Відео

The CFRs require that flight crew be provided with and use supplemental oxygen after 30 minutes of exposure to cabin pressure altitudes between 12,500 and 14,000 feet and immediately on exposure to cabin pressure altitudes above 14,000 feet. Every occupant of the aircraft must be provided with supplemental oxygen at cabin pressure altitudes above 15,000 feet.

Unique paint lines

Music has ruined more videos than it ever helped.

Actually hypoxemia is defined as o2 sat of <92 percent in which organs start to deteriorate unless supplemental o2 is given, reference USMLE STEP 1 2020. 94 percent o2 sat is still good.

@@bryanadriano88 correct, kinda. The science is the same everywhere but protocols are not. The goal is to be proactive not reactive. And they shouldn’t wait for their sats to drop that low if they can start supplemental O2 at <94% as required by my states protocols (TN) and my previous states protocols (PA). The point is they don’t need to keep it at 100%. And doing so could give them a false sense of security. For instance if they get CO poisoning one of the best ways to self asses is by O2 sat. Unless they want to spend $1K to buy a C0-Oximeter which would show COHgb levels. If you’re short of breath and at 100% O2 with other common symptoms of CO poisoning such as headaches, nausea, irritability, no fever associated with symptoms, history of exposure to something like an exhaust leak, multiple patients with similar complaints. At that point they could turn up their O2 to as close to 100% O2 they could get while telling ATC of their possible exposure so they can have EMS waiting to bring them to the appropriate hospital or MEDEVAC if possible since I can call MEDEVAC for that due to transport times.

@@zachschaneberger for protocol's sake well said. It does get more complicated than that when you have people who have normal values at 94 or 93 percent, naturally lung funtion decreases with age post 30 years old, unless a smoker or with previous lung disease in which the decline is steeper, lets say a 45 year old person, known smoker with underlying lung disease, it would be normal for him to have an o2 sat of close to 92 or 93 percent, as you have stated people must o2 supplement at an o2sat of 94, that means o2 supplementation from the getco aka taking off upto landing the aircraft, as per protocol's sake.

How match

I also have a G model and planning an upgrade to glass. Can you share more info about your panel? What is your glass?

CIES Incorporated No sir. Used the factory ones.

is350 is not a grocery getter. Thats what the es350 is for. come on dude quarter mile low 13's aint a grocery getter. the car barley even has room for any groceries in the back seat lol.

T-roy Animal Guy yes the car that’s older, has a smaller engine beat a newer bigger engine car how sweet huh!

T-roy Animal Guy is350 has a gearing advantage. It’s got a short final drive ratio, and the other benefits the guy above me said.

306hp vs 333hp with less weight.. and pulled barely half a car let?... that sink in..😈

I've run against a few newer M3's in my '09 is350 F-Sport. Off the line I can keep up for a bit - overall the BMW is always a little faster, but they actually run together pretty nicely. With intake/exhaust/headers/dropped suspension, and carbon fiber wheels I'd guess I've shaved 50lb and have about 350hp. I think it's also geared lower than the BMW, so off the line with TC off, it's damn fast.

+modlife nice set up you have there good for you brotha ❤ Lexus :)

why do people roll? i never understood this. Deep stop then go is the only way to not only test the car but the driver. #stoprollingpusses

lol ISF was an M5 competitor

BMW are not made to be fast let's face it....101 fact about bmw ....if it's a even match bmw will mostly fail ....i know I own a m3 and a few e46 ....

mike: LOL@ISF being an M5 competitor. This is the older generation 333 HP M3. The ISF was a competitor to the E90 M3 that made 414 HP. Around the race track, M3 always won.

Mark Dorchester yeah sure ...thats why half the videos posted up on UA-cam ,the m5 lose .I'm a BMw fanatic but I'm sure you're not familiar with the ISF. They don't get the engine check light like how we do when we drive it hard.

I don't disagree with anything you said. Just said, ISF is an M3 competitor. BTW, I own a Lexus RCF carbon package in Molten Pearl.

2008 IS350 : 3,527 lb curb weight 2002 M3 Coupe: 3,415 lb curb weight 3527 - 3415 = 112 lb weight advantage for the M3. NOT 800 lbs, lol.

Where are you getting this information

I still think the Lexus is better than the m3 I like the engine reliability

Curb weights were obtained from the manufacturer websites.

Agreed on the reliability, I wouldn't personally own a BMW out of warranty.

+JAW TAPPER You do know that the m3 has launch control right? 0-60 in 3.6 sec

+Julian Lopez My bad I never knew that. I just hate to see that Lexus lose because I have one. Have you all seen " Hell cat vs. Hurricane"

JAW TAPPER I feel you bro. Lexus only gets sporty when get into the F sport. Lexus isnt a slow car by any means but a normal lexus just cant beat a sporty car.

That m3 doesn’t do near 3.9 seconds lol is350 will jump him off the line , if u don’t know what your talking about don’t talk lol

M3 will still win.

+chillinxxpaki69 yes its faster...

Isf has higher top speed than m3. Lexus lfa will destroy bmw m6 is every department meant. The only thing bmw has on lexus is it's SUV or SAV's however u fancy

chillinxxpaki69 you arent to bright....I can tell by the way you spell, type and talk about something completely different..Not going to waste my time going back and forth with you...

Lol if you can't accept the facts clearly I'm wasting my time here. Bye