- 70
- 187 893
Dr Neil Ashton
United Kingdom
Приєднався 28 сер 2021
Welcome to the Neil Ashton podcast UA-cam channel.
The Neil Ashton podcast is hosted by Dr. Neil Ashton, an ex-F1 and NASA engineer who is an expert in aerodynamics, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Machine Learning High-Performance Computing. He is currently the WW Tech Lead for Computer Aided Engineering at Amazon Web Services. This podcast talks to world leading experts from engineering and science about their life journeys and explain how engineering is used in industries such as Formula 1, Elite cycling, Space Travel, Autonomous vehicles and more.
Note this podcast does not represent the views of AWS or Amazon.
The Neil Ashton podcast is hosted by Dr. Neil Ashton, an ex-F1 and NASA engineer who is an expert in aerodynamics, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Machine Learning High-Performance Computing. He is currently the WW Tech Lead for Computer Aided Engineering at Amazon Web Services. This podcast talks to world leading experts from engineering and science about their life journeys and explain how engineering is used in industries such as Formula 1, Elite cycling, Space Travel, Autonomous vehicles and more.
Note this podcast does not represent the views of AWS or Amazon.
S2, EP6 - Dr. Prith Banerjee - ANSYS CTO
In this episode of the Neil Ashton Podcast, Dr. Prith Banerjee, CTO of Ansys, shares his extensive journey from academia to the corporate world, discussing the interplay between academia and industry, the role of startups in innovation, and the transformative potential of AI and ML in simulation. He emphasizes the importance of solving real-world problems and the need for collaboration between academia, startups, and large corporations to foster disruptive innovation. He discusses innovative business models for data sharing, the intersection of data-driven and physics-informed approaches, the role of open source in AI innovation, the potential of foundational models in computer-aided engineering (CAE), the future of quantum computing in simulation, and offers advice for aspiring innovators and entrepreneurs. He emphasizes the importance of collaboration, data governance, and the need for interdisciplinary approaches to solve complex problems in engineering and technology.
Dr. Banerjee's book - The Innovation factory: www.amazon.com/Innovation-Factory-Prith-Banerjee-PH/dp/B0B7LZPDZW
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to the Podcast and Guest
05:18 Dr. Prith Banerjee's Journey: From Academia to CTO
09:10 The Role of Academia, Startups, and Industry
17:22 Advice for Startups: Motivation and Market Sizing
24:04 The Impact of AI and ML on Simulation
35:07 Future of AI in Physics and Simulation
36:10 The Power of Data in AI Models
40:33 Incentivizing Data Sharing for Better Models
42:55 Physics-Driven vs Data-Driven Approaches
47:30 The Role of Open Source in AI Innovation
52:06 Foundational Models and Simulation Data
58:22 The Future of CAE and Quantum Computing
01:06:29 Advice for Aspiring Innovators
Audio-only
Apple podcast version: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-neil-ashton-podcast/id1745076065?i=1000680525606
Spotify version: open.spotify.com/episode/4AiARcFCwZJMWGZiIV2aX2?si=b09764f18dd8404b
Keywords
Neil Ashton, Prith Banerjee, CAE, AI, ML, simulation, academia, startups, industry, innovation, AI, data sharing, physics-driven, open source, foundational models, quantum computing, CAE, simulation, innovation, engineering
Dr. Banerjee's book - The Innovation factory: www.amazon.com/Innovation-Factory-Prith-Banerjee-PH/dp/B0B7LZPDZW
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to the Podcast and Guest
05:18 Dr. Prith Banerjee's Journey: From Academia to CTO
09:10 The Role of Academia, Startups, and Industry
17:22 Advice for Startups: Motivation and Market Sizing
24:04 The Impact of AI and ML on Simulation
35:07 Future of AI in Physics and Simulation
36:10 The Power of Data in AI Models
40:33 Incentivizing Data Sharing for Better Models
42:55 Physics-Driven vs Data-Driven Approaches
47:30 The Role of Open Source in AI Innovation
52:06 Foundational Models and Simulation Data
58:22 The Future of CAE and Quantum Computing
01:06:29 Advice for Aspiring Innovators
Audio-only
Apple podcast version: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-neil-ashton-podcast/id1745076065?i=1000680525606
Spotify version: open.spotify.com/episode/4AiARcFCwZJMWGZiIV2aX2?si=b09764f18dd8404b
Keywords
Neil Ashton, Prith Banerjee, CAE, AI, ML, simulation, academia, startups, industry, innovation, AI, data sharing, physics-driven, open source, foundational models, quantum computing, CAE, simulation, innovation, engineering
Переглядів: 18 107
Відео
S2, EP5 - NASA's Quesst for Quieter Supersonic Flight with Peter Coen
Переглядів 57114 днів тому
In this episode of the Neil Ashton podcast, Peter Coen from NASA discusses the evolution and future of supersonic travel, focusing on the challenges faced by the Concorde, the technological hurdles of modern supersonic aircraft, and the innovative NASA Quesst mission (and X-59 demonstrator) that aims to provide crucial data to rewrite the aviation noise regulations. The conversation delves into...
