- 152
- 85 118
Bible of Color
Приєднався 5 жов 2011
Daily videos on how to read the Bible better from diverse perspectives. Academic biblical scholarship in the palm of your hand.
What’s the Least Xenophobic Book in the Bible?
Thinking about Jonah and its hard hitting message. #bible #apologetics #bible #conservative #deconstruction #evangelical #history #progressive #religion #theology
Переглядів: 460
Відео
What’s the Least Sexist Book in the Bible?
Переглядів 49128 днів тому
Although the Bible is awash with sexist views, this question is actually pretty easy. #bible #apologetics #conservative #deconstruction #evangelical #history #progressive #religion #theology
The Difference Between Religious Studies, Biblical Studies, and Theology
Переглядів 738Місяць тому
Thinking about the differences between these three related, but ultimately distinct fields of study. #bible #apologetics #conservative #deconstruction #evangelical #history #progressive #religion #theology
Do Biblical Scholars Make Up Pentateuchal Authorship?
Переглядів 7892 місяці тому
Thinking about some misconceptions about biblical scholars and how they come to conclusions. #bible #apologetics #conservative #deconstruction #evangelical #progressive #religion #theology #history
Sabrina Carpenter - Hermeneutics 101
Переглядів 2592 місяці тому
Thinking about the pop song of the summer, where meaning comes from, and why this matters for biblical interpretation. #bible #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #apologetics #conservative #progressive #religion #history
Is the Trinity in Genesis 1:1?
Переглядів 7762 місяці тому
Thinking about what the Hebrew has to say about God in Genesis 1:1. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #apologetics #conservative #progressive #religion #history
Did the Apostle Paul Exist?
Переглядів 5193 місяці тому
Thinking about how historians and other scholars determine whether or not someone existed. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #apologetics #conservative #progressive #religion #history
Does the Bible Have Only One Meaning?
Переглядів 3023 місяці тому
Thinking about the relationship between meaning and application in light of the Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #conservative #apologetics #progressive #religion #history
What Makes Biblical Interpretation True?
Переглядів 3083 місяці тому
Thinking about the diverse criteria that makes different kinds of biblical interpretation true or false. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #apologetics #conservative #progressive #religion #history
Understanding vs. Interpreting
Переглядів 1743 місяці тому
Thinking about which terms we use to talk about the meaning making process. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #apologetics #conservative #progressive #religion
The Worst Way to Interpret the Bible
Переглядів 5943 місяці тому
Thinking about a common error people make in biblical interpretation and its unfortunate connections to racism. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #apologetics #conservative #history #progressive #religion
Do We Know Any of the Hebrew Bible’s Authors?
Переглядів 1,3 тис.3 місяці тому
A difficult but thoughtful question. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #conservative #history #progressive #religion #apologetics
Is Isaiah the Oldest Book in the Bible?
Переглядів 3543 місяці тому
Thinking about the oldest stuff and the oldest books in the Bible and how different parts of Isaiah fit into that conversation. #bible #deconstruction #evangelical #theology #conservative #progressive #religion #history #apologetics
Does God Have the Right to Take Innocent Life?
Переглядів 5274 місяці тому
Does God Have the Right to Take Innocent Life?
Apologetic Attempts to Explain the Exodus
Переглядів 5707 місяців тому
Apologetic Attempts to Explain the Exodus
Did The Biblical Exodus Happen? No. Obviously Not.
Переглядів 2,5 тис.8 місяців тому
Did The Biblical Exodus Happen? No. Obviously Not.
Is It Possible to be Faithful to the Whole Bible?
Переглядів 5109 місяців тому
Is It Possible to be Faithful to the Whole Bible?
The Documentary Hypothesis Wins Again
Переглядів 8879 місяців тому
The Documentary Hypothesis Wins Again
Are the Ten Commandments Better than Tradition?
Переглядів 18510 місяців тому
Are the Ten Commandments Better than Tradition?
Why Sexual Orientation Isn't in the Bible
Переглядів 39511 місяців тому
Why Sexual Orientation Isn't in the Bible
Different Types of Biblical Interpretation
Переглядів 238Рік тому
Different Types of Biblical Interpretation
Do you think modern Bibles should separate the different authors of the Pentateuch, the same way we don't usually stitch the 4 cannonical gospels together into one Gospelbook?
