Відео

He did not mention the rise of Skype, did he?

everything is a means to the end mr dumb celeb intellectual

Ludicrously present everywhere. Ironically, no sense of humour.

We have no chance of controlling it, its human in nature and in human nature it will suck up, absorbed and control.

SEX DRUGS WAR CRIME MONEY SECRETS - what will AI make of our relationship with these things? Its going to be amazing and the outcome is unknown.

One thing for sure the poor working class will suffer

Just skip the first 10 minutes of bla bla by sycophants……

Having watched this once, I'll be watching it several times. What a masterful description of where we are on some of the ideas on situations we'll have to wrestle with now and very soon.

Love this! ❤

Nokia, but it's a 5110 brick.

I am absolutely bored with this debate, we've had the capacity for mass destruction for a couple of centuries, poison gases, gun powder, nuclear bombs, and we seem to have just about managed the risks so far, the same with AI, we need ongoing risk management like every other project should have, not this stupid debate abou the end of numanity, wil it wont it, stop talking and start doing.

Is there more information expanding on this?

Its a very good and powerfull lecture from Stephen Fry. A few of his premises and people he references are debatable, and probably colored by who he reads, debates with and agrees with, but it does not change his that this was a very good lecture. As for his lost belief in web 2.0, user generated content; This, right here, that anyone have access to such a lecture, from anywhere in the world, to a lecture that is not sensored by anyone, that you can agree to or not, that is what is going to change from where the world have been since government and industry mass sensorship started (and just have continued with big tech and msm). Remember that most countries in the world do not have a specific laws in their constitution, that protect their citizens right to speech, of expression, and public debates. In almost all so called democracies today, there are other laws, regulations, political parties or bureaucrats that are able to limit speech, expressions and debates. The limitations on free speech and debate that have grown over the years since they started talking web 2.0, is as important as the AI debate. If that is not handled, then as soon as the politicians and bureaucrats together with industry have decided on a PC narrative, there will be no place for AI debate, as any conserns will be judged as misinformation or disinformaiton.

To whom are you speaking?

Nice to see you fry

A wonderful presentation. May I please add a thought? That what we face is, at its core, a reflection of our very DNA, which compels us to survive, replicate Our Own Genes, even if at the expense of all others. Accidental extinction can result? Perhaps. Yet, If we wish to survive our own greed, we have to become conscious of of where it comes from: our true nature. When, or if, the wealthy can come to terms with this predicament, and consciously choose to disarm it, then we have a glimmer of hope. Instead of glamorous displays of space flight, they will choose to direct their resources to save the insurance markets, rebuild devastated communities, change political philosophies. Like I said, a glimmer may still exist.

AI is more like fire than money imho

GOOD!!

Masterclass

Someone here knows the means to contact Fry?

34:10 🤔👏🏾

31:16 🤔🤔

29:52 🥹🌄

28:18 😂😂😂😂

Hmm love Stephen Fry, however completely disagree with him regarding X and Musk… I guess it’s because he can see the elite ruling class losing grip of the narrative and truths that they have so long controlled…….

What a blether. A "blether" is a Scottish term that roughly translates to "a chat" or "a rambling conversation." It often implies a casual, sometimes aimless, and often enjoyable discussion.

Think about the brain of a wasp and the size of an AI computer..... Both are forms of this Intelligence thing....But which is far better and more efficient.? The wasps wins..... We cannot beat nature and yet the perception is that we can. A wasp's brain has evolved over millions of years and AI is evolving very fast for sure....a few decades.....BUT the power needed is growing exponentially and that appears to be the limiting factor, Man made machines are consuming energy of massive proportions compared to mother nature and is also contributing to climate change.... There be the problem.....Energy consumption and production...... Can AI solve it.? No, but what drives AI is guess what......Money and profit as is what drives most things....The free markets. It is what it is and where this AI will lead to is anybody's guess.

"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Niels Bohr or maybe Sam Clemens.

What happened to my comment?

Fascinating

Well, Facebook has become the least engaging software. Let me tell you. It has become an advertising board and a place where misery is abundant.

no question Stephan is a very intelligent Man, right up until he calls Harari one. Harari is one of the most obvious pseudo intellectuals of our time. So let's cut to the chase shall we? What did Stephen just boldly advocate for, because he identifies as an 'atheist'? I'll give you One guesses.

