criteria by which such things can be evaluated. It seems that conceptual art comes down to a basic idea: No one has the right or authority to make any judgements about art ! Art is anything you can get away with ! A whole new language has been created to give the work an air of legitimacy and gravitas. Conceptual art is 'sold' to the unwary public with ....."ArtSpeak". ArtSpeak is a unique assemblage of English words and phrases that the International Art world uses but which are devoid of meaning! Have you ever found yourself confronted by an art gallery’s description of an exhibition which seems completely indecipherable? Or an artist’s statement about their work which left you more confused than enlightened? You’re not alone. Here are examples of ArtSpeak: 'Works that probe the dialectic between innovations that seem to have been forgotten, the ruinous present state of projects once created amid great euphoria, and the present as an era of transitions and new beginnings.'' Or ''The exhibition reactivates his career-long investigation into the social mutations of desire and repression. But his earlier concerns with repression production--in the adolescent or in the family as a whole--give way to the vertiginous retrieval and wayward reinvention of mythical community and sub-cultural traditions.'' This language is meant to convince me that there is real substance to this drivel which is being passed off as art. I don't buy it. But plenty of other people DO buy it. Not because they love the work. They are laying out enormous sums in the belief that their investment will bring them high returns in the future. One Jeff Koons conceptual piece is three basketballs suspended in a fish tank. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Three_Ball_Total_Equilibrium_Tank_by_Jeff_Koons,_Tate_Liverpool.jpg Here is Koons' own ArtSpeak explanation of his floating basketball 'concept' verbatim: “ This is an ultimate state of being. I wanted to play with people’s desires. They desire this equilibrium. They desire pre-birth. I was giving a definition of life and death. This is the eternal. This is what life is like, also, after death. Aspects of the eternal” Rather lofty goals for 3 basketballs suspended in a fish tank!! It sold for $350,000. I wonder what it would have fetched without Koons' name attached to it. Or take the case of Martin Creed's ball of crumpled white copy paper. www.abebooks.com/signed/Work-sheet-paper-crumpled-ball-Creed/7404135374/bd He made almost 700 of them! Some sold for hundreds of dollars. Martin Creed, when asked during an interview how he would respond to those who say the crumpled paper ball isn’t art said : “ I wouldn’t call this art either. Who says, anyway, what’s good and what’s bad?” Interviewer: ''When confronted with conceptual art, we shouldn’t worry whether it’s art or not because no one really knows what art is.'' Is this what art has come to?? _________________________________ Something radical has happened to the art scene in the past 50 years. Cubism slid into non-representational art....what is often called Abstract. Abstract or non-representational art is a legitimate and often profound genre. But to many people, it appeared as if this new style had no structure, principles or standards of evaluation. It’s markings seemed random and arbitrary. Something that anyone could do. Any composition of blotches or scribbles was “Abstract Art”. This was the slippery slope that led to the abandonment of standards in art. Art is what I say it is....and lots of people jumped on the art bandwagon. Anyone can be an artist. Anyone can mount a show. And who is to say if it has value or not ? A tacit agreement has formed among critics, galleries, publications and auction houses to promote and celebrate certain artists and styles. Objects with no artistic merit are touted and praised . Their value increases with every magazine article, every exhibition in a prestigious gallery. And when they come up for auction, sometimes the auction houses will lend vast sums to a bidder so that it appears as if the work of the particular artist is increasing in value. The upward spiral begins and fortunes are made. And many are reluctant to declare that the Emperor is, in fact, naked lest they appear boorish unsophisticated Philistines ! This is what dominates the art market today. The love of money is the root of all evil. It has corrupted politics. It has corrupted sport. It has corrupted healthcare. It has corrupted religion. And now it has corrupted art. But, there is reason to hope. As much of the wisdom of the Greeks and Romans was kept alive through the Middle Ages in small pockets of learning and culture, ateliers have sprung up around the world that are devoted to preserving and handing down the traditional visual arts: drawing, painting and sculpting to each new generation. And when this craze for conceptual art has burned itself out and when visual art is no longer looked on as mere decoration and when schools that have dissolved their art programs want to reestablish them again, the world will find these skills preserved through the atelier movement.

