Відео

I've done this repair twice and it's no fun!! I just did this modification today with the kit I bought from this company. Took about an hour to do. Only works if you can manually move the door lock. If it's jammed you can't use this fix. ua-cam.com/video/xWtIe_xU160/v-deo.html

These lenses are 11 years appart. For this reason only I find the 17-35/2.8D AFS ED-IF (what a name...) does very well, being 11 years older. Also, it offers the advantage of a wider aperture and an aperture ring (in my case as I still shoot film on mechanical Nikons). As it'd be expected, the newer is sharper, but by a bit only - and it has nano coating, 11 years of lens design evolution, is a darker lens (helps on sharpness) and VR which, on a 20 sec exposure with some wind makes a difference. It had to be sharper and I thought the difference would be greater! After seeing your review I'm pretty happy with my choice, the 17-35/2.8. It will get to my hands on a couple of days and I believe it'll be a nice addition to my photo kit. Seem all it needs is a stop close or two for great performance, which is usual on wide angles and most lenses in general. Thanks for the comparision!

Some of us are hard of hearing. Your volume is impossible for me. Sorry.

Oh byeah!

It I very sad these parts are so poorly made. I can understand wear and tear, but I had my caravan less then 2 years before having this problem. If I had known it was prone to this problem I never would have bought this make of car. Just an unnecessary expense no owner should have to do, at least not in 20 yrs or so. I have a 2012 and it seems every year has this problem Chrysler dropped the ball on generally a great car to drive. Thanks for the video.

I’m trying to do this now, and I’m having no luck with the lock button, only unlock. It’s on the left side, and according to the wiring diagram, the unlock is tan/orange, and the lock is tan/purple, which is how I hooked it up. You said the top and second pins were lock and unlock and the bottom pin was ground in the video, but the wiring doesn’t seem to match the pins when I look at the way they’re taped together. Anyway, I tried it in all combinations and nothing will work with the lock button. I even tried all combinations directly to the battery terminals, and only the top two pins got it to open or close, the fourth pin is irrelevant. I figured connecting positive from the battery to the bottom pin and negative to the second would get it to lock but it doesn’t seem to make a difference. I’ve messed with this on and off for a week and am lost so I guess I’m just hoping there’s something simple I’m missing

Hi. Big question. You might know the answer. Just got for free a 06 Town & Country. Some rust. 175k miles but lots of maintenance. My question is about sliding doors. Both actually. They open/close from key fob, from inside buttons or center control buttons but not from de door handle. At least not by themself. They do manually. Not sure what could be the problem. I googled and googled but still dont have an answer. Maybe they are not even supposed to do that! So please lmk in case you have an advice at least where to start. Thank you

Mine moves but it’s not opening the door. What am I doing wrong?

Were you able to lock and unlock it manually before you relocated the actuator? I ask because on my 2011 grand caravan I can not move the manual lever at all so I'm thinking my actuator is seized up, or does it start moving freely once the power is disconnected from it?

I agree , stupid location for the actuator. It's be cool if it was accessible via a quick access panel. The car companies don't do this because the high failure part costs 1200-2000 to fix a door with a 50 dollar part.

The wires are different colors on mine. I noted that they are the large diameter wires in that loom.

Thanks for the video! :) Interesting stuff

Good job! You for hire? I'm in Alabama and I need me a couple. Both side on my 08 are busted.

Thank you very much!!! Coma-shmoma 🙂. That sharpness 👍.

is it wide open both lens?

I get your frustration with the manual focus. But too bad you're comparing an out of focus capture to one that's in focus... Where is the base for the comparison then. Me personally I didn't have a lot of trouble focusing with fast lenses so it would've been nice to have a comparison between two images that are in focus....

I stop watching your review after you said 2:31 that you used auto focus on Sigma, ...Josh, really!?

Wow the audio sucks! I'm sorry about that again. Quick post/19 month follow-up: The Sigma 20mm 1.4 is awesome and I have not looked back since ditching the Samyang. The Sigma 20mm 1.4 is still my #1 for astro followed by the Sigma 14mm 1.8. I do still enjoy the images and wider field of view out of the 14-24mm Nikkor and the zoom comes in handy. My advice is to not get to wrapped up in reviews. Just get what you can afford and make the best of it. High ISO tech has come so far that you can push the sensor with cheap lenses and get great results.The old Tamron and Sigma 17-35's can be found for cheap and aren't bad if coma doesn't make you lose sleep...

1:08 Here he is describing which one is the Sigma

Thanks for digging into this, seems other reviews struggle to get past the coma and talk about things the Sigma actually does well. I decided to go with the Sigma to pair with my A7s, I figure as I'll mainly be looking to do shorter exposure time lapse and hyper lapse the overall sharpness, contrast and light gathering than moderate coma.

Also, not sure what you are seeing but Tony Northrup did a review on the sigma 20mm comparing it with the rokinon and criticized the sigma for coma. his photos showed worse coma with the sigma. The sigma is twice the price of the rokinon too. Dustin abbot also reviewed the sigma and was dissapointed with the coma performance.

Huh? Im totally baffled. At the very end of the video you say you passed on the sigma 14mm 1.8 prime lens because the nikon 14-24 zoom lens seems wider? The nikon is an f2.8 lol. Uh hmm...ok. So you opted for a zoom lens with nearly 2 full stops LESS light over a prime thats most certainly sharper (primes are usually like that vs zooms). Ok...good luck.

Couldn't tell which one was you. Moving to fast. I saw a guy laying down on the chairs and it kinda looked like you.

you say it is out of focus than you claim less of sharpnes, wtf?!

Tnx for the detailed side by side comparison

the sigma is on left?

Pretty.

I think thats unfair because Rokinon seems to be out of focus....

at 4:00 in the video, I think the Sigma has more astigmatism, not coma when it's a flat line like that. But I could be wrong.

Thank you for the intelligent commentary. Great in depth analysis.