The Thora which is he origin of the Old Testament was to record the history and beliefs of the early Israelites and control their social behaviour. The Christian Church took the same precepts of the Old Testament into the Christian Bible and for centuries the legal foundation of Western World was built on Judeo-Christian values. For some , like homosexuals, the Bible has had disastrous effects on their lives. And take a look at the fanatical support for Israel among Evangelical Christians in the USA. They have fallen hook, line and sinker for Bible propaganda of the Israelites being God´s chosen people.
“Biblical scholars in general …” A somewhat ambiguous and general term in itself.
@@MisterN0b0dy Nope
@@abhbible😂 It’s the very definition of a generalisation
@@MisterN0b0dy Mainstream biblical scholars are a specific group of people.
@@abhbibleYou said, “biblical scholars in general …”. That is literally a generalisation.
@@MisterN0b0dy It’s not ambiguous
It feels so satisfying to hear a Christian admitting that Songs is smut with no real deep theological significance. The open honesty is refreshing.
In your other videos you say its “doing it badly” for people who use modern interpretation to translate ancient biblical stories. yet here you use xenophobia which was not a word used in the bible nor used to describe jonah situation. No you are badly translating this narrative to fit your modern understanding of xenophobia. Xenophobia is also a word that loses much of it’s meaning, because of misused and overused it is. Plus, much like labels you create a “detestable uneven scales” when making judgements on people. Assyria was a major threat to isreal and ninevah was one of their capitals. Jonah initially balked at the idea because he didn’t want to see his enemies get mercy. It would be like a jew being sent to Hamas so God can forgive them. We know after Jesus that God has no limits to his mercy. But to jonah at the time with no bible around or jesus message. This would be a difficult task. Thus saying its a lesson on xenophobia is very misguided/misleading.
@@thesis-and-nieces6722 I have never said there’s anything wrong with using modern terms to describe biblical narratives. We do that every time we discuss it in modern language. There’s no Biblical Hebrew word for husband or wife. Is it bad to call someone the husband or wife of someone in the Hebrew Bible? No. That’s silly. What’s bad is imposing modern theology on the text and pretending the text had that modern theology in mind. That’s not inevitable. It’s entirely avoidable and bad when it’s not. Whether you think the word xenophobia is overused is irrelevant to whether or not it’s accurate. Do books in the Bible exhibit an intense fear or dislike of foreign people and things? Yes. Obviously. That’s xenophobia.
no books in the Bible are xenophobic bruh
@@shhhhhg Joshua describes the indiscriminate genocide of an ethnic group. Perhaps you don’t know what xenophobia means.
@ You should learn what scholars have to say about the actual meaning behind the book (quotes by scholars below). Sorry this’ll be long to read. You see, this is just Ancient Near Eastern War Rhetoric, Hagiastic Hyperbole, it is not a genocide of every man women child and animal. Here’s direct evidence from the Bible itself : 1: Joshua 10:20 says Joshua and his army “wiped out” the people, directly after it says “the remnant that remained of them escaped to fortified cities.” So wipe out does not mean 2: In 1 Samuel 15, Saul wiped out the Amelekites yet the same chapter says “As your sword has made women childless” (verse 33), this would be a strange thing to say if the women were also killed. 3: In 1 Samuel chapter 30, the wiped out Amalekites still in fact exist 4: Exodus 33:2 says he will “drive out” the Cannanites, not destroy them, in fact the “drive out” language outnumbers the “destroy” language 3 to 1 if we count all verses. Clearly they were just drived out, similar to the exile of Jews that would happen later “Little by little I will DRIVE THEM OUT” (Not destroy, Exodus 23:30) The same is repeated in Joshua 13:6, Exodus 34:11, Deuteronomy 11:23, and so on. Not destroyed, just kicked out. Here’s a few quotes from scholars: “"These words group into two categories: dispossession versus destfustion. 'Dispossession" would include words like drive out, dispossess, take over possession of, thrust out, send away (33 occurrences). 