Відео

Thanks for the feedback. I will make sure it is less loud in the future ❤️

Wise words - thank you ❤️

Thanks so much ❤️

I read the other day in the kybalion about “the Devine paradox”; the world doesn’t exist and still it does. In other words, it is all an illusion but if you hit your toe on a rock the pain is real.

I can imagine that there are a multitude of instances where one gets a glimpse behind the veil. I once realized that words and the concepts they describe are the same thing. For example: a car and the word “car” are the same - very hard to explain rationally.

If you experience it then it is maya because it start and end in your experience.

There is world beyond science and empirical knowledge. Not everything is or has to be rational and objective.

Are there any books about your theory or is it based on intuition and inside?

What kinda game?

@OntologicalOdyssey I answered you and the comment was erased. Another comment I made on this thread has also been erased. The comment was about an Infinite Universe being both conscious and not conscious at the same time and the choice being yours to make. Odd thing for UA-cam to censor

Thank you ❤️

I guess there could be something after eternal and total consciousness which is beyond what we can perceive or imagine.

@@toomanydonuts ALL is Mind. Everything is mental. In which Mind we move and breathe and have our being. All is in THE ALL and THE ALL in all. To those who truly understand this truth hath come great knowledge.

@@markscerbo3029 Those who think they know the Truth often use archaic language as well. "Hath", ROFL.

@thebaryonacousticoscillati5679 "All is in THE ALL and THE ALL in all" is the most basic Universal truth in existence. How is this in dispute? My use of the word "hath" is quite relevant. So glad you picked up on something so important that negates us being in God and God being in us. We can now all be nihilists without any nagging doubts. Thank you for your great service to humanity.

❤️🙏

Definitely, the physical laws of nature have to come after creation was initiated by something or someone.

Well said ❤️

I guess that’s why a lot of cosmologies start with the word. Also words are vibrations - so I think you are onto something!

People always assume if we live in a simulation then it would be a digital one because that is how we would do it. But that doesn’t mean that it is the only way to create advanced technology (such as a massive simulation) - maybe „they“ use consciousness as their tools.

Escape is achieved via my channel art. Magnetically suspended rainbow bridge between brain hemispheres to the higher dimensions and eternities of life....

I wonder about those things all the time and I wonder even more why nobody else seems to wonder and is only concerned with trivial things.

@OntologicalOdyssey That's a good question. There's a few things going on with that imo. From a young age we're taught that pretty much everything is already figured out. People lose that sense of curiosity. Also, the ego likes to "know." Living in the unknown is a place of vulnerability in some ways. It is super interesting how 90% of people will never once question where the hell they are while I question it almost daily. Haha

I was once asked how often I think about death. People didn’t believe me when I said “everyday”. I realized over the years, nobody really knows anything for sure. If anyone knows, it is probably the mystic rather than the scientist, with their changing opinions and opposing ideas about everything.

Alpha is finished ❤️

There is probably also a reason why it exists (so that we can handle our life as embodied beings with finite senses). But it is also good to know that there is something beyond the illusion of our limited perception. I think forcefully removing maya (for example kundalini experiment seems to be such a thing) can be quite dangerous, I think. A middle path is probably the best: where one accepts that the universe created maya for a reason (or maya is an aspect of the universe) and where one tries to be aware that there is more than we perceive.

@@Trapster The name Hari is also Maya. In fact, one of the Divine 1008 names of Lord Vishnu in the Vishnu Sahasranamam is Maya.

Vishnu itself ’मायावी’ Mayavi

You don't get rid of maya, you just see it for what it is.

@@michaelwilmshurst3663 Rorri Maesu says useaMirroR Lord Yama is little more than a reflection of doubt. Say Yama, in reverse and Listen close. Am i?

Beautiful ❤️

Truth is One. Unity, a minimum of two.

@@markscerbo3029 Unity only requires two if still within the realms of Maya. Rorri Maesu says useaMirroR Say Maha in reverse to reveal that Great Aham TaT

@@NakedSageAstrology Love is the One which transcends the dual nature of human perception. Is it not written, "THE ALL is LOVE"? Herein speaks the Unification of the Alpha and Omega, the True reconciliation of all paradox. The Key of Creation. The Law of One The Eighth and Supreme Principle - The Mark of the Els

@@NakedSageAstrology There is but One God, and their name is LOVE

A reflection of ayaM. Rorri Maesu says useaMirroR

It’s partially shielding you from „true reality“. If our senses would perceive everything as it is, we would probably go crazy. I think that is what sometimes happens when someone awakens their Kundalini.

​@@OntologicalOdyssey Well, it could also be a practical matter. In discussions about Dr. Donald Hoffman's "Interface Theory of Perception," he has compared it to a higher-level interface, such as an operating system's user interface. Typing this message would be very difficult if I had to manually manipulate the hardware components of my computer. Similarly, life as a human might be really difficult if we could perceive the entire spectrum of light and hear the entire spectrum of sound. The background knowledge required to even partially understand what is going on can take a very long time to acquire.

@@crypticnomad I think in Asperger and Autism one can see what happens if the filters are different.

@@OntologicalOdyssey I think it is The Yellow Brick road.

Thanks a lot ❤️

We have a video about synchronicity as well, if that’s what you are implying.

I am sorry you feel like this. The channel is dedicated to explore parallels between scientific and spiritual concepts and to ask “what-if” questions.

@@OntologicalOdyssey Don't feel too bad that guys just wrapped up in MAYA OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. I thought it was a decent video didn't go into depth but scratched the surface. either way you make a good video and you are a good narrator.

