Відео

*No that's not the fruit Jesus talks about in John 15*

Thanks

2nd time watching! Great information here. I would add this thought...the Holy Spirit works outside believers until immersion into Christ where He then works from within believers and seals them for entrance into the Kingdom...the promise is offered to all. (I'm both a former Roman Catholic and Calvinist protestant.)

I think it is important to start with what isn't considered bearing fruit. Jesus isn't talking about material possessions and physical wealth, but rather fruits of the spirit. How we approach people (with kindness, mercy, long suffering, patience and love) and helping others come to repentance and faith in Christ

I finished viewing the remainder of your study on the history of baptism. Well done. I want to point out another significant way in which New Testament baptism differs from the Jewish ceremonial cleansings. The Old Testament washings were typically self-administered, whereas New Testament baptisms are always described in the passive voice, indicating they are performed by someone else on the convert. This makes New Testament baptism an act of submission. Not a work performed by the individual, but something done to them. When a person dies physically and their friends take their body to bury it, no one can call it a work of the one being buried. This is the true type, or picture, of the one who is baptized. Paul says that before baptism you were spiritually dead in your sins (Colossians 2:11-14). It is no more rational to call baptism a work of the person being baptized than it is to call a burial the work of the person being buried. A dead man cannot bury himself. Scripture commands believers to be baptized, not to baptize themselves. By submitting to baptism, the individual entrusts themselves to the one administering the baptism. He is buried as dead in sin, to be raised up alive in Christ. Keep up the good work.

I know you said it, but it went by so quickly that many may miss it. We are baptized into Christ. The only concept or action in the New Testament associated with the phrase into Christ is baptism. Do you not know that all of us who have been BAPTIZED INTO CHRIST Jesus were baptized into his death? -Romans 6:3 For as many of you as were BAPTIZED INTO CHRIST have put on Christ. -Galatians 3:27 Ephesians 2:12-13 states that anyone outside of [separated from] Christ has no hope. A non-baptized Christian is a contradiction in terms. If you are not in Christ, you are not a Christian. Thanks for your study.

Thank you greatly for this video🙏🏽, I believe the Lord has put on my heart, to prayer walk but one of my mentors said that this may be me be zealous and that I will open myself up to warfare. In my mind, everything we do to fight for God kingdom is going to include dealing with warfare, If you have any thoughts on this, please let me know

What do you believe?

Thank you for this

It didn't

If you look into Zwingli, he writes that he had a vision/dream of the true meaning of the Lords supper, and that an angel appeared to him and gave him that new revelation, and that ultimately changed his mind on the lords supper. Interesting that it took 1,500 years to finally get that revelation, but not many in the American western evangelical church know about any of this, or that there even is an opposing view of the Lords supper and baptism.

All modes were accepted... and infant baptism was the standard practice

Matthew 16.18 ends the idea of any restoration movement... All orthodoxy holds to baptism for the remission of sins...

As many of you that has been baptized into Christ have put on Christ .Galatians 3:27

Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you. (Romans 16:16, ESV)

Campbell and Limpscom were the servants of Satan

Plz safe for bangladeshi student😢

Tertullian didn’t reject infant baptism. He preferred that infants not be baptized due to a belief that eventually turned into outright heresy by the Novations. Its was an issue concerning Hebrews 6:4-6. Once this matter was cleared up by the Church, then infant baptism was no longer an issue.

This was a very well presented, fair minded, and unbiased presentation of those views. I appreciate your work.

Yes, the teaching that baptism is not essential to and not a part of the salvation process is only as old as the 16th century in Christendom. Obscure groups, such as the Cainite Gnostics, mentioned by Tertullian in his treatise, "On Baptism," were the exceptions.

The only baptism we have to understand today, is the baptism in water in Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins, Acts 2:38, Acts 16:33, Acts 22:16

People make the mistake of thinking that Campbell’s teachings regarding New Testament worship were peculiar to Campbell. The fact is (and there is solid, undeniable evidence) that before Campbell ever came to America, there were Christians in America teaching and observing the same thing. They even called themselves the church of Christ. The evidence is in a book written by a man named Robert Semple called “History of the Rise and Progress of Baptists in Virginia.” The churches of Christ in Virginia and their beliefs were mentioned in the book. The book was written many years before Alexander Campbell ever came to America. There are copies of it still in existence, and it has been reprinted in recent years. It proves that what many call “Campbellism” didn’t start with Campbell at all. Not only that, but Christians believing and practicing what Campbell later taught about salvation and worship also existed throughout the history of Europe, and their existence was documented by the Catholic Church who opposed them and persecuted them heavily. There is a well-researched book called “Traces of the Kingdom” that was written by an English brother named Keith Sisman. It shows the evidence for the church, patterned after the New Testament example of the first century Christians, existing throughout Europe, long before the Protestant reformation. We are not something that evolved out of Campbell’s previous Protestant traditions as your video suggested, but something that preceded it and started on Pentecost when the apostle Peter (inspired by the Spirit of God) preached the first gospel sermon, documented in Acts 2. The church of Christ (being “of Christ” because it abides in the doctrine of Christ - 2 John 9) has existed ever since. It is not a denomination. It precedes even the concept of denominationalism.