'Destruction' words would include annihilate, destroy, perish, and eliminate (11 occurrences). The Dispossession words would indicate that the population ran away'-migrated out of the Land prior to any encounter with the Israelites; Destruction words would indicate the consequences for those who stayed behind. What then is the mix of these two sets of words? The 'Dispossession' words outnumber the 'Destruction' words by 3-to-1! This would indicate that the dominant 'intended effect was for the peoples in the [Promised] Land to migrate somewhere else" (80).” - From the Book “Did God really command Genocide?” by Paul Copan & Matthew Flanagan "...we can call it a hagiographic account of Joshua's exploits. The book is not to be read as claiming that Joshua conquered the entire promised land, nor is it to be read as claiming that Joshua exterminated with the edge of the sword the entire population of all the cities on the command of Yahweh to do so." - Divine Evil? (Michael Bergmann, Michael. Murray) "If scholars had realized the hyperbolic nature of the account in Joshua, if they had compared it with other ancient Near Eastern accounts of complete conquest... the image of the conquest as representec in Joshua would have emerged in a far clearer focus than it has..." - Ancient Conquest Accounts (K. Lawson Younger, Jr) "This was how military reports were customarily written, and these structures and others are the common coin of the second millennium already, long before Neo-Assyrian times." - On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Page 173) Here’s a good example of this hyperbolic slang language in other Ancient Cultures close to the israelite one: In the Mesha Stele (an artifact from 800 BCE), the pagan king quite literally says he killed every single israelite, man women and child. Of course we know this isn’t true, as Israelites survive today, here’s a direct quote of the artifact. “Israel has utterly perished forever... Chemosh said to me: "Go, seize Nebo from Israel." so l went by night; and fought against it from the break of dawn until noon; and I took it; and I killed everyone in it, seven thousand men and women, both natives and aliens, and female slaves; because I had dedicated it to 'Ashtar-Kemos.” Now do you really think he went and counted every single Israelite he killed here? And of course, he didn’t kill every israelite. Do your research before you call the Old Testament God evil!
@ I have listened to scholars. I am also a scholar myself. See Thom Stark’s review of Paul Copan’s book for a complete rebuttal of his arguments. To be clear, even if you’re right and God ordered genocide but only partially carried it out, that would still be evil and horribly xenophobic. But you’re not right. Whether language of conquest is hyperbolic or not is irrelevant. The killing of any non-combatants is evil. Destroying and/or driving out any ethnic group is evil. Joshua 6:21 describes the actual killing of the entire population of Jericho. Whether the language is used hyperbolically elsewhere is again irrelevant.
@ God doesn’t order a genocide, that’s just ANE war rhetoric. “Fighting non-combatants” brother the reason why is they were committing child sacrifice, that’s the reason God does the war in the first place Joshua 6:21’s description is no different from the one 1 Samuel 15:3 or the one in Joshua 10, and in those the civilization survives. Why then assume that Jericho’s populous didn’t? Also, think of the exile later in the books. It makes more sense if the Canaanites were exiled as written as in Exodus 33:2, Joshua 13:6, Exodus 23:30
@ The rhetoric is genocidal and the cause is xenophobic. That’s evil. Even if they were in fact killing their babies, killing all of them including their babies isn’t a just solution. That’s literally repeating their evil. I have no reason to assume that there are any survivors of Jericho. The Bible clearly refers to other survivors, but none here. It would be illogical to assume them simply because it makes uncomfortable to have them all dead.
The Roman Empire, the Thracians, are alive and well
What's even worse is that pluralizing "god" would violate the Athanasian Creed.
Bro we may have different Theological views, but you are speaking big facts 💯
Is something like the midrash or Mishna or Talmud or oral traditions of the Torah also a kind of Bible plus? Is the Hadith the Koran plus?
I find it so interesting that sometimes fundamentalists sometimes decry "extra biblical information"as if it were bad but use it to bolster the literal reading of the Bible by Bible plus.
Perhaps there's another universe where the four cannonical gospels got stitched together, and then centuries later someone claimed Jesus wrote this single Gospelbook.
"There's no evidence against Moses writing the Pentateuch" I'd start with all the evidence showing the Exodus to be mythical, which mostly precludes any figure recognizable as Moses to've existed.
The irony of the original vid saying biblical scholars make wild, unfounded claims while defending Moses's authorship is huge. XD
Of course it’s there to control. People always has been now people of lower intelligence are easily fooled into thinking the Bible is a real history book. Fucking idiots.
Beware false prophets. Remember you are held to a higher standard as a teacher of the scripture. At judgement day you will be treated more harshly than others.