Much Ado About No-Thing That's what Maya is friend. It's a reflection of You. Say Maya in reverse to reveal that ayaM.

To imply this video says "nothing" means one didn't obtain any useful semantic information or meaning from it. Perhaps the content is truly just random nonsense, in which case it is unlikely anyone would derive much semantic information from it. On the other hand, it might contain deep and immensely useful information that someone is either unable or unwilling to see. For example, reading all of Einstein's papers to my roommate's cat would likely mean little to it. I view "epistemic humility" as a virtue; there is no point in anyone's life where they can truly say, "Today I know everything." This framing might not always be practically useful, but it is one way of understanding things among almost certainly infinite ways. Different framings may be more or less useful depending on the context.

@@omtheta1821 thank you

I think electromagnetism has a huge influence on the development of biological organisms. If the fields shift it probably has an effect on all forms of life.

@@OntologicalOdyssey with so much to consider perhaps we should take it slow. Electromagnetism has been my trade fourty years and running

How do you know that was Aether that you saw?

Are the different types of yantras for different things to see?

Try it. I beg you to. But to answer your question I really don't know. I'm assuming because it is because of numerous descriptions I've read. It surrounds me in every direction. It has an undulating movement. It is nearly transparent with a light blue shimmer. I've tried many times to interact or coax it but it never reacts to me. I've tried chanting, crystals, electromagnetism , single pointed concentration, and other spiritual practices but nothing. At first I was introduced to it with the help of entheogens and the yantra but now I can witness it unaided.

@@OntologicalOdyssey I've worked with the shree yantra in the protocol I mentioned above about 7 times. Each and every time I come to see it, the aether/the shimmer. But what is beautiful to me is ayahuasca brought me the same result. For the summer of 2022 I worked for an ayahuasca church. We journeyed every weekend. I'd say at least 4 times I saw the aether, but without the yantra. The same undulating shimmering sea of energy. Referring back to your question, only once did I work with another drawing. It was a Tibetan mandala. I did not give it much time or effort with that one but I'd venture to say yes different yantras different outcome.

I hope my comment reaches the many. Especially psychonauts who have a science background. You don't need to take a large dose. The yantra does the work. Each and every time once I take my gaze off the poster, I am able to see it. I first got in to it because for a while I was researching terms like resonance and frequency. I used to practice mantra but wasn't getting any where with that. Then one day it occurred to me there is frequency in still photos, the yantras. The frequency of sacred geometry. Specifically the equilateral triangle. But more so that yantra has phi built in too. I hope some one tries it. Remember you don't need a large dose. ty

Thank you ❤️

I agree, I actually think people will not even realize when they die. In a similar way that one usually doesn’t know that one is dreaming.

Thank you very much for the feedback ❤️

I agree, we just published a video about the logos :)

Indeed.. *sigh*. The mind that suffers from materialism/physicalism is a mind that suffers from narcissism (that which Dr. Iain McGilchrist refers to as left-brain dominant thinking).

Say that in a dumb way for people like me who feel this situation happening but don’t understand how to describe it. Plz.

@@ordinarypete The works of Dr. Iain McGilchrist upon "the psychological roots of the modern metacrisis" may be helpful for thee..

Interesting! I always tell people that there is a reason why you have two brains and that it is one’s task to think with both at the same time. For example, a photo of your child is a symbol of love AND color particles on piece of paper. Things are physical and metaphysical or rational and irrational at the same time.

Thank you, that means a lot ❤️

If you want accurate information you should read scientific papers in academic journals. Here, on this channel, we are more interested in exploring ideas. For example, putting two concepts, like morphogenetic fields and the ancient idea of the astral plane, next to each other in order to see which parallels might exist. This videos is not a proof it is an open ended speculative hypothesis.

​@@OntologicalOdyssey this person was questioning the specific statement made at 1:13 not the premise of the video. As far as I can tell Sheldrake would agree with what you said, but that's beside the point. You should never, EVER qualify your claims by saying that you aren't holding yourself to standards of accuracy. If you can't be accurate and also explore ideas, then you need to find another shtick, because you clearly aren't cut out for doing anything that anyone should be taking seriously. You need to have the spine to make dam sure that you can back up what you are saying before you say it. Deferring to academic journals as though they are more accountable than you is a laughably bad look.

Same, very curious what will happen

@@OntologicalOdyssey no I was being sarcastic. I wouldn't want to be reincarnated back into cruelty and traumatizing death world. How do you think we'll be endlessly reincarnated after the sun explodes and kills everything? Maybe if the universe is also endlessly cyclical or infinite. Possible I guess. Only kinda after life I want is heaven. Probably doesn't exist though. 😔 I don't see what the point would be of being infinitely created and destroyed. You aren't really learning anything by turning into a million chickens that get eaten and then a child molester or something lol

@ericgraham8975 I guess what you describe is samsara, the Buddhist concept of endless rebirth and suffering. I have read in some books that some monks are actually “disgusted by life”. If you subscribe to this idea then the only way out is the right hand path and enlightenment (nirvana). And about the cyclical nature of the universe: according to theosophy and Hinduism even existence appears and disappears (parlaya and manvantara) regularly. Also, there are many suns in the existing universe and according to some traditions many more life forms than human life. Ps: devachan is a form of heaven before rebirth - so you maybe get some heaven before the next round.

@@OntologicalOdyssey yeah I'm pretty disgusted lol probably other forms of life out there

Thanks for your comment and the material proposed for further research! I hope that this is useful for future watchers of the video!

Thanks for your kind words! Please share the channel if you want to support our growth :)

Thank you for your comment :)