S2, EP4 - Celebrating Prof. Antony Jameson: A CFD Pioneer
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Місяць тому
In this episode of the Neil Ashton podcast, we celebrate the life and contributions of Professor Antony Jameson, a pioneer in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The conversation explores his early influences, academic journey (he has more than 505 publications), and significant contributions to aerodynamics and engineering. Professor Jameson shares insights from his career in both academia and...
S2, EP3 - Dr Michael Hutchinson - Cycling aerodynamics and the lifelong pursuit to go faster
Переглядів 6 тис.Місяць тому
S2, EP3 - Dr Michael Hutchinson - Cycling aerodynamics and the lifelong pursuit to go faster
S2, EP2 - The Future of CFD: 5 Key Trends to Watch
Переглядів 11 тис.Місяць тому
S2, EP2 - The Future of CFD: 5 Key Trends to Watch
S2, EP1 - Dr. Nikolas Tombazis - From Poacher to Gamekeeper, Defining the future of Formula 1
Переглядів 1,9 тис.2 місяці тому
S2, EP1 - Dr. Nikolas Tombazis - From Poacher to Gamekeeper, Defining the future of Formula 1
S1, EP14 - Season 1 recap and what's next
Переглядів 964 місяці тому
S1, EP14 - Season 1 recap and what's next
S1, EP13 - Prof. Anima Anandkumar - The future of AI+Science
Переглядів 19 тис.4 місяці тому
S1, EP13 - Prof. Anima Anandkumar - The future of AI Science
S1, EP12 - Prof. Karthik Duraisamy - Scientific Foundational Models
Переглядів 1,2 тис.4 місяці тому
S1, EP12 - Prof. Karthik Duraisamy - Scientific Foundational Models
S1, EP11 - Prof. Max Welling - Machine Learning Pioneer & AI4Science Visionary
Переглядів 14 тис.5 місяців тому
S1, EP11 - Prof. Max Welling - Machine Learning Pioneer & AI4Science Visionary
S1, EP10 - AI4Science - Personal Thoughts and Perspectives
Переглядів 3805 місяців тому
S1, EP10 - AI4Science - Personal Thoughts and Perspectives
S1, EP9 - Dr Chris Rumsey - NASA & Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Переглядів 6 тис.5 місяців тому
S1, EP9 - Dr Chris Rumsey - NASA & Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
S1, EP8 - Prof Jack Dongarra - High Performance Computing (HPC) Pioneer
Переглядів 16 тис.6 місяців тому
S1, EP8 - Prof Jack Dongarra - High Performance Computing (HPC) Pioneer
S1, EP7 - Pat Symonds - Formula 1 Legend
Переглядів 1,8 тис.6 місяців тому
S1, EP7 - Pat Symonds - Formula 1 Legend
S1, EP6 - Prof Juan Alonso - the Future of Computational Science
Переглядів 35 тис.6 місяців тому
S1, EP6 - Prof Juan Alonso - the Future of Computational Science
S1, EP5 - Dimitris Katsanis - Designing the World's Fastest Bikes
Переглядів 2,3 тис.6 місяців тому
S1, EP5 - Dimitris Katsanis - Designing the World's Fastest Bikes
S1, EP4 - Academia or Industry? PhD or no PhD? 4 key career questions
Переглядів 16 тис.7 місяців тому
S1, EP4 - Academia or Industry? PhD or no PhD? 4 key career questions
S1, EP3 - Prof Tony Purnell - F1, British Cycling, PI Research and much more
Переглядів 1,4 тис.7 місяців тому
S1, EP3 - Prof Tony Purnell - F1, British Cycling, PI Research and much more
S1, EP1 - Neil Ashton - Podcast Intro
Переглядів 2577 місяців тому
S1, EP1 - Neil Ashton - Podcast Intro
S1, EP2 - Dr Florian Menter - CFD Turbulence Modelling Pioneer
Переглядів 3,4 тис.7 місяців тому
S1, EP2 - Dr Florian Menter - CFD Turbulence Modelling Pioneer
I really learn from these podcasts, especially from the questions you ask the guests.
