Відео

it works with any 100bpm song

That’s the joke! Hence it being in a comedy.

what is the name of the song?

​@@Clonasepukkkk How Deep Is Your Love

Sounds like me

Only 100lb ?

@@zodrob7 yes, just a bit more than your body weight, little buddy.

Fire engines just use insane amount of fuel; it’s measured in gallons per mile, not miles per gallon (or liters per kilometer, not kilometers per liter). Fire engines are high-maintenance and a piece of equipment that breaks down “on the beat“ won’t be able to respond to a fire somewhere else. All solutions are simple apart from reality.

@@denvan3143 Not true really, new appliances use minimal fuel and aren't high maintenance!

@@lincolntrains2639 i’ve never before heard a fire engine referred to as “an appliance“. I worked at a technical publication firm where our three main products were documentation, custom software for business/industry and Logistics Support Analysis. (LSA). at the heart of LSA Is that you can have a large fleet of something (trucks, copy machines, whatever) with certain reliability/service life attributes or for the same cost a smaller fleet with superior reliability/service qualities. So when you say new appliances are less energy intensive and lower maintenance that entails higher levels of engineering precision and manufacturing, which results in higher production/retail costs and energy consumption - a bigger carbon footprint. So what specific “appliances“ are you talking about?

@@denvan3143 The umbrella term for fire fighting vehicles is appliances (At least in the UK) This is because a 'fire engine' is not one vehicle, it is a range of different vehicles with different equipment and capabilities. Now when he says that 'fire engines' drink fuel it is completely incorrect, most are based off of a commercial vehicle chassis which is designed by the manufacturer to be as efficient as possible as these vehicles are used to make money so less running costs the better. Also not once did I talk about how 'energy intensive' they are or how much carbon footprint their manufacturing has.

@@lincolntrains2639 Ah, A different idiom, I see, as the British use the word “cute“ whereas in the US we tend to use the term “gear“ to describe the same thing. But I do recall now that airline pilots refer to their aircraft as “appliances“. In the US a firetruck or similar vehicles would more often be referred to as “equipment“ then as “appliances”. The exact phrase was “minimal fuel and not high maintenance“. Energy intensive this more inclusive, as it applies to vehicles powered by petroleum, hydrogen or electricity. And the prospect of vehicles being economical to make more money again is considered in terms of logistics: A lot of less reliable energy consuming vehicles/machines or a smaller Number that are more reliable and energy efficient; these are all budgetary considerations for companies/corporations regarding profitability.

The police are there to make sure the firemen don't go back to watching box sets

@@justvin7214 Or looking for anything laying around they could nick!! ( I,ve seen it!)

Police keep spectators out of the way who could interfere with the firefighters, cars away from danger and protect the firemen from being struck bypassing vehicles. Additionally, if an arsonist is encountered at the fire it’s the responsibility of the police, not fire fighters to deal with it.

@@denvan3143 Oh, you've taken it seriously, have you? There had to be one...

@@SaxonSuccess you might not embarrass yourself in this fashion if you were to develop a writing style; particularly one that included a sense of comedy and/or sense of humor. But don’t feel bad; in lieu of such attributes I’m sure you have many fine qualities.

I’m guessing you’re not Scottish and dinae get it?

@@stevecummings2703 I'm from Perth, I've seen all of Line of Duty and a few episodes of Taggart, including the one that Alex Norton plays a murderer in. So I think I got it.

Simon ah well, it’s not for everyone.

@@cherrynado That'd make absolutely no sense

@@Kinobambino I think that was a reference to The Office.

@@snakeeyes2551 I can't even see what @piepot wrote