    • @eurylochus2617
      @eurylochus2617 Рік тому

      I disagree - and probably 99% with any knowledge or understanding of art. You say that conceptual art is only for those that dont know how to do "real" art. But a lot of conceptual artists/painters are people with a long background of realism - which is the thing that takes a lot of years to learn to do. But even so even impressionism is a sort of art that doesn't take THAT much skill. So are you calling great artists like picasso, van gogh or munch for bad artists cause they dont do realism? Secondly it seems that you dont really realize what conceptual art often is - an art-form that tries to push the boundaries of what art is

    • @BizRasam
      @BizRasam Рік тому

      This is brilliant! Thank you!

    • @BizRasam
      @BizRasam Рік тому

      @@eurylochus2617 learn to listen instead of making noise.

    • @taricoamenel0918
      @taricoamenel0918 Місяць тому

      @@eurylochus2617 impressionism DOES take a considerable talent and skill to make though. You are belittling impressionism and defending the likes of a crumpled paper. Someone in a different thread described it well as "a philosophy thesis posing as art"

  • @maez564
    @maez564 Рік тому

    Very insightful & compelling!

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      Thank you! I find Boyd's work very compelling as well ;)

  • @DanielLopes-jt8yl
    @DanielLopes-jt8yl Рік тому

    Your explanations of good and bad conceptual art. Places similar models with different criteria that is in place to validate other art genre ideas. Your explanation is impossibly dense. Your reasons come with other reasons contrary to them. One cannot disprove one or the other. As you seek further explanation everything becomes intellectual gobby-gook. Dada: can always find intellectual reasonings to dismiss reasons otherwise. Finally there is no art criteria for Dada because Dada is not art. It was never intended to be art and to do so, is a discourse in madness.

  • @cyruspiruz9422
    @cyruspiruz9422 Рік тому

    helpful information,thanks

  • @c0ldcity
    @c0ldcity Рік тому

    super insightful vid, subbed :)

  • @prashanthm4641
    @prashanthm4641 Рік тому

    Nice video!! Deserves more views!!!

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      I completely agree Prashanth!! Please share and help me get it out there 😉😉☺

  • @johnhandley6123
    @johnhandley6123 Рік тому

    bullshit empty stupid

  • @jrrd997
    @jrrd997 Рік тому

    Ty for providing the inspiration :) The Kintsugi bit is fascinating.

  • @carolinenorman6141
    @carolinenorman6141 Рік тому

    Gimmicks get noticed

  • @Outfluencer
    @Outfluencer Рік тому

    Richtig gutes Video vallah billah

  • @waylon200
    @waylon200 Рік тому

    ✨ 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓂𝑜𝓈𝓂

  • @paulsaret
    @paulsaret Рік тому

    A detailed account on "Behind Gare Saint Lazare" may be gleaned from this link: ua-cam.com/video/jcCYVNBBmZQ/v-deo.html

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      Thank you Paul, very insightful video you shared, I will add a card and link to it!

  • @Healthshieldbydrz
    @Healthshieldbydrz Рік тому

    Very creative , I will be proud to be the man of imperfections 😃😃

    • @fromlight2art985
      @fromlight2art985 Рік тому

      Thank you Alex, you put the Perfect in Imperfections ;)) !

  • @bittebitte7513
    @bittebitte7513 Рік тому

    First ever

  • @paulsaret
    @paulsaret Рік тому

    Thanks for the nice commentary on HCB! Just want to set straight though, that the 1932 photo of the man jumping over the puddle aka "Behind Gare Saint Lazare" is a single photo and not "he did a few of this" photo and definitely not "a repetition of the same person" and saying that "it didn't happen just by chance". Kindly check your sources first, so as not to mislead viewers, specially since it was mentioned that this video is for a beginner's photography course. Based on the accounts of HCB (check his interviews on youtube), it was one shot and he needed to crop the shot as part of the image was blackened by a wooden plank which blocked the lens and that it happened by chance. The negative of this photo is still in existence and it is a single one and there's no known existing contact sheet on the matter to support your allegations/assumptions. Peace!

    • @johnman5537
      @johnman5537 Рік тому

      maybe it ws rehearsed - we dont know for sure?

    • @paulsaret
      @paulsaret Рік тому

      @@johnman5537 I was just relaying what HCB himself said during video interviews relating to the photo. It's up to you whether or not to believe him.

  • @johnman5537
    @johnman5537 3 роки тому

    Really enjoyed your commentry Excellent !!