Відео

Really great to see these extraordinary minds together!

Being a Norwegian interested in science, I highly appreciated the laureate’s candid thoughts on their experiences when entering a field of research that was not mainstream ‘’correct’’.

Awesome. Pure.❤

I thought the thing that happened right before this was gonna be posted too, when the scientists talked about their lives and we (the visiting students) got to ask questions, is that coming later?

When we know that quantum tunnelling is possible on a smaller scale, can we mix quantum theory with general relativity theory?

Suuuuper well deserved. Well done Dr Tsao!

Tell us all about In Vivo Therapeutics and how you worked with that crook, Frank Reynolds, who lied about being paralyzed and used company money for personal use. And then you did a promotional video for him for another sham company (PixarBio) for which Reynolds was sentenced to 7 years in prison for securities fraud. How am going to get my money back??? I called the SEC and the Massachusettes Securities Commission--let's see what they say

When happened it?

Thank you very much!

I love You Nancy ❤🎉Most Congratulations 🎊

Congrats Chad!

Congratulations Sara!

Lisa Randall is awesome! Her brain is like a gas turbine at 80000 rpm while mine is an atmospheric steam engine ))

How are protons separated to use in any collider?

She’s amazing 🥹❤️

35:03 totally mind blowing. sounds like home. thanks much ❤

Proprioception when you don’t have it you know it you may not know what to call it but you know somethings not quite right… incredibly disabling

The earth is flat locally the same as the speed of light is constant locally. Over large distances the earth is not flat and the speed of light is not constant. Light only slows down where and when it encounters the gravity of a galaxy which slows down time and shortens distance.

A proton is a collection of 1836 expanding electrons and add a bouncing expanding electron makes a hydrogen atom. “G” calculated from first principles- the hydrogen atom- in 2002. The expanding electrons and atoms do it all. No energy, charge, photons, waves, spin, fields, potential, quantum, quarks, space time, space-time, etc. All Standard Theory/Model was replaced by Expansion Theory in 2002.

And yet the CAUSE of gravity is not on her radar. Discovered/ published in 2002: “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy , Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

Very beautiful voice

Mine blown

What a well filmed lecture. Lisa is fantastic as usual.

Brenda Milner was 96 years old here in 2014. She’s still alive and quite sharp at 105 today (Dec 2023)

❤🎉ALL THE BEST IN 2024 TOO...

Conservation of Spatial Curvature: Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .-------------------------------

What a dry audience

You will Be Mine❤🎉😅

Wonderful work, wonderful talk. Now we are ready to optimize our manipulation of single atoms and take advantage of the room at the bottom, as Richard Feynman said

Congratulations to ALL these People , following their Passion with their Abilities to Work thru Our Amazing World 🌎 ❤️ 🎉

1st!, do I get an Award..(?) 🏆 😅❤🎉

J'ai rien compris

The Raman Randall "fifth" or Randall Ramen, either way a Swedish Prize in settling hierarchy should the LHC verify their theory.

You are my role model on the path of neuroscience

You are truly an inspiration Dr. Milner!!!!!!!!!

It boggles my mind that such a momentous piece of research only attracted 91 views so far. Eve Marder's contributions to the understanding of neuron homeostasis are some of the most foundational pillars of future neuroscience and possibly AI.

David Julius...amazing scientist.

i didnt know that a gaseous body can sustain waves. i thought seismology regarded solids or liquids. how do waves propegate thru a gas?

Beautiful & very intelligent Lisa is with fabulous personality as well

I keep watching your presentation and I am even more perplexed. Who cares about the energy or a mass of a proton? What does it even mean? What are you studying?

it's all great but I do not think normal people can associate anything of this with normal life.

Brilliant!

Ever seen,the best physics professor

Ever seen,the best physics professor

A pionerring LEGEND!!!!

That was lovely

@28:21 why is the half of the image mirrored? there is no way sunspot are symmetrically distributed

Can this be used for dementia patients?

A beatiful mind... fantastic

Geez... That was hard to get thru.