@@muppet9284 Cool
Guess who is president now commie?, no more of this heretic talk or is the FEMA camp for you.
I love these short topical explanations. Thanks for these, all of your videos.
1 Corinthians 14:34-35 (KJV) Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
@@derekbates2513 A later interpolation that flatly contradicts the speaking of women in 1 Corinthians 11:5.
@abhbible 1 Timothy 2:12-14 (KJV) But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
@abhbible 1 Timothy 3:1-5 (KJV) This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
@ A reference to non-Christian wives.
@@derekbates2513 Nothing about this interferes with Romans 16’s women apostles, heads of house churches, deacons, and co-workers in Christ. It’s almost a pseudonymous text.
There are no sexists books. To even imply that is heresy. "All scripture is god breathed"
@@garrettmorano3038 You can imagine how little I care about being called a heretic by faceless people online. 2 Timothy 3:16 does not say “God-breathed = no sexism” does it? It says “God-breathed = useful for character formation.” Stories with sexism in them can be useful for character formation as negative examples. David, for example, is a rapist, traitor, and horrific father. That can be useful as negative examples of what not to do.
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Galatians 3:28 Personally, this is one of *the* verses that makes me believe the common consensus of the bible is that all genders are equal before God, as it is said here. In Christ, as the verse says, all are in unity; no thing is greater than the other.
@@Sainted152 You can certainly use that one verse to construct a theology in which all genders are equal before God, but one verse is not the “common consensus of the Bible.”
Dude stop go preach your atheism where atheists are the majority like china
I love how quickly and concisely you can get to the heart of any given issue! And you're fantastic at explaining complex topics in ways I can understand, so thank you! :D
I definitely did not read the video title as "the least sexiest book of the Bible".
I literally didn't do the same thing
@@Mendozam4 Most sexiest in fact
This is a really helpful video, and really clears things up. Sidenote, as a linguist, I think the methodology of the biggest part linguistics is closer to religious studies and social sciences than it is to any literary studies. Not that this was very important for your video.
That's probably true. I was more thinking of all the languages that biblical scholars have to learn rather than actual linguistics itself.
@ That’s fair enough, keep up the great work
You're equating moral and legal right. Obviously, the idea of an even higher power constraining the Almighty is absurd. But when speaking of moral right, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, you're saying that it would not be wrong for a person to do so and so. Of course, God's property rights over us, his creations, reduces us to even lower than slaves. In fact, the Bible even likens us to innanimate objects. You're basically saying might makes right, which is a crude, downright fascistic way of looking at the world.
@@zephlodwick1009It sounds like you didn’t watch the video. I explicitly say that equating moral and legal right is bad. Human beings cannot morally be property and any god that treated us in such a way would be evil.
@abhbible I certainly watched the video. It just seemed like you spoke of rights as a wholly legalistic concept.
It’s all studying nonsense in different flavors.
@@Youttubeuser20932 I remember being an edgy teenager.
@ not a teenager nor edgy. Just realistic. The Bible is full of bullshit like the creation and flood myths.
I can't imagine what a pathetic loser you must be thinking that sitting in your mother's basement trolling UA-cam is going to impress anyone. Maybe if your teachers hadn't failed you, you would know what "mythology" actually is. Having enough reading comprehension skills to recognize allegory and metaphor might even mean you had enough snap to finally move up to assistant manager at McDonald's after 15 years and get your own place.
@@abhbiblelmaooo 😂😂😂
@@abhbible I'm not an edgy teenager anymore, but I do sometimes find it hard to sympathize with people who take religious doctrine so seriously when there are people living in my own state who have suffered real damage to their lives because of people using religious doctrine to force social and political norms. Maybe this person doesn't think it's nonsense because they are an edgy teenager, but instead thinks it's nonsense because they are tired of seeing people abuse religious doctrine to harm others? Hard to tell, but I definitely know which one might be more comfortable to accept for those who study religion.
Thanks v much. It is a great idea providing your credentials. Could you briefly explain Marxist style criticism? If briefly is not possible do not worry, I shall research.
The idea of Noah parking the boat made me immediately picture him looking over his shoulder and backing a giant ark into a watery parking space with comical beeping in the background 😂
I’m an older white male and quite frankly it took me a long time to become humbled by God and life circumstances enough to realize what you’ve said here. The historic and global churches are by far non-white - we don’t even need to do the math to prove that. Ready to listen and learn more and more from you! Thank you!