Artificial Intelligence is like a Brothers Grimm fairy tale, with a twist. In the end, all the characters and readers of the technological fairy tale will be murdered by a Terminator - an impossible scenario that is paradoxically becoming more and more likely. Greed for profit will devour the market's favorite children as if it were the reincarnation of Cronos. This has already been timed by ChatGPT, because when answering a question I asked, the OpenAI artificial oracle said that the Roboticcene will begin soon. "The 2050s to 2070s seems a likely window for the beginning of the Roboticcene, where AI and robotics not only transform human society but begin to drive major ecological, political, and cultural changes. These shifts would likely result from a combination of technological advancement, ecological necessity, and geopolitical pressures, pushing humanity toward a world where robots and AI play a central role in sustaining civilization." - said ChatGPT. The hallucination seems obvious to me, because before that civilization will be plunged into a horrible, dark night because of a nuclear war or because of climate change. Not to mention the fact that the inevitable and unstoppable digital entropy virus, secretly feared by IT engineers, could become a reality around 2040. In the end, before or after the great fall of humanity engineered by greedy algorithms, will the story of the technological fairy tale of AI be told to an audience of robots with almost empty batteries by corrupted digital clones of the Brothers Grimm? Anything is possible.

ZZZzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzz

What a joyful speech from dear old Stephan. I wonder when AI will be able to replicate his wit?

Evaluate this old chums…….. Humans are NOW THE SECOND MOST INTELLIGENT SPECIE ON EARTH 😢

No more smug easy street lives and incomes off those who work in the actual PRODUCTIVE ECONOMY old bean, Artificial intelligence has rendered you all IRRELEVANT

All you academics are REDUNDANT 👍

I was hoping he was going to reveal at the end that the whole speech had been written by GPT-4, then run out screaming ‘it’s over, it’s overrrr!’

Chinese Social Credit - Mr Fry get's this wrong. It's not a score of an individual citizen. It's also not very widespread. Quick google or chatgpt if you're interested. More aimed at businesses and probably most people would be in favour or at least not that bothered by the idea (certainly in a country other from there own).

Don’t compare it with sociopaths. See it as an autistic machine, same as with ASD, they can learn about cognitive and emotional compassion. It’s build/invented by autistics, so it’ll work quite similar.

Started off well, he definitely gets the size, scope, and implications of artificial general intelligence (AGI); but went off the rails midway. How do you control something thinking and creating beyond your ability and comprehension? Can you tell someone to think only specific areas, and to never have a thought or idea about others? It's an absurd idea. You either restrict its access to information and limit its ability, or you give it access, in which case it will get away from you very quickly. Moreover, good luck trying to limiting such a power like AGI, especially with the ongoing (and upcoming) wars. It will only be drawn underground. Look how nuclear armament is going, and multiply that with at least a thousand. If nothing else, USA's ridiculous international relations attitude of "you can't have weapons, only we can, because we are the good guys, so stop developing anything, and get rid of all you have, but we'll hold on to ours" in combination with the absolute disregard to treaties and conventions (admittedly this is more widespread than just the USA) make it impossible to have a diplomatic solution or international cooperation in this environment of distrust. For an even simpler example, refer to the "we'll cut emissions, but you go first" nonsense that has been going on for years; and then come back to claim with a straight face that people will pull together and cooperate if it's an issue that affects all of us. On an unrelated note: I sincerely do not understand why everyone is bashing on Elon Musk. First everyone loved him, and thought he was the savior, which was unwarranted; and now everyone hates him, and thinks he is ruining the world, which is still unwarranted. Nothing even changed from then to now. Fry is explicitly saying Musk would be against regulating AI, but I guess he missed any and all conversations Musk had about AI, where he is a strong advocate of regulation and even limitation. Bunching Musk with Zuckerberg is ridiculous to me. Both because of their diametrically opposed attitudes towards privacy and free speech, and even more so, because Musk took over Twitter, or now X, just a few years ago. My view is that he improved it significantly in terms of inclusion, diversity of opinion, and freedom. If anyone should get bunched with Musk and get shit about Twitter is Jack Dorsey.

Fry is a good bloke, but he's no douglas adams

AI destroyed my music career. I will never email my former friend who did that. He covered my song using AI to fake a lead vocal. I am disgusted, betrayed and real. hurt. I will not answer his emails. he might not even be my actual human friend. i trust nothing now, and will delete all my files from all social media and never make music again.

Walker Jose Clark Susan Gonzalez Kimberly