Відео

Noice

Really good to see this ongoing dialogue. The Qnetic story is inspiring. It’s ‘revolutionary’!

Love this, can Vega be used for home energy storage as an alternative to batteries?

à 0:04 on reconnait un bon GMP ! IUT never die brother !

what kind of bearing do u use, is the flywheel in a vacoum and what kind of sealing do you use?

Old technology. What is the round trip storage efficiency, losses over time, machine cost per kWh, machine life. Can it compete with batteries?

Your website product page has a 2030 projection cost of $101/MWh. I think you mean $101/kWh.

4 hours of storage on a flywheel of that shape? I don't think so... Flywheel storage systems already exist, and they are used purely as a carry over for things like data centers to keep them running long enough to start a generator. You can't fool physics, this is a scam.

They should wear covid masks too.

So a bigass flywheel that needs extra careful manufacturing, is by definition extremely heavy so hard and expensive to ship, has a linear charge and discharge curvature making it hardly usable for practical energy storing compared to batteries. Yeah this sounds like a pump and dump project. Only situation where it would make sense is an isolated, small consumption household. But then it doesn’t since it needs to be shipped and installed making it prohibitively expensive. In which scenario does this make the slightest sense compared to batteries for household energy storage and water dam for large scale energy storage?

Congrats team…looks like a solid piece of quality engineering. Good luck with the next development process.

Beautiful stuff!!

You guys seem to have an amazing product, but no clue about marketing. First, you are going to HAVE to change that name. "Qnetic" has to be one of the worst names I have ever heard. It needs to be easily pronouncable, and even better if it's fun and bubbly to say. Words like "google" or even "bubbly" itself. Definitely don't try to start with a scientific idea "Kinetic" and morph that into something. Even something like "Massive Energy" would be better than "Qnetic" when you look at that it's not obvious how to even say it. Next, dear god hire some actors, you two are no on camera personalities. Main guy you were alright, but the outfits and fact you sat in chairs during presentation....you guys just need people who know what they are doing to handle the public face of this idea. You two are not it. UA-cam is the right idea, but you need cool visuals and youtubers who are passionate about this stuff to be contacted etc. Real life miniature demos with the side cutaway would be cool. A little info about your composite would be nice, I know it's proprietary but what IS it? Is it plastic? Metal? It looks weird in the render.

I question how this is better than nuclear power. Perhaps safer, but for the infrastructure layout the energy density and output of nuclear cannot be beat. This may have some application in remote locations, otherwise it is just a clever toy at this point

Would be fine products about 10 kWh to help with fluctuations, armonics in industries and general buildings

Awesome! 👍🏻

That's quite a low radius for what's possible with that volume of material. You should consider increasing tensile strength of the rotor material which in turn allows for an increase in radius.Velocity and Radius are squared terms in the energy equation, so I would consider optimizing for those to get the most energy density possible.

Useful info. Sadly all too brief. Need many more communications about how the product development is going. Keep up the good work Qnetic, the world is needing you!

How do you compare to the Torus Flywheel, Amber Kinetics or Beacon Power?

Creative Cooper…perhaps you are unaware that Qnetic rotor ‘pods’ are, for aesthetic and utility reasons, to be installed inground and are therefore totally protected from any unlikely function failure. Good luck with your future product development.

what is the risk of explosion though?

There is no kinetic energy in a moving mass there is force Mv squared kinetic energy is the energy of consistent work from a consistent force regards Graham Flowers MEng

The issue I have looking at these kinds of setups, is that a flywheel holds more energy the wider it is. A 300 pound flywheel that's over 60 ft in diameter, will hold far more energy than a 300 pound flywheel that's 60 inches in diameter. However, air friction is a real problem, making it harder to vacuum seal a 60 ft flywheel when compared to a 60 inch one.

What is unique for energy storage comparing to other flywheel techniques?we are working in energy storage market for several years. we are deploying different types of energy storage technology for our renewable power plants.

B.S.!!!!!!!! Global warming is a scam. Do not fall for any of it.

There is no energy crisis just a consumption crisis

I have a prototype idea for the renewable source of energy future name HYFES hydraulic flywheel energy storage

finally someone understands that this thing must be cheap. i would say even cheaper!

I wouldn't trust these wackos with my lunch money. There's nothing new about flywheel energy storage. There are very good reasons why they're not really being used. They are huge, heavy machines that must be very precisely balanced or the just won't work or worse wobble and explode. The can dump all thier energy at once if the bearing fails. Then the precisely balanced wheel is ruined.

So much of what you said about fossil fuels was wrong. There has been a slight temperature increase over the last 250 years. There has been no increase in severe weather events.

Oh I thought you were Qinetic at first. I hope you have a good legal team

Excellent how much in Aus dollar's when is it available

There is much better Technology....I do Working on Today.

And in the first few seconds claims a debatable issue as fact.

Join you how!!??? Love flywheels…!!!

How a small investor like 1000 us $ can invest with you, so you can make pool at world stage of like minded stakeholders. What about your financial model and it's certification body.

less than a minute into the video and an inaccurate statement. Wind and solar are not cheaper than coal or gas when all aspects of connecting them to and supplying a grid.There are other costs that are over and above than the so called 'Levelised cost' and the fact that there has to be an equal, reliable and immediately available alternative source of generation at all times. How accurate will the rest of the video be? While inertia is an essential part of generators feeding a grid, which renewables do not have, it's function is as a damper to keep frequency stable. Real frequency support comes from controlling the conventional generators fuel supply. Reserve power can have a place in this particularly where relatively large amounts of input is required which can be pumped hydro or chemical battery. Simple inertia as a source of energy storage can only have a limited duration before frequency falls too low. However good the bearings of an inertial system is, once power is removed it slows down, dependent on the friction and load applied to it. Essentially all the talk of transitioning away from fossil fuel generation is an illusion and will never happen by using renewable generation. It's practical and technical deficiencies make this unworkable.

I wish I had the cash to invest in you guys. Or get a job to help in anyway. I want to see homes and businesses have this. It would be huge!! How can I help living in the Chicago area? I can be head of the home division office located here in the future...I can imagine so many uses for this with EVs and multiple EVs per house hold. Or help push power to mega chargers for semi's/ large supercharger stations.

This is by far the best energy storage I could ever have thought about. Wish you luck guys !