"Thank you, Neil Ashton and Prith Banerjee, for this insightful podcast! It was fascinating to hear Prith share his experiences across academia, startups, and corporates, and to explore how these different perspectives shape innovation. I also appreciated the discussion on opportunities and how balancing Horizon 3 and Horizon 1 activities can drive impact across startups, corporates, and academia.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I had the honor and privilege of being Juan's PhD student at Stanford in the late 90s and early 2000s. I was in NorCal recently and he graciously made himself available and gave me a demo of Luminary Cloud. My jaw was on the floor! I have been doing CFD on and off since 1997. I couldn't believe how fast, simple, well-thought and smooth Luminary Cloud was. I used to assume that one could either get fast results with limited fidelity by using the likes of OpenVSP (VSPAero) or FlightStream, or high fidelity results that were computationally slow and expensive using the likes of STAR-CCM+ (or God forbid Fluent and its painful workflow). Once I saw Juan's demo of Luminary Cloud it felt like one could have one's cake and eat it too. It's essentially a sleek and extremely high-fidelity RANS solver that runs as fast (or even faster than) OpenVSP, it is all cloud-based, it is unbelievably smooth with a gorgeous and modern GUI, it runs in a simple browser, and it's always up-to-date without the need to download and install GBs of software updates every few months. It's truly on a different level than anything else out there.
Thank you for posting this video Neil. I had the privilege and honor to learn from Prof. Jameson at Stanford during my PhD. In the late 90s I was looking for some reference paper and he reached into his drawer and gave me a copy of his 1984 "Transonic Flow Calculations" (Princeton University Report MAE 1651). It was no ordinary document. It was close to 100 pages long and held together by a thick binder clip. It turned out to be one of the best CFD references I used during my PhD. I also made extensive use of Tony's FLO103 and FLO107 codes to conduct my own PhD research. He has a truly unique mind and I don't think I ever saw him without a notepad, a pencil, and an eraser. Beyond his innumerable contributions to CFD and his accomplishments in aircraft analysis and design, Tony is always kind, caring, and curious. Back then when I was a student, it didn't matter whether one needed help with an obscure equation in some esoteric paper, or finding the best ergonomic office chairs for the entire lab at an unbeatable price, he always surprised you with his resourcefulness and caring. He also organized wonderful gatherings at his home with great food and great company that certainly made you feel like you belonged, especially if you were an international student far from home. A truly wonderful man! It is great to see his kind face and hear his voice in your video. It brings back many great memories...
Thanks for a great interview. Tony gave such an interesting insight into the Jaguar F1 saga.
Glad you enjoyed it!
excellent interview!!!
Thank your for your valuable thoughts and time! I have been informed about this AI for Science further. Foundation is more important as it could easily help people shift their field and pick up AI as a fundamental tool.
Thanks for an awesome podcast! Season 1 was a standout, especially with the in-depth discussions on CFD and machine learning. And, it's always great to hear what the legends thinks about doing PhD. I'm really looking forward to Season 2, especially with the focus on aerospace and F1-it’s exactly what I’ve been eager to explore!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Hi Neil. Great podcast. I didnt know it was on Spotify so ended up ”listening” through YTube. I actually searched on Spotify but didnt find it. I guess I wasn’t very thorough. But how about adding links to other platforms under the description of each video?
@@TimofeyMukha great idea! I will do that
Great podcast once again.. very interesting points and questions discussed here. Would definitely recommend to all students and early career professionals in the AI + Science domain. I agree with the point that there is a need for all the respective professionals from AI and Science/Engineering domains to interact with each other and explore each other's ideas, for a more fruitful progress in this field. Neither one can thrive without the help of the other! That's what I feel. It is an exciting time to be living and working on these hard problems, especially with these new tools.