Dont the Cambellites (Church of Christ) believe that you will burn in hell if you worship god with musical instruments?

The late Dr. Jack Cottrell discovered Zwingli as the originator of disconnecting baptism from salvation while he doing his doctoral dissertation at Princeton in the late 60's. He published a book before his death called "Baptism : Zwingli or the Bible" which included his dissertation and thoughts on Zwingli. Cottrell published numerous books and articles on this subject over his lifetime.

Thanks for God’s wisdom you have shared.God bless you

"Now on the last day, the great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, 'If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, as the Scripture said, "From his innermost being will flow rivers of living water." ' But this He spoke of the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were to receive; for the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified" (John 7:37-39). Baptized in water, Jesus was anointed, receiving the Holy Spirit. Precisely the same pertains to us in baptism (and additionally, the baptismal entrance into the New Covenant brings the cleansing from sins).

Action that comes from a changed heart🙌🏽

Stone Campbell movement is another man made heresy. One true church of Christ is the Catholic Church

♥️✝️♥️

I love the core mission and needed this reminder. Thx!

who of the Early church fathers were discipled by the Apostles?

love it!

Thank you so much

Yes. The church is a family. ✝✝✋🏽✋🏽

Background scenery 👍

Wow the chills and hair on my neck standing up. Running. Who talks like this. Golly

Also, ultimately God is behind the movements; not the leaders that are inspirational.

I thought of the jesus movement in the 70's.

Are you have material available to start a Bible Discovery group. I am from Africa

A person must be baptized to be saved, but it has nothing to do with water. The proof is found below. Eating Kosher is not unbiblical, but it is not required under the New Covenant. Circumcision of male children is not unbiblical, but it is not required under the New Covenant. Trimming your beard according to the Law of Moses is not unbiblical, but it is not required under the New Covenant. Water baptisms were a part of the Old Covenant, but they are not required under the New Covenant. The proof is found below. John baptized with water. Jesus baptizes with the Holy Spirit. Which one is related to salvation, based on Romans 8:9? . Heb. 9:10 (YLT) only in victuals, and drinks, and different baptisms, and fleshly ordinances-till the time of reformation imposed upon them . (Old Covenant ------> New Covenant) . Eph 4:1 I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, Eph 4:2 With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love; Eph 4:3 Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. Eph 4:4 There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; Eph 4:5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism, (What is the one baptism of our faith here, based on Eph. 1:12-13, and 1 Cor. 12:13?) . Eph 1:12 That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ. Eph 1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, . 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Co 1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. . Rom 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. . Act 11:15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. . Act 1:5 For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Mar 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. Mar 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (See Mark 1:8.)

Eph 4.5 One Lord ,One faith and one BAPTISM..( this is spiritual) .this means water baptism is not part of a Christians calling today .

I don't have to delve into what these fellows believed. I need to delve into the scriptures to become informed by God. The function of Baptism was made simple to believe but was continually fleshed out beyond John's (the Baptizer) call to be baptized and Peter's call to be Baptized more specifically in the Name of Jesus Christ. They were both upon repentance for the remission of sins. Mark 1:4 can dispel the notion that the Greek word 'eis' in Acts 2:38 means because of. Furthermore, denying Baptism's role in salvation is not so much a disbelief as it is having fallen prey to a deception. The foundation of Baptism's function is based on what the scriptures say about it. If you base your baptism on something not in scripture then it really isn't obedience and it really isn't a baptism. It MUST be in scripture for it to be a legitimate matter of faith. For instance an outward sign of what has already occurred in the heart. That's not in scripture anywhere. Baptism is an instruction that is to be obeyed motivated by faith. If you are doing it for your outward show you are missing the biblical reason for doing it. Much the same as when Jesus says do your praying in secret and when God hears your prayer in secret he will answer it openly. 1 Peter 3 does not say that baptism represents anything. It says that our baptism saves us much the same as Noah and his family were saved by water. Later passages tell us what Baptism represents like Romans chapter 6. In Romans 6 we see no such relegation of baptism to denominationalism's disfunctional understanding. No Baptism serves as a grave for the man of sin in us that by faith we recon to be dead. We direct this profession toward God... God is the audience. And God seeing us acting in faith by that faith he changes his mind about us and adopts us into his family and grants us the seal of the indwelling spirit. In baptism, it is God who is doing the work. We are making an appeal to him by faith and he is granting that request.

It's so crazy learning about these latter-day (1800s) debates, pretty much the same as the old "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin" arguments from Medieval times. Like, why should anyone care what a Bronze Age text says in the first place? It's just "chasing after wind". I guess one positive effect, if one can call it that, is that the infighting between Christians does tend to keep them off the streets.

This is too good, bless you

i did one, i prayed, LUKE 14:26 lite up the night, from then on I hated everybody, lol. Take the test, do it now😊

@blizzardjm, Maybe listen to the message before judging the messenger 😮

It’s not Jesus’es. Just Jesus’. Sounds the same as Jesus

Wasn't that Authority called the Melchizedek priesthood?

Great encouragement! What is my role in evangelism if not to draw others to Christ?

This is great advice Joey. We have to encourage others to read and learn about God’s teachings.