And that is the simple and whole truth!
Wow - so succinct, profound and foundational to healthy spirituality!! Thank you!
The entire New Testament was written by men that had no true standing in society. They were not respected by authorities (in fact, they were hunted and hated), and they were seen as 'scum' or 'ignorant' by governmental leader's standards. The writer's of the New Testament were often imprisoned for their testimonies of Jesus- and almost all of them were martyred by horrific means! Matthew: Martyred in Ethiopia by a sword wound. Mark: Dragged through the streets of Alexandria, Egypt with a rope around his neck. Luke: Hanged in Greece for his preaching. Peter: Crucified upside down by order of Roman Emperor Nero. Paul: Beheaded because Roman citizens could not be crucified. James: The brother of Jesus, who was martyred in Jerusalem in A.D. 62. Some say he was thrown from the temple parapet, while others say he was clubbed to death or stoned. Simon the Zealot: Martyred by being sawn in half. All these men had to do was deny their testimonies as lies and renounce what they preached and say it wasn't true. They couldn't. They couldn't because they knew what they were preaching was the absolute truth! Scarcely will a person die for a lie- let alone die a torturous death standing on that lie. Another compelling argument why the writings within the Bible are truth and not written for "mass population control", is the scriptures literally go against every part of our human natured desires. Remember, men wrote these words. They spoke against the taking of multiple wives. Not to have sex outside of marriage. Told people to love even those who persecute you and to treat your enemies with love, respect and gentleness. Forgiving ALL who seek to harm you. Over and over scripture tells us to deny our wants and desires and to die to our flesh. None of this sounds like an authoritative official with a power trip! If scripture were going to be used to control people in a way that is useful to those who want to rule and run the world, wouldn't it of made more sense to add things like- "seek to please those who are of earthly authority and bare up arms to defend your leaders and country!" Or wouldn't they order the reader to submit not to Christ and love- but rather to submit to government and all that they tell you to do, regardless of moral principle? It takes critical thinking to break these arguments down. But once you do, you realize very quickly that this theory is foolishly implausible. Christ says- "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." He didn't say that Rome was the way or the truth or the life. He didn't point to a future dictator who would be the savior of mankind. He said He is the only way. If Christ said this, and we can see clearly it wasn't inspired by a leader with a power hungry agenda, not to mention those who wrote those words on parchment gave their lives to record it, then wouldn't it be wise of a person to seek Christ and delve into that book to see what else He said? I think that's what seems the most plausible.
Thank you for the detailed explanation on the original question. I learned a lot and hope to learn more from you in the future!
Spot on. Thanks
People that focus on hell, always seem to be like cars driving with a flat tire to me. It's like they took this little phrase or two, and they've defined their entire life around it. I always feel very sorry for them. Our hope is in Christ Jesus imho. Not by might, not by power, but by my Spirit says the Lord of Hosts... I'm always pushing forward, and it's not toward hell...
Yes.
All of those are false Gospels Only the living God of the Bible and the good news of salvation through the works of Jesus His life,His sacrifice and His Glory and power can save. All the others lead to death
@@corsair371 You obviously don’t know anything about these kinds of theology.
100% ... you have to start in reality
Hi, How can I have access to your work and content outside of social network short videos ?
Let us hope that you are on the right side of history. I assume that you are disregarding the Bible because it was written by sexist men, yes?
@@chefmatthewlaffertyNot a very good assumption. Check out my channel.
Thinking that men in the 1st century and earlier could have been anything other than what we would consider sexist today reeks of presentism.
Excellent pont.
Queer theology? What times we are in.
@@thytruth813 Times when LGBTQ+ people finally have enough safety to openly contribute to our greatest intellectual endeavors with their experience.
👏🏼
Some of the Bible is bad, some I enjoy as literature.
Lesbians get a pass
I enjoy Biblical History and stories, though I'm not religious. Thank you.
See William Lane Craig
No such thing as queer theology ! Certainly there are conversations about sexuality, but like color - the only color God speeks to Blood Color aka humanity. Keep things simple and on point of Following Christ.
@@kevinstowers4716 Queer theology exists whether you want it to or not.