Loved the season 1, particularly listening to the backgrounds and stories of some of the legends in CFD and Machine Learning fields. Regarding the question of the medium of consumption, I personally prefer watching it over UA-cam, as it lets me feel like I am in the moment and more connected. Suggestions: May be bring some of the founders in the Space Tech or Deep Tech industries to have a perspective about entrepreneurship, and hopefully giving some advice to PhDs or postgraduates who want to embark on that path. Also, if you could touch upon the consultanting side of things, like how people from Science and Tech with good research/industry experience move into specialised consulting roles, that would also be interesting and helpful I guess. Nevertheless, looking forward to the next season 👍 Cheers😊
Thanks so much, will definitely try and do some of the things you mention!
Thanks for the upload. I'm not convinced about what Professor Anima said at 50:00 regarding the medical catheter. At 44:00, she said that "we/our collaborators in fluid dynamics had a simple idea...of ridges, vortices....". So the originator is the Human. The design concepts generated can be and are generated by AI models. These designs are then validated after 3D printing and testing....etc. My point here is that AI models do not and will NEVER be able to come up with the idea in the first place. They don't understand and they don't reason. NEVER will. They can generate trillions of options to drown in. So yes it remains science fiction for AI models to produce by themselves something that works and is as expected. They can test this by asking their AI model to create a medical catheter that reduces/eliminates bacteria. My guess is it will provide zillions of options (including one to remove the tube altogether to achieve 0 bacteria flow) and then it remains up to the team to eliminate most and possibly test others but whichever way you do it the Human brain is a must in this loop and AI models are simply tools like computers, simulators...etc, granted advanced and very useful tools.
Thoroughly enjoyed the entire conversation. Thank you for putting this out.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Super! The 80-20 analogy is very interesting.
This is one of the gems amongst all the career podcast/advice videos, even a rare one focusing on career advice for PhDs. Loved your perspectives and arguments for each career path. I do agree with you (although I am also biased) that with the advent of AI and it's application on various domains and industries, the tech sector and the core industries both are looking for domain experts with AI skills to sort of have a balance in the team I guess. This hopefully continues so that PhD students like us get more opportunities to migrate to industries and the tech sector for better paid positions. Although, I do want to get your perspective Dr. Neil, on the case when someone, who has gained several years of experience in any Industry (space sector), and then comes back to pursue his PhD (with AI based research). What would you suggest for those people, who might be in their late 30s by the time they complete their PhD?
Thanks for sharing
Great chat Pat, loved hearing your story. I still remember you running your suspension program on punched cards at Huntington College in the early days at Royale. It has been a privilege to have worked for you over many years.
Fantastic discussion! Bringing lots food for thought. I am very happy to see long-form podcasts getting more and more into my favorite domains of science :)
Great to hear!
Amazing! Commenting for reach
And then if you cant get enough of Max: ua-cam.com/video/HohUBYHO2dc/v-deo.html
Can't wait for the other episodes!
Super interesting topic!
Glad you think so!
Great job, Neil!
Thanks very much!
Very fascinating and informative sir, so let's use this technology for the betterment of the world, for instance diseases are a big one and I know if say cancer is cured, that would put alot of people out of work and that's what scares me. That if diseases get cured would the news ever see the light of day......
I will😊😅😮🎉😂
Sir, my department is Electrical engineering. I have completed Bsc in EEE. I want to pursue career in Renewable energy. Sir, Should i do a master's in renewable energy or i should go for technical learning or industry experience
Thanks for the question! It's all about what ultimate career you would like. Do you have a dream job in mind that you're are doing this education to achieve?
Formula One is soft boy, rainbow 🌈 racing at its finest....What a disgrace of a sport.
Great interview! Very clever Mr. Symonds !
5min foreword %(
Sorry I’m still learning the podcasting ropes!
How “informed” are the VCs about the actual addressable market size of paying someone to do CFD?
It’s always difficult to get a truly accurate representation of the total addressable market size but my limited experience of these VCs is that they are very well informed and do their due diligence before investing in any company. Also nowadays several of the large ISVs post their earnings so they can also see the potential size from them too
Juan is the GOAT
Another gem of an interview. Juan is the GOAT!
Dear Dr.Ashton, I come from a background in aerospace and materials engineering at a BSc level and did my thesis on computational materials science. After this I have been working for a year in the industry while doing my MSc in applied mathematics focusing on optimization, inverse problems, HPC , CFD , FEM etc . My question now is ; would you recommend to get another year or two in the industry before going for a phd after my MSc or go straight to phd after msc ? I love fluid dynamics and control theory and in general everything that has to do with aerospace but since I am 26 , I think I may have missed the train when it comes to pursuing a phd..
Thanks so much for your question. Every decision like this is deeply personal and dependant on your own circumstances but I can give at least my opinion. In order to do a PhD and get the most out of it, you need to be deeply passionate about the topic and have a good University and supervisor behind you. It's a potentially 3-5 year journey and if it's something you're motivated to do, it'll make it much easier. So if you want to go down the PhD route, really do your research on the topic area, the supervisor, the University etc. Obviously they will want to make sure you are right for them but it's super important the other way around too. I would say that going into industry for 2 years and then trying to start a PhD will be hard - because you'll be 28 by then, already got used to potentially a higher salary in industry and perhaps get out of the mode of studying and research. So personally I would go straight into a PhD and give yourself the target of being as efficient as possible and getting it done within 3-3.5 years (depending on which country you are doing it in) i.e finish before 30. During your PhD you can start to do short month-long internships too (if you get permission from your supervisor and University) so that you keep in with industry and network and maybe even do colloborations as part of your PhD with some companies you might want to work with. The logic there, is that you are almost getting yourself ready for a great job after your PhD whilst you are doing the PhD. Everything I've just wrote assumes you want to go into industry after your PhD, but of course during the PhD you may change your mind and stay onto academia. The main thing is not to underestimate the time to do a PhD and normally once you go down the route of getting a job in industry it just gets harder to go back to University of personal/financial reasons etc. I hope that's useful and all the best!
@@drneilashton Thank you very much for your response. I agree on everything that you said. I will be 28 finishing my master's but I will have 2-3 years of work experience by that time and join a phd. I am aware that the salary as a phd candidate is lower but I am not doing it cause of money. I would like to be as efficient as possible and be done in 3-3.5 years (I studied in the Netherlands and Denmark so I would like to pursue a phd in Europe). Finishing at the age of 31 while having 3 years of experience in the industry (mostly defence) is not bad I believe and I could also leverage knowledge and experience. On the other hand I was considering of getting a 1-year research MSc at the Von Karman institute instead which requires a 2 year MSc in order to be admitted and specialize in hypersonics. This I believe will give me a lot of knowledge and research experience to go back in the industry as an alternative to a phd. Last but not least, I feel that in the industry , at least in my job where I work for an integrator and not for a designer , my skills are going to the rubbish bin and not utilized and I am kind of disappointed by this and I believe many new engineers face the same and for that reason I would like to go 'higher' in the field let's say. Your videos are very valuable by the way. Thanks for the content.
That’s a very good point about the 1 year research MSc too which could be a middle option. Only problem with that (in my opinion) is sometimes that’s too short to fully get immersed into a topic and do all the surrounding things like build up a network of people within academia through conferences and workshops. On the point of your skills not being used that is also sometimes a manner of finding the right company for your career stage. I.e a very large enterprise might have lots of engineers so you get asked to work on quite a small area which might not use all your skills. Whereas a smaller consultancy company might give you a far broader responsibility. As you can imagine it’s very case dependant but also don’t worry in that luckily in the field of engineering you’ll have lots of options so also try not to worry about making the wrong decision as they all help to build up knowledge and experience!
@@drneilashton yes indeed , either work for a smaller consultancy firm or start your own . But with regards to the networking part in academia I definitely agree with you , not enough time to meet the people and make connections. Things get annoying when you’re dealing more with project managers who only ask about cost and deadlines than actual engineers who understand things so as you said , working as a consultant in a specialised field seems better idea.
Hi Neil! What a great suprise finding you in YT... Thank you for sharing!
Thanks Eduardo!!
This is immensely helpful to students. Thank you for sharing!
You're very welcome!
Very solid advice!!
Thanks Will!
Dear Dr. Ashton, saw your video from LinkedIn and jumped right in. As a PhD student near completion, this really gave me a good perspective about the differences. Thank you!
So glad it helped! All the best with finishing your PhD!
Really interesting podcast!
Thanks William!
This is gold. Thank you for interviewing the legend himself.
Thanks very much!
Interesting. Thanks
thanks for watching!
Now this is a podcast series I'll definitely watch.
Thanks! If you have any people/topics you would like to see covered let me know!
I had the pleasure of attending a lecture of Florian in Dresden. Truly inspirational - great job, Neil!
